It was during the film, when his manager is suggesting that he goes solo, mentions Michael has a certain percentage of all sales sold, MJ the solo artist not the Jackson 5 and he thinks Freddie could be even bigger than MJ
Can't share the link but Siedah Garrett just confirmed that she isn't featured in the biopic. I'm not sure she needed to be really, I think she considers herself a little more important than she actually was
respect Bill, cheers 
Michael suggested if they released it as a single, it'll be a hit. They listened.
I’m already seeing uproar on MJ Twitter about this and I don’t understand whatsoever. She’s not nearly instrumental enough for a spot. Otherwise, one could feasibly argue that Rod Temperton, Stevie, Teddy Riley, Bruce Swedien, Brad Buxer, Bill Bottrell, Jam/Lewis, Rodney Jerkins, and multiple others should also be portrayed. It’s just too complicated and messy.
You don't understand John Branca showing off his sports cars and talking about his career accomplishments is gonna be crucial to the plot just wait and see"cut some boring lawyer scenes"
And i get that film , however Eddie Murphy is 'attached ' to Spike Lee . Spike / +Eddie+ /Iman/ + magic Johnson = remember the time ,,,m loved making his 'short films ' the creation and process ... and we all know the history about m and videos .. it will be interesting to see who gets a mention & who gets a character assigned..
.process of elimination in a way ? ..well, whatever it is ...it's a mission !have not the foggiest ,
Siedah Garrett is not "Some celebrity".
Us applauding the (as of yet) excellent execution of a biopic that most of us felt was a terrible idea at the start somehow equates to the estate not fulfilling your wish list?
That would actually be a cool thought. They could include him either in the RWY video or in MSG. It would be really cool to have an actual celebrity play himself.
Well, tbf, she co-wrote it with Glen Ballard so if she gets a name check so should he.
Agreed. You could certainly create a nice little dramatic scene for the writing of MITM. I'm not trying to downplay the importance of that song in Michael's career but, in the totality of his drama packed life, I don't think it stands out so much that Siedah has to be a character in the film.
He hasn't aged much either.
The more I think about it, the more I'm leaning towards the idea that it should have been a series of films and not one film alone!
Its a biopic for the general public, stop thinking everything has to be included. I see so many things random events listed here as 'this should be included' while its not relevant it all.
I understand the argument for more than one film. But I think one, stand-alone film is better, artistically and commercially.
It’s making you cringe that fans are discussing what is arguably the most important release of MJ’s legacy within the past 20 years? Okay……
thanks 