"Michael", a biopic about Michael Jackson, is officially happening.

[R1chard]

A biopic about a musician with zero of his music makes zero sense.

I did say that's where people are going wrong.

A biopic does not need music.

It just doesn't.

Maybe there's people who don't like rap music, but they watch Straight Outta Compton because they want to understand the culture and the artists involved? They want to understand the people and their lifestyle, without being subjected to obnoxious rapping every 5 minutes.

Same thing with this movie.

Again: a biopic is not musical entertainment.

They're different.

I think that's just a fundamental misunderstanding lots of people on this board have.

Those are the unofficial ones.

Yes. And the best biopics are always unofficial, because they're free to tell the story honestly without always trying to portray the subject in a positive light.

Again, the point of a biopic isn't to turn Michael into a hero.

The estate can not make a movie that touches this accusation and settlement,

That's why it needs to say "the estate didn't make this".

It is their movie. And they are forbidden to do that per the settlement.

So this is an actual example of where artistic freedom has been limited, and integrity has been taken away - ie the estate's involvement literally makes the film worse.

Personally I dont care how much the movie makes in its first weekend. Doesn't matter if it makes $100 or $100 million, as long as it's a GOOD MOVIE

Exactly.

The quality of the movie is the only thing that counts. Not the critic score. Not the popularity. Not the size of Branca's bank account.

People are worshipping the wrong thing.

This movie has to be a good film that pleases critics/audeinces and not just die-hard fans like us. It needs to tell the truth, no matter how uncomfortable it may be for some of y'all.

Hear hear.

Tons of critics automatically dismissed the Broadway show just on the grounds that it barely addressed the allegations. It was like the actual show itself didnt matter, it was just labelled MJ propaganda from the start. These films CAN'T repeat that.

Yep. It's hard to take the stage show seriously. The movie is absolutely impossible to take seriously because it glosses over some of the most interesting and unusual aspects of the subject matter.

To answer your question, yes I will be disappointed if it makes less.

So here's the thing.

I went to see Hail Mary on Sunday.

I liked it.

So now the question: am I a bad person if I go to watch it again? Will you hate me if I tell my friends to watch it? Will I be banned from this board because I contributed money to the Hail Mary box office profits and potentially prevented "Michael" from taking its rightful place as the biggest grossing movie of the year? Am I insulting MJ's legacy? Maybe I need to stop going to the cinema altogether, just in case another movie gets too popular?

Consider your answer carefully.

 

[apple🍎]

Personally I dont care how much the movie makes in its first weekend. Doesn't matter if it makes $100 or $100 million, as long as it's a GOOD MOVIE (and not just 100% fluff)

My main concern is that Paris' prediction about the movie being nothing but fan-pandering propaganda is true. This movie (and especially the sequel, if there is one), above all else, has to be a good film that pleases critics/audeinces and not just die-hard fans like us. It needs to tell the truth, no matter how uncomfortable it may be for some of y'all.

Tons of critics automatically dismissed the Broadway show just on the grounds that it barely addressed the allegations. It was like the actual show itself didnt matter, it was just labelled MJ propaganda from the start. These films CAN'T repeat that.

I think we pretty much established this is gonna be American Dream with a bigger budget. So no need to stress about that.

 

[Prometheus77]

Yes. And the best biopics are always unofficial, because they're free to tell the story honestly without always trying to portray the subject in a positive light.

Again, the point of a biopic isn't to turn Michael into a hero.

Have you seen Michael's unofficial ones??? They are trash. Now it's time for an official one.

That's why it needs to say "the estate didn't make this".

But the estate did make it.

So this is an actual example of where artistic freedom has been limited, and integrity has been taken away - ie the estate's involvement literally makes the film worse.

Apparently they stop in 1988. So no integrity has been taken away. Maybe you just wait until you've seen the movie, before shitting on it.

 

[Annita]

https://twitter.com/x/status/2039056536413028673

 

[Dtwmjj]

I've watched 3 interviews with the cast and director. They all say this movie takes place from Michael's childhood to early parts of his solo career. This movie shows you how lonely Michael was.