Redfrog at this point you are going in circles, spinning and twisting and I am getting bored by it so I am out of that.
That's rich you were caught in contradictions you said one cannot say MJ never opened that book because he wrote an inscription inside the cover you compared notes in a book he was reading to the inscription in Boys and you accuse me of spinning and twisting.
You dismiss reasonable speculations as desperate at the same time you speculate that
MJ saw the pictures and kept both books anyway because "it's not only pedophiles who can have such books"
and "the inscription shows he looked at those pictures with innocence" and "he had an interest in art photography, vintage, rare art books".
Here's what you are missing:
There is not a shred of evidence that MJ would have knowingly kept
any book full of pictures of nude boys, rare art book or not.
There is evidence to the contrary.
Forget about the suggestive pictures. He was asked about pictures of "boys who were undressed".
Watch his reaction. It's not only that he didn't remember those books and was genuinely surprised by the news
that they found them but he said the only way such books could be in his place is if he never opened them,
meaning if he never saw the pictures.
So the facts regarding those books are not inconclusive. It's conclusive that Mj was not interested in keeping
books with pics of naked boys, art or no art, innocent or not.
It's also conclusive that a pedophile would have used those books for sexual gratification, that's not speculation that's as much of a fact
as hetero guys using Playboy for the same thing. So the fact that MJ wasn't even interested in those books, didn't remember them
at all didn't get rid of them while he was being threatened with a police investigation is significant evidence
to show that he was not a pedophile.
That's why they need to imagine and speculate that MJ hid stuff before the raid. Ridiculous, unsubstantiated speculations. Let's not get dragged into it by similarly desperate counter-speculations.
They are not similarly desperate counter-speculations, not even close. How can you say they are?
Earlier you admitted it's not unreasonable to assume that he wrote that message to someone else
and as for clearing the house what haters say makes absolutely no sense: they say he was crazy
about those books for years, made sure they were in his bedroom in that file cabinet,
then hid stuff before the raid got rid of logs and everything dirty but left those books in his bedroom. Ridiculous.
However it's not ridiculous that a guilty person anticipating a police raid would get
rid of such books after being threatened with an investigation and you still dodge this simple question:
Do you honestly believe a mentally capable pedophile trying to clear his house of incriminating evidence would
make the mistake of leaving two such books he used for gratification for years in his bedroom?
Yes or no?
yeah... Redfrog, you are very helpful in searching, but please, calm down, you are overjacksoned right now...., so stay focused on REAL things.
LOL I like that word. The real thing is that all the facts about those books point to MJ absolutely not having any interest in obtaining and keeping any book with pics of nude boys and that is very relevant to prove he was not a pedophile especially when these two
books are frequently used to prove the opposite. Tell a non fan that the books are inconclusive evidence
and watch how convinced they will be that MJ didn't use those books to jerk off.