Lightbringer
Proud Member
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2003
- Messages
- 1,161
- Points
- 113
What did she say? Is the story still up on her instagram or is it already gone?thought it was pretty funny
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What did she say? Is the story still up on her instagram or is it already gone?thought it was pretty funny
Yeah but seriously, mainly 1 out of 5 stars. Its frustratingwe don't care about all this haters
Is that only journalists voting? Or select people with some kind of "power"?27% on Rotten Tomatoes...
It's Joever
What does that mean27% on Rotten Tomatoes...
It's Joever
No offense, but I knew this would be the case with critics as soon as I realized that they wouldn’t deal with the allegations since that’s all they really care about. It is what it is.Reviews are even worse than I’d imagined.
Critically panned![]()
My Dear, I was alive when Michael Jackson first released the "Thriller" album.Reviews are even worse than I’d imagined.
Critically panned![]()
Those were not professional reviews. The review embargo was lifted at 2pm GMT today as you can see by searching Google. What you are referring to are "first reactions".What embargo are you talking about? Critics have been coming in before...
What does that mean
Exactly this!Worse than I expected, but there was no universe where an MJ biopic gets critical praise unless it depicted him as a depraved pedophile. I’m seeing some reviews genuinely critical about the quality of the movie we got, but the overwhelming majority are harping on their decision to not address the allegations, which is exactly what we all knew would happen.
The variety review literally said,I don't really care about the general reviews. I expected the film to be panned because it doesn't imply MJ was weird or a pedo.
It's all these people care about, really.
What we can do is leave our own reviews where the public can make reviews and ratingsI don’t get why anybody here even cares 1 bit for those critic reviews. We knew from the start that they would absolutely destroy it. MJ doesn’t **** kids = 1/10 in their mind. The audience score is what’s important, and the reactions I’ve seen from them are great!
That’s not true. Rotten tomatoes works differently. Basically, the 26% is the percentage of critics who liked the movie.![]()
Michael | Rotten Tomatoes
Discover reviews, ratings, and trailers for Michael on Rotten Tomatoes. Stay updated with critic and audience scores today!www.rottentomatoes.com
100% is the best score, so 26% is kind of an average rating of 2.6 of 10 on IMDB. Which would make it one of the worst rated movies to ever be made.
Obviously the fuckbags rating the movie is not rating the actual movie, but what was not in it (the allegations). Or they simply was going to diss the movie because they think MJ was a child molester and dont care about the actual film! This is their chance to publicly slate Michael Jackson again through the film and they are not missing that opportunity!
Some of these assholes gave Leaving Neverland like 90-95% despite all the lies and manipulation in it....its not about the film itself its about taking sides.
They gave Leaving Neverland a score of 98% but the audience gave the documentary a score of 27%.Not surprising and actually quite funny.
Leaving Neverland got a 98% Rotten Tomatoes score for reference.
If you need validation from pretencious snobby out of touch critics then you will cry over their reviewsReviews are even worse than I’d imagined.
Critically panned![]()
Yep! I'm seeing it multiple times. Screw the critics. We all knew they'd do this. They don't see any humanity in MJ and want him to be portrayed as a depraved sick monster. Since this film doesn't do that, they are panning it. They hate Michael's guts.If anything I am even more excited now. I might go and see it some more times. Help make it more of a success so they can look even more stupid