Is Michael Jackson's Former Attorney Too Big To Jail?

  • Thread starter Dangerous Incorporated
  • Start date

Dangerous Incorporated

Guests
La Toya believes Michael Jackson's death was "definitely a conspiracy." In a statement to the media, she insists that others should be brought to justice: "I do believe Dr Conrad Murray is responsible for his death." But she claimed other people had instructed the doctor to ensure the singer eventually overdosed on the drugs he was administered.

Even though we, the public, knew Michael Jackson was fearful he would be murdered, we don't know what his children were witnessed to the day he died, or what he told members of his family leading up to his death, so we don't exactly know what La Toya knows. But does what the public know so far suggest the possibility of a conspiracy?

Here in a nut shell is what we have learned so far:

First, Murray alone is charged with Jackson's death. Since he was to be paid $150,000 a month to keep the superstar healthy, he appeared to have nothing to gain and everything to lose by Jackson's death. But a closer look suggests something else. Murray did nothing to convey that his contract with AEG was going to be anything but brief. While Jackson was ordering furniture in preparation for his 'This Is It' tour, Murray showed no signs of divesting himself of his multi-state medical practice in order to accompany the signer. In fact, he was on a phone call to one of his regular patients as Jackson lay dying in the next room. And when he did have an opportunity to resuscitate the singer, he was more concerned with what paramedics would find when they arrived. This is an unmistakable indication he knew that what he had done to Jackson was unethical if not down right criminal.

We also know that when prosecutors feel they don't have a strong case, they typically overcharge in order to better ensure a conviction on one of the lesser charges. But not here. Murray was minimally charged with involuntary manslaughter, the outcome of which news pundits say will be an uphill battle for the DA to prove; and which will be decided by expert testimony. But if Conrad, who cockily says "no dice" to plea bargaining, beats it, he walks.

Enter entertainment attorney John Branca who was terminated by Jackson in 2003 for embezzlement, and other "white collar" crimes including surreptitiously representing both sides in contract negotiations. Branca shows up right after Jackson's death with a questionable document entitled "The Last Will Of Michael Joseph Jackson" which he alleges is Jackson's will from 2002. This document makes Branca executor of Jackson's estate and gives him control over all the superstar's "real [and] personal" property. Jackson's mother and three children are the heirs, but in name only, to the mega star's billion dollar empire. They are to receive a monthly stipend, the amount of which was decided by Branca, which we know to be a pittance of the estate executor's commission.

La Toya's conspiracy theory gained legitimacy when a special prosecutor denied the Jackson family's right to question the validity of the will, while California law permits such a legal inquiry.

Then there is former California Governor Jerry Brown, who is now the state's current attorney general. Brown's various political campaigns have benefited from John Branca's law firm's donations, which compelled the state DA to uncharacteristically involve himself in the case. The politician made much ado in the media about filing legal papers to deny Murray the ability to practice medicine. This no doubt was supposed to give "legitimacy" to the single killer theory while being prejudicial against Jackson's family, friends and fans, as they call for further investigation.

Why should Branca care if Murray practices medicine? He apparently cared enough to involve the attorney general to discourage any notion of a broader investigation, which is what Brown attempted to do when he called Murray's conduct "reprehensible," and said, "We will argue in court that Murray was reckless in giving Jackson such a dangerous drug and has demonstrated a serious lack of judgment that should prohibit him from practicing medicine."

Next, Judge Michael Pastor who has been described in the media as 'one of the toughest, smartest' arbiters of justice in the US (yawn), was recently added to the mix as the judge who will preside over the Murray involuntary manslaughter trial.

The fact that Judge Pastor was appointed to the bench in 1983 by none other than Jerry Brown adds respectability to La Toya's claim. It links the trial judge to Branca, who holds sway at the center of La Toya's conspiracy theory, and who not only has every thing to gain from Jackson's death, but also enough "political capital" for the people's "fall guy" to get a free pass.

Thus, based on all the above, it strongly suggests the possibility of a conspiracy is at play here. And when La Toya Jackson says, "Michael was worth more dead than alive, they knew what they had to plan for this to happen ..." she appears to be right on the money.

http://www.superstarofpop.com/blog
 
load of bs
1/ a judge denied Joe's motion, not a prosecutor, not a family motion
2/ only an interested person can challenge the will (probate code section 48), not the whole family
3/ the judge decides the amount of the allowance, not branca, AEG or Jerry Brown
4/ The heirs will inherit when the probate will be close. During the probate, only a family allowance
5/ the LA DA is doing the investigation, not AG. Jerry Brown is investigating others doctors with the DEA
6/ justice must be done for MJ & his kids, not fans. MJ is not their property

it's just some sentences
the author of this need to do some researches
 
Last edited:
load of bs
1/ a judge denied Joe's motion, not a prosecutor, not a family motion
2/ only an interested person can challenge the will (probate code section 48), not the whole family
3/ the judge decides the amount of the allowance, not branca, AEG or Jerry Brown
4/ The heirs will inherit when the probate will be close. During the probate, only a family allowance
5/ the LA DA is doing the investigation, not AG. Jerry Brown is investigating others doctors with the DEA
6/ justice must be done for MJ & his kids, not fans. MJ is not their property

it's just some sentences
the author of this need to do some researches

why let the truth get in the way of a good story/conspiracy
 
To the naysayers: Go ahead, keep your heads in the sand OR continue to stick to 'the script'. It's one or the other. Just remember, not everyone was born yesterday. This whole mess stinks to high heaven and the stench is not coming from the Jackson's side like we've been force fed to believe.
 
well if there are facts then post them. when things that are pointed out as false like what marc did you have no answer. if you are intrested in the truth why? dont you want the false seperated from the fact. i thought this section was about searching for the truth. i guess some prefer to ignore some things as it maybe helps them cope with what happened. some big set up by every big business going is i guess easier to suffer with than a dr just fecked out

ppl can give out theories all they like but unfortunatly without evidence to back them up they are pointless and nothing more than a theory that anyone can create
 
well if there are facts then post them. when things that are pointed out as false like what marc did you have no answer. if you are intrested in the truth why? dont you want the false seperated from the fact. i thought this section was about searching for the truth. i guess some prefer to ignore some things as it maybe helps them cope with what happened. some big set up by every big business going is i guess easier to suffer with than a dr just fecked out

ppl can give out theories all they like but unfortunatly without evidence to back them up they are pointless and nothing more than a theory that anyone can create

Elusive unlike you I don't think Murray just 'messed up big time' BUT i agree with you on this one. The fans or\and the family bring out names of people without giving the evidences and this is just wrong.

people should keep it reasonable and don't mix up things. I'm more than willing to know the truth but nobody seem to tell it right.
 
load of bs
1/ a judge denied Joe's motion, not a prosecutor, not a family motion
2/ only an interested person can challenge the will (probate code section 48), not the whole family
3/ the judge decides the amount of the allowance, not branca, AEG or Jerry Brown
4/ The heirs will inherit when the probate will be close. During the probate, only a family allowance
5/ the LA DA is doing the investigation, not AG. Jerry Brown is investigating others doctors with the DEA
6/ justice must be done for MJ & his kids, not fans. MJ is not their property

it's just some sentences
the author of this need to do some researches

how do you know for sure, that the judge isn't in someone's pockets? do you trust the system that much, to be as righteous as religion?

and how do you know that probate can't be held up indefinitely by some 'powers that be'?

and why wouldn't an 'interested person', represent the whole family?

trusting the system implicitly? i thought you might not think that, since Tom Sneddon was able to make a law specifically designed for Michael Jackson, during the trial.
since we are seeking the truth, i think we've all been around, long enough to know that men can operate nefariously, and not everything is on the up and up, and people can do things that people cannot imagine, could be done, that are truly terrifying. that is truth in this world. whether what i say can be proven or not, this dark behaviour in the world, is still fact.

nor should people fear questioning of 'established order'. it's nothing new. it helped to eliminate things like racism, for example. well..sort of eliminate it.

is there any more proof needed that there are people out there who love money and will do anything for it? we know that proof is not needed to know that.

there are human rights violations going on around the world, as we speak. if people can get away with something, they will do it. it's human nature. everybody is educated enough to know that.

to seek truth means to seek it, not muzzle people who are seeking it. if you muzzle them, then you are saying you know the truth, even though you were not there to witness it. and that is living a lie. we didn't progress through the centuries by shutting people up. what i'm saying here, is not aimed just at you. but the very first part of what i posted is in response to your post.

so, ask yourself this. has there never been a time in human history where a man made a law, and then found a way to break it..or..circumvent it? do you really think there has never been a time?

when Sneddon made his new law, it was a clever way to break an old law. but if you don't want to look at it that way, it's fine.
 
Last edited:
and everything i am saying here is not to say that Murray is innocent or guilty. i don't know. he may be the only one. i know he is capable of corruption. all i am saying is, that i don't accept things, immediately, at face value. i want someone to pay. but i want to be sure it's the right one..or ones. or both.

yea..i was just thinking about corruption, when i thought of that american electric company, 'enron', which was supposed to be looking out for american citizens, but, instead, was stealing money from them. corruption is just about everywhere.
 
Last edited:
Elusive unlike you I don't think Murray just 'messed up big time' BUT i agree with you on this one. The fans or\and the family bring out names of people without giving the evidences and this is just wrong.

people should keep it reasonable and don't mix up things. I'm more than willing to know the truth but nobody seem to tell it right.

Apparently, those who may have known, or who REALLY seemed to have known things are "KILLING THEMSELVES"!!! Evan Chandler, Peter Lopez...

How odd is that?
 
well if there are facts then post them. when things that are pointed out as false like what marc did you have no answer. if you are intrested in the truth why? dont you want the false seperated from the fact. i thought this section was about searching for the truth. i guess some prefer to ignore some things as it maybe helps them cope with what happened. some big set up by every big business going is i guess easier to suffer with than a dr just fecked out

ppl can give out theories all they like but unfortunatly without evidence to back them up they are pointless and nothing more than a theory that anyone can create


I trust the opposition pays you all well!!! For almost a year now, many of us have been uncovering "evidence" that there is more to Michael's death than Murray and Michael's "addiction". So many coincidences, unanswered questions and discrepancies that most of us have tried to answer--either with logic or facts. However, if there has been a conspiracy regarding Michael's death (and most of us here believe there has been) and if the conspirators are who we think they are--do you honestly think it is going to be easy to PROVE--they'll just hand us evidence? No one ever said this would be easy, but then again Michael's TRUE fans are looking for real answers and truth--not trusting the lies that seem to pass as explanations for a FEW here! We are not "creating" anything here! Most everything is documented in some way--perhaps not in a way to satisfy you! Somehow I feel that you have lost track of what this forum is about--may I refresh your memory:

"The Conspiracy In this forum we question Michael's death, the latest news and stories surrounding his death and the conspiracy theories - contains heavy spectulation so please if you aren't able to respect the atmosphere of this section do not enter."
 
VNCWilliam thank you for voicing my concerns. We have every right to question the system from the moment there are so many precedent cases of corruption. The opposite would be surprising in fact.
Why would defending the system as it works be so important anyway? People should critisize and demand changes for the better.
 
Just a reminder.
We lost someone we love dearly and we have every indication that the truth behind his death remains HIDDEN for a number of reasons.
We are not just going to sit down and swallow the official version of events as it is conveniently fed to us.
 
Back
Top