"2000 Watts" vs "Invincible"

Famalam


  • Total voters
    14

Spaceship

Proud Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2015
Messages
1,345
Points
113
What's the better song

Kinda hard to say. Both are generic 'N Sync type songs. I guess "2000 Watts" is more interesting because of the deep (although clearly processed) vocals, but it was literally a Tyrese song. No reason for it to be on an MJ album.

"Invincible" suit MJ better, but there's nothing interesting or memorable about the song. It's basically a blander version of "Heartbreaker".
 
Yes, how did both Invincible and Heartbreaker make the cut? And also being slapped on immediately after each other? I dont get that. It just one song ending and then a worse version of the previous one starting.

Any of the cut songs from the Invincible sessions is better than Invincible the title track. Of course they are better than 2000 watts as well.

I have a hard time voting in this poll because I would like for both songs to not be on the album, but I gave 2000 watts the vote because MJ was trying something new and 2000 watts is more bad ass than Invincible no matter how you cut it!
 
Last edited:
Ideally, drop "Invincible" from the album entirely and replace "2000 Watts" with "Shout".
 
“2000 Watts” by a hair. I think “Invincible” is more pleasant to listen to, but “2000 Watts” is so unique and weird.
 
2000 Watts easily. I don't mind 2000 Watts. I always find it interesting to listen to 2000 Watts. It isn't a great song, but it is different and that makes it enjoyable to listen to.

Invincible is a very average song. I don't get the concept of the song. A girl rejects Michael because she is invincible. Like what? Before I heard the song for the first time, I thought it was about Michael being invincible. The best part about Invincible is the rap feature by FATS, and he is crap. That is how you know that Invincible isn't a good song.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top