Mark Geragos on His Client Frank Cascio vs Michael Jackson

At the moment we are supposed to believe that 7 different kids were molested by MJ and all 7 did not tell a single soul about it until 20-30 years later after Michael Jackson had died and all around the time either themselves or their families got into financial difficulties.

Nor did they help Gavin Arvizo during the 2005 trial when they could have spoken up and put MJ behind bars and thus been safe from MJ and also have saved other potential molestation victims? So all of them turned into masterful liars that kept 100% silent? I just find that very hard to believe!
 
Last edited:
But I find it hard to believe that Frank behaved like a true gentleman and somehow it was all fabricated, but we cant know for sure.
You've just demonstrated the exact viewpoint most will use against MJ.

The fake songs, FCs book, the fact that he worked for MJ as an adult and was part of the 2005 trial needs to be front and centre of any rebuttal to the Cascio allegations. Shame TMZ glossed over the fake songs.
 
You've just demonstrated the exact viewpoint most will use against MJ.

The fake songs, FCs book, the fact that he worked for MJ as an adult and was part of the 2005 trial needs to be front and centre of any rebuttal to the Cascio allegations. Shame TMZ glossed over the fake songs.
With exception that there await no big financial payout from describing Frank Cascios alleged bad behavior while making accusations against MJ all can be related to enormous financial motives! That is why I always say that you can not compare the accusations against MJ with any accusations made against a standard citizen/normal person. Nobody would for example falsely accuse Jack 49 of child molestation as there would be nothing to gain from it!

Frank Cascio was not hated by the fan base as he defended MJ in his book and everywhere else, even with the fake songs hitting there was certainly no mob against him, many fans are still not even aware that the songs are fake and even less so who was behind it!

The 2005 trial is tricky as Frank was one of the 5 co-conspirators along with Dieter Wiesner, Ronald Konitzer, Mark Schaffel and Vinnie Amen who allegedly assisted MJ in molesting children in various ways but for some bizarre reason were not charged with any crime.

Perhaps that whole scenario will be explained, or at least Franks version of it! But like you have noted before, it would be tough for Frank to bury MJ in the 2005 trial while excusing himself! Unless he claims he was being strung along by Michael Jackson via some kind of role play or that MJ was controlling him. At this point I would not be surprised by anything!
 
Last edited:
With exception that there await no big financial payout from describing Frank Cascios alleged bad behavior while making accusations against MJ all can be related to enormous financial motives! That is why I always say that you can not compare the accusations against MJ with any accusations made against a standard citizen/normal person. Nobody would for example falsely accuse Jack 49 of child molestation as there would be nothing to gain from it!
All true, except it's only us fans that seem to care about the fake songs and the financial motives. Rest of the world seems to not care about those details. The Faking Michael podcast was great investigative journalism released a year ago, but it had no impact outside the fan community. And I think MJs voluntary 93 settlement is what works against him when accusing others of financial motives, it's seen as hush money irrespective of whether it was or wasn't. And these Cascio payments will likely look the same.
Did the TMZ reporter bring up 2005 trial?

Also, false allegations also occur outside of the world of the rich and famous.
 
Last edited:
Which victim writes a thick book about his tormenter With a lot of love who still believes that you can't help
 
All true, except it's only us fans that seem to care about the fake songs and the financial motives. Rest of the world seems to not care about those details. The Faking Michael podcast was great investigative journalism released a year ago, but it had no impact outside the fan community. And I think MJs voluntary 93 settlement is what works against him when accusing others of financial motives, it's seen as hush money irrespective of whether it was or wasn't. And these Cascio payments will likely look the same.
Did the TMZ reporter bring up 2005 trial?

Also, false allegations also occur outside of the world of the rich and famous.

I dont think they spoke much about the 2005 trial, I did watch the entire interview, but since Frank did not testify I believe there was little to discuss there.

Geragos also kept saying that the estate should have a duty to inform the kids and Katherine about settlements and stuff. That was brought up by Geragos 3 or 4 times with the TMZ host disagreeing with him as thats not how the estate is set up. Branca does not have to go to Prince and say "hey Prince, we are set to do this, do you give us permission to do that?" The only thing the kids could do is go to a court and say thate estate is not working in their best interest - but that would require the estate probably losing a lot of money or tanking the estate on purpose - which is the opposite of what they have done!

As for the fake songs, of course non-MJ fans wont pay attention to that as long as its not tied to the credibility of the Cascios. And I do not think many outside the fan base knows about both the fake tracks and the new allegations. But of course I would hope it will be brought to attention if the Cascios are given the green light to go public with this!

False accusations does indeed take place, but it happens a lot more often if the accused is filthy rich, which we knows as MJ had 1000s of lawsuits every year regarding various things!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top