Dangerous Incorporated
Guests
[youtube]sKrBPNRCLiA[/youtube]
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
no that was the head of the LAPD.cooley been incharge for a while. prosecuted janet arvizo. iwould think the charges can only be changed if they decide to take it to a GJ on the quiet like they did with mj. but i see no reason why they would change the charges they dont know anything now that they didnt know when the charges were filed.And wasn't it Steve Cooley the one who replaced the last chief who resigned in the middle of the investigation?
well hes the D.A he has assistants who will advise but hes the boss. the judge has nothing to do with the charges. hes to make sure any trial is run by the rules and the LAPD are the investigators. they find the evidence and the D.A decides on the charges as they are the lawyers.Doesn't anyone else have a say in the charges but this guy? I heard there is a chance the charges could still be changed in the next hearing.
What about the judge? Or someone else in the LAPD.
What about the estate?
I'm sure they have donated under different names.
PS Can a moderator correct the DA's name on the thread title?
dont believe he was. rotheman was invloved with chandler. why would chandler need a crim defence attorneyShapiro & his wife gave an additional $6000. He was Chandlers criminal attorney. James Belushi gave $6500.
id hope not. cooley also prosecuted janet arvizoWhat about the estate?
I'm sure they have donated under different names.
dont believe he was. rotheman was invloved with chandler. why would chandler need a crim defence attorney
id hope not. cooley also prosecuted janet arvizo
June Chandler testified to it under cross from Mesereau:
http://www.geniusmichaeljackson.com/court/Transcripts/Court Transcript 4 11 2005.txt
I believe they were investigated for extortion by LAPD, in the Tabloid Truth they said it was all dropped the day before the settlement - is my recollection - it may not be in Tabloid Truth, I may have just seen it on TV. I'd have to go check to be totally accurate, but there was something reported on that.
27 Q. Do you recall at one point meeting with
28 Robert Shapiro? 5720
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. And when was that?
3 A. In Larry Feldman’s office.
4 Q. How many meetings did you have with Robert
5 Shapiro?
6 A. I don’t recall.
7 Q. Do you know why he was at the meeting?
8 A. I -- I think as part of Michael Jackson’s
9 legal team.
10 Q. Who, Robert Shapiro?
11 A. I think so. I don’t recall.
12 Q. Okay.
13 A. It was so long ago.
14 Q. Well, he was there because Michael Jackson’s
15 attorneys were claiming extortion, right?
16 A. I don’t recall.
17 Q. Robert Shapiro was there because he’s a
18 criminal defense lawyer, right?
19 MR. SNEDDON: Your Honor, excuse me. I want
20 to interpose an objection before the next question
21 comes out. Speculation. She says she doesn’t have
22 any recollection of this, so why Mr. Shapiro --
23 THE COURT: Stop talking. You’re just
24 supposed to give your grounds for the objection.
25 MR. SNEDDON: I’m sorry. Object.
26 Speculation.
27 THE COURT: All right. Overruled.
28 The question -- the last question, would the 5721
1 court reporter read it back, please?
2 (Record read.)
3 THE COURT: You may answer.
4 THE WITNESS: Correct.
5 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Do you remember also in
6 your meetings, meeting -- excuse me, let me rephrase
7 that.
8 In the meetings you’ve described with Larry
9 Feldman, Michael Freeman, Robert Shapiro, do you
10 also remember a lawyer named Richard Hirsch being
11 present?
12 MR. SNEDDON: Your Honor, I’m going to
13 object as to all those people and compound.
14 THE COURT: It’s vague.
15 We’ll take our break now.
16 (Recess taken.)
17 THE COURT: Mr. Mesereau.
18 MR. MESEREAU: Thank you, Your Honor.
19 Q. Just very briefly, you and Evan hired
20 attorneys and tried to negotiate a financial
21 settlement before you ever talked to any police
22 officer, right?
23 A. No.
24 Q. You were negotiating for money before you
25 ever reported anything to any police officer in Los
26 Angeles, correct?
27 A. Not correct.
28 Q. Do you know the dates you hired your 5722
1 attorneys?
yeah its a totally corrupt way of electing officals.back handers all the way basically money for votes. and they have the cheek to talk about other countries
I can understand the lawyers trying to get influence, but
William & Patricia Hume, owners of Basic American, Inc. gave $26000. That is a food company, privately held. Bechtels gave too, quite alot. He must be figured to win.