Even then, that's still basically doing what he did with Quincy again. But maybe there'd be a whole new dynamic that'd really make for some high art.
See, I can't agree with that. I know Q had this awesome background in jazz - total respect to the guy - and he started so young and worked with all the greats. But someone like Herbie Hancock would bring stuff that Q doesn't even know exists. I'm not a musician so I can't explain what I mean. But I can feel it in my bones, lol.
Someone like HH - I truly think something really radical could have happened.
Just to be clear, I don't want to change anything from Michael's post-Q career. I'm not the musical genius, he is! I'm happy with what he did.
But my mind is going 200mph atm! Thinking of what might have been. In another universe.