Latest on MJJC

Does Paris believe in her father’s guilt or innocence?

pug said:
She is making implications and claiming a new friendship with the Cascio family.
Click to expand...
The only thing I have been able to find are some news articles writing AI looking texts citing "inside sources claims" etc. So where is that Paris herself is making implications and claiming a new friendship with the Cascio family?
 
pug said:
She is making implications and claiming a new friendship with the Cascio family.
Click to expand...

Is this the source you are referring to?


"Recently however, she appears to be in retreat from that position. It can be revealed for the first time here that those close to the Cascios say Paris has – devastatingly – come to believe that the stories about her father being a paedophile are likely true.

A source said they understand Paris will 'go public' when she feels ready. 'Paris has stayed in touch with the Cascio family and she is especially close with their mother, Connie. There have been some very candid conversations over the years between Paris and the Cascio family and, based upon those, Paris knows exactly what her father did,' says the source.

The insider adds: 'This will come out officially from Paris in time but it's going to come out when Paris wants it to come out.'

She is said to be sympathetic to the Cascios, whom she got to know well as a child, even though, should their claim succeed, it will cause her significant financial loss. Sources close to Paris say this is an overstatement and oversimplification of a very complex situation. They say that if she now believes her father might have been a paedophile, it is not something which she shares with them, or intends to share with the world. We're told her feelings about her father and his legacy are 'complicated and private'."
 
Lightbringer said:
Is this the source you are referring to?


"Recently however, she appears to be in retreat from that position. It can be revealed for the first time here that those close to the Cascios say Paris has – devastatingly – come to believe that the stories about her father being a paedophile are likely true.

A source said they understand Paris will 'go public' when she feels ready. 'Paris has stayed in touch with the Cascio family and she is especially close with their mother, Connie. There have been some very candid conversations over the years between Paris and the Cascio family and, based upon those, Paris knows exactly what her father did,' says the source.

The insider adds: 'This will come out officially from Paris in time but it's going to come out when Paris wants it to come out.'

She is said to be sympathetic to the Cascios, whom she got to know well as a child, even though, should their claim succeed, it will cause her significant financial loss. Sources close to Paris say this is an overstatement and oversimplification of a very complex situation. They say that if she now believes her father might have been a paedophile, it is not something which she shares with them, or intends to share with the world. We're told her feelings about her father and his legacy are 'complicated and private'."
Click to expand...
SOURCE!?
 
Lightbringer said:
Is this the source you are referring to?


"Recently however, she appears to be in retreat from that position. It can be revealed for the first time here that those close to the Cascios say Paris has – devastatingly – come to believe that the stories about her father being a paedophile are likely true.

A source said they understand Paris will 'go public' when she feels ready. 'Paris has stayed in touch with the Cascio family and she is especially close with their mother, Connie. There have been some very candid conversations over the years between Paris and the Cascio family and, based upon those, Paris knows exactly what her father did,' says the source.

The insider adds: 'This will come out officially from Paris in time but it's going to come out when Paris wants it to come out.'

She is said to be sympathetic to the Cascios, whom she got to know well as a child, even though, should their claim succeed, it will cause her significant financial loss. Sources close to Paris say this is an overstatement and oversimplification of a very complex situation. They say that if she now believes her father might have been a paedophile, it is not something which she shares with them, or intends to share with the world. We're told her feelings about her father and his legacy are 'complicated and private'."
Click to expand...
Where is the source. What utter bullshit. She knows exactly what he did, based on what the Cascios told her?? Right. 😅
 
If Paris ever did come out against MJ like that article claims, it would only confirm to me that she's always been stupid. I hope it isn't true though, because that would be such a vile blow to MJ's legacy. She did say the biopic was sugarcoated, and while that seems to be a valid criticism, it is very strange for someone like her to say in light of this.
 
MsAshley said:
If Paris ever did come out against MJ like that article claims, it would only confirm to me that she's always been stupid. I hope it isn't true though, because that would be such a vile blow to MJ's legacy. She did say the biopic was sugarcoated, and while that seems to be a valid criticism, it is very strange for someone like her to say in light of this.
Click to expand...
I don't know why everybody assumes that "sugarcoated" has to be about the allegations or that it even has anything to do with Michael himself. There are so many people who hurt Michael, and we know they'll never be exposed in the biopic. When Paris was asked how she hoped the biopic would show her father, she answered "Love and light". So if she wants the biopic to show anyone's dark side, I don't think it's her father's.
 
Lightbringer said:
Is this the source you are referring to?


"Recently however, she appears to be in retreat from that position. It can be revealed for the first time here that those close to the Cascios say Paris has – devastatingly – come to believe that the stories about her father being a paedophile are likely true.
Click to expand...
The Cascios are just feeding the press with more lies. They want paris to respond which would draw attention to their lies. And while the biopic era is here Paris is wise to ignore them.

Lightbringer said:
A source said they understand Paris will 'go public' when she feels ready. 'Paris has stayed in touch with the Cascio family and she is especially close with their mother, Connie. There have been some very candid conversations over the years between Paris and the Cascio family and, based upon those, Paris knows exactly what her father did,' says the source.
Click to expand...
This right here just proves the cascios are liars. When they first went public with the cascios their lawyer said Paris Prince and Blanket had no idea the estate paid them or that they were making claims. He even went so far as to say that they had "evidence"(which they dont) that would make them believe their claims.

SO how the hell could Paris have conversations about it "over the years" with them? Now they are saying she's known for years, but just a few months ago they were saying they have evidence that will convince them. Key word being WILL, meaning in the future.


Liars can never keep their stories straight.

Lightbringer said:
The insider adds: 'This will come out officially from Paris in time but it's going to come out when Paris wants it to come out.'

She is said to be sympathetic to the Cascios, whom she got to know well as a child, even though, should their claim succeed, it will cause her significant financial loss. Sources close to Paris say this is an overstatement and oversimplification of a very complex situation. They say that if she now believes her father might have been a paedophile, it is not something which she shares with them, or intends to share with the world. We're told her feelings about her father and his legacy are 'complicated and private'."
Click to expand...

LOL what sources? They just make shit up. Never believe unnamed sources.
 
paris-jackson-responds-to-fans-v0-7qijfv0bicxg1.jpeg

I saw this on the infamous Leaving Neverland sub on Reddit, but I wanted to ask this because I am very concerned.

I for the longest time thought Paris was one of her father’s strongest defenders, and I understand that given how she clearly has her own life and career now that she doesn’t talk about him the majority of the time. However recently, there has been some grumbling about Paris’ feelings about the allegations.

First was I think some if not all of her MJ tattoos were removed, then it was her commentary on the biopic (which I ended up agreeing with her on), and most pressing, the Daily Mail (not a reliable source) implying that she knows and is siding with the Cascios.

The most recent development from about a week ago was her comment on the picture above. What do you guys make of all this? I genuinely want to know, and please post any evidence of either case please.

BTW, regardless of her stance, I condemn any and all harassment towards Paris or anyone else. Michael would be ashamed.
 
The comment Paris was responding to is completely unhinged. I dont think she does, I just think she's had enough of the genuinely mental and toxic MJ fans - the latest of whom have turned on Diana Ross, because she allegedly did not want to be part of the film.

If Paris does believe, then it's something we just have to come to terms with. I don't believe it - and I hope she keeps her distance from MJ fans because she struggles and is open about her struggling. Morons posting shit like the above to her wont help her.

I applaud her for standing by her principles and not supporting the film even if I enjoyed it and I fully support anything she launches against this estate. If anything, Paris is doing more for MJ the man than anyone else, by actually trying to hold people accountable rather than ride the hige wave the film has created - which she could have easily done.

Anyone who comments, messages or contacts Paris about her father in an intrusive or abusive way is 100% unhinged IMO.
 
KingofPop125 said:
First was I think some if not all of her MJ tattoos were removed, then it was her commentary on the biopic (which I ended up agreeing with her on)
Click to expand...

Not to be derailing but what do you think she didn't like from the biopic; she didn't really made that clear right? Michael being portrayed 'too good'..?
 
Victorious said:
Not to be derailing but what do you think she didn't like from the biopic; she didn't really made that clear right? Michael being portrayed 'too good'..?
Click to expand...
She only saw the first screenplay I think - so her opinion wouldn't reflect what we saw. Im open to correction though?
 
That means the fans are slowly doubting Paris we can't know what she thinks and won't share it either
 
Would it even matter if she thinks he was a pedo? People can think and are free to think everything, doesn't change the truth
 
KingofPop125 said:
paris-jackson-responds-to-fans-v0-7qijfv0bicxg1.jpeg

I saw this on the infamous Leaving Neverland sub on Reddit, but I wanted to ask this because I am very concerned.

I for the longest time thought Paris was one of her father’s strongest defenders, and I understand that given how she clearly has her own life and career now that she doesn’t talk about him the majority of the time. However recently, there has been some grumbling about Paris’ feelings about the allegations.

First was I think some if not all of her MJ tattoos were removed, then it was her commentary on the biopic (which I ended up agreeing with her on), and most pressing, the Daily Mail (not a reliable source) implying that she knows and is siding with the Cascios.
Click to expand...
She cut herself on some tattoos and some didn't look good anymore, I think, so she had them covered. The commentary on the Biopic was only about it being too "Hollywood dreamworld" - like and that it's not reality. And I don't know why you quote tabloids.

KingofPop125 said:
The most recent development from about a week ago was her comment on the picture above. What do you guys make of all this? I genuinely want to know, and please post any evidence of either case please.
Click to expand...
I think you don't need evidence to understand what she wants to say? She acted like a fan but Michael is her father and now she's old enough to understand that she has a different relationship to him, not like a fangirl, but like a daughter. She doesn't have to act this way to show her love for him. Maybe in the past she felt like she had to act like a fan to be accepted by the fans.

KingofPop125 said:
BTW, regardless of her stance, I condemn any and all harassment towards Paris or anyone else. Michael would be ashamed.
Click to expand...
Yeah, and that's why I don't understand why people can't let the woman live in peace?! 🤷
 
Markus-MJ said:
I just saw her Instagram she actually had all the tattoos removed
Click to expand...
I already answered why, we had that topic here in the forum months ago. Her body, her choice, doesn't mean anything.

I suggest, all people who believe she doesn't love her father try to feel some empathy and think about everything she had to go through in the past. I am not her and already getting angry, so I can only imagine what it feels like for her. Really disrespectful. So many people twist her words, it's unbelievable.
 
She didn’t get her Michael tattoos removed, she had mentioned some shit drama about that when she went live a couple weeks ago. That’s just people throwing hate and stupid speculation. The cut on her arm where one Michael tattoo is was not there out of a hatred for her father, it happened before she had gotten the tattoo. People are hating on her and how she feels about her father without any real proof, they care more about that than the actual fact that she had gone through a hard time and hurt herself. False claims and accusations of her, just like with Michael. Go read some facts people please
 
KingofPop125 said:
paris-jackson-responds-to-fans-v0-7qijfv0bicxg1.jpeg

I saw this on the infamous Leaving Neverland sub on Reddit, but I wanted to ask this because I am very concerned.
Click to expand...

What about what she said is concerning?

That she no longer acts like an obsessed fangirl over her own father.

Sounds like a healthy improvement to me.
KingofPop125 said:
I for the longest time thought Paris was one of her father’s strongest defenders, and I understand that given how she clearly has her own life and career now that she doesn’t talk about him the majority of the time. However recently, there has been some grumbling about Paris’ feelings about the allegations.

First was I think some if not all of her MJ tattoos were removed,
Click to expand...
OK Im going to start reporting every comment that makes this claim for misinformation from now on. Because it's ridiculous. I and others on here have already proven that this isn't true. And here you are again repeating it.

It's suspect behavior to continue to repeat something that has already been debunked over and over again. It's purposeful deception to keep repeating it at this point

KingofPop125 said:
then it was her commentary on the biopic (which I ended up agreeing with her on), and most pressing, the Daily Mail (not a reliable source) implying that she knows and is siding with the Cascios.
Click to expand...
The dailyfail claim contradicts the first story the cascios were peddling so it's clearly just lies and slander spread by them and their lawyers. It has nothing to do with Paris.
KingofPop125 said:

The most recent development from about a week ago was her comment on the picture above. What do you guys make of all this? I genuinely want to know, and please post any evidence of either case please.
Click to expand...
Theres nothing wrong or concerning with what she says.

If she acted like a fangirl guilters would use that against her as well. They Criticize Prince for always talking about Michael and promoting him

There is nothing PPB could do that the guilters would not twist into some kinda "evidence" against michael or that they are coverinng up for Michael.

KingofPop125 said:
BTW, regardless of her stance, I condemn any and all harassment towards Paris or anyone else. Michael would be ashamed.
Click to expand...
Well spreading unproven and debunked claims about her, even under guise of "asking questions" is harassment in my book
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top