Latest on MJJC

Attorney General Jerry Brown on Michael's Will

  • Thread starter Dangerous Incorporated
  • Start date

Dangerous Incorporated

Guests
Attorney General Jerry Brown has filed to stop Murray from practising medicine.

The California state medical board will ask a judge to prevent Dr. Conrad Murray from practicing medicine in California while he is being prosecuted in Michael Jackson's death, according to documents filed on Tuesday with the court by California Attorney General Jerry Brown.

Brown, who is also running for governor, said in his filing that Murray, who was the pop star's personal physician, "administered a lethal dose of propofol, as well as other drugs, to Michael Jackson."
http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/03/23/jackson.doctor/index.html
Click to expand...
Wiki states:
In early 2004, Brown expressed his interest to be a candidate for the Democratic nomination for Attorney General of California in the 2006 election.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Brown
Click to expand...
What I found interesting was the AG Jerry Brown is also on Michael's 2002 Will
(Edmund Gerald "Jerry" Brown, Jr.):
0701091mjwill7.gif

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2009/0701091mjwill7.html

Is wiki wrong and why is Brown on MJs Will?
 
let me explain

as we know from reported news stories about the trust that Michael left 20% to non specified charities.

when there's a will, the beneficiaries best interest are represented and protected by their lawyers. Streisand is representing Katherine, the kids have their court appointed lawyer. so who will represent the non specified charities?

here what the estate is doing is notifying the attorney general's office - specifically the charitable trusts section- that they are left a certain amount/percentage of money in MJ's will. Attorney Generals Office of Charitable Trust sections are the ones that will represent the charities and make sure that the charities get the money that they are supposed to get.

It's also important to understand that Brown isn't really included in the will, he's just being notified as he's the current attorney general and is the head for the charitable trusts office.
 
And isnt that a conflict of interest?

And does anyone know why wiki would say that Brown was interested in being nominated for AG in 04 when the Will in 02 states he already is AG?
 
Rubi said:
DI. I´m really fan of your posts. Thanks for sharing.
Great post
Click to expand...

Thank you very much for saying so.


Its just come to my attention that in 2002 he was Mayor of Oakland, Brown became AG in 2007
 
Jerry Brown is not nammed in the will. In the trust papers, it is said charities. The charities are represented by the AG, currently Jerry Brown. If he leaves the office, the charities will be represented by the new AG.
 
marc_vivien said:
Jerry Brown is not nammed in the will. In the trust papers, it is said charities. The charities are represented by the AG, currently Jerry Brown. If he leaves the office, the charities will be represented by the new AG.
Click to expand...

Have you seen the page of the Will I posted? He is in charge of the Charitable Trust. However in 2002, Brown wasnt an AG, he was a Mayor.
 
Dangerous Incorporated said:
And isnt that a conflict of interest?
Click to expand...

why would it be? he's not benefiting / receiving any money from the estate. he's just the head of the office that will represent the charities.

marc_vivien said:
Jerry Brown is not nammed in the will. In the trust papers, it is said charities. The charities are represented by the AG, currently Jerry Brown. If he leaves the office, the charities will be represented by the new AG.
Click to expand...

exactly

Dangerous Incorporated said:
Have you seen the page of the Will I posted? He is in charge of the Charitable Trust. However in 2002, Brown wasnt an AG, he was a Mayor.
Click to expand...

DI - he wasn't and isn't named in the 2002 will. In 2009 the estate executors gave notice to the Current Attorney General - which happens to be Brown.
 
Last edited:
Dangerous Incorporated said:
And isnt that a conflict of interest?

And does anyone know why wiki would say that Brown was interested in being nominated for AG in 04 when the Will in 02 states he already is AG?
Click to expand...

DI, sorry English is not my first language.
Not always reach full understanding. But I think a conflict of interest. Although I am not sure if this may have been updated with the appointment of Brown.
But in his opinion it could answer why a will dated 2002, and his executioner fired in 2003, is valid in 2009?
By common interests?

Thanks
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top