From what i read from you guys wouldnt it be better if the more ppl see it the better as it shows him as a total nut job?
Yes, it would be, but the point was to fight against it being supported via MSNBC/commercial support from sponsors, etc. Something which I think we largely succeeded in despite it being aired--actually, I think it is a million times better this way. I'm against censorship, even if it applies to something as stupid as that documentary, I think channels should have the right to air whatever they see fit--however, I won't personally support something like that documentary.
Also, at the time, we had no way of knowing the documentary would be so anti-Murray. We assumed, since MSNBC was anti-Michael, that it would portray Murray in a favourable light, and not as the true blue whack job he actually is.
Just as an aside, you can find it on YouTube, which is where I watched it. Individual users have uploaded it with no advertisements so neither they nor MSNBC are getting any money out of it being on there. The commercials have also been omitted, so the sponsors of the original piece which aired on MSNBC aren't getting the exposure they desperately craved.
I'm glad they chose to air it in the end, as we all got to watch the entire thing blow up in their faces. The real winners in the entire scenario were, ironically, David Walgren and Deborah Brazil, who got to use the thing to in essence stick it to Murray. MSNBC lost big time, since they didn't even get a significant fraction of the ratings they were hoping to get, and the sponsors must not have been too happy about that. Of course the biggest loser of them all was Conrad Murray, who was basically the only one who really had something major to lose from this whole enterprise. MSNBC will doubtlessly recover [and hopefully learn a lesson too], the lawyers obviously got paid for their, ehm, "services," and in a few months everyone will forget they were even on that mockumentary to begin with, and things will go back to normal for them.
But Murray will never ever live it down. It will haunt him in the appeal as well, assuming he beats the staggering odds and manages to get an appeal in the first place. It will also serve as an example to other media outlets that no one has any interest in what Murray has to say--they didn't at the height of the trial, and they won't months afterwards, so it's not even worth investing time and money in talking to him.
Dumb and dumber are at it again......geez, how tough can their heads be? suck it up Murray, do your damn time you spineless bastard! So sick of this ongoing crap!
Which is which? Admittedly I'm having some trouble sorting them into their appropriate label. =o
-cough- And Chernoff and Baldy deserve some of our everlasting hate too. -cough- Although admittedly Baldy is very intelligent for keeping himself out of everyone's hair (I assume he does not like hair too much) and keeping his bald little a-- out of the dumb mockumentary, thus avoiding much of the backlash that bit Cherry and Flanny in their cute little behinds. Good for you, smart Baldy. Now we know why his head's so big. =o
But I had to LOL when Chernoff tried to say he had no idea the documentary existed and that he was being filmed to appear on it, LOL! He was the one who was in it the most, aside from Murray himself, and he was also talking directly to the camera person at some points, like when he was talking about people sending him emails telling him he sucked (lol). So, unless he has a habit of talking to himself extensively whilst laying in bed with nothing but a sweatshirt and short shorts on, an issue onto itself, there really is no credibility in that statement.
I think he thinks we're stupid, but he's the stupid one, lol. =o