Murray Trial - All media reports/articles - Merged - No discussion

Re: Murray Trial_ All media reports/articles - Merged - No discussion September 30th

October 20, 2011
Did someone get their feelings hurt?
Posted: 05:39 PM ET

CNN's Alan Duke was reporting from the 12th floor of the courthouse when he heard an argument going on at the elevators behind him. He says the heated words were being exchanged between Dr. Conrad Murray's lead defense attorney, Ed Chernoff, and one of the defense experts, anesthesiologist Dr. Paul White.
He didn't want to go into details but says they were talking about people "taking things personally."

As we all know by now, Dr. White is longtime friends with Dr. Steven Shafer, who has been on the stand all day testifying for the prosecution. Dr. Shafer took a jab at Dr. White's research earlier today, saying how he was "disappointed" that his colleague would suggest Michael Jackson could have died by drinking propofol.

We're not ones to gloat, but we have to say we totally called this one. Will their friendship survive
http://insession.blogs.cnn.com/2011/10/20/did-someone-get-their-feelings-hurt/



Dr. Conrad Murray
"I'm Praying for the Prosecutor"

Dr. Conrad Murray made a pretty shocking statement last night, leaving a restaurant in Santa Monica. He said, "I would like to pray for the prosecutor, his associates, and his expert witness."

Sadly, the photog didn't ask why Murray was praying for them ... whether it's because he prays for everyone, be they friend or foe -- or whether he's praying because he believes they are portraying him unfairly/unethically before the jury.
http://www.tmz.com/2011/10/21/dr-conrad-murray-praying-for-prosecutor-jury-michael-jackson/
 
Last edited:
Conrad Murray Defense Team Challenges Expert Who Blamed Doctor for Michael Jackson's Death
Published October 21, 2011
Associated Press

The lead attorney for the doctor charged in Michael Jackson's death challenged a key prosecution expert Friday about his contention that the physician was responsible for the death of the singer.

Attorney Ed Chernoff cross-examined Dr. Steven Shafer, who previously testified that the only plausible explanation for the death was that Jackson had been hooked up to an IV drip of the anesthetic propofol then left alone by Dr. Conrad Murray.

"That's a bold claim, isn't it," Chernoff asked.
"It's an honest statement," Shafer replied.

Chernoff also questioned the Columbia University researcher and professor about his IV demonstration for jurors on Thursday.
The defense attorney suggested Shafer had drawn conclusions that weren't necessarily supported by the evidence. Chernoff said the type of IV line that Shafer used in the demonstration was never found at Jackson's house.

Murray has pleaded not guilty to involuntary manslaughter. He could face up to four years behind bars and the loss of his medical license if convicted.

Shafer was expected to be the last witness called by the prosecution. After Shafer's testimony ends, defense attorneys will begin presenting their case.

Shafer, an expert on propofol, told jurors Thursday that his explanation was supported by items found in Jackson's bedroom, the singer's autopsy results and Murray's lengthy statement to police.
Using charts and his own experience, Shafer said Jackson likely stopped breathing because of the propofol and without someone to clear his airway. The propofol would have kept dripping into the IV tube, with gravity carrying it into the singer's body, he said.
Shafer said Murray committed 17 violations of the standard of care that could have led to Jackson's serious injury or death.
He rejected any theory that Jackson could have given himself the fatal dose of the anesthetic or sedatives

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainmen...finally-question-expert-who-claims-doctor-is/


Murray attorneys challenge expert
By Alex Dobuzinskis

LOS ANGELES - Attorneys for Dr Conrad Murray Friday challenged a top anesthesiology expert over assumptions he made in a courtroom demonstration on how Murray could have given Michael Jackson a deadly drug infusion.

The cross examination of Dr Steven Shafer came a day after the expert prosecution witness gave damaging testimony against Murray at his involuntary manslaughter trial in Jackson’s 2009 death from an overdose of the drug propofol and sedatives.

Shafer had set up an IV drip system in court to suggest the way in which Murray might have wrongfully infused the powerful anesthetic propofol into the singer. But defense attorneys Friday disputed whether such a system was ever used.
“You understand that when the police came to the scene, when coroner investigators came to the scene, they did not find an IV set such as that one?” Ed Chernoff, the lead defense attorney, asked Shafer on the witness stand.

Shafer admitted that a vented IV tube with a plastic spike — such as the one he used in his demonstration for jurors — was not found at the scene. But he testified that Murray still could have used one and easily balled up the tube and pocketed it before leaving Jackson’s Los Angeles mansion.
Jurors have heard prior testimony that an IV pole, saline bags and propofol vials were among the items found in Jackson’s bedroom after he died on June 25, 2009.

Murray has admitted that on the day Jackson died he gave the singer a relatively small dose of 25 milligrams of propofol for sleep. Defense attorneys are challenging the prosecution’s argument that Murray could have administered as much as 40 times that amount of the drug afterward through an IV.
Defense attorneys have said that Jackson might have given himself an extra, fatal dose of propofol when Murray was out of the bedroom.

Murray, who has pleaded not guilty, faces a maximum sentence of four years in prison if convicted.

http://jam.canoe.ca/Music/2011/10/2...sic&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter


Lawyer for Jackson physician questions credibility of medical expert
By Martin Kasindorf, Special for USA TODAY Updated 11h 6m ago

Ed Chernoff, lead lawyer for defendant Conrad Murray, was cross-examining Columbia University anesthesiologist Steven Shafer, the state's 33rd and last witness. Shafer had testified Thursday that the only "workable" scenario for how Jackson died in June 2009 was that Murray had infused him with 1,000 micrograms of the anesthetic propofol over three hours -- an amount 40 times higher than the dose Murray told police he had administered.

Jackson died of "acute propofol intoxication," combined with the effects of the sedative lorazepam, a coroner's autopsy determined. Murray, who pleaded not guilty, contends through his attorneys that Jackson gave himself the fatal doses while the doctor was away from the singer's bedroom.

Shafer, an authority on propofol, rejected the defense's scenario and several alternatives. He showed the jury on Thursday graphs based on his mathematical models to demonstrate that only Murray's use of a steady propofol drip on a sleeping Jackson could produce the high level of propofol found in the entertainer's blood in the autopsy.
Chernoff sought to cast doubt on the validity of Shafer's graphs and on his demonstration to the jury of how he believed Murray had set up an IV pole feeding propofol and a saline solution into Jackson's veins.

The cross-examination was nearly overshadowed by the outbreak of a feud between Shafer and the defense's propofol expert, Dr. Paul White of Dallas, resulting from Shafer's ridicule of White during earlier testimony for the prosecution.

Chernoff raised potential doubts about one simulation by Shafer that showed that Jackson probably received 10 doses of lorazepam of 4 micrograms each, every 10 minutes beginning at midnight June 24, 2009. Evidence introduced earlier in the trial showed that Jackson didn't arrive home from a concert rehearsal until around 1 a.m. Shafer acknowledged that fact.

Chernoff next questioned a Shafer chart that assumed Murray had given Jackson only a single 25-microgram dose of propofol -- as the doctor told police detectives two days after Jackson died. Shafer's chart, which said 25 milligrams would be insufficient to kill Jackson, assumed that Murray had pushed in all the propofol at once.
But Murray told the police he had infused it slowly over 3 to 5 minutes -- exactly the way Shafer recommended to other doctors in propofol instructions he wrote for the drug's manufacturer.

Chernoff told Shafer he had made questionable "grand statements" in setting up for the jury an IV stand and hanging on one side of the stand a slit saline bag into which he placed a bottle of propofol. Investigators had testified that they found a slit saline bag with a bottle of propofol
in it at the scene. Chernoff suggested Shafer was unreasonable in assuming that Murray actually had performed this unconventional form of IV setup.

Questioned by prosecutor David Walgren on Thursday, Shafer said he was "disappointed" that White, a longtime friend and colleague, had written a report for the defense calling it feasible that Jackson could have died from swallowing propofol. Shafer said the impossibility of swallowed propofol having any effect was "first principles" of medicine taught to "first-year medical students."
Shafer said he had commissioned a study of human volunteers in Chile that showed oral ingestion of propofol did not induce sleep. The defense did its own study with the same result, and last week dropped its claim that Jackson swallowed propofol.
White, an expert permitted by Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor to be in court through Shafer's testimony despite an order excluding other potential witnesses, apparently took umbrage at Shafer's remarks. And Chernoff sallied into Shafer in White's defense.

The brouhaha became public just after the jury left the courtroom Friday for the mid-afternoon recess. A clearly angry Pastor, citing an online report on E! News, asked White if during a break in testimony Thursday he had said "what a scumbag" in a voice audible to reporters.
White told the judge he did not recall doing so. White did say he had been criticizing Walgren for allegedly "tampering with evidence" by removing part of the top of the propofol bottle found in Jackson's bedroom. (Walgren said he had done it for "demonstrative" reasons.)
White denied telling E! News reporter Baker Machado (cq) in the hallway that his favorable personal opinion of Shafer had changed. White said he had told the reporter, "Of course, when someone makes derogatory comments about you in court, it affects you."
The judge read White a quotation of him in the online story that the doctor did not deny. "I am going to take the high road not the low road with him," White was quoted as saying. "I was his teacher when he was a medical student. The truth will come out. It always does."
Pastor chastised White, saying, "You have no business making those comments, Dr. White." Saying he wanted to explore whether White had violated a judicial order against out-of-court comments on the case, he ordered the doctor to appear Nov. 16 at a hearing on whether he should be sanctioned or ruled in contempt of court.
"Was that on TV?" White was overheard asking defense lawyer J. Michael Flanagan outside the courtroom later. The trial is being televised and streamed on the Web. Flanagan said he didn't know if the cameras were on or off. (Since the jury had left the courtroom, the cameras were off.)
Pastor said White and Shafer could stay in court through each other's testimony for now, "but let's be real clear -- it's a short leash," he said.

Resuming cross-examination, Chernoff accused Shafer of making "dismissive" statements meant to humiliate White because he had topped him on the issue of swallowing propofol. "You preferred to shove it down his professional throat," Chernoff said.
On an objection by Walgren, Pastor ruled the question out of order.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation...tion-TopStories+(News+-+Nation+-+Top+Stories)
 
Last edited:
Contempt hearing set for expert in Jackson case
Associated Press | Posted: Friday, October 21, 2011 5:16 pm

A judge says comments made to a reporter by a key expert who will testify for the doctor charged in Michael Jackson's death may be a violation of a court order.
Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor on Friday set a Nov. 16 hearing to consider whether Dr. Paul White should be found in contempt for talking to a reporter from E! Entertainment Television.
E! reported Thursday that White called the prosecutor a "scumbag" and spoke about prosecution expert Dr. Steven Shafer, who is still testifying.

White said in court that he didn't recall making the statement.
Pastor set the contempt hearing outside the presence of jurors in the involuntary manslaughter case against Dr. Conrad Murray.
White and Shafer are colleagues at Columbia University. White will testify when Murray's attorneys begin calling witnesses.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.
The lead attorney for the doctor charged in Michael Jackson's death challenged a key prosecution expert Friday about his contention that the physician was responsible for the death of the singer.
Attorney Ed Chernoff cross-examined Dr. Steven Shafer,. who previously testified that the only plausible explanation for the death was that Jackson had been hooked up to an IV drip of the anesthetic propofol then left alone by Dr. Conrad Murray.
"That's a bold claim, isn't it," Chernoff asked.
"It's an honest statement," Shafer replied.

Chernoff also questioned the Columbia University researcher and professor about his IV demonstration for jurors on Thursday.
The defense attorney suggested Shafer had drawn conclusions that weren't necessarily supported by the evidence. Chernoff said the type of IV line that Shafer used in the demonstration was never found at Jackson's house.

Murray has pleaded not guilty to involuntary manslaughter. He could face up to four years behind bars and the loss of his medical license if convicted.

Shafer was expected to be the last witness called by the prosecution. After Shafer's testimony ends, defense attorneys will begin presenting their case.
Shafer, an expert on propofol, told jurors Thursday that his explanation was supported by items found in Jackson's bedroom, the singer's autopsy results and Murray's lengthy statement to police.
Using charts and his own experience, Shafer said Jackson likely stopped breathing because of the propofol and without someone to clear his airway. The propofol would have kept dripping into the IV tube, with gravity carrying it into the singer's body, he said.
Shafer said Murray committed 17 violations of the standard of care that could have led to Jackson's serious injury or death.
He rejected any theory that Jackson could have given himself the fatal dose of the anesthetic or sedatives.

AP Entertainment Writer Anthony McCartney contributed to this report.
http://globegazette.com/entertainme...cle_662fe15e-e29c-5287-be8a-8acc6a615c5d.html


L.A. NOW
Southern California -- this just in

Conrad Murray judge: Did witness call drug expert a 'scumbag'?
October 21, 2011 | 3:28 pm

The judge in the trial of Michael Jackson’s personal physician said Friday that he was considering contempt-of-court charges against a key defense witness for reportedly calling a prosecution expert “a scumbag.”
Dr. Paul White, set to take the stand for the defense next week, denied in court making the remark, which was reported by E! Online Thursday.
He did acknowledge to Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor that he made other critical comments about a fellow anesthesiologist, Dr. Steven Shafer, to E!.
“I am going to take the high road, not the low road with him,” the network’s website quoted White as him saying. “I was his teacher when he was a medical student. The truth will come out. It always does.”

Pastor set a hearing for Nov. 16 for possible sanctions against White and defense attorneys for Dr. Conrad Murray.
The judge, who previously issued a gag order against trial participants, told White outside the presence of the jury: “You have no business making any of those comments.”

Shafer is the most important medical witness for the prosecution, and White serves the same role for the defense. The men, longtime colleagues who have described themselves as friends, disagree on what scientific evidence shows about Jackson’s death.

In White’s report, he said it was possible the singer caused his own death by drinking propofol, a theory Shafer dismissed as clearly impossible.
On the witness stand, Shafer said was “disappointed” by White, who was sitting in the well of the court behind the defense table.

White and Murray have whispered to each other during breaks in Shafer’s testimony.
White was a professor at Stanford Medical School when Shafer was a student, but in testimony Friday, Shafer emphasized that he did not consider White his teacher.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lan...e-did-defense-call-drug-expert-a-scumbag.html


October 21, 2011
Tsk, tsk! Defense expert in trouble...
Posted: 07:08 PM ET

Defense expert Dr. Paul White could be held in contempt for comments he made on Thursday, which were apparently overheard by members of the public and media. The judge addressed the matter outside of the presence of the jury.

He asked Dr. White if he said, "What a scumbag," in reference to prosecutor David Walgren. Dr.
White denied making the comment.
He recalled expressing his disapproval over the way Walgren had handled a propofol bottle. He said he made a comment to Walgren about how he thought he was tampering with evidence.

The judge also asked Dr. White if he said that "Dr .Shafer's testimony has changed the way I think of him." Or, "I will take the high road, not the low road. The truth will come out."
Dr. White tried to explain that he felt that some of the things that have been said about him were unfair. But the judge ignored his attempt to put the comments into context.
"You have no business making those comments either in this courtroom or where they can be overheard," said Judge Pastor.
The judge also reminded everyone that the attorneys, their staff and witnesses are not allowed to comment on the evidence.
A contempt hearing has been set for Nov 16th.

http://insession.blogs.cnn.com/2011/10/21/tsk-tsk-defense-expert-in-trouble/


Conrad Murray trial expert called a 'scumbag' by witness & former colleague during testimony: report
BY Nancy Dillon DAILY NEWS WEST COAST BUREAU CHIEF
Saturday, October 22nd 2011, 4:00 AM

LOS ANGELES - The trial of Michael Jackson's personal doctor took a bizarre turn Friday with an accusation that a key defense witness mumbled "scumbag" as his former colleague testified.
The judge set a Nov. 16 hearing to consider whether Dr. Paul White should be found in contempt of court for allegedly making the snide aside to a reporter for E! Entertainment Television on Thursday.
White told the judge he did not recall making the outburst.
But White was captured rolling his eyes Friday as his former colleague, Columbia University Professor Dr. Steven Shafer, continued his testimony as a key prosecution witness.

Shafer admitted under cross-examination Friday that he worked with White on books and even nominated him for an award in research excellence in 2009.
He then reiterated an earlier comment that he was "disappointed" when White prepared a defense report saying it was possible Jackson died after chugging the surgery-strength anesthetic propofol while the defendant, Dr. Conrad Murray, wasn't looking.

Defense lawyer Ed Chernoff tried to paint Shafer as an egotistical former student trying to upstage his one-time mentor, accusing Shafer of trying to "shove" the mistake down White's "professional throat" by swilling propofol himself to prove White wrong.
Shafer is an important prosecution witness because he's considered a foremost expert on propofol, the anesthetic that killed the King of Pop in conjunction with other sedatives.
He performed a powerful demonstration for jurors Thursday, setting up a replica of the propofol drip system that he believes killed Jackson on June 25, 2009.

Chernoff did his best to discredit the simulation Friday, pointing out that the IV system Shafer used was not like any that cops found in the house.
Shafer conceded the point and suggested that an IV line is easy to roll up and smuggle out of a location.
"That's a bold claim, isn't it?" Chernoff said of Shafer's overall theory that Murray gave Jackson more propofol than he admitted to police.
"It's an honest statement. It's what I think happened," the New York anesthesiologist said.

The grilling got even testier at times.
"You do understand the difference between opinion and fact, don't you?" Chernoff asked. "You understand that everything you've said in the last few days was your opinion. You understand that?"
Shafer called the question "interesting," adding that he gave his name on the stand, and that was a fact.
"To say that one should not lie at UCLA Medical Center is my opinion," he concluded, referencing the prosecution's claim that Murray lied when he didn't disclose his propofol use to doctors at the hospital as they tried to revive Jackson.

Murray, 58, has pleaded not guilty to involuntary manslaughter and faces up to four years in jail and the loss of his medical license if convicted.

ndillon@nydailynews.com
http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2...bag_by_witness__former_colleague_during_.html
 
Last edited:
Re: Murray Trial_ All media reports/articles - Merged - No discussion September 30th

Aphrodite Jones Reports: No Doubt Conrad Murray Acted with a Conscious Disregard for MJ's Life
October 21, 2011
[ Aphrodite Jones gives her perspective on the trial of Conray Murray. Check in for her regular reports.

The prosecution is finally about to rest it's case and I, for one, feel they put on a string of witnesses who have proven, beyond any doubt, that Conrad Murray acted with a conscious disregard for Michael Jackson's life. I realize many fans wanted Murray charged with 2nd Degree Murder, but hopefully people are now realizing how difficult it is to get a conviction in this instance -- that in truth, it's hard to get 12 people to agree on anything, no less homicide in a "delicate" circumstance such as this. Of course it is not a slam dunk that Murray will be found guilty -- those of us who have spent our lives in courtrooms know better than to predict how a jury will see things -- look at the Casey Anthony jury and how shocking their verdict was.
Still, I believe this LA jury is taking the matter at hand most seriously and they were paying keen attention to the demonstration of the IV drip with the propofol in the courtroom, which is a good sign. These jurors seem to be impacted by the real and present danger Dr. Murray placed Mr. Jackson in -- plying the superstar with more drugs than anyone had ever fathomed. Of course, the defense will now try to paint Conrad Murray as a "God fearing man" who served a poor community in Texas and was, allegedly, a very caring doctor.

But then, no one has said Conrad Murray is a bad man -- the charge is that he is a negligent and bad doctor. Was he a money grubbing physician who would do anything for the $150K a month salary from MJ? Clearly, the defense will argue that was not the case. What the defense will ask the jury to decide is whether MJ caused his own death ... What a charade we are all in store for, as a team of lawyers will attempt to blame MJ for being an addict who swallowed too many pills and/or injected himself with lethal doses of drugs. Let the mud slinging begin -- and MJ fans, brace yourselves -- be ready to stand up and fight!

http://blogs.discovery.com/criminal...-acted-with-a-conscious-disregard-for-mj.html
 
October 22, 2011
What's propofol taste like? Dr. Shafer knows!
Posted: 12:13 AM ET

Dr. Steven Shafer testified that he drank about 20 milliliters of propofol only one time, before conducting a study on oral ingestion of the anesthetic with six human subjects.

In a testy exchange, Chernoff pointed out that in his earlier testimony, Dr. Shafer said that ingestion of propofol was not effective orally and that even a first year medical student should have known that, but despite this knowledge Dr. Shafer still conducted the human study directing volunteers to drink propofol and he himself even drank it. Chernoff said Dr. Shafer did all of this just to spite the defense expert Dr. Paul White and to prove Dr. White was wrong.

http://insession.blogs.cnn.com/2011/10/22/whats-propofol-taste-like-dr-shafer-knows/


Conrad Murray Trial Recap: Defense Expert Conducted Beagle Propofol Tests
Posted on Oct 21, 2011 @ 08:30PM
By Jen Heger - Radar Legal Editor

Dr. Conrad Murray's lead defense attorney, Ed Chernoff revealed in court Friday afternoon, that their defense witness, Dr. Paul White had conducted oral ingestion of Propofol to Beagle dogs, RadarOnline.com is reporting.
As RadarOnline.com exclusively reported, Dr. Murrray's defense team commissioned a study on Beagle dogs to determine how much Propofol would have to be orally ingested to cause Michael Jackson's death.
One of Murray's lawyers revealed in open court last week that findings from the study revealed that taking Propofol orally would not cause death, and they wouldn't be pursuing the theory that Jackson overdosed by his own hand.

Chernoff asked the prosecution's final witness Dr. Steven Shafer, a renowned Propofol expert if he was aware that their expert had conducted a Propofol ingestion study on Beagle dogs.
Chernoff said to Dr. Shafer: "Dr. White in addressing the same issue, you know that he commissioned a study, paid for by the defense involving oral Propofol and Beagles?," to which Dr. Shafer said, "I did not know that."

PETA has demanded a federal investigation into the Propofol testing on the dogs. PETA (the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals organization), filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) on Monday alleging "cruel drug toxicity tests on beagles commissioned by the defense team of Dr. Conrad Murray, the physician now on trial for his alleged role in Michael Jackson's death.

“PETA asserts that if attorneys from Flanagan, Unger, Grover & McCool did commission the tests for the drug propofol - the toxic effects of which have been extensively studied in dogs and humans - those tests were likely conducted in violation of the federal Animal Welfare Act's prohibition against tests on animals that duplicate previous experiments. PETA has filed a complaint with the State Bar of California as well."

Under further questioning, Shafer admitted to jurors that is was a ‘possibility” that Jackson could of caused his own death.
When asked whether the singer could have overdosed by removing a clamp on an intravenous line of Propofol, Shafer replied: "That's a possibility."
But the medical expert said that hasn't changed his opinion that Murray was culpable in the singer's death.
Shafer explained there is no way to determine whether Murray or the singer were responsible for starting the flow of the drug that dripped into Michael's veins.
Murray's lawyers claim Jackson woke up when the physician left the room and gave himself the drug, but Shafer said this possible outcome was "in no way exculpatory" because Murray would've had to set up the procedure.

Chernoff began cross-examining Shafer by attacking the conclusions he has reached in court during his testimony.
Chernoff said to him: "You understand that everything you said in the last three days was your opinion."
And Shafer replied: "I stated my name, which I think was a matter of fact."

It was a blistering day for the defense, as Judge Michael Pastor ordered Dr. White to appear on November 16, 2011, to determine if he was in contempt of court for calling Deputy District Attorney David Walgren a "scumbag." to E! News. Dr. Shafer will resume testimony on Monday morning.

If convicted of involuntary manslaughter, Dr. Conrad Murray could face up to four years in state prison. You can watch the trial live, here
http://www.radaronline.com/exclusiv...fense-expert-beagle-propofol-tests-paul-white
 
Last edited:
Conrad Murray's words may seal his fate
Whether he lied or told police the truth, Michael Jackson's physician is guilty, prosecutors say.

By Harriet Ryan and Victoria Kim, Los Angeles Times
October 22, 2011
The prosecution's case against Michael Jackson's personal physician might be summarized this way: He lied about everything, but even if he told the truth, he's still guilty.

During a four-week case that rounded toward a conclusion Friday, prosecutors suggested that Dr. Conrad Murray's own words created a Catch-22 in which conviction was the only outcome possible. His statement to police, if taken by jurors at face value, contained enough admissions of gross negligence to amount to a manslaughter confession, prosecutors said.
And if jurors decided he lied to police, as numerous scientific experts and others said he must have, his true conduct was even more egregiously criminal, they argued.

The simultaneous use and debunking of Murray's own words sets up an enormous challenge for his defense, which will began its case next week.
His lawyers have not announced whether the doctor will take the stand in his own defense. But some legal experts said that would be a significant risk.
"There is just so much out there now, from his statement and these experts, and for him to get up there, I just think the prosecution would have a field day," said J. Christopher Smith, a Los Angeles criminal defense attorney who has followed the case closely.

Initially, Murray's attorneys planned to delve into Jackson's history of abusing propofol and other drugs and the financial pressures on him at the time he died. These two elements, the defense had said, explained why the singer might give himself the anesthetic propofol in a desperate attempt to sleep before critical rehearsals.
But Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor barred most testimony pertaining to those areas as irrelevant and prejudicial.
So the defense case instead will focus on witnesses who are expected to challenge the prosecution's contention that Murray's treatment of Jackson amounted to criminal conduct. They will also present character witnesses likely to offer testimonials about the doctor's charitable works and caring manner.

Legal experts said the prosecution's case has left the defense with a big damage-control job.
"They've got the defense in a trick bag," Smith said. "Whichever way they go, it seems like the prosecution is going to have a comeback."

The falsehoods and ineptitude, as recounted from the witness stand, began months before Jackson's death when Murray assured an insurance company the singer was in perfect health. It culminated in his interview with homicide detectives. An audio recording of that 2 1/2-hour interview was played for jurors and became an initial basis for three prosecution medical experts to call Murray clearly responsible for his patient's death.
"It's like leaving a baby that's sleeping on your kitchen countertop," one expert, cardiologist Alon Steinberg, said of Murray's account to police that he left Jackson alone after injecting him with propofol.
Steinberg and two other physician experts found medical incompetence in nearly every part of Murray's narrative. He failed at even the most basic aspects of care, they said. His attempt to perform CPR when Jackson still had a pulse goes against basic medical training, the experts said.
The witnesses also attacked Murray's account of how Jackson died. Dr. Steven Shafer, an anesthesiologist, said that almost nothing about the quantity of drugs Murray said he administered matched up with what was later found in Jackson's blood. Of the physician's claim that he gave Jackson just two small injections of the sedative lorazepam, Shafer said, "This did not happen."
He was also dismissive of Murray's account of injecting Jackson with a 25-milligram dose of propofol more than an hour before his death. Shafer said blood levels showed the dose was probably 40 times larger and given by an intravenous drip. The only way to explain the massive amount of propofol in Jackson's body, Shafer said, was that Murray left the drug running into Jackson's veins after his heart stopped.
He also called "crazy" the defense's main contention: that Jackson injected himself with a lethal combination of lorazepam and propofol. Even when Shafer appeared to throw the defense a bone — acknowledging Friday that it was possible Jackson had triggered the fatal flow of propofol by knocking a clamp off an intravenous line — he maintained Murray was at fault for abandoning his patient.

Defense attorneys have already abandoned one scenario they had previously argued: that the pop star drank the propofol that killed him, prompting a prosecutor to complain that their case was "ever-changing."

The Murray defense team plans to call two experts: a toxicologist and Dr. Paul White, an anesthesiologist who has researched propofol. Those experts could argue that Murray's care of Jackson was unorthodox but not criminal. The charge of involuntary manslaughter requires prosecutors to show that Murray caused Jackson's death by committing a crime "not amounting to a felony" or while acting "without due caution and circumspection."

Defense experts could tell jurors that off-label uses of drugs are common and in many cases help patients, said Joseph Low IV, a Long Beach criminal lawyer who previously worked on Murray's defense.
"Just because he used propofol differently than its original use doesn't make it … manslaughter," Low said.
He said that defense experts might tell jurors that the hard-and-fast rules prosecution witnesses have accused him of violating — providing propofol in a household setting, for example — are more nuanced.
"Standard of care is a matter of opinion based on who you put on the stand," Low said.

The character witnesses include an 82-year-old woman who knows Murray's work at a Houston charity clinic. The defense is expected to use their testimony to counter the portrayal of Murray as primarily concerned with collecting his $150,000-a-month salary.
"It humanizes him," said veteran criminal defense attorney Roger Rosen. "Jurors are still human beings at the end of the day, and I think that even though they are instructed not to be guided by sympathy, let's face it: That does enter into it."

harriet.ryan@latimes.com
victoria.kim@latimes.com
http://www.courant.com/entertainment/la-me-1022-conrad-murray-20111022,0,5776341.story
 
Re: Murray Trial_ All media reports/articles - Merged - No discussion September 30th

Edited ...now 5 above^
 
Last edited:
Re: Murray Trial_ All media reports/articles - Merged - No discussion September 30th

Lawyer for Jackson physician questions expert's credibility
LOS ANGELES -- An attorney defending Michael Jackson's personal physician in his manslaughter trial attacked the credibility of a key prosecution medical expert Friday, questioning the expert's opinions on lethal drug doses allegedly given to the singer.

Ed Chernoff, lead lawyer for defendant Conrad Murray, was cross-examining Columbia University anesthesiologist Steven Shafer, the state's 33rd and last witness. Shafer had testified Thursday that the only "workable" scenario for how Jackson died in June 2009 was that Murray had infused him with 1,000 micrograms of the anesthetic propofol over three hours -- an amount 40 times higher than the dose Murray told police he had administered.

Jackson died of "acute propofol intoxication," combined with the effects of the sedative lorazepam, a coroner's autopsy determined. Murray, who pleaded not guilty, contends through his attorneys that Jackson gave himself the fatal doses while the doctor was away from the singer's bedroom.

Shafer, an authority on propofol, rejected the defense's scenario and several alternatives. He showed the jury on Thursday graphs based on his mathematical models to demonstrate that only Murray's use of a steady propofol drip on a sleeping Jackson could produce the high level of propofol found in the entertainer's blood in the autopsy.
Chernoff sought to cast doubt on the validity of Shafer's graphs and on his demonstration to the jury of how he believed Murray had set up an IV pole feeding propofol and a saline solution into Jackson's veins.

The cross-examination was nearly overshadowed by the outbreak of a feud between Shafer and the defense's propofol expert, Dr. Paul White of Dallas, resulting from Shafer's ridicule of White during earlier testimony for the prosecution.

Chernoff raised potential doubts about one simulation by Shafer that showed that Jackson probably received 10 doses of lorazepam of 4 micrograms each, every 10 minutes beginning at midnight June 24, 2009. Evidence introduced earlier in the trial showed that Jackson didn't arrive home from a concert rehearsal until around 1 a.m. Shafer acknowledged that fact.

Chernoff next questioned a Shafer chart that assumed Murray had given Jackson only a single 25-microgram dose of propofol -- as the doctor told police detectives two days after Jackson died. Shafer's chart, which said 25 milligrams would be insufficient to kill Jackson, assumed that Murray had pushed in all the propofol at once.
But Murray told the police he had infused it slowly over 3 to 5 minutes -- exactly the way Shafer recommended to other doctors in propofol instructions he wrote for the drug's manufacturer.

Chernoff told Shafer he had made questionable "grand statements" in setting up for the jury an IV stand and hanging on one side of the stand a slit saline bag into which he placed a bottle of propofol. Investigators had testified that they found a slit saline bag with a bottle of propofol in it at the scene. Chernoff suggested Shafer was unreasonable in assuming that Murray actually had performed this unconventional form of IV setup.

Questioned by prosecutor David Walgren on Thursday, Shafer said he was "disappointed" that White, a longtime friend and colleague, had written a report for the defense calling it feasible that Jackson could have died from swallowing propofol. Shafer said the impossibility of swallowed propofol having any effect was "first principles" of medicine taught to "first-year medical students."

Shafer said he had commissioned a study of human volunteers in Chile that showed oral ingestion of propofol did not induce sleep. The defense did its own study with the same result, and last week dropped its claim that Jackson swallowed propofol.

...White, an expert permitted by Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor to be in court through Shafer's testimony despite an order excluding other potential witnesses, apparently took umbrage at Shafer's remarks. And Chernoff sallied into Shafer in White's defense.

The brouhaha became public just after the jury left the courtroom Friday for the mid-afternoon recess. A clearly angry Pastor, citing an online report on E! News, asked White if during a break in testimony Thursday he had said "what a scumbag" in a voice audible to reporters.

White told the judge he did not recall doing so. White did say he had been criticizing Walgren for allegedly "tampering with evidence" by removing part of the top of the propofol bottle found in Jackson's bedroom. (Walgren said he had done it for "demonstrative" reasons.)

White denied telling E! News reporter Baker Machado (cq) in the hallway that his favorable personal opinion of Shafer had changed. White said he had told the reporter, "Of course, when someone makes derogatory comments about you in court, it affects you."

The judge read White a quotation of him in the online story that the doctor did not deny. "I am going to take the high road not the low road with him," White was quoted as saying. "I was his teacher when he was a medical student. The truth will come out. It always does."

Pastor chastised White, saying, "You have no business making those comments, Dr. White." Saying he wanted to explore whether White had violated a judicial order against out-of-court comments on the case, he ordered the doctor to appear Nov. 16 at a hearing on whether he should be sanctioned or ruled in contempt of court.

"Was that on TV?" White was overheard asking defense lawyer J. Michael Flanagan outside the courtroom later. The trial is being televised and streamed on the Web. Flanagan said he didn't know if the cameras were on or off. (Since the jury had left the courtroom, the cameras were off.)

Pastor said White and Shafer could stay in court through each other's testimony for now, "but let's be real clear -- it's a short leash," he said.

Resuming cross-examination, Chernoff accused Shafer of making "dismissive" statements meant to humiliate White because he had topped him on the issue of swallowing propofol. "You preferred to shove it down his professional throat," Chernoff said.

On an objection by Walgren, Pastor ruled the question out of order.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2011-10-21/Michael-Jackson/50858380/1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: Murray Trial_ All media reports/articles - Merged - No discussion September 30th

[h=1]Jackson doctor's defense case expected to start[/h]
render.htm

ANTHONY McCARTNEY
Published: Today
render.htm

Dr. Conrad Murray sits in a courtroom during his involuntary manslaughter trial in Los Angeles, Friday, Oct. 21, 2011. Murray has pleaded not guilty and faces four years in prison and the loss of his medical license if convicted of involuntary manslaughter in Michael Jackson's death. (AP Photo/Reed Saxon, Pool)
LOS ANGELES (AP) - Defense attorneys for the doctor charged in Michael Jackson's death are expected to begin calling witnesses in their case Monday after they finish grilling a key prosecution expert.
The defense case will be Dr. Conrad Murray's opportunity to counter four weeks of damaging testimony about him from 33 prosecution witnesses who have cast him as an inept, distracted and opportunistic doctor who repeatedly broke legal, ethical and professional guidelines.
The defense case is expected to comprise of 15 witnesses, although Murray's attorneys have not publicly revealed whether they will call the Houston-based cardiologist to testify on his own behalf. Jurors have heard from the doctor through a more than two-hour interview with police, and it seems unlikely that Murray's attorneys would subject their client to what would be blistering questioning from prosecutors.
Monday will begin with lead defense attorney Ed Chernoff questioning Dr. Steven Shafer, the prosecution's final witness and an expert in the anesthetic propofol, which Murray had been giving Jackson as a sleep aid. Chernoff's questioning on Friday challenged Shafer's conclusions and comments he had made about colleague Dr. Paul White, who will testify for the defense team.
So far, Shafer has not retreated from his position that Murray is solely responsible for Jackson's death and that the cardiologist committed 17 egregious violations of medical practices that each could have either led to Jackson's serious injury or death.
After Shafer is done testifying, Murray's attorneys will likely ask a judge to dismiss the involuntary manslaughter case against the cardiologist. Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor will rule on the oral motion immediately and if he rejects it, the defense case will begin.
Defense attorneys have said they will call police detectives who prosecutors did not call, several character witnesses, White and possibly other experts. They expect their case will last through Thursday.
Murray has pleaded not guilty, and faces up to four years behind bars and the loss of his medical license if convicted.
The defense will have its work cut out for them to try to sway jurors to acquit Murray.
"He will have to change the landscape here and show some reasonable doubt, said Marcellus McRae, a former federal prosecutor and trial attorney who has been following the case closely. "The question is will this be enough."
McRae said calling Shafer as the prosecution's final witness was a master stroke.
"Brick by evidentiary brick, Shafer has built a wall of scientific reasons for the jury to conclude that Dr. Murray was criminally negligent," he said. "It allows the prosecution to tell the jury that their case is built on science rather than shifting theories."
Out of sight of the jury, the defense's theory has shifted in recent months from arguing that Jackson swallowed propofol and gave himself the fatal dose and more recently that the singer had swallowed several pills of the sedative lorazepam, which led to his death.
They may also argue that Jackson somehow gave himself a shot of propofol after Murray left the room, killing him quickly.
Prosecutors have sought to discredit all those theories through Shafer, who himself drank propofol before the trial in an attempt to confirm that it wouldn't induce sedation or other ill effects. He called the amount of lorazepam in Jackson's stomach "trivial" and last week said the only possible explanation for Jackson's death based on the evidence was that Murray put the singer on IV drip of propofol and left the room after the singer appeared to be asleep.
This week, it will be the defense's turn to either offer alternate theories or somehow pick apart the prosecution's case.
___
AP Special Correspondent Linda Deutsch contributed to this report.


Copied and pasted it for you Elusive.
 
Re: Murray Trial_ All media reports/articles - Merged - No discussion September 30th

Thanks
 
Janet Jackson reschedules shows to be with family
Trial of doctor charged in Michael Jackson's death continues this week
By NEKESA MUMBI MOODY
updated 10/24/2011 9:41:19 AM ET 2011-10-24T13:41:19

NEW YORK — Janet Jackson is rescheduling part of her Australian tour so she can support her family during the trial of the doctor accused of involuntary manslaughter in her brother Michael's death.

Dr. Conrad Murray is on trial in Los Angeles. He is accused of being negligent in his care of the superstar, who died in 2009 of an overdose of the anesthetic propofol at age 50.
The prosecution is wrapping up its case this week, and the defense is about to present its case. The Jacksons have been a regular presence at the trial; Janet Jackson was there at the beginning.

"When I planned these shows, the schedule in California was completely different," she said in a Sunday statement to The Associated Press. "After talking with my family last night, I decided we must be together right now. .... This saddens me in so many ways."
The shows for her "Number Ones" tour were scheduled in Melbourne on Wednesday, Thursday and Saturday; to make them up, she'll perform one night, on Nov. 3, in Rod Laver Arena. She thanked her fans for their support and understanding.

Jackson also has the support of her promoter.
"It is important that Janet is with her family at this critical point in the hearing. While Janet and our company apologize for any inconvenience for the reschedule of the Melbourne shows, we thank Janet for the great and successful concerts in Perth and Adelaide and eagerly await her return. ... Our thoughts and prayers are with Janet and the entire Jackson family," promoter Paul Dainty said.

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/45015949/ns/today-entertainment/



Jackson Family Unites As Trial Nears End
Defense Expected To Open Its Case Later Monday
By Alan DukeCNN
POSTED: Monday, October 24, 2011
UPDATED: 11:24 am CDT October 24, 2011

LOS ANGELES (CNN) -- The involuntary manslaughter trial of Michael Jackson's doctor entered what could be its last week Monday with the final prosecution witness on the stand for cross-examination by the defense.

Janet Jackson canceled shows in Australia to be with her family in Los Angeles for the final days of Dr. Conrad Murray's trial, but she did not arrive home in time to attend Monday morning's session.
She sat with her parents and several siblings during the first five days of the trial, but she has not been at court in nearly three weeks.
"After talking with my family last night, I decided we must be together right now," she said in a statement posted Sunday on her website, announcing that three shows this week in Melbourne are canceled.
The concert promoter told Jackson fans it was "important that Janet is with her family at this critical point in the hearing."
Defense lawyers will use the next four days to challenge the prosecution's contention that Murray's reckless use of the surgical anesthesia propofol to help Jackson sleep makes him criminally responsible for the pop icon's death.

The defense cross-examination of the prosecution's key witness, anesthesiologist expert Dr. Steven Shafer, grew so heated and personal Friday that the judge called lawyers for a sidebar and ordered them to "cut it out!"

The defense is expected to begin presenting its case later Monday.
Murray's lawyers have said they plan to call about 15 witnesses, including three medical experts, a police officer and several of Murray's patients from his clinics in Las Vegas, Nevada and Houston.
Randy Phillips, the head of AEG Live, is set to be among the first witnesses the defense calls.

Murray's lawyers have argued that Jackson was pressured by Phillips, whose company was promoting his comeback concerts in London, to show up healthy and on time for rehearsals or else the tour might be canceled.
Murray told detectives Jackson begged for his "milk," his nickname for propofol, after a sleepless night and just hours before he died from what the coroner said was an overdose of the surgical anesthetic.
Murray, in a police interview, said he was using sedatives to wean Jackson from propofol, which he had used almost every night for two months to fight his insomnia. But after a long, restless night and morning, the lorazepam and midazolam had no effect, Murray said.
"I've got to sleep, Dr. Conrad," Murray said Jackson pleaded to him. "I have these rehearsals to perform. I must be ready for the show in England. Tomorrow, I will have to cancel my performance, because you know I cannot function if I don't get to sleep."
Murray said he gave in to Jackson's pleas and gave him an injection of 25 milliliters of propofol around 10:40 a.m.

Shafer testified last week that there was no way Jackson got only that amount of propofol, based on the high level of the drug found in blood taken during his autopsy.
The "only scenario" to explain Jackson's death was that he overdosed on propofol infused through an IV drip set up by Murray, Shafer said.
The Los Angeles County coroner ruled that Jackson's death was a homicide, the result of "acute propofol intoxication" in combination with sedatives.
The defense contends Jackson self-administered the fatal dose, along with sedatives, without Murray knowing.
Shafer said the level of propofol in Jackson's blood taken during his autopsy could not have been from either Murray or Jackson injecting the drug, but only from an IV system that was still flowing when his heart stopped.

Prosecutors, however, opened the door for one scenario in which Jackson, not Murray, could have triggered the overdose.
"Can you rule out the possibility that Michael Jackson manipulated something to cause it to flow?" Deputy District Attorney David Walgren asked Friday.
"That's a possibility," Shafer said. But that is assuming Murray set up the drip and left Jackson's side, he said.
Would Shafer's opinion that Murray was responsible for Jackson's death change if he knew Jackson turned the drip on?
"No, if Michael Jackson had reached up, seen the roller clamp and opened it himself, this is a foreseeable consequence of setting up an essentially dangerous way of giving drugs," Shafer said. "It doesn't change things at all. It would still be considered abandonment."
Defense lawyer Ed Chernoff cross-examined Shafer about the assumptions he used to reconstruct an IV drip system he believed Murray set up next to Jackson's bed. Shafer demonstrated the system in his testimony Thursday.

Jackson died because Murray failed to notice that his patient had stopped breathing while he was hooked up to the IV drip of propofol, Shafer testified. The doctor should have realized Jackson had stopped breathing, he said.
"When you're there, you see it, you know it," Shafer said.
Phone records and testimony showed that Murray was on the phone with one of his clinics, a patient, and then a girlfriend about the time that Shafer calculated the oxygen in Jackson's lungs became depleted, causing his heart to stop beating.

"Had Conrad Murray been with Michael Jackson during this period of time, he would have seen the slowed breathing and the compromise in the flow of air into Michael Jackson's lungs, and he could have easily turned off the propofol infusion," Shafer said.

Toxicology studies of drugs in Jackson's blood and computer models Shafer used to analyze how the singer died were overshadowed Friday when Chernoff focused on the personal and professional rivalry between Shafer and Dr. Paul White, the defense anesthesiology expert.
The experts first met in 1978 when White was an assistant professor at Stanford University and Shafer was a medical student. They became friends and co-authored research papers, but this trial appears to have changed their friendship.
Chernoff accused Shafer of wanting to "shove it down his (White's) professional throat" in a question stricken from the record by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor.
White, who has been sitting in the courtroom listening to Shafer's testimony, was lectured by Pastor about comments about Shafer attributed to him in an online blog.
White admitted Friday that he told a reporter that he had changed his opinion of Shafer after hearing his testimony Thursday. "The truth will come out. It always does," E! News Online quoted White as saying.
White denied calling Shafer "a scumbag," as the website quoted him as saying.
Pastor, who imposed a gag order on all parties in the trial, set a contempt of court hearing for White next month.

http://www.click2houston.com/entertainment/29566931/detail.html
 
Last edited:
Re: Murray Trial_ All media reports/articles - Merged - No discussion September 30th

Dr. Conrad Murray Defense Team in Shambles
October 24th, 2011 8:14 AM by Free Britney

As if Dr. Conrad Murray's defense team didn't have its work cut out for it already, the legal ensemble is starting to fracture amid reports of persistent infighting.

Ed Chernoff, Dr. Murray's lead attorney, is from Houston and had been staying with another member of the team, J. Michael Flanagan, to save Murray money.
But he moved out from Flanagan's digs a week and a half ago. "Ed didn't like the way Michael was handling the prosecution witnesses," says a close source.
"Ed felt that Michael was too abrasive and caustic with his questioning, and that Michael allowed witnesses to clarify points that only helped the prosecution."
"Things were getting very tense, and he's moved into a hotel in Santa Monica," a source close to Dr. Conrad Murray said, after the final straw this month.

Courtroom onlookers were stunned as Chernoff decided he was going to be handling the questioning of the DA's expert medical witness, Dr. Steven Shafer.
"Flanagan had prepared for approximately four months to cross examine Dr. Shafer," the insider said. "Michael was thoroughly prepared and ready."
"When Ed told Michael that he would be handling Dr. Shafer, he felt like the rug was pulled out from under him. There is nothing Michael can do about it."
"Ed is the lead attorney in the case, but Michael was specifically brought on board to handle the medical aspects of the case, along with the witnesses."
"Ed and Michael are barely talking to each other... Michael, whose area of expertise is Propofol, has essentially been frozen out for the time being."

There is also the matter of a defense witness possibly being held in contempt of court for calling Deputy DA David Walgren a "scumbag" in a TV interview.
"Chernoff was LIVID that Dr. White, the defense's anesthesia expert, made those comments to the press, but his entire case essentially rests with him."
"Flanagan is still under the assumption that he will be handling questioning of Dr. White, but Ed could very likely commandeer the questioning of him also."
"Nareg Gourjian, the third lawyer on the team, is just keeping his head down, and staying out of the drama. Nareg will question several defense witnesses."

Read the full report at Radar Online
http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2011/10/dr-conrad-murray-defense-team-in-shambles/
 
October 24, 2011
Our 5 biggest moments from last week
Posted: 11:24 AM ET


Testimony in the Dr. Conrad Murray trial is set to resume today at 11:45am ET/8:45am PT (there could be a slight delay due to some motions the attorneys are expected to argue). Here's your chance to get caught up on what you missed last week.

Dr. Steven Shafer dominated the witness stand, providing hours and hours of compelling medical testimony for the prosecution. Here are our top five biggest moments:

#5 — Dr. Conrad Murray was WAY off on his drug calculations.

Dr. Murray told detectives that he only administered a total of 4mg of the sleep medication lorazepam to Jackson the day he died. But Dr. Shafer said that Dr. Murray must be mistaken because — based on the levels of the drug found in Jackson's blood during the autopsy — Jackson had significantly more lorazepam in his system when he died. Shafer says the only way Jackson's blood would have the level of lorazepam observed at autopsy is if he got 10 consecutive injections at double the rate Murray claims.

#4 — Propofol 101: Here's how you're supposed to do it.

Dr. Shafer walked the jury through a video demonstrating the proper way to administer the anesthetic propofol to a patient. The video also showed the procedures taken when a patient's heart stops beating. It was a stark contrast to the equipment and procedures used by Dr. Murray in Jackson's bedroom.


#3 — Murray entered a "pharmacological never-never land" with Jackson.

Dr. Shafer says that Michael Jackson had such complex drug problems that he was — medically — in uncharted waters. He called it a "pharmacological never-never land" and said that Jackson's unique combination of issues would have been a challenge for any doctor to treat. Dr. Shafer said not enough research exists on the effects of propofol withdrawal.

#2 — Battle of the experts gets ugly.

Dr. Shafer threw the first punch earlier in the week by saying he was "disappointed" in his longtime friend's report, which said Jackson could have died from drinking propofol. Defense attorney Ed Chernoff accused Dr. Shafer of being "dismissive" and said he tried to shove the results of his own study down Dr. White's "professional throat." But Dr. White certainly isn't innocent in all of this. He could now be held in contempt for some comments he made that were overheard by members of the public and media. Dr. White tried to explain himself but the judge didn't want to hear it and set a contempt hearing for Nov. 16th.

#1 — Dr. Shafer: There's only one way Michael Jackson could have died.

Dr. Shafer methodically eliminated several scenarios. He says there's no way a single dose of propofol (not 25mg, 50mg or 100mg) could have killed Jackson. He eliminated several self-injection scenarios, too. It all came down to the levels of propofol found in Jackson's body during the autopsy. The drug works so fast that any single dose would leave a small amount in his blood. Dr. Shafer said there's only one possible scenario: Jackson was hooked up to an IV drip of propofol. He then rigged up the system that he believes Dr. Murray used to infuse Jackson with the propofol.

Complete courtroom coverage of the Conrad Murray trial airs live on HLN from gavel to gavel. It’s also on In Session on truTV from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. ET every weekday.

Posted by: HLN's Amanda Sloane, In Session's Graham Winch
http://insession.blogs.cnn.com/2011/10/24/our-5-biggest-moments-from-last-week/
 
Re: Murray Trial_ All media reports/articles - Merged - No discussion September 30th

InSession In Session
A mix of fans and media make up the 20 people in line for this morning's random drawing of courtroom seats for day 16 of #MurrayTrial

abc7MurrayTrial ABC7 Murray Trial
Here's pic of the heated argument between supporters of Dr #Murray & people who believe he's guilty. http://yfrog.com/h8dgqtlj

nSession In Session
After Friday's combative testimony between Ed Chernoff and Dr. Shafer, the defense displayed its softer side today.

CNNLive CNN Live
by cnnbrk
The prosecution rests in the trial of Dr. #ConradMurray. Live: http://on.cnn.com/cnndcl2 #MichaelJackson

mccartneyAP Anthony McCartney
Judge Pastor determined there was enough evidence for a jury to reach a decision, and then he asked defense to start calling witnesses.

mccartneyAP Anthony McCartney
The prosecution has rested. The feed has been turned off while defense argues a motion to dismiss.
 
Last edited:
Prosecution Rests in Jackson Case
By IAN LOVETT
Published: October 24, 2011
LOS ANGELES — The prosecution rested its case on Monday in the involuntary manslaughter trial of Michael Jackson’s physician after almost a month of testimony that provided a gloomy look at the pop star’s final days.

Several witnesses said they had expressed concern about Jackson’s health and his ability to perform, while audio recordings played for the jury — including one in which he speaks — detailed the singer’s dependence on prescription drugs to fall asleep.

“I had no childhood,” Jackson is heard saying in a slow and slurred voice on the tape made by his doctor, Conrad Murray, about six weeks before his death. Speaking about the young people who might be treated at a proposed Michael Jackson Children’s Hospital, the singer added: “I feel their pain. I feel their hurt.”
In another audio recording, this from a police interview with Dr. Murray two days after Jackson’s death, the doctor described Jackson begging for his “milk,” or propofol, a powerful anesthetic, to help him sleep on the morning he died.
“He complained, ‘I’ve got to sleep, Dr. Conrad. I have these rehearsals to perform,’ ” Dr. Murray said on the recording.

Prosecutors called a barrage of witnesses, from concert promoters to medical experts, as they sought to show that the dose of propofol that Dr. Murray ultimately administered to Jackson on the morning of June 25, 2009, proved fatal.

Last week, Dr. Steven Shafer, an anesthesiologist, outlined 17 “egregious” deviations from the standard of care in Dr. Murray’s treatment of Jackson, including some that he deemed “unconscionable” and morally dubious.
Speaking almost angrily, Dr. Shafer said that by agreeing to Jackson’s request for propofol, Dr. Murray acted as an employee, not a doctor, putting his own interests above those of his patient. “That did result in Michael Jackson’s death,” Dr. Shafer said.
“We are in a pharmacological never-never land, something that’s only been done to Michael Jackson and no one else in history,” he said of the combination of drugs Dr. Murray gave Jackson.

The defense will now make its case for Dr. Murray’s innocence, though it is unclear exactly what Dr. Murray’s lawyers will tell the jury, after they suddenly dropped one of their primary arguments.
In their opening statement, Dr. Murray’s lawyers portrayed Jackson as a drug-addicted insomniac, and suggested that he had either swallowed or injected himself with the prescription drugs that killed him while Dr. Murray was in the bathroom.
Outside the jury’s presence, however, one of Dr. Murray’s lawyers, J. Michael Flanagan, admitted, to the apparent surprise of prosecutors and the judge, that Jackson’s death could not have been caused by ingesting propofol, and the defense would not make that argument to the jury. Mr. Flanagan said the results of an independent study he commissioned showed that the results of swallowing the medicine would have been minimal.

Like almost everything concerning Jackson here, the trial has set off a carnival. A huge encampment of global news media has sprouted outside the courthouse, watching as shouting crowds — and even an airplane trailing a banner — voiced their hope that Jackson’s death would be avenged. A few also held signs in support of the doctor.

Dr. Murray, a Houston cardiologist, had been hired at $150,000 a month to serve as Jackson’s personal physician as the singer rehearsed in Los Angeles for “This Is It,” a series of 50 sold-out concerts in London intended to alleviate some of his enormous debt. Dr. Murray had stayed with Jackson at least six nights a week, helping the singer sleep.
But prosecutors have alleged that Dr. Murray was more concerned with his salary than with his patient. They called several witnesses in an effort to show that Dr. Murray tried to hide evidence of the drugs he was giving Jackson, both before calling 911 and after Jackson was pronounced dead at the hospital.

The defense will most likely shift the focus back to Jackson himself and his dependence on prescription drugs. In addition to their argument that Jackson delivered the fatal does of propofol himself, Dr. Murray’s lawyers have also worked to show that Jackson was addicted to another drug, Demerol, a painkiller that he received from his dermatologist.
But Dr. Murray’s lawyers have their work cut out for them. The prosecution’s medical experts testified that even if Jackson had administered the propofol himself, Dr. Murray would still be responsible, because he should have been more closely monitoring his patient.
“In either scenario, Conrad Murray played a direct role in causing Michael Jackson’s death, those are your findings?” the deputy district attorney, David Walgren, asked Dr. Nader Kamangar, a sleep specialist.
“That is correct,” Dr. Kamangar said.
The defense plans to call more than a dozen witnesses, including its own medical experts, and the trial is expected to go to jury deliberations in a week or so.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/25/u...ackson-case.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss
 
Prosecution Rests Case Against Dr. Conrad Murray in Michael Jackson Death Trial
Published October 24, 2011
Associated Press

Prosecutors concluded their case Monday against the doctor charged with Michael Jackson's death after questioning 33 witnesses, including an expert who said the physician committed numerous violations of medical practices that could have led to the singer's serious injury or death.

Defense attorneys quickly called their first witness -- Dona Norris, a records custodian for the Beverly Hills Police Department who discussed the 911 call received on the day Jackson died.
She was one of 15 defense witnesses expected witnesses over the next few days.

The final prosecution witness against defendant Dr. Conrad Murray was Dr. Steven Shafer, an expert on the anesthetic propofol that authorities say killed Jackson.
Shafer told jurors that it's difficult to know the precise effects of the drug on the singer because he had been given so much of it in the months before he died.
Shafer made the statement while being cross-examined by lead defense attorney Ed Chernoff, who noted the risk that Jackson would stop breathing should have been low after the first few minutes the drug was administered on the day he died.
Chernoff based that conclusion on models and research done by Shafer.

"In Mr. Jackson's case, it's harder to have that certainty," Shafer replied. "There's very little, almost no precedent for this level of propofol exposure."
Shafer, a Columbia University researcher and professor, said Jackson had been receiving propofol almost every night for more than two months, according to a police statement by Murray. The Houston-based cardiologist has pleaded not guilty to involuntary manslaughter.
Shafer previously testified that he thinks a propofol overdose killed Jackson. But he said Murray kept no records about how much of the drug he gave the singer.
Shafer has said the only possible explanation for Jackson's death based on the evidence was that Murray put the singer on an IV drip of propofol then left the room after the singer appeared to be asleep.
Murray's attorneys will try to counter four weeks of damaging testimony from 33 prosecution witnesses who have cast Murray as an inept, distracted and opportunistic doctor who repeatedly broke legal, ethical and professional guidelines.
Murray's attorneys have not publicly revealed whether they will call him to testify.
Jurors have heard from the doctor through a more than two-hour interview with police, and it seems unlikely his attorneys would subject their client to what would be blistering questioning from prosecutors.

Shafer has not retreated from his position that Murray is solely responsible for Jackson's death and that the cardiologist committed 17 egregious violations of medical practices that each could have either led to Jackson's serious injury or death.

Out of sight of the jury, the defense's theory has shifted in recent months from arguing that Jackson swallowed propofol and gave himself the fatal dose and more recently that the singer had swallowed several pills of the sedative lorazepam, which led to his death.

They might also argue that Jackson somehow gave himself a shot of propofol after Murray left the room, killing him quickly.
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainmen...conrad-murray-in-michael-jackson-death-trial/


L.A. NOW
Southern California -- this just in
Conrad Murray defense: D.A. drug expert’s theory ‘out of thin air’
October 24, 2011 | 12:32 pm

Prosecutors wrapped up their case in the manslaughter trial of Michael Jackson’s personal physician Monday with the testimony of a prominent anesthesiologist who said Dr. Conrad Murray’s account of what happened in the singer’s house was not supported by scientific evidence.

In his fifth day on the stand, Dr. Steven Shafer was grilled by a defense attorney on his earlier testimony on how much of the anesthetic propofol Murray could have given Jackson, and by what method.
After ruling out various scenarios one by one, Shafer ultimately concluded that the only plausible explanation was that Murray gave Jackson an intravenous drip of propofol and left it flowing into the singer’s body even as his heart stopped.
He said he believed Murray had given Jackson 40 times more propofol than he admitted to police.

Attorney Ed Chernoff, in his cross examination, said the scenarios Shafer chose to consider were arbitrary.
“You chose this out of thin air, you chose this example?” Chernoff asked.
“Yes,” Shafer replied.
Under questioning later by a prosecutor, Shafer said he had no choice but to speculate about what happened in the hours leading up to Jackson’s death because Murray kept no records –- something he said in earlier testimony was an egregious violation of standard of care.

Shafer also reiterated his opinion that there was no chance the pop star could have given himself the lethal dose of propofol –- what Murray’s attorneys told jurors was the cause of Jackson’s death.
“You were not able to find a scenario that could explain the blood levels and also self injection?” Deputy Dist. Atty. David Walgren asked.
“Correct,” the expert said.
After Shafer finished on the stand, prosecutors rested their case, clearing the way for Murray’s defense to begin calling witnesses.

Over four weeks, the government called 33 witnesses, many of whom alleged deceptions and incompetence by Murray in the months leading up to and the days following Jackson’s death.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lan...e-da-drug-experts-theory-out-of-thin-air.html
 
Last edited:
Defense lawyers call first witnesses in case of doctor accused in death of Michael Jackson

By Associated Press, Updated: Monday, October 24, 9:54 PM
LOS ANGELES — Defense attorneys for the doctor accused of killing Michael Jackson began their case Monday after prosecutors presented a portrait of the physician as the inept, distracted engineer of the King of Pop’s death.

The first defense witnesses were Dona Norris, a records custodian for the Beverly Hills Police Department, who identified time stamps on records of the 911 call received on the day Jackson died.

They also questioned Alexander Supall, a Los Angeles Police Department surveillance expert who .retrieved grainy surveillance footage shot outside Jackson’s home on the day of his death.

Supall, told jurors he only collected a few minutes of footage taken around the time Jackson arrived home after a June 25, 2009, rehearsal for his comeback concerts.

The defense, in a conference at the judge’s bench, also made a routine motion for a directed verdict of acquittal for Dr. Conrad Murray, but it was not argued and the judge rejected it, saying he would allow the jury to decide the case.

Defense lawyers have said they will have 15 witnesses but have not publicly revealed whether they will call Murray to testify.
Jurors have heard from the doctor through a more than two-hour interview with police, and it seems unlikely his attorneys would subject their client to what would be blistering questioning from prosecutors.

Prosecutors rested their case earlier in the day after four weeks of testimony from 33 witnesses.
The defense then began its effort to counter damaging testimony that cast Murray as an opportunistic doctor who broke legal, ethical and professional guidelines to satisfy a patient who was paying him $150,000 a month.

Murray, a Houston-based cardiologist, has pleaded not guilty to involuntary manslaughter.

Dr. Steven Shafer, an expert on the anesthetic propofol who wove a net of scientific evidence around Murray, was the final prosecution witness. The defense has said it will present testimony from its own propofol expert to counter Shafer’s opinions.
Shafer previously testified that he thinks a propofol overdose killed Jackson. But he said Murray kept no records about how much of the drug he gave the singer.
Under defense cross-examination, Shafer remained steadfast in his position that that Murray was solely responsible for Jackson’s death. He portrayed the doctor as grossly negligent and “clueless” in what to do when his famous patient stopped breathing.
In his last minutes on the stand, Shafer, who had testified for nearly five days, was challenged by defense attorney Ed Chernoff on whether the mathematical models on which he based his conclusions actually applied to the doses of propofol given to Jackson by Murray.
Shafer said his mathematical simulations were difficult because Murray kept no records.
He based his reconstruction on Murray’s police interview in which he said he had been dosing Jackson with the drug nightly for six weeks.
“There is almost no precedent for this amount of propofol exposure,” Shafer said under questioning.
Shafer has said the only possible explanation for Jackson’s death based on the evidence was that Murray put the singer on an IV drip of propofol then left the room after the singer appeared to be asleep.

Shafer never retreated from his position that Murray is solely responsible for Jackson’s death and that the cardiologist committed 17 egregious violations of medical practices that each could have either led to Jackson’s serious injury or death.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...0/24/gIQA2ozhBM_story.html?wprss=rss_national
 
Conrad Murray's Defense Team’s Decision To Call LAPD Detective Could Backfire
Posted on Oct 24, 2011 @ 01:45PM
By Jen Heger - Radar Legal Editor

Dr. Conrad Murray's defense team will be calling an LAPD detective that will testify that on the day Michael Jackson died, the embattled cardiologist never revealed that he had given the King of Pop Propofol, RadarOnline.com is exclusively reporting.

The prosecution rested their case on Monday morning with their final witness Dr. Steven Shafer, and now it’s the defense’s time to build a case of innocence for their beleaguered client — and first up, LAPD Detective Porsche.
Detective Porsche will tell jurors that Dr. Murray did admit to giving Jackson a sedative, but not to administering the powerful anesthetic Propofol.

"Detective Porsche was dispatched by LAPD to the hospital to interview the pertinent witnesses after Jackson’s death. Detective Porsche met with Dr. Murray and he admitted to giving Jackson sedatives,” a law enforcement source tells RadarOnline.com. “The defense is calling him to the stand because Dr. Conrad Murray returned calls to Detective Porsche the day after Jackson died — which they claim shows that Dr. Murray had nothing to hide, and that he was willing and ready to talk to cops.”

However, the decision to call this witness could backfire very quickly for the defense because Deputy District Attorney David Walgren will most likely ask the detective on cross examination: "If Dr. Murray ever mentioned that he gave Propofol to Michael Jackson, and that answer will be no. Remember, Detective Porsche was at the hospital right after Jackson died. Dr. Murray never, never mentioned the word Propofol the day that Jackson died, and this will be emphasized by the prosecution," the insider says.

As RadarOnline.com previously reported, Dr. Murray's defense team is fighting with each other.
Ed Chernoff, Dr. Murray's lead attorney, is from Houston, Texas, and had been staying with another member of the defense team, Michael Flanagan, to save his client money. But after a recent bout of bickering, Chernoff moved out from Flanagan's posh digs in San Marino, and into a hotel.

Dr. Murray's defense could rest their case this week. If convicted of the involuntary manslaughter charge, Dr. Murray could face up to four years in state prison.

http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2011/10/conrad-murray-defense-lapd-witness-could-backfire
 
Thank you to Elusive^

Defense in Jackson case opens with doctor, police
Story user rating:

LINDA DEUTSCH
Published: Yesterday

LOS ANGELES (AP) - Defense attorneys for the doctor accused of killing Michael Jackson began their case Monday, targeting Jackson as the architect of his own demise by seeking to cure his insomnia with an intravenous drug, even when he was warned it was dangerous.

With the testimony of a doctor and a nurse practitioner, the lawyers showed that Jackson had been on his quest for at least 15 years, and in the months before he died he began asking for intravenous medication, specifically an anesthetic.

Jackson would eventually get the drug propofol from Dr. Conrad Murray, now on trial for involuntary manslaughter in the death of the superstar.

Taking over in the packed courtroom after prosecutors rested their four-week case, defense lawyers showed their hand at last, calling witnesses who indicated it was Jackson who demanded the drug that eventually killed him.

Dr. Allan Metzger, who was Jackson's friend and confidant over two decades, said he refused the singer's request for an intravenous anesthetic two months before his death and told the star it would be dangerous if administered in his home.
Prosecutors were quick to exploit the testimony to show that other medical professionals rejected any suggestion by the singer that he receive anesthetics as a sleep aid.
"You explained to him that it was dangerous, life-threatening and should not be done outside a hospital, correct?" prosecutor David Walgren asked on cross-examination.
"That's correct," Metzger replied.
Metzger added that there was no amount of money that would have prompted him to give Jackson the anesthetic propofol,

The next witness, holistic nurse practitioner Cherilyn Lee, said she treated Jackson with vitamin infusions and he felt so much better that he invited her to go with him to London for his concert tour. Then he reported he couldn't sleep and asked her to come to his home and watch him sleep, she testified.
She said she thought his problem was that he had been drinking highly caffeinated beverages for energy. Once he withdrew from them, she was confident his problem would abate. But it did not.
She said she urged him to undergo a sleep study but he said he didn't have time.
In mid-April 2009, shortly before he began treatment with Murray, Jackson asked Lee to watch him sleep, which she did. She said he slept for five hours but was upset when he awoke.
"He said, 'You see, I can't stay asleep,'" she said.
Lee, who has spoken publicly about Jackson's demand that she get him propofol, was expected to tell jurors about that exchange when she returns to the witness stand Tuesday.

Metzger also said he had known for at least 15 years that Jackson had trouble sleeping. When he made a house call to the singer's home in April 2009, Metzger said the singer asked him about intravenous sleep medications and anesthetics. He mentioned a specific drug that he wanted, Metzger said.
"I think he used the word juice," Metzger said. The physician prescribed two oral medications, although he said the singer told him that he did not believe any oral medication would work.
Metzger added that there was no amount of money that would have prompted him to give Jackson the anesthetic propofol, which he said the singer didn't mention by name during their visit.

Murray has pleaded not guilty. Authorities contend Murray gave Jackson a lethal dose of propofol as a sleep aid.

Metzger was one of several hostile witnesses that defense attorneys plan to call during their case, which began with brief testimony from a records custodian for the police emergency dispatcher, a police surveillance specialist and two detectives who investigated Murray.

Defense lawyers have said they will have 15 witnesses but have not publicly revealed whether they will call Murray to testify.

Jurors have heard from Murray through a more than two-hour interview with police, and it seems unlikely his attorneys would subject their client to what would be blistering questioning from prosecutors.

Prosecutors rested their case earlier in the day after testimony from 33 witnesses.

The defense then began its effort to counter damaging testimony that cast Murray as an opportunistic doctor who broke legal, ethical and professional guidelines to satisfy a patient who was paying him $150,000 a month.

AP Entertainment Writer Anthony McCartney contributed to this report.
http://m.apnews.mobi/ap/db_6718/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=vVcyj82o
 
abc7MurrayTrial ABC7 Murray Trial
#MichaelJackson's family member present today: I saw Janet, Randy and La Toya arriving to cheering fans. #conradmurraytrial


abc7MurrayTrial ABC7 Murray Trial
All the #MichaelJackson's family present today: Janet, Randy, Rebbie, Katherine and La Toya. #conradmurraytrial

PatrickNBCLA Patrick Healy
Drizzly Day 17 for #MurrayLA trial... Lawyers discussing evidence admissibility...Cherilyn Lee, RN returning to stand. http://ow.ly/i/jSar


abc7MurrayTrial ABC7 Murray Trial
Defense attorneys want the judge to allow jurors to see the contract between AEG and #MichaelJackson to show he was under extreme pressure.

abc7MurrayTrial ABC7 Murray Trial
#BREAKINGNEWS: Judge Michael Pastor has rejected the defense motion to introduce #MichaelJackson's contract with AEG as exhibit into trial.


abc7MurrayTrial ABC7 Murray Trial
The issue of #conradmurray testifying came up today when attorneys talked about witnesses. Judge said he noticed Murray's name not the list.

abc7MurrayTrial ABC7 Murray Trial
Judge Pastor says he wants to advise Dr #Murray of his right to testify and right not to testify. "It's the Michael Pastor law", judge joked

abc7MurrayTrial ABC7 Murray Trial
Cherilyn Lee indicated this is very difficult for her, almost broke down in tears. Judge said she could be taken to a room to rest.


PM
abc7MurrayTrial ABC7 Murray Trial
On another note, judge said a couple of witnesses were hassled and harassed by members of the public today and that was simply unacceptable

abc7MurrayTrial ABC7 Murray Trial
Judge said he threw those members of public out, they're persona non grata in his courtroom; if he can, will bring indirect contempt charges
 
Last edited:
Michael Jackson shopped for sleep in last months, witnesses say
By Alan Duke, CNN
October 25, 2011 -- Updated 0930 GMT (1730 HKT)

Los Angeles (CNN) -- A nurse who says Michael Jackson asked her to give him propofol to help him sleep returns to the witness stand Tuesday morning for the second day of Dr. Conrad Murray's defense presentation.
Cherilyn Lee, who first treated Jackson with IV drips loaded with vitamins, is expected to describe how two months before the pop icon's death, she warned him it wouldn't be safe to give him anesthesia in his home.

A Los Angeles doctor testified for the defense Monday that Jackson asked him for "intravenous sleep medicine" the same weekend he made the request from Lee.
Jackson's meetings with the doctor and nurse came after Murray had already placed his first order for propofol supplies that he soon started administering to Jackson on a nightly basis leading up to his death two months later.

Prosecutors rested their case in Murray's involuntary manslaughter trial Monday morning after 33 witnesses testified over 16 days.

Testimony could end this week after the defense calls about 10 more witnesses, including the head of the company that promoted Jackson's comeback concerts, several Murray heart patients and a defense anesthesiology expert.

A major part of Murray's defense strategy is to convince jurors that Jackson was responsible for his own death through his aggressive search for propofol, the surgical anesthetic the coroner ruled killed him.
The prosecution contends Murray's reckless use of propofol in Jackson's bedroom, without proper precautions, made him criminally responsible for his June 25, 2009 death.

Dr. Allan Metzger, who treated Jackson off and on for two decades for "his profound sleep disorder," testified as a defense witness Monday that Jackson called him to his home on April 18, 2009, to ask for help.
Jackson asked for "intravenous sleep medicine," but he did not specifically name a drug, Metzger testified Monday. "I think he used the word juice," he said.
Jackson wanted the anesthetic delivered by IV because "he did not believe any oral medicine would be helpful," Metzger said.
Metzger declined Jackson's request, instead giving him prescriptions for two oral sedatives to help him sleep.
Deputy District Attorney David Walgren used the defense witness to make the prosecution's point that using propofol outside a clinical setting is unacceptable.
"Is there any amount of money that would have convinced you to give him intravenous propofol in his house?" Walgren asked Metzger.
"Absolutely not," Metzger answered.

The defense then called Lee, a nurse who practices nutrition and natural remedies. Lee worked with Jackson to help his fatigue and insomnia from February through April of 2009, she said.
After two months of using IV infusions of vitamins, "sophisticated" vitamin smoothies and bedtime teas, Jackson began asking for more help, Lee testified.
"His complaint was 'I have a problem sleeping and all the natural remedies and everything you're doing is not working,'" she said. "When I need sleep, I need to go to sleep right away."
The court session ended before defense lawyer Ed Chernoff could ask Lee to describe what kind of help Jackson was asking for, but the nurse previously told CNN that he requested propofol.
"I told him this medication is not safe," Lee told CNN on June 30, 2009. "He said, 'I just want to get some sleep. You don't understand. I just want to be able to be knocked out and go to sleep.'"

Four police officers were also called as defense witnesses Monday morning, but their testimonies were brief.

A Beverly Hills police officer testified that a 911 call routed through her department at 12:20 p.m. on June 25, 2009, asked for help at Jackson's Holmby Hills estate.

A Los Angeles police officer testified next about retrieving seven minutes of video from a security camera at Jackson's home. The video, shown to the jury, captured Jackson's arrival home from his last rehearsal just before 1 a.m. on the morning he died.

Michael Jackson fans sitting in court appeared to become emotional as they viewed the last video ever recorded of the pop icon alive, grainy security camera video of Jackson arriving home from his last rehearsal.

Two LAPD investigators were called to the stand by the defense Monday and testified briefly.

Randy Phillips, the head of AEG Live, is expected to be called by the defense this week.

Murray's lawyers have argued that Jackson was pressured by Phillips, whose company was promoting his comeback concerts in London, to show up healthy and on time for rehearsals or else the tour might be canceled.
Murray, in a police interview, said he was using sedatives to wean Jackson from propofol, which he had used almost every night for two months to fight his insomnia. But after a long, restless night and morning, the lorazepam and midazolam had no effect, Murray said.
"I've got to sleep, Dr. Conrad," Murray said Jackson pleaded to him. "I have these rehearsals to perform. I must be ready for the show in England. Tomorrow, I will have to cancel my performance, because you know I cannot function if I don't get to sleep."
Murray said he gave in to Jackson's pleas and gave him an injection of 25 milligrams of propofol around 10:40 a.m.

The testimony of anesthesiologist expert Dr. Steven Shafer, concluded Monday morning, 11 days after he took the stand as the prosecution's 33rd, but perhaps most important, witness.
Shafer testified last week that there was no way Jackson got only the amount of propofol Murray said he did, based on the high level of the drug found in blood taken during his autopsy.
The "only scenario" to explain Jackson's death was that he overdosed on propofol infused through an IV drip set up by Murray, Shafer said.

The defense contends Jackson self-administered the fatal dose, along with sedatives, without Murray knowing.

http://edition.cnn.com/2011/10/25/justice/california-conrad-murray-trial/index.html?eref=rss_crime



25 October 2011 Last updated at 02:31
Murray defence begins arguments in Jackson death trial

Detective Orlando Martinez was one of the first defence witnesses called
Lawyers defending Conrad Murray, Michael Jackson's doctor, have called their first witnesses.
They will have to counter four weeks of testimony from prosecution witnesses, who alleged that Dr Murray acted unethically and with gross negligence

Among the first witnesses were a doctor and a nurse practitioner, who had both previously treated or counselled Jackson.
Dr Allan Metzger, a friend of Jackson's for over two decades, testified that Jackson had requested anaesthetics from him as a sleep aid.
During their cross-examination, prosecutors used the same testimony to show that other medical professionals rejected using intravenous or oral anaesthetics to help Jackson sleep.

Cherilyn Lee, a holistic nurse practitioner who treated Jackson with vitamin infusions, testified that she urged Jackson to undergo a sleep study for his insomnia, but he refused, saying he didn't have enough time.
Ms Lee, who has spoken publicly about Jackson requesting propofol from her, is expected to tell jurors about further exchanges with the late singer when she continues testifying on Tuesday.

The defence also questioned Detectives Dan Myers and Orlando Martinez about testimony from bodyguard Alberto Alvarez.
Mr Alvarez said that after Jackson's breathing stopped, Dr Murray told him to place equipment and vials into a bag before calling the 911 emergency service.
The defence has contended that Mr Alvarez may have changed his story after a coroner's official report was released.

Dr Murray is not expected to testify, but the defence has said they will call their own propofol expert to counter testimony of anaesthesiologist Steven Shafer, the prosecution witness who testified for five days.
Defence lawyers argued in opening statements that Jackson could have drunk an extra dose of propofol, but later told the court they would drop the argument based on their own studies.

Prosecutors have portrayed Dr Murray as grossly negligent for administering the drug outside of a hospital setting.

The defence has argued that he was trying to wean a troubled Jackson off the drug, and that the pop superstar, desperate for sleep during rehearsals for a planned comeback concert, administered the fatal dose himself.

Correspondents say that with multiple witnesses already called on Monday, the case could go to the jury as early as the end of this week.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-15440281

Michael Jackson: Defense of Dr. Conrad Murray stumbles at the start
Score one for the prosecution. A former physician for Michael Jackson, called as a defense witness, says he would "never" have administered propofol at a patient's home as sleep medicine.

By Warren Richey, Staff writer / October 24, 2011

Michael Jackson: Defense of Dr. Conrad Murray stumbles at the start
Score one for the prosecution. A former physician for Michael Jackson, called as a defense witness, says he would "never" have administered propofol at a patient's home as sleep medicine.
By Warren Richey, Staff writer / October 24, 2011

Lawyers defending Michael Jackson’s personal physician sought Monday to poke holes in the prosecution’s case in the month-long manslaughter trial of Dr. Conrad Murray.
But the effort seemed to falter badly when a former physician for Mr. Jackson – called as a defense witness – testified that he would never, for any price, administer an intravenous sedative like propofol at a patient’s home as sleep medicine.

“Did you ever give Michael Jackson propofol,” Deputy District Attorney David Walgren asked Dr. Allan Metzger.
“Never,” Dr. Metger answered.
Was there any amount of money that would convince Dr. Metzger to administer propofol to Jackson in his house, Mr. Walgren asked.
"No,” the doctor said emphatically.
Rather than helping the defense, Metzger’s testimony appeared to significantly bolster the involuntary manslaughter case against Murray.

Murray is charged with giving Jackson a lethal dose of propofol on June 25, 2009 in an effort to treat the pop star’s chronic insomnia. The medical examiner ruled that Jackson died of acute propofol intoxication.
A medical expert called by the prosecution told the jury last week that the available evidence suggests that Murray set up an unimpeded intravenous drip of propofol that continued to flow into Jackson’s body until he was so drugged that he stopped breathing and died.
Defense lawyers ridiculed the assertion as mere opinion. But it remains to be seen whether Edward Chernoff and others on the defense team will offer a more plausible explanation for how so much of the powerful anesthetic got into Jackson’s system.

They have suggested that Jackson may have self-administered the lethal dose, but medical experts have said that prospect is unlikely because the anesthetic is so fast-acting.

Dr. Metzger’s testimony came shortly after Walgren announced that the prosecution was resting its case. So far, prosecutors have called 33 witnesses and introduced over 220 pieces of evidence at the trial at the Los Angeles County Courthouse.

Defense lawyers are expected to call 15 witnesses.
After the defense presents its case, prosecutors may call rebuttal witnesses before the case is submitted to the jury. The may happen as early as next week.

In addition to Metzger, the defense on Monday called four members of the Los Angeles Police Department and a nurse/practitioner who gave nutritional supplements and natural sleep remedies to Jackson intravenously in February and March 2009. The testimony of Cherilyn Lee is potentially significant because it demonstrates that Jackson was participating in nightly intravenous drips before the arrival of Dr. Murray in April.

Murray has said he provided propofol to Jackson on a nightly basis from April until his death in June.

Ms. Lee testified that at one point Jackson asked her to sit at his bedside through the night so she could observe his difficulty in staying asleep. She said she watched Jackson sleep for about five hours before he woke up around 3 a.m.
She said she had administered a special nutritional IV with a low dose of vitamin C, in addition to a cup of “Sleepy Time Tea.”
“I stayed and watched him every second,” she told the jury.
Lee said Jackson had asked her to come to London and continue her nutritional therapy while on tour. But later Jackson complained that natural remedies would not ease his insomnia.

If convicted, Murray faces up to four years in prison and loss of his medical license.

The trial is set to continue on Tuesday.
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justic...se-of-Dr.-Conrad-Murray-stumbles-at-the-start
 
Last edited:
L.A. NOW
Southern California -- this just in

Conrad Murray trial: Hairdresser among witnesses to testify
October 25, 2011 | 6:41 am

In their ongoing effort to suggest Michael Jackson was a desperate man who accidentally took his own life, defense lawyers for his former physician were set Tuesday to call two members of the singer's inner circle to the stand.

Lawyers for Dr. Conrad Murray were expected to question the witnesses, Jackson's longtime hairdresser and the entertainment executive overseeing his comeback, about his final days, a period in which they have portrayed him as racked with anxiety and addled by drugs.
The hairdresser, Karen Faye, and the executive, Randy Phillips, were to take the stand on the second of what is anticipated to be a four-day defense case. Murray, 58, stands accused of involuntary manslaughter in Jackson's June 25, 2009, death.

His lawyers contend Jackson gave himself a lethal amount of the surgical anesthetic propofol in an effort to deal with chronic insomnia that was jeopardizing rehearsals crucial to the success of his "This Is It" comeback concerts.

Faye told police that in the last week of Jackson's life, he was weak, paranoid and under the influence of what seemed to be drugs, according to a defense filing. She told others she feared he would die.

Among those she confided in was Randy Phillips, the chief executive of AEG Live, the concert promoter bankrolling Jackson's planned London concerts. In court papers filed Monday, defense lawyers indicated they planned to question Phillips about the terms of the contract between AEG and Jackson.

If the singer continued to miss rehearsals, he would be in danger of violating the contract and "the consequences of said failure would have been dire," defense lawyer Nareg Gourjian wrote.
The terms required Jackson to put on a "first-class performance" at each of 50 shows and "to maintain a positive public perception," Gourjian wrote. AEG was footing the bill for the lifestyle Jackson and his children enjoyed as well as concert preparations, money that the singer would have to pay back if the shows did not happen.

Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor has barred the defense from delving into Jackson's troubled finances, but in the filing, Gourjian called the contract "vital to the defense."
"It is…imperative for the jury to review the Agreement to understand the stringent requirements that were placed on Mr. Jackson and to illustrate that, under the circumstances, the actions taken by Mr. Jackson on June 25, 2009 were not unreasonable," the lawyer wrote.

Before Faye and Phillips testify, jurors are to hear from a nurse practitioner who said Jackson asked her to get propofol for his sleep problems. In testimony late Monday, Cherilyn Lee said she encouraged the pop star to use natural remedies, such as tea and vitamins, for insomnia. When that failed, she suggested he enroll in a sleep study or have his amino acid levels checked.
"He said he didn't have time for all that," Lee recalled.

Murray faces a maximum sentence of four years in prison if convicted. The prosecution, which rested its case Monday, maintains he egregiously violated a host of medical standards, including using propofol in a home setting.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lan...l-hairdresser-among-witnesses-to-testify.html



Defense has no plans to put Conrad Murray on stand
Judge says he will remind defendant of his right to testify, however

TODAY news services updated 2 hours 35 minutes ago 2011-10-25T15:56:50
LOS ANGELES — Attorneys for Michael Jackson's former physician told a judge on Tuesday they have no plans for him to testify in his involuntary manslaughter trial in the singer's death.

Dr. Conrad Murray's lead attorney, Ed Chernoff, did not mention Murray's name when he listed witnesses who would take the stand, prompting Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor to say he would inform Murray of his right to testify, even if that might conflict with the defense strategy.
Chernoff asked if the judge was legally obligated to give that advisement to Murray and Pastor's reply was short.
"It's a requirement under Michael E. Pastor law," Pastor told the attorney.
The revelation came on the second day of the defense in the 4-week-old trial in which Murray is accused of involuntary manslaughter by giving the powerful anesthetic propofol to the Jackson as a sleep aid at the pop star's home.

The panel of jurors will also hear Tuesday from Cherilyn Lee, a nurse practitioner who has said Jackson repeatedly asked her for propofol to help him sleep, but she refused. Lee began her testimony Monday, the sixth witness that Dr. Conrad Murray's attorneys called to try to shift the blame for Jackson's death to the singer himself.

Murray's team plans Tuesday to call other witnesses who they think may support that theory, including Randy Phillips, the president and CEO of concert promoter AEG Live, and Jackson's makeup artist and hairstylist, Karen Faye. They will also call several expert witnesses who will try to rebut the testimony of prosecution experts who said Murray was reckless and at fault in Jackson's unexpected death on June 25, 2009.

Murray has pleaded not guilty to involuntary manslaughter.

The defense's case now appears to hinge on their claim that Jackson gave himself a fatal dose of propofol. In a court filing Monday, Murray's attorneys argued that they should be allowed to show jurors the agreement between Jackson and AEG Live to show that Jackson had much to lose if he couldn't perform 50 comeback concerts planned for London's O2 arena.

AEG would have been allowed to recoup its investment in the shows and advances paid to Jackson if he couldn't perform, the filing states.

Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor will consider whether to allow the agreement and testimony about it by Phillips, although he has previously excluded any evidence of Jackson's financial hardships.

"This evidence directly supports the defense theory of the case — that Mr. Jackson self-administered propofol due to the enormous pressure and stress placed on him pursuant to the agreement," the defense filing states. "Mr. Jackson's mental state on June 25, 2009 is highly relevant to the defense in this case."

Murray's attorneys expect Faye will testify that Jackson was distraught about completing the comeback shows.

One of the initial defense witnesses, Dr. Allan Metzger, supported prosecutors' contentions that Murray acted recklessly by giving Jackson propofol as a sleep aid and that the singer was looking forward to the show.
"He was excited," Metzger said of Jackson's demeanor during conversations and a house call in the months before the singer's death. "He was talking to me about some creative things that he was thinking about. He spoke to me about his excitement and his fear about the tour."
Metzger said Jackson felt the shows were a big obligation and he wanted to deliver stellar performances.
The doctor, who knew and treated Jackson for more than 15 years, testified the pop superstar asked him about IV medications during his house call.
On cross-examination, Metzger said he told Jackson that using any IV drugs or anesthetics to sleep was unsafe.
"You explained to him that it that was dangerous, life-threatening and should not be done outside of a hospital, correct," prosecutor David Walgren asked the doctor.
"That's correct," he replied.
"Was there any amount of money that would have convinced you to give him intravenous propfol in his house?" Walgren asked.
"Absolutely not," Metger said.

Lee was similarly against Jackson taking propofol to help him sleep. She told The Associated Press in 2009 that the singer repeatedly asked for the drug while she was treating him for nutrition and sleep issues.
"I said, 'Michael, the only problem with you taking this medication' — and I had a chill in my body and tears in my eyes three months ago — 'the only problem is you're going to take it and you're not going to wake up,'" she recalled telling Jackson.
Lee kept detailed notes of her treatments on Jackson, which she flipped through repeatedly while testifying Monday.

According to prosecutors, Murray kept no notes on his treatments on Jackson after signing on as his personal physician for the London shows.

Defense attorneys expect to conclude their case Thursday, but even if they do, jurors won't begin deliberations until next week. A judge told attorneys that he would give them the weekend to craft their closing arguments and finalize jury instructions.

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/45032681/ns/today-entertainment/



October 24, 2011
Your guide to the defense's case
Posted: 04:42 PM ET

The defense case will be much quicker than the state's case. It took prosecutors 16 days, they called 33 witnesses and they displayed or marked more than 200 exhibits. In contrast, the defense is expected to take just a few days and finish presenting its case Thursday.

Lead defense attorney Ed Chernoff advised the court last week that they expect to call a third expert in addition to anesthesiologist Dr. Paul White and toxicologist Michael Hanson. While Chernoff did not say who his third expert would be, Dr. Stephen Pustilnik is on the witness list. He's a medical examiner from Texas and could contradict some of the testimony given by the Los Angeles county medical examiner who conducted Micheal Jackson's autopsy.

Here is a list of possible witnesses for the defense's case:

-Dona Norris, Evidence Manager for Beverly Hills Police Department
(Norris finished testifying Monday)

- Alex Supall, a police surveillance specialist with the LAPD

-Randy Phillips, President of AEG

-Dr. Paul White, Anesthesiologist

-Michael Hanson, Toxicologist – Analyzed Jackson's stomach contents

-LAPD detectives Orlando Martinez and Dan Myers

-Amir Dan Rubin, former Chief Operating Office of UCLA Medical Center

-Dr. Stephen Pustilnik

-4 character witnesses

The defense began its case Monday and they have already called two witnesses to the stand.

The first defense witness was Dona Norris, the evidence manager for the Beverly Hills Police Department. Norris confirmed that her department received a 911 call at 12:20PM on June 25, 2009, the day Jackson died.

The second witness the defense called was Alex Supall, a police surveillance specialist with the LAPD. Supall was charged with the duty of obtaining footage shot by Jackson's surveillance equipment on June 25, 2009.

Defense attorney Nareg Gourjian play a portion of a security tape that showed what could be Jacksons's entourage arriving at the gates of the driveway at around 12:46AM on June 25, 2009.
Posted by: In Session's Grace Wong, In Session's Graham Winch

http://insession.blogs.cnn.com/2011...gn=Feed:+rss/cnn_insession+(Blog:+In+Session)
 
Last edited:
L.A. NOW
Southern California -- this just in

Conrad Murray: Judge issues another blow to defense
October 25, 2011 | 10:29 am

A judge barred testimony about Michael Jackson’s contractual obligations to a concert promoter Tuesday, dealing yet another setback to his personal physician’s defense.

Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor said details about the contract would distract jurors from their task of deciding whether the physician is guilty of involuntary manslaughter in Jackson’s death.
“It involves the fact finder getting taken on a side tour of accounting principles and law school,” Pastor said in denying a defense request to introduce the 42-page document as evidence during the testimony of promoter’s chief executive.

Lawyers for Dr. Conrad Murray had hoped to use the contract between the pop star and AEG Live to suggest Jackson was under enormous financial pressure to pull off a series of London concerts.
Under the terms of the contract, AEG was advancing Jackson money to support himself and his children and to mount the 50 shows. If Jackson was unable to perform, he would have to repay more than $30 million, defense attorney Ed Chernoff said in court.
Jackson was already more than $400 million in debt, the lawyer said.

The defense contends the pressure led Jackson to inject himself with a lethal dose of the anesthetic propofol in a desperate attempt to sleep before important concert rehearsals.
The judge previously prohibited the defense from introducing evidence of Jackson’s money woes and prosecutors urged the judge to take the same tact with the contract.
“At every turn,” Deputy Dist. Atty. David Walgren said, “Conrad Murray through his attorneys have put the blame for his failures on Michael Jackson and this is just another attempt to do the same."
The judge agreed, saying that unless the defense could find witnesses who had heard Jackson say his anxiety was based in financial concerns, the contract was irrelevant.
“This is not a contractual dispute. This is a homicide case,” Pastor said.

AEG executive Randy Phillips is expected to take the stand Tuesday.

The judge said the defense could question him about the broad outlines of his relationship with the singer and his observations of his health and behavior in the months before his death.

Murray, 58, faces a maximum of four years in prison if convicted.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lan...ars-jackson-concert-contract-as-evidence.html
 
Tearful nurse testifies she warned Michael Jackson that anesthetic was unsafe for use at home
Associated Press, Updated: Tuesday, October 25, 9:53 PM

LOS ANGELES — A sometimes tearful nurse testified Tuesday that her efforts to save Michael Jackson from the drug he craved for sleep were rebuffed by the star who insisted he needed the powerful anesthetic that eventually killed him.

Cherilyn Lee, a nurse practitioner who tried to shift Jackson to holistic sleep aids in the months before he died, said the singer told her Dipravan, a brand name for propofol, was the only thing that would knock him out and induce the sleep he needed. He told Lee he had experienced the drug once during surgery

Cheryln Lee, a nurse who treated Michael Jackson for sleep disorder in early 2009, testifies during the Dr. Conrad Murray involuntary manslaughter trial at the Los Angeles Superior Court in Los Angeles, Calif. Monday, Oct. 24, 2011. Murray has pleaded not guilty and faces four years in prison and the loss of his medical licenses if convicted of involuntary manslaughter in Michael Jackson’s death.

Lee almost didn’t testify. She sat down in the witness box then said she felt dizzy before starting to cry.
“This is just very sensitive for me,” she explained.
Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor had her taken to another room to rest, and she returned 20 minute later saying she felt better. She became tearful again while testifying that she had warned Jackson not to take the drug.

Lee told of coming into Jackson’s life at the beginning of 2009 and leaving just before Dr. Conrad Murray arrived. Murray has pleaded not guilty to involuntary manslaughter and is accused of giving Jackson a fatal dose of the drug Lee would not give him.
Lee recalled a meeting with the superstar at his rented mansion two months before his death.
“He was sitting very close to me,” she said. “He looked at me and said, ‘I have a lot of difficulty sleeping. I’ve tried a lot of things and I need something that will make me fall asleep right away. I need Dipravan.”
Lee had never heard of the drug but did research and later told Jackson it was too dangerous to use in a home.
At one point she asked: “What if you didn’t wake up?”
Jackson, however, was unswayed and adamant the drug would be safe if he had a doctor who could monitor him while he slept.
Prosecutors claim Murray abandoned Jackson after administering the fatal dose of propofol and failed to have proper life-saving and monitoring equipment on hand.

Lee was called to the stand by Murray’s defense, but the impact of her testimony was mixed.
While she supported a defense theory that Jackson was doctor shopping in a desperate search for someone to give him propofol, a prosecutor seized on her warning to show Murray should have known the dangers too and refused the request by Jackson.
Under cross-examination by prosecutor David Walgren, Lee acknowledged a conversation with Jackson in which she told him: “No one who cared or had your best interest at heart would give you this.”
She said her final refusal to provide the drug came on April 19, 2009, and she never saw Jackson again.

Another medical witness, Dr. Allan Metzger, testified Monday that Jackson also implored him to provide the anesthetic. Metzger also refused and instead gave the singer sleeping pills that had proven effective in the past.
Metzger saw Jackson just one day before Lee refused the request for drugs by the singer.

Attorneys for Murray, a Houston-based cardiologist, are trying to show that Jackson was a strong-willed celebrity who became the architect of his own demise when he insisted on getting the intravenous drug. They also alleged he gave himself the fatal dose after Murray left his bedroom.
Lee said she had treated Jackson for nutrition and energy issues as he prepared for his planned series of “This Is It” comeback concerts.

Lee was followed to the witness stand by Randy Phillips, president and CEO of concert promoter AEG Live who handled arrangements for Jackson’s ill-fated concerts.

Judge Pastor blocked Murray’s attorneys from asking Phillips about Jackson’s contract with AEG for the shows.
Defense attorneys had wanted to introduce Jackson’s contract to show that he would have owed $40 million to the promoter if the concerts were canceled. The lawyers said Jackson would be desperate to make sure the shows continued and needed sleep to get through his rehearsals.
Pastor said there was no evidence Jackson was concerned about the money and allowing testimony about the contract might confuse jurors.
“This is not a contractual dispute. This is a homicide case,” Pastor said.

AP Entertainment Writer Anthony McCartney contributed to this report.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...0/25/gIQAX1cqEM_story.html?wprss=rss_national



October 24, 2011
IVs aren't just for propofol
Posted: 10:32 PM ET


Nurse practioner Cherilyn Lee testified that she hooked Michael Jackson up to multiple IVs to infuse the King of Pop with a nutritional cocktail.
“It’s the Myer’s Cocktail, which is Vitamin C, B Vitamin, magnesium, calcium,” said Lee.
Lee testified she was treating Jackson for symptoms of fatigue. She believed part of the problem was Jackson’s love of Red Bull. Lee suggested the caffeine-laden drink was causing Jackson to feel tired, because too much caffeine can actually can cause some people to feel tired.

Jackson also complained to Lee that he had trouble sleeping, and even had Lee observe his struggle with insomnia a couple of times. On April 19, 2009 about a month before Jackson died, Lee sat by the pop star’s bedside as he tried to sleep.

Lee said, “He had an I.V. going, yes, of Myer’s Cocktail and Vitamin C. And he’d had some Sleepy Time tea . . . this time, he actually slept five hours.”Lee also testified that at some point that night Jackson woke up and requested sleep medication.

Lee will return to the stand at 12:00 noon ET/9:00 a.m. PT on Tuesday. At that time, she will continue her direct examination by defense attorney Ed Chernoff.

http://insession.blogs.cnn.com/2011/10/24/ivs-arent-just-for-propofol/
 
Last edited:
Michael Jackson believed propofol was safe, nurse says
By Alan Duke, CNN
October 25, 2011 -- Updated 1855 GMT (0255 HKT)

Los Angeles (CNN) -- MIchael Jackson told a nurse that doctors assured him using propofol at home was safe as long as he was monitored, a nurse who tried to treat Jackson's insomnia with natural remedies testified Tuesday in the involuntary manslaughter trial of Dr. Conrad Murray.

Jackson died two months after his conversation with nurse Cherilyn Lee, from what the coroner ruled was an overdose of the surgical anesthetic propofol, combined with sedatives.

Prosecutors contend Dr. Murray's use of propofol to treat Jackson's insomnia in his home was reckless, in part because he did not have proper equipment to monitor his patient and he abandoned him to make phone calls.

The head of AEG Live, the company promoting Jackson's ill-fated comeback concerts, began testifying Tuesday afternoon, although the judge ruled the defense could not ask him about the financial arrangements of the concert contract.

Defense lawyer Ed Chernoff argued Jackson's contract was key to explaining Jackson's "desperate desire to get to sleep," which is part of Murray's defense that "Jackson took action into his own hands" and self-administered the fatal overdose.

Lee's testimony was briefly interrupted Tuesday as she was overcome with emotion. "I'm feeling really, really dizzy," Lee said. "This is just very sensitive to me."

Lee and a Los Angeles doctor, both called as defense witnesses, testified that Jackson asked them for drugs to help him sleep in April 2009. This was after Dr. Murray had already agreed to work as his personal physician and placed his first orders for propofol.

Lee, who used IV drips loaded with vitamins, "sophisticated" vitamin smoothies and bedtime teas, to treat Jackson's insomnia, said Jackson became frustrated with her natural remedies.
"He said 'I'm telling you the only thing that's going to help me sleep right away is the Diprivan and can you find someone to help me to sleep?'" Lee said. Diprivan is a brand name for propofol.
After some quick research, the nurse warned Jackson that it was dangerous to use propofol at home, Lee testified.
Jackson was not deterred, she said, even after she asked him "but what if you don't wake up?"
Deputy District Attorney David Walgren asked her, "And he responded, 'I will be OK, I only need someone to monitor me with the equipment while I sleep'?"
"Yes, that's exactly what I said," Lee said.

Dr. Allan Metzger, who treated Jackson off and on for two decades for "his profound sleep disorder," testified Monday that Jackson called him to his home on April 18, 2009, to ask for "intravenous sleep medicine" to help him sleep.
Jackson wanted the anesthetic delivered by IV because "he did not believe any oral medicine would be helpful," Dr. Metzger said.
Metzger declined Jackson's request, instead giving him prescriptions for two oral sedatives to help him sleep.

Randy Phillips, who as the head of AEG Live, negotiated Jackson's "This Is It" concert deal, was called to testify by the defense Tuesday.
Jackson feared that if he missed any more rehearsals that AEG Live would "pull the plug" on the shows, leaving Jackson "a very, very poor man and desperate," Chernoff said.
"Michael Jackson was in a position where, if these shows did not take place, he would be responsible for all of these production costs," which Chernoff estimated would be close to $40 million.
This was Jackson's state of mind that caused him to self-administer the propofol that killed him, Chernoff said.

Prosecutor Walgren said Murray's lawyers wanted to argue that "somehow his finances caused Michael Jackson to commit accidental suicide."
Judge Pastor agreed with Walgren's argument that the contract should be excluded from the trial because it was "full of legalese and complex terms" that would confuse the jury.
Jurors would be "taken on a side tour of accounting principles and law school" if he allowed the contact -- which he called "not an easy read" -- to be used as evidence, Pastor said. "This is a homicide case," Pastor added.
The defense wanted to use the contract during the Phillips' testimony, which will continue Tuesday afternoon.

http://edition.cnn.com/2011/10/25/j...d-murray-trial/index.html?eref=rss_topstories
 
October 25, 2011
MJ wanted to break records with his last tour
Posted: 05:45 PM ET

Randy Phillips from AEG gave us a behind-the-scenes look at Michael Jackson's "This Is It" tour today when he testified for the defense. He said the contract they worked out with Jackson provided for 31 shows. That number may sound a little arbitrary but Michael Jackson picked it for a reason. He said he wanted to do 10 more shows than Prince had done during his last tour.
When pre-sales opened up, Phillips said the demand for tickets was like nothing he had ever seen. They realized right away that they needed to add more shows. So Phillips contacted Jackson who agreed to do a maximum of 50 shows, under two conditions:

1. That he would get an estate outside of London so he and his family wouldn't be cramped in a hotel (no matter how beautiful it was). Jackson had pretty specific demands, too: 16+ acres, running streams and horses.

2. He wanted Phillips to arrange to have a representative from the Guinness Book of World Records on hand for the 50th show. He told Phillips it was a feat he knew no other entertainer could ever beat: to fill that big of a venue (the O2 Arena in London) that many times.

Phillips says that in June of 2009, director Kenny Ortega expressed some concerns over Jackson's performance at rehearsals. He said Jackson wasn't as engaged or focused as he needed to be for a production of this magnitude.

Phillips asked Dr. Conrad Murray to set up a meeting so they could discuss their concerns with Jackson. Jackson told them he had been practicing at home and that he was ready.
"You build the house and I'll put the door on it and paint it," Phillips said Jackson told them. That meeting was held on June 20, 2009. Jackson died five days later.

http://insession.blogs.cnn.com/2011/10/25/mj-wanted-to-break-records-with-his-last-tour/

AEG Live President Testifies in Conrad Murray?'s Trial
Posted by Jeremy Thomas on 10.25.2011
AEG Live President Randy Phillips testified at Conrad Murray's manslaughter trial today. Check out the highlights:

Credit: TMZ

* Phillips said the demand for tickets was nothing he's ever seen before in his life. So Phillips called Jackson to see if they could add more shows.
* Jackson agreed under 2 conditions... #1 -- he wanted a 16-acre country estate outside of London with streaming rivers and horses for the kids... and #2 -- that Phillips made sure MJ made it into "The Guinness Book of World Records" as the artist with the highest number of shows at the famous O2 Arena (Prince currently holds the record with 21 shows).
* Randy's testimony could prove Michael Jackson? was under extreme pressure to perform at the time of his death -- which eventually pushed the singer over the edge.
* When Phillip sheard Jackson wanted his own personal doctor to accompany him on the tour, he tried to convince Jackson to get someone in London, but MJ insisted on bringing his own doctor with him.
* Phillips said in June 2009, tour director Kenny Ortega told him MJ wasn't focused and was missing rehearsals.
* Phillips then got a call from MJ's manager, Frank DiLeo?, asking for a meeting to discuss MJ's health.
* Phillips said during the meeting -- held on June 20th -- MJ assured him he was ready ...saying, "You build the home, and I'll put the door on it and paint it."
* Phillips asked Murray after the meeting if he was aware that Jackson was seeing Dr. Klein. He said Murray told him he'd "look into it."
* Phillips told prosecutors he thought MJ had great trust in Murray.
* He said he never felt at any time MJ was not ready for the shows.
* Chernoff asked Phillips if Jackson would have been responsible for the tour costs had the shows been canceled. Phillips said yes. But when Chernoff tried to ask how much, he was stopped by the judge. Earlier during the day the Judge ruled the contract between MJ and AEG Live would not be admissible in court saying "This is not a contractual dispute .. this is a homicide case."

http://www.411mania.com/music/news/207562/AEG-Live-President-Testifies-in-Conrad-Murray\\s-Trial.htm
 
Wednesday October 26th, 2011 11:44
Jackson wanted residency so kids wouldn’t “live like vagabonds” anymore: Murray trial update

The AEG Live exec who negotiated the deal to bring Michael Jackson to London’s O2 Arena in 2009 gave some background to the fated 50 night residency as the defence continued to present their case in the Conrad Murray trial yesterday.

Randy Phillips revealed that it was the finance company who “owned the note” on Jackson’s Neverland property that originally initiated talks between the live music giant and the late king of pop. A high profile residency in one venue, which meant no exhausting moving from city to city, appealed to Jackson, Phillips said, adding that the singer hoped his fee from the shows would enable him to buy a new home for his three children so they could stop “living like vagabonds”.

Jackson initially agreed to 31 shows, Phillips said, ten more than Prince had performed at the same venue two years earlier, but subsequently agreed to go up to 50 to meet demand. Some have claimed AEG Live pressured Jackson to increase the number of dates against his will, but Phillips insisted Jackson had gladly extended the run, insisting a rep from the Guinness Book Of Records be on hand at the final show, because he was convinced this would be the biggest residency ever.

The 50 night cap was set mainly for visa reasons, and the extension was conditional on AEG providing Jackson with a country estate – with a stream and horses – so his children wouldn’t have to live in a hotel suite for too long. Phillips added that London was chosen for the comeback show, rather than somewhere closer to home for Jackson, because it was “the hottest concert market in the world, bigger than New York and Toronto combined”.

Earlier in the day the nurse consulted by Jackson about his sleeping problems returned to the witness stand. Cherilyn Lee revealed that Jackson had asked her about using propofol to aid sleep two months before his death. She revealed the pop star told her: “I know this [propofol] will knock me out – as soon as it gets into my vein I am knocked out and I am asleep”.
Lee admitted she didn’t know much about the drug, but says that she researched it after her conversation with Jackson had learned about its significant side effects, and that it should only be used for surgery in a hospital setting. She told the court that she relayed all this information to Jackson, but that he responded: “I will be OK, I only need someone to monitor me with the equipment when I sleep”.

Jackson died, of course, when Murray failed to monitor his patient after administering the drug. Quite how much he administered, and whether Jackson himself added to the dosage, is at the heart of Murray’s manslaughter case, though many medical experts presented by the prosecution insisted that giving the late pop star any amount of propofol outside a hospital environment – and Murray has admitted he did – is sufficiently negligent for the doctor to be found guilty.

The defence’s presentation so far has been pretty run of the mill compared to some of the dramatic testimonies presented by the prosecution. Defence lawyers are trying to portray Jackson as a man on the edge, partly because of the stress caused by his 50 night O2 booking, and with an insatiable craving for prescription drugs to overcome anxiety, pain and insomnia. They may be successful in these efforts, though it seems unlikely that will be enough to convince the jury that Murray was not negligent in feeding the singer’s cravings. It remains to be seen if, like the prosecution, the defence are saving their more dramatic and persuasive witnesses for their finale.

What we do know is Murray definitely won’t testify – or, that is to say, the defence won’t call him to the witness stand. The defence team confirmed this 100% yesterday. Though judge Michael Pastor said he’d still give Murray the formal opportunity to provide a testimony, even though neither the prosecution nor the defence have requested that he do.

http://www.thecmuwebsite.com/articl...e-like-vagabonds-anymore-murray-trial-update/


Defense witness describes a confident Michael Jackson
Dr. Conrad Murray's lawyers had hoped Randy Phillips would bolster their claim that the star was filled with anxiety. Instead, he detailed plans for the concert series.
By Harriet Ryan and Victoria Kim, Los Angeles Times

October 26, 2011
In his three decades in the music industry, Randy Phillips founded a successful record label, worked with stars from Prince to Celine Dion and propelled his concert promoting company, AEG Live, to annual revenues of more than $1 billion.

But he is likely to be remembered best as Michael Jackson's last boss, and it was that role that took Phillips to the witness stand Tuesday at the trial of the pop icon's doctor.
For two hours, Phillips walked jurors through "This Is It," Jackson's planned comeback concert series, from its genesis in a Bel-Air hotel suite to a final rehearsal at Staples Center that left a normally cynical music executive with goose bumps and his star performer with a great confidence.
"He put his hands on my shoulders as we were walking out and he said to me, 'You got me here, now I'm ready. I can take it from here.' And that's the last I saw him," Phillips recalled in a packed courtroom that included Jackson's sister Janet.

Phillips was called to the stand by lawyers for Dr. Conrad Murray, who had hoped his account would bolster their claim that an anxiety-ridden Jackson gave himself a lethal dose of propofol in a desperate attempt to sleep before critical rehearsals.
But Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor prohibited many of the areas the defense planned to probe, and the answers Phillips gave often were at odds with their portrait of Jackson as fearful and the production as deeply troubled.

"No one on our end was ever contemplating pulling the plug," insisted Phillips, chief executive of AEG Live.
The "This Is It" shows had the potential to make Jackson, in debt $400 million by some estimates, a very rich man, but their failure would have sunk the singer to new levels of insolvency.

AEG was paying for everything in his life — from his rented Holmby Hills mansion to the personal chef who prepared him organic juices — as well as the huge expense of mounting a high-tech show that included multiple sets, Jackson catapulting over the crowd and 3-D elements. If he failed to perform, Jackson would have to reimburse AEG more than $30 million, according to the defense.
The judge ruled, however, that the 42-page contract would distract and confuse jurors and barred the defense from questioning Phillips, who signed the document along with Jackson, about its details. But after the executive repeatedly referred to the contractual obligations on both sides, defense attorney Ed Chernoff was permitted to ask if Jackson "was ultimately responsible" for the production costs.
Yes, Phillips replied.

Jackson's mother, Katherine, is suing AEG for wrongful death, and a lawyer for AEG accompanied Phillips to court and sat in the spectator's gallery as he testified.

Phillips said "This Is It" grew out of a 2008 phone call from Philip Anschutz, the billionaire head of AEG Live's parent company. Anschutz asked him to meet with Century City financier Tom Barrack, whose company had recently purchased a note on Jackson's Neverland ranch.

Jackson said achieving stability for his family was the motivating factor for performing again, Phillips testified.
"The primary reason was that he wanted to finally settle down and get a really, really good home for the kids and his family so they weren't, in his words, living like vagabonds," Phillips said.
The children were present in the Hotel Bel-Air suite for the Oct. 2008 meeting — he recalled that they wore Halloween costumes — and Phillips said the discussion about securing them a home "got emotional" and both men teared up.

The defense has suggested that Jackson was forced by Phillips and AEG into more shows than the 10 originally scheduled, but the executive denied that. He said that 31 shows were always planned and that Jackson agreed to 19 additional concerts "in 20 minutes."

His only conditions were that Phillips get the Guinness Book of World Records to document his 50-show feat and rent him a sprawling country home outside London for his children.
"He was very specific. He wanted 16-plus acres, running streams, horses," Phillips said. "He wanted to give them a pastoral country vibe."
Jackson was also adamant about bringing Murray to London.

Phillips testified that Murray assured him In June 2009 that the singer was in perfect health.
Two weeks later, things had taken a different turn. The concert director, choreographer Kenny Ortega, had grown frustrated with Jackson's repeated absence from rehearsals and wondered in an e-mail to Phillips if it might be time they "pulled the plug."

At a subsequent meeting five days before Jackson's death, Murray "guaranteed us that Michael would get into it, would connect," Phillips recalled.
Phillips denied that the shows were ever in doubt but acknowledged that Jackson's problems "focusing" might have delayed the concerts.
"At some point it could be postponed to the point that production would not be possible?" Chernoff asked.
"I can't speculate on that," Phillips replied.

harriet.ryan@latimes.com

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/l.../local+(L.A.+Times+-+California+|+Local+News)
 
Last edited:
Conrad Murray, The Prison System as a whole…
October 25, 2011 by Staff

If you live in this country, or anywhere in the world, you have probably seen or heard of the happenings in the Conrad Murray trial; that’s the guy accused in the death of Michael Jackson for anyone living under a rock. The trial has been shocking, heart wrenching, and intriguing for fans of the late King of Pop. It has been as much a spectacle in the absence of the best to ever do it as was the spectacle that surrounded MJ from the time Joe knew the boy could sang. The parade of girlfriends and doctors slurred phone calls and intimate secrets about what happened in Michael’s bedroom during his last living day on Earth has provided a bit of insight into the troubled star; the conflicted genius we all grew up with but never really knew.
Should someone be held accountable for his death. Umm… Duh. Will that person be Conrad Murray… Probably. (I’m not really sorry or feel some kind of compromised journalistic integrity for convicting him here) But what’s this business about him not serving prison time or jail time or any time?

Last week while driving home I was listening to the Tom Joyner morning show. Tom, Sybil and Jay were of course talking about the trial. That day’s nugget: the fact Doctor Murray may serve his prison time as house arrest because of overcrowding.

First thought: “Prisons are not supposed to be overcrowded.” Second thought: “Something is really wrong with this picture.”
Less than a week later I’m at work looking for content and I see a story on the Associated Press about new debate among states about what to do with prison inmates serving life in prison. The story discusses new research that shows when older criminals are released they are less likely to commit crimes. It also points out the fact that the number of inmates serving life sentences has jumped 22 percent in just the last five years. The reason: the number of offenses legislators have attached life sentences too.

This same day I see another story. A preview of the CNBC documentary Billions Behind Bars: Inside America’s Prison Industry that aired last Tuesday. The pre-packaged piece discussed how many states are turning toward private prisons to house their inmates because states no longer have the money to buy and build the number of beds for the rising number of criminals. Here overcrowding and state budgets play a role into making prison a booming billion dollar business when for all intents and purposes it should not be. What bothers me about these stories, these bits of news nuggets, is that this particular issue disproportionately affects Black people; specifically Black men.

From Human Rights Watch:
“The disproportionate representation of black Americans in the U.S. criminal justice system is well documented. Blacks comprise 13 percent of the national population, but 30 percent of people arrested, 41 percent of people in jail, and 49 percent of those in prison. Nine percent of all black adults are under some form of correctional supervision (in jail or prison, on probation or parole), compared to two percent of white adults. One in three black men between the ages of 20 and 29 was either in jail or prison, or on parole or probation in 1995. One in ten black men in their twenties and early thirties is in prison or jail. Thirteen percent of the black adult male population has lost the right to vote because of felony disenfranchisement laws…

…In every state, the proportion of blacks in prison exceeds, sometimes by a considerable amount, their proportion in the general population. In Minnesota and Iowa, blacks constitute a share of the prison population that is twelve times greater than their share of the state population. In eleven states — Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming –the percentage of the prison population that is black is more than six times greater than the percentage of the state population that is black.
Clearly the prison industrial complex is alive and well.

“There is no other country in the world that has imprisoned more people of color than the United States. The entire population of the United States only represents five percent of the world’s population and over twenty percent of the world’s prison population. Incarcerating poor people in large numbers has become big business for the United States. As a matter of fact, more African American males are locked up in prisons throughout the United States than were slaves in 1850. This is a larger prison population than that of the top 35 European countries combined.”

Attorney General Eric Holder has taken steps to minimize the incarceration rate of Black males with lowering the punishment disparity between a drug dealer or addict caught with crack and one caught with cocaine. Instead of the laws being 100 to 1 as they were in the Reagan 80s it is now 18 to 1. But it is not just crackheads and crack dealers being locked up. Everyone isn’t Nino Brown or Pookie. Black men are being locked up for foolishness if they aren’t killed first. If Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates can be arrested for disorderly conduct inside his own home, and Princeton professor Cornel West can be arrested twice in the same week for being Cornel West loudly advocating for the 99 percent at Occupy Wall Street rallies, we must know that life isn’t any better for your average Black man with a mean mean mug and a little too much swag in his walk.

This is not to say that Dr. Conrad Murray — with whom we began this post — should not serve time if convicted of involuntary manslaughter in the death of Michael Jackson. Dr. Murray should not be the symbol of the Black man fighting the power if he is found to be absolutely negligent in the death of the greatest entertainer to ever live. He should go to prison. My concern — or wonder rather is that there is possibly someone else in prison, another Black man, that probably shouldn’t be there. Is there some two-bit criminal who robbed a home and brandished a gun at the age of 16 was tried as an adult and is now doing 20 to 25 years for a stupid decision made at a time in his life where he was more prone to stupidity than reasonability.

Instead of making the citizens of this nation productive and trying to rehabilitate them we lock them up with disregard for their future or even our own as a nation because locking people up is profitable. That is until it isn’t. Privatizing the prison industry has nothing to do with our capitalist society meeting a demand and everything to do with our society shirking its responsibilities on a moral issue.
Prisons are not supposed to be overcrowded. States should not build prisons based on third grade reading scores. Black men should not be locked up for congregating while black when pariahs like Bernie Madoff are allowed to roam the streets in Bentley’s and fly the skies in leer jets for decades.

Conrad Murray should serve time if found guilty because he is then responsible for killing a man. That’s a big deal to only get house arrest. Lindsay Lohan actually should go to prison for like a year because maybe she’d stop getting arrested and wasting our time. Lehman Brothers’s Dick Fuld, Goldman Sachs’s Lloyd Blankfein, J.P. Morgan Chase’s Jamie Dimon, Bank of America’s Ken Lewis, the succession of CEO’s at AIG and many other big bankers and Wall Street traders should all face charges for what they did to this country and the politicians and Presidents that allowed the legislation; H.W., Clinton, and W should also be held accountable. They should be tried before a “jury of their peers” and forced to face the real life consequences of ruining lives for no other reason than to make more money than they will ever spend, pay taxes on, give away, write off, or leave in a trust for future generations to come.

There are people in this country that do deserve to go to prison and not just when it is politically convenient. There are Black men and White men both corporate and blue collar that sometimes do deserve to go to prison. But there are others who can be rehabilitated. There are others who can be integrated into society and become a productive and contributing member to the country and the economy.
For example, 12-year-old Cristian Fernandez faces life in prison in the death of his 2-year-old half brother. The case is right out of Jacksonville, Florida where I live. It has sparked national outrage. At 12-years-old Fernandez now spends 23 hours in isolation. The State Attorney and Fernandez’s defense are haggling back and forth over a plea deal that will hopefully spare the child’s future. As it stands now Fernandez will be tried as an adult and could spend the rest of his life in prison. At 12-years-old most of us don’t even know what we want to do with our lives yet here is this little boy that is learning that it is possible for the rest of his life he will be doing nothing but wasting away behind bars in a maximum security prison. Where is the justice in that?
Can Fernandez be rehabilitated? Possibly. Will he allegedly kill again? Possibly. But why take away his options at 12 instead of investing the time in alternatives.

Crime will happen because we are human. It is human to err and sometimes those errors include crime; petty, white collar, or violent. However, not everyone that commits a crime is a sociopath or life-long criminal that will only escalate over time. Our justice system is no longer about justice and all about sentencing; being tough on crime and no-nonsense with criminals. That is not the way society should work. It is unfortunate that it does.

As the spectacle grows around the Conrad Murray trial remember that he may not face any time what-so-ever if convicted of killing Michael Jackson, yet your brother with his loud music, flashy car, and get-the-****-out-my-face attitude may be jailed for driving while Black and face a slew of other trumped up charges that could land him a three day stay at the free hotel for just being himself. Where is the justice in that?

We know why our prisons are bursting at the seams and why Black communities have been ripped apart. The question is will anything be done to reverse course; or is everyone to busy making money off of someone else’s misery?

Staff Writer; Nikesha Leeper
http://thyblackman.com/2011/10/25/conrad-murray-the-prison-system-as-a-whole/
 
Back
Top