Case Against Michael Jackson Brought by Wade Robson Tentatively Dismissed by Judge,

elusive moonwalker

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2003
Messages
26,815
Points
48
As of today, a summary judgment AGAINST Wade Robson has been granted three different times by two different judges of the Superior Court.

“Wade Robson has spent the last 8 years pursuing frivolous claims in different lawsuits against Michael Jackson’s estate and companies associated with it. Robson has taken nearly three dozen depositions and inspected and presented hundreds of thousands of documents trying to prove his claims, yet a Judge has once again ruled that Robson’s claims have no merit whatsoever, that no trial is necessary and that his latest case is dismissed,” said Jonathan Steinsapir, attorney for the Estate of Michael Jackson
 

NatureCriminal7896

Proud Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2019
Messages
10,310
Points
0
MICHAEL WAS FOREVER ALWAYS INNOCENT! AHHHHHHHHHHH! WE DID IT GUYS! I"M CRYING AND SHAKING RIGHT NOW! WHOOHOO! PARTY! NOW WE CAN OFFCIALLY MOVE ON WITH OUR LIVES! WHOOHOO! :highfivev1: :highfivev1: :highfivev1: :highfivev1: :highfivev1: :highfivev1:
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2004
Messages
5,428
Points
0
Oh the MSM won't likely say a goddamn thing. If the roles had been reversed though.....sigh.

I recently saw Loving Neverland and once again saw how utterly disgusting the media was during the trial and after the trial. **** the MSM.

Party time! King forever!
 

SmoothCriminal1995

Proud Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Messages
1,640
Points
38
Great news, especially coming on Monday.
Credit to everybody who stood behind Michael
"Lies run sprints but the truth runs marathons"
 

CherubimII

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
6,303
Points
63
elusive moonwalker;4321488 said:
Dont be .offical ruling. Thrown out. Crawl back under your rock robson you waste of air.

https://www.showbiz411.com/2021/04/...station-is-dismissed-by-court-in-final-ruling
<header style="position: relative; top: -14px; margin-bottom: 6px; color: rgb(75, 75, 75); font-family: Arimo, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Michael Jackson Absolved: Second Accusation of Molestation is Dismissed By Court in Final Ruling

by Roger Friedman - <time itemprop="dateCreated" class="entry-date updated" datetime="2021-04-26T13:23:06+00:00">April 26, 2021 1:23 pm</time>
5066

</header>

“Leaving Neverland,” the documentary in which two men accused Michael Jackson of child molestation, has been repudiated in court.

The Los Angeles Superior Court this morning ruled against Wade Robson in CASE NO. BC508502 in claims against corporations owned by Michael Jackson and/or the Estate of Michael Jackson and dismissed his case again. The Michael Jackson Estate is represented by the late Howard Weitzman and Jonathan Steinsapir of Kinsella Weitzman Iser Kump LLP. Statement from Mr. Steinsapir:
“As of today, a summary judgment AGAINST Wade Robson has been granted three different times by two different judges of the Superior Court.

“Wade Robson has spent the last 8 years pursuing frivolous claims in different lawsuits against Michael Jackson’s estate and companies associated with it. Robson has taken nearly three dozen depositions and inspected and presented hundreds of thousands of documents trying to prove his claims, yet a Judge has once again ruled that Robson’s claims have no merit whatsoever, that no trial is necessary and that his latest case is dismissed,” said Jonathan Steinsapir, attorney for the Estate of Michael Jackson.


Previously, the case brought by James Safechuck against the Jackson estate was thrown out.
Robson and Safechuck not only sued Jackson but participated in the HBO documentary directed by Dan Reed in which they alleged molestation years after Jackson died. Oprah Winfrey bought their story hook, line, and sinker, and conducted interviews with them allowing the men to allege accusations without any solid evidence. Now the court has ruled against them. It’s over.
https://www.showbiz411.com/2021/04/...station-is-dismissed-by-court-in-final-ruling[/QUOTE]
 

CherubimII

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
6,303
Points
63
<header class="caas-header" style="display: flex; margin: 0px 0px 10px; -webkit-box-orient: vertical; -webkit-box-direction: normal; flex-direction: column; width: 800.36px; color: rgb(29, 34, 40); font-family: &quot;Yahoo Sans&quot;, YahooSans, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><header class="caas-title-wrapper" style="margin: 0px 0px 32px; padding-bottom: 10px;">
</header></header>[FONT=&amp]Judge tosses lawsuit of man who alleged Jackson molestation (yahoo.com)[/FONT][FONT=&amp]

ANDREW DALTON<time class="" datetime="2021-04-26T23:21:50.000Z">Mon, April 26, 2021, 6:21 PM</time>

LOS ANGELES (AP) — A judge on Monday dismissed the lawsuit of a man who alleged that Michael Jackson sexually abused him as a boy.

Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Mark A. Young granted the Jackson estate's request to dismiss the suit brought in 2013 by Wade Robson. The judge said two Jackson entertainment corporations targeted by the lawsuit had no legal duty to protect Robson from Jackson.

“There is no evidence supporting plaintiff’s contention that defendants exercised control over Jackson,” the judge wrote. “The evidence further demonstrates that defendants had no legal ability to control Jackson, because Jackson had complete and total ownership of the corporate defendants."

The dismissal came after the judge dismissed a similar lawsuit in October by James Safechuck. Both men made their allegations in the HBO documentary “Leaving Neverland.”
Vince Finaldi, attorney for Robson and Safechuck, said the ruling has “fatal flaws” and will be appealed.
“If allowed to stand, the decision would set a dangerous precedent that would leave thousands of children working in the entertainment industry vulnerable to sexual abuse by persons in places of power,” Finaldi said in a statement.
Robson, now a 38-year-old choreographer, met Jackson when he was 5 years old. He went on to appear in Jackson music videos and record music on his label.

His lawsuit alleged that Jackson molested him over a seven-year period, and that as Jackson's employee, the two corporations Jackson had started had a duty to protect him the same way the Boy Scouts or a school would need to protect children from their leaders. But the judge found the corporations were merely legal entities that were controlled by Jackson, not organizations that could control him.

Another judge previously dismissed the lawsuits by Robson and Safechuck in 2017, finding the statute of limitations had expired. But an appeals court revived the legal actions in 2019 after California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a new law giving those who allege childhood sexual abuse longer to file lawsuits.

The allegations gained new life when the two men repeated them in detail in “Leaving Neverland," a documentary that premiered at the Sundance Film Festival and later aired on HBO.
The Jackson estate has adamantly and repeatedly denied that he abused either of the boys, and brought a lawsuit against HBO that is now in private arbitration.
[/FONT]

“Wade Robson has spent the last 8 years pursuing frivolous claims in different lawsuits against Michael Jackson’s estate and companies associated with it," Jackson estate attorney Jonathan Steinsapir said in a statement after Monday's ruling. “Yet a judge has once again ruled that Robson’s claims have no merit whatsoever, that no trial is necessary.”

The Associated
P[FONT=&amp]ress does not typically name people who say they were victims of sexual abuse. But Robson and Safechuck have repeatedly come forward and approved of the use of their identities.

[/FONT]
 

MOR316

Proud Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2020
Messages
63
Points
0
I don't like the wording, from either the Estate or The Judge...
It's not absolving Michael from anything, just saying The Estate had no control over his alleged actions

Happy of course those two liars have now been dismissed
 

NatureCriminal7896

Proud Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2019
Messages
10,310
Points
0
i'm am the only one who feels happy and relieve it's over but also sad due to the fact what Michael went though all his life. kind of sad it took this long to give him justice. :cryv6:
 

Hess

Proud Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
11,156
Points
63
Reed was there to film LN2 most likely. They will probably try to make it look like the case was unfairly thrown out.

So sad if they really makes a LN2... I hope no one will buy it.

Dan Reed should be hold accountable for sharing these lies. A doc with such serious claims should be factual. LN was soo full of mistakes and stories that were torn apart. Everyone who spend 5 minutes investing it would realize it was garbage.
 

elusive moonwalker

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2003
Messages
26,815
Points
48
MOR316;4321537 said:
I don't like the wording, from either the Estate or The Judge...
It's not absolving Michael from anything, just saying The Estate had no control over his alleged actions

Happy of course those two liars have now been dismissed

Nothing to do with the estate. It was the companies that were been sued. Info below.

https://mobile.twitter.com/Caramelicedtea/status/1384891429449838595

They claimed Michael Jackson's companies were the largest child abuse sex orchestrators in the world. Their idea of how this sex ring worked? That MJ's people would answer their calls and put them through to MJ.
5:27 pm · 21 Apr 2021·Twitter Web App
3
Retweets
29
Likes
caramella
@Caramelicedtea
·
21 Apr
Replying to
@Caramelicedtea
They claimed they'd be able to prove MJ's companies were thinly veiled sex rings for kids. They never proved a single manager or higher up actually knew of any supposed abuse. They in fact also claimed at the same time that he covered up the abuse so nobody would know.
caramella
@Caramelicedtea
·
21 Apr
So when people will say this doesn't prove MJ wasn't an abuser, etc. They explicitly claimed MJ's companies were a sex abuse ring. For eight years they've done this bullshit on the basis they could prove MJ's companies orchestrated abuse. They couldn't prove one instance of this.
 

NatureCriminal7896

Proud Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2019
Messages
10,310
Points
0
If LN2 is ever made it doesn't matter anymore because their case will most likely get thrown out again. we won guys. whooo! :smilev5:
 

Galactus123

Proud Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2011
Messages
5,000
Points
48
If LN2 is ever made it doesn't matter anymore because their case will most likely get thrown out again. we won guys. whooo! :smilev5:
LN2 might affect public opinion. I'm sure they will make Michael look bad and say that accusers aren't believed.
 

NatureCriminal7896

Proud Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2019
Messages
10,310
Points
0
All cases of Michael has been solve already. he found not guilty many times. at this point it's all an drag on lie to make Michael look like a bad person because some people didn't like him.
 

Hess

Proud Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
11,156
Points
63
I do agree LN2 could damage his image - but I think after the last 2 years. Those who really wants to believe these lies will never change their mind.

Those who saw LN and did believe MJ is innocent will keep believing so even if there comes a LN2.

So actually I don't really fear that a LN2 will do much damage in the long run. - Still I would hate if they made a LN2 of course. - But the big damage was LN - and I think all the errors, factual mistakes etc. made it so unbelievable that not many chnged their opinion about MJ because of that. - And if they did, LN2 will not change a thing.
 

elusive moonwalker

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2003
Messages
26,815
Points
48
Of course they wont . They want $$$$$$. He gets nothing if they lose. If he were as good at lawyering as he is lieing then he might have a chance??
 

NatureCriminal7896

Proud Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2019
Messages
10,310
Points
0
well i guess we got too excited. bummer. not doubting we lost but still kind of sucks we still have to wait a bit. ugh. let it end already.
 
Top