Source needed in regard to Jordan's description...

[Arckangel]

Does any have a reliable source stating that the jurors or Grand Jury felt that the description Jordan gave of Jackson's genitalia did not match the strip search photos?

The source must specify jurors or The Jury. I've spent days looking already.

Thanks!

 

[kelley]

Most of the grand Jury records are sealed.

However the media did report a grand juror as saying they did not see any compelling evidence during the proceedings.

And the Grand Jury not even recommending to indict (which is rare for a GJ) is pretty good evidence that there was no match as well.

 

[Spaceship]

There is no reliable source saying that they didn't match, but it was reported by reputable sources in 1994 that MJ's mother was subpoenaed to testify whether or not MJ had recently bleached his genitals. This might imply that there wasn't a match, but who knows. Tom Sneddon did file a motion stating that Jordie Chandler correctly identified a splotch on MJ's genitals.

 

[kelley]

There is no reliable source saying that they didn't match, but it was reported by reputable sources in 1994 that MJ's mother was subpoenaed to testify whether or not MJ had recently bleached his genitals. This might imply that there wasn't a match, but who knows. Tom Sneddon did file a motion stating that Jordie Chandler correctly identified a splotch on MJ's genitals.

Even Dan Reed king of the guilters admitted it didn't match.

Also police sources told the media it didn't match.

Sneddon and the prosecutors description of this matching splotch has changed multiple times over the years.

And getting one splotch correct at " about the same relative location" on a black man with vitiligo is laughable.

They knew he had vitiligo. They could say there was a spot anywhere and chances are high that there would have been one there just because of the nature of the disease.

The Guilter cult ignores the circumcision aspect because it debunks their narrative of it being a match.

 

[Spaceship]

Even Dan Reed king of the guilters admitted it didn't match.

Source? You'd think he'd be one of the ones saying it matched.

 

[kelley]

Source? You'd think he'd be one of the ones saying it matched.

He admitted that Jordan said MJ was circumcised and he wasn't. It was in a article where Reed was quoted.

He of course used the old tired excuse that Jordan was confused and couldn't tell the difference. But that contradicts the Chandlers own book where they said Jordan had seen MJs penis from every angle and "so many times" . And it also contradicts Jordans claim to Dr Gardner that he masturbated Michael " about 10 times" (which was later removed from his story for obvious reasons) which makes it impossible for him to not know the difference.

Also Evan wrote in his "time line", which was really his own draft of the script of lies he coached Jordan to tell, That Michael told Jordan that Brett Barnes was uncircumcised unlike them and so he had to masturbate differently.

There's so much evidence that the description didn't match and that Jordan never saw Michael naked at all. If it was any other person people would just say it was no match and conclude the Chandlers lied.

But people WANT to believe Michael did this against all logic or facts.