Estate wins IRS case

Mikky Dee

Sunset Driver, Midnight Rider
Joined
Mar 8, 2016
Messages
2,964
Points
48
Just as I knew they would. This is a massive win for the Estate. The legal team did the right thing to challenge the IRS on its ridiculously over-inflated estimations.

Summary:

The original insane bill from the IRS.

fa998a45-c85a-4479-acb3-4daec09a791d-jpeg.2525201


The 3 items left that they couldn’t reach an agreement on and so went to trial.

f3c2ea74-c4e5-44ca-8bf1-69e86fe09768-jpeg.2525200


Estate scored on 2 of the 3 issues with this ruling.

edd72167-8dab-4fe9-9615-e58194850b58-jpeg.2525253


No penalties levied against the Estate either.
 

CherubimII

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
6,303
Points
63
[FONT=&amp]MAY 03, 2021[/FONT]
[FONT=&amp]<time datetime="2021-05-03T14:52:13" class="publish-date js-publish-date" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 1em; font-family: Oswald, sans-serif; font-size: 1.4em; vertical-align: baseline; text-transform: uppercase; display: inline;"></time>[/FONT]
[FONT=&amp] 2:52pm PT by Ashley Cullins[/FONT]
Michael Jackson&#8217;s Likeness Valued at $4.1 Million in Big Tax Court Win for Estate
Click on the link to see the court documents at the end of the article.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/michael-jacksons-likeness-valued-4-1-million-tax-court
<figure class="blog-post__media main-media is-content-initialized" data-media-type="image" data-media-id="" data-content-type="expandableImage" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px 0px 0px 212px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-family: &quot;Open Sans&quot;, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; overflow: hidden; position: relative; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<figcaption class="media__details-text" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px; padding: 0.5em 0px; border: 0px; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">Steve Granitz/WireImage

The executors of the estate say the decision is "a huge, unambiguous victory for Michael Jackson&#8217;s children."

More than four years after going head-to-head with the IRS in U.S. Tax Court, Michael Jackson's estate has emerged largely victorious &#8212; with a federal judge finding the artist's worth at the time of his death to be much closer to its estimate than the government's and declining to issue any penalties.</figcaption></figure><aside class="blog-post-features" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px auto 1em 1em; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-family: &quot;Open Sans&quot;, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; float: right; width: 300px; overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<iframe id="google_ads_iframe_/8352/thr.com/esq.article_2" title="3rd party ad content" name="google_ads_iframe_/8352/thr.com/esq.article_2" width="300" height="600" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0" data-google-container-id="3" data-load-complete="true" data-integralas-id-4fbc5f12-69b0-d5dd-6863-37dab078c173="" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-width: 0px; border-style: initial; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: bottom;"></iframe>




</aside><article class="blog-post-body js-fitvids-content js-main-article-content" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px 0px 0px 212px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 1.75em; font-family: &quot;Open Sans&quot;, sans-serif; font-size: 0.975em; vertical-align: baseline; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">The dispute centered on how much Jackson's image and likeness were worth when he died in 2009, which would determine how much in taxes the estate would owe the IRS. It also includes the worth of Jackson's interest in New Horizon Trust II, which included his stake in Sony/ATV Music Publishing, and New Horizon Trust III, which included Mijac Music, a publishing catalog that owned the copyrights to compositions Jackson wrote or co-wrote and works by other songwriters. (The estate and IRS generally agreed on the value of the other assets.)

On Monday, after a lengthy deliberation process, U.S. Tax Court Judge Mark Holmes issued a more than 250-page ruling that begins by acknowledging the complexities of the situation.

"From the time he was a child Michael Jackson was famous; and there were times in his life, testified his executor, when he was the most famous person in the world," writes Holmes. "There were certainly years when he was the most well-known popular-music star, and even after his death there have been years when he was the world&#8217;s highest-earning entertainer. But there were also many years when he was more famous for his unusual behavior and not his unusual talent. And there were some years where his fame was turned infamous by serious accusations of the most noisome acts. We make no particular judgment about what Jackson did or is alleged to have done, but we must decide how what he did and is alleged to have done affected the value of what he left behind."

The IRS valued Jackson's likeness and image at about $434 million, while the estate said it was only worth about $2,000 at the time he had died. The reason? Jackson struggled to rehabilitate his image amid allegations of child molestation. In fact, one of the estate's experts estimated that in the final six months of his life Jackson only made $24 in image and likeness-related revenue. (After further expert consultation leading up to the trial the estate would increase its valuation to around $3 million.)
Holmes notes that, in a situation like this, it's vital to separate what the value was at the time of Jackson's death from what the value would later become because of the estate's management of those assets.

Because there's no seeing the future, the estate's experts compared Jackson's posthumous prospects to those of other departed celebrities, specifically Marilyn Monroe, James Dean, Bettie Page, Jackie Robinson, Princess Diana and Elvis Presley. It also factored in public perception, balancing respect for his artistic talents against damage to his reputation. Holmes notes that the "stigma is reflected in his lack of endorsements or merchandise agreements unrelated to a musical tour or album from 1993 until his death."

The IRS, however, gave greater weight to "foreseeable opportunities," including themed attractions, branded merchandise, a Cirque du Soleil show, a film and a Broadway musical. Again, Presley was used as a bit of a template, as were other celebrities with brand deals (Tony Hawk, Paris Hilton, Regis Philbin, Jennifer Lopez and Tyra Banks). Meanwhile, the Cirque show became a factor because Jackson's ex-manager Tohme Tohme said negotiations were underway before Jackson's death.

Holmes found the hypotheticals to be "unreliable and unpersuasive" &#8212; and notes that the government's expert failed to account for any costs of managing the likeness rights and seems to have ignored the hit Jackson's reputation had taken. He writes, "Any projection that finds a torrent of revenue, and not just a trickle, from such a man&#8217;s image and likeness &#8212; especially one who in the last two years of his life was so unpopular he did not even have a Q score &#8212; is simply not reasonable." (Then, there's the whole perjury thing.)
Ultimately, Holmes found Jackson's likeness to be worth approximately $4.15 million at the time of his death, his interest in New Horizon Trust II (which included the Sony/ATV stake) to be valueless because at the time he died its liabilities exceeded its assets by about $89 million, and his interest in New Horizon Trust III (which included Mijac) to be just more than $107 million. (Read the full ruling below.)
Holmes doesn't fault the estate for its valuations and found no penalties are warranted.

"Jackson had outlived the peak of his popularity, but in the decades before his death he kept spending as if he had not," writes Holmes. "Popular culture always moves on. There will come a time when Captain EO joins Monte Brewster and Terry Forbes as names that without googling sort of sound familiar, but only to people of a certain age or to students of entertainment history. And just as the grave will swallow Jackson&#8217;s fame, time will erode the Estate&#8217;s income. It resurrected and then sold what became its most valuable asset to Sony before trial. The value of what it has left, no matter how well managed, will now dwindle as Jackson&#8217;s copyrights expire and his image and likeness shuffle first into irrelevance and then into the public domain."
John Branca and John McClain, co-executors of The Estate of Michael Jackson, on Monday issued this statement in response to the decision: "This thoughtful ruling by the U.S. Tax Court is a huge, unambiguous victory for Michael Jackson&#8217;s children. For nearly 12 years Michael&#8217;s Estate has maintained that the government&#8217;s valuation of Michael&#8217;s assets on the day he passed away was outrageous and unfair, one that would have saddled his heirs with an oppressive tax liability of more than $700 million. While we disagree with some portions of the decision, we believe it clearly exposes how unreasonable the IRS valuation was and provides a path forward to finally resolve this case in a fair and just manner."

The estate was represented by attorneys from Hochman Salkin Toscher Perez; Hoffman Sabban & Watenmaker; Freeman Freeman Smiley; and longtime Jackson estate lawyer the late Howard Weitzman of Kinsella Weitzman Iser Kump.






</article>
 
Last edited:

Mikky Dee

Sunset Driver, Midnight Rider
Joined
Mar 8, 2016
Messages
2,964
Points
48
I don't really like some of the things the Judge said in his ruling, but if his perceptions helped him to come to the right decision for the Estate and for the benefit of Michael's children, then I guess the end justifies the means.
 

Hess

Proud Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
11,156
Points
63
One more case done.

Hope The estate is soon finished with all these court cases and can focus on the music and the legacy of MJ.
 

elusive moonwalker

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2003
Messages
26,815
Points
48
I don't really like some of the things the Judge said in his ruling, but if his perceptions helped him to come to the right decision for the Estate and for the benefit of Michael's children, then I guess the end justifies the means.

The estate were stuck between a rock and a hard place. They had to downplay everything inorder to win. Basically a means to an end. The money the estate has made post 09 shows everything
 

Paris78

Proud Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2011
Donations
$40.00
Messages
6,301
Points
63
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Branca on the IRS/Robson case wins: &quot;I think people have come to realize that Michael was innocent of any charges and unable to protect himself. We’ve got a wonderful Broadway play coming, we’ll be reopening our Cirque du Soleil show soon and we’ve got some surprises coming.” <a href="https://t.co/jKAgnDgawX">https://t.co/jKAgnDgawX</a></p>&mdash; andjustice4some (@andjustice4some) <a href="https://twitter.com/andjustice4some/status/1389972711741353984?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 5, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 

PoP

Proud Member
Joined
May 25, 2008
Messages
6,495
Points
48
YES! Take that IRS ya leeches!
 

SmoothGangsta

Proud Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2013
Messages
2,473
Points
48
Kinda hard for me to celebrate the estate actively trying to devalue MJ as an artist so they don't need to pay taxes. Nothing really to celebrate here considering the entire situation was the Estate's fault in the first place.
 

somewhereinthedark

Proud Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2012
Messages
892
Points
28
SmoothGangsta;4322061 said:
Kinda hard for me to celebrate the estate actively trying to devalue MJ as an artist so they don't need to pay taxes. Nothing really to celebrate here considering the entire situation was the Estate's fault in the first place.


I don’t like how Michael’s value was/had to be devalued, either. HOWEVER, I would rather this happened than his kids/Estate be saddled with a $700 million-billion tax bill. In the long run, who cares or is going to remember anything other than having to pay $4 million in taxes vs almost a billion. I would take $4 million anyday and that’s reason to celebrate, IMO.
 

elusive moonwalker

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2003
Messages
26,815
Points
48
It was nothing more than a means to an end. It would have been like the turkeys voting for xmas if the estate had argued the opposite
 

SmoothGangsta

Proud Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2013
Messages
2,473
Points
48
It wouldn't have been a thing if the Estate didn't try to under value MJ at the beginning. I just don't see what we're celebrating? They don't need to pay as much taxes because they lied and tried to make it look like MJ was a nobody when he died? I'm really not trying to be a downer I just don't see how them lying and basically throwing MJ under the bus so they don't need to pay taxes is a good thing. I get that it was already happening but as I said it wouldn't have even happened in the first place if they hadn't tried to under value him in order to pay less money.
 
Top