Elephant in the room.

From the amount of interest shown in such photos, you'd think they depict something far more sinister/graphic. I think there's some public gaslighting going on.

On one hand, people (especially journalists) see a resemblance or a link between between stuff and extrapolate it into a web of so-called proofs (especially if it's a proof they were hoping for), on the other hand, these pictures don't prove much anything, I wonder what's the goal of this likely gaslighting/manipulation... This targeting of MJ, misinterpreting the pictures feels extremely gross from those whose are manipulating the info... and if it's not manipulation then it would be world class incompetence.

(Though that photo I saw of Hilary in that strange looking dress that she's not use to been seen wearing, after people accused her of drinking children's blood or something has quite a disturbing effect...) (I wouldn't be surprise if that picture turned up to be a fake made with intentions.)

That has to be traumatic and likely made him feel very alone and thus he was an easy target for these kinds of people. When you feel like the whole world is against you will latch on to anyone who shows you kindness and pretends to be your friend.
I don't disagree with your overall message, but this sentence contradicts itself. If you feel the whole world is against you, you will less likely trust people until the prove they're friends... which is not necessarily an easy thing to ponder.
MJ was naively drawn into all kind of mysticisms that can easily be sources of manipulations. And maybe he had that common lack of social judgement that I personally know well that says "if I wouldn't do anything to harm people, why would they do anything to harm me". You can be aware of that "weakness", through the flow of life it keeps taking you by surprise.
 
Last edited:
Don't worry guys, nobody is gonna change their mind based on those pictures. Those who are going "Look there's proof!" are the same ones who already believed the allegations. And those who still believed in Michael's innocence after all the dirt that has been thrown at him for 32 years are not suddenly going to believe he was guilty based on one totally innocent picture.

Ted Lieu says it might be a crime if they just inserted the pictures


SOMEBODY SUE DOJ INTO OBLIVION

And while at it sue Radar Online too
The MJ estate can't sue for defamation because he's dead, but I guess Diana Ross, Evan, Prince and Paris could do something about it if people keep using that picture to imply things...

I'm glad Grace and Evan are speaking up, but Matt Fiddes on the other hand has no credibility. He keeps inserting himself in other people's stories when he wasn't even there, so we can't use him as a source here.
 
Back
Top