He's just sick of being harassed by guilters hoping and praying he was abused as well as people who keep saying he's Michael's secret son.
That's so sick. This is exactly why I've ALWAYS said that MJ guilters do NOT actually care about victims of child sexual abuse. And they never have.
Wanting someone to have been an abuser or have been abused just so you can find something to prove your guiltist fantasies is
extremely sick. Now that I know for sure that Omer hasn't made allegations, I feel so bad for him, as well as Macaulay Culkin and Brett Barnes especially, as they are constantly being falsely portrayed as "victims", even though they have always denied abuse (Barnes even sued HBO for defamation regarding LN).
Not to mention how nearly
all of the people behind the formation of the allegations often had nefarious things to hide as well. (Including, but definitely not limited to: Victor Gutierrez being a literal pedophilia apologist/glorifier, Evan Chandler being an emotionally abusive and negligent father, the Arvizos engaging in many kinds of shady activity, Wade Robson's behavior towards underage girls (he was even called "uncle pervy" by some girls due to his creepy behavior) etc.). It's always been clear throughout the years and to this day that Michael was used as nothing but a smoke and cover for many people.
Also, as pointless as it seems to gatekeep MICHAEL JACKSON... If anyone calls themselves a fan (especially one that's been a fan for decades), but still continues to doubt Michael's innocence or play devil's advocate (e.g. saying things like "He never should've been around children at all" and other comments that insinuate his guilt), I really question their fan status. And I've been doing that lately with some people here. It shows they really have not done enough research or even hold an ounce of critical thinking regarding Michael's cases. If they were really sure of Michael's innocence, I don't think they would be constantly questioning it. It's reasonable that any kind of doubt would be there (and only be
momentary) right after watching LN, as the film is
designed to manipulate its viewers. But LN and the news of its release is now five years old (and Wade and James's allegations are even older news than the film). By this point, it shouldn't allow fans (especially self-proclaimed long-time ones) to be
completely duped into believing Wade and James's lies.
EDIT: I also must say that anyone who proclaims Michael's relationships with children "made him look suspicious" is contributing to nothing but another lie.
What's
actually "suspicious" is taking a look at these relationships (which were unanimously platonic and innocent) and holding a weird, preconceived idea that they were sexual somehow without any proof. Same for the usual "bed = sex" straw man argument MJ guilters love to use when it came to MJ's "sleepovers." MJ guilters openly and unashamedly sexualize MJ's friendships with children (which were also NOT just with young
boys btw), but have the nerve to say
he was the one with a pedophiliac mindset. Just another example of how MJ guilters are blatant scapegoaters and just people pushing their strange fantasies onto someone else.
. I'm laughing my ass off at the above statement.
You need to stay off the drugs instead of constantly pointing the finger at those who have a different view of yours.
