Mark Geragos on His Client Frank Cascio vs Michael Jackson

Victorious said:

So all of this must also be very difficult for 'guilters'. If they believe Frank Cascio, than all their ideas about grooming, preferences, gender, seperating kids from parents, disfunctional parents, MJ not sleeping on the floor, dumping 'special friends' at a certain age etc. etc. make absolutely no sense anymore.

Of course nothing added up/lined out between Safechuck and Robson's stories already, but now it just becomes ridiculous

Click to expand...

Especially since the girl is claiming it too and they all claim abuse until 2009. Well in 2009 the girl Marie was an adult. So.....have we come full circle to the Guilters admitting MJ was attracted to adult females??


All of them were adults in 2009. Frank was nearly 30 years old.

So much for the claim that he dumped "BOYZz" at puberty.

Also the guilters excuse for Jane doe is that she "looked like a boy" (she did NOT). But Marie Nicole always looked like a girl and dressed like a girl so......

Will Shana now change her story and claim MJ "raped" her instead just had passionate fan fiction sex with her like she wrote in her book? She might as well jump on the liar bandwagon too.

All this!

This is posted on Reddit by a user named: Funny-Sir1975

“Do the Cascios really expect anyone to believe Michael secretly abused each and every one of them behind their backs, one by one, like a villain plot — and that all of them kept it a secret from each other for decades without ever mentioning it, noticing anything, or getting any hints about it happening to their siblings?

And if that did happen, then Frank continuing to work with Michael, defend him, and stand by him even after his death would make him a terrible brother for allowing that to happen to his younger siblings. He has no incentive to lie — yet he’s called Wade Robson a liar, called Leaving Neverland false, and spoken out on his own accord, without anyone pushing him to.”

Please don't click on this horrible tabloid, especially with its racist and disgusting title referring to Michael.

I believe it’s lies, but I am a little worried, where do they get these sources? Most likely lying and made up.

Daily Fail are reporting this:

“ALISON BOSHOFF: *****'s daughter reaches out to his 'grooming' victims for the first time”​

Azi-Moonwalker said:

Please don't click on this horrible tabloid, especially with its racist and disgusting title referring to Michael.

I believe it’s lies, but I am a little worried, where do they get these sources? Most likely lying and made up.

Daily Fail are reporting this:

“ALISON BOSHOFF: *****'s daughter reaches out to his 'grooming' victims for the first time”​

Click to expand...

Its obviously BS. Dailyfail is trying to bait Paris into responding which will make the story blow and draw more attention to it.

I hope Paris remembers this and after MJ is vindicated she sues them.

kelley said:

they all claim abuse until 2009.

Click to expand...

Did they really say that? Can you post the quote?

Next they're gonna claim it was Michael's ghost who forced them to record fake songs!

Hallo alle zusammen, ich war bisher nur Mitleserin und hoffe sehr, dass mein Deutsch hier auch übersetzt wird.

Ich erinnere mich daran, dass MJ und FC jahrelang nach 2005 nicht miteinander besprochen haben. Es ging wohl darum, dass FC im Prozess gegen Michael nicht aussagen wollte. Erst kurz vor Michaels Tod haben sie sich wohl wieder vertragen.

Außderdem sollte lt. Sneddon FC zu den Mitverschwörern gehören, gemeinsam mit Wiesner, Konitzer und Amen.

Meserau war auch nicht mit der MJ-Verteidigung von Geragos einverstanden. Daher sollte er sich auch nicht in die Verteidigung einmischen.

Dass sind so meine ersten Gedanken, nachdem ich mir die Posts hier durchgelesen habe. Mir fällt sicherlich noch mehr ein. Erstmals eine gute Nacht

Rosa57 said:

Hallo alle zusammen, ich war bisher nur Mitleserin und hoffe sehr, dass mein Deutsch hier auch übersetzt wird.

Ich erinnere mich daran, dass MJ und FC jahrelang nach 2005 nicht miteinander besprochen haben. Es ging wohl darum, dass FC im Prozess gegen Michael nicht aussagen wollte. Erst kurz vor Michaels Tod haben sie sich wohl wieder vertragen.

Außderdem sollte lt. Sneddon FC zu den Mitverschwörern gehören, gemeinsam mit Wiesner, Konitzer und Amen.

Meserau war auch nicht mit der MJ-Verteidigung von Geragos einverstanden. Daher sollte er sich auch nicht in die Verteidigung einmischen.

Dass sind so meine ersten Gedanken, nachdem ich mir die Posts hier durchgelesen habe. Mir fällt sicherlich noch mehr ein. Erstmals eine gute Nacht

Click to expand...

Hi @Rosa57
My name is MJ TinkerBell nice to meet you!! Welcome to our German MJ Fans always!!
I translated your Post so I could understand your point of view! Hope this is ok!


Post From Rosa57
Hello everyone, I've only been a follower so far and really hope my German will be translated here.
I remember that MJ and FC didn't speak to each other for years after 2005. It was apparently because FC didn't want to testify in Michael's trial. They apparently only made up shortly before Michael's death.
Furthermore, according to Sneddon, FC was supposed to be one of the co-conspirators, along with Wiesner, Konitzer, and Amen.
Meserau also didn't agree with Geragos' defense of MJ. Therefore, he shouldn't interfere in the defense either.
Those are my first thoughts after reading the posts here. I'm sure I'll think of more. Good night, first of all.

Is this the same family that submitted fake MJ songs for an album so that they could make money? And now, this same family is claiming abuse, just when the biopic is heating up? They've magically been silent for years until now?

Excuse my language, but these people can get fucked. All of them. They aren't worth our time. Every one of these leeches had the chance to get Mike put behind bars for life in '05. If you're that broke, get a job. Damn.