ACTION REQUIRED: Object selection of Diane Dimond

Maria MJ

Proud Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2009
Messages
1,051
Points
0
Location
East Europe
Dear MJJC Family,

Weeks before the trial begins, our community needs to be proactive to ensure fair and unbiased media coverage and prevent the worse from happening. We need to speak up because Diane Dimond is scheduled to rule the airwaves during the Murray trial. DD is embedded as Jackson Expert in the media population's perception and they don't question it after 20 years. It will take work and perseverance to crack this false persona and show media that there are far more appropriate and competent people to do the job.

Let’s voice our objections to the selection of Diane Dimond for participation in a discussion about journalistic integrity, balance and fairness in reporting criminal trials. We all know she is a big part of the problem rather than the solution, so she is the least qualified person for discussing either the topic of "fairness" or the topic of "Michael Jackson.”

Comments at:
http://reliablesources.blogs.cnn.com/2011/07/10/when-a-trial-becomes-entertainment/

Letters to:

Letters@newsweekdailybeast.com

Letters to the Editor for the U.S. and International print editions:

Letters@newsweek.com

Mailing Address:
Newsweek/Daily Beast Company
555 West 18th St.
New York, NY 10011

Your comments are also needed in this well-read blog:
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/reliable...s-legal-loudmouths-harm-the-judicial-process/

Please remember to write respectful, constructive comments, and use neutral nicknames.

We would like to thank each and every one of you for your devotion in protecting and honoring Michael’s name and legacy.

MJJC Legacy Project Media Advocacy Team

Maria (Maria MJ)
Kim (windy09)
Deborah (DeborahFfrench)
 
It's a wonder how after all these years, they still call her a "Jackson expert"
 
Guys didn't we do this before in another thread? I remember signing a petition about her coverage. She even responded to fans that she was still on TV, meaning that our outrage did not count. Is this action a continuation of the last petition?
 
Back
Top