Planet Earth: Fact- File and Discussion

Re: MJJC Legacy Team Project: Planet Earth

I was in that march yesterday and I have to say it was so wonderful and great--the energy was vibrant and it was inspiring to see 400k people show up in NYC to voice their concern and love for Planet Earth. There were many politicians, celebs, scientists, and native peoples, etc. The idea of "Unite the Struggle," which brought 1.4k groups together is such a great step forward. All ages, all generations, all races--it was soooo inspiring!

A march more than 4 miles long--took me more than 6 hours from start to finish. In NY: Al Gore, Mark Ruffalo, Leonardo Di Caprio, Oren Lyons, Jane Goodall, Bill McKibben, Sheldon Whitehouse, Bernie Sanders, Charles Schumer, Vandana Shiva, Ban Ki-moon, Laurent Fabius, Segolene Royal, Bill de Blasio, Maura Cowley, Ed Norton, Sting, Evangeline Lilly, Dennis Kucinich, Michael Brune, Scott Stringer, Tom Steyer, Malachy McCourt, --and me!

(in London Peter Gabriel, Vivienne Westwood, Emma Thompson, in Paris Nicolas Hulot)
 
Sea Change campaign: tackling ghost fishing gear
Our Sea Change campaign reduces the huge suffering caused by ‘ghost gear’ – abandoned fishing gear that turns oceans into death traps for sea animals
The ghost fishing gear crisis
Abandoned, lost and discarded nets, lines and traps are one of the biggest threats to our sea life. A staggering 640,000 tons of gear is left in our oceans each year. That gear traps, injures, mutilates and kills hundreds of thousands of whales, dolphins, sharks, seals, turtles and birds annually. So, through our Sea Change campaign, we’re aiming to save one million animals by 2018.

By bringing together governments, businesses and fishing organizations, we can protect sea life and move towards a future free from the ghost fishing gear threat
Ghost fishing gear: our work
We’re working in three ways to protect animals from ghost fishing gear. We:

Bring together partners to stop gear being abandoned
Support new ways to remove ghost gear from the seas
Help to replicate successful local sea animal rescue efforts on a global scale.
Global Ghost Gear initiative
The Global Ghost Gear Initiative is a big part of our Sea Change campaign. By collaborating with a range of partners, we’re working to understand just how bad the problem of ghost fishing gear is – and to respond with solutions that work for animals and people. The seafood industry spends millions each year untangling nets from propellers, for example, so we’re developing solutions that protect animals and benefit businesses too.



- See more at: http://www.worldanimalprotection.us...kling-ghost-fishing-gear#sthash.yn4AXio8.dpuf

[video=youtube_share;UJBtoBHxPko]http://youtu.be/UJBtoBHxPko[/video]

Join us in building the Global Ghost Gear Initiative and help us create a sea change - See more at: http://www.worldanimalprotection.or...728.746890846.1411799149#sthash.xCLNFr19.dpuf
 
United States of America to recycle batteries Good News for us North Americans


rr8lkw.jpg

Recycling batteries image; Credit: © Shutterstock




In the spring of 2013, a national voluntary recycling program will launch. Consumers will no longer have to trash their batteries. This is a win/win for businesses, consumers, and the planet.

European Union environmental strategies, policies, and regulations influence environmental decision making in the United States. The EU is guided by a precautionary principle: Prevent harm to humans and to the environment. As a result, the EU has a history of progressive approaches for solving complex-interdependent environmental issues. Environmental stewardship is an integral part of the culture in the EU, influencing citizens, government and corporate actions.

However, the US veers toward clear scientific evidence before taking action on environmental issues.

When a US manufacturer wants to sell consumer goods in the EU, an issue arises. The US manufacturer must meet different and often competing environmental standards. What is burdensome are the cost and legal complexities associated with disharmony in environmental standards.

Alkaline batteries contain magnesium; they may contain higher toxic chemicals such as mercury, lead, and cadmium. These "endocrine disruptors," may interfere with the body's endocrine system. They can produce adverse developmental, reproductive, neurological, and immune effects in humans and wildlife. Despite this, batteries in the US are classified as non-hazardous materials and they are tossed in a person's kitchen garbage can.

The EU applied the precautionary principle to the manufacturer, use, collection and recycling of batteries. The Battery Directive (2008) mandated the following:

1. Presence of heavy metals must be indicated on all batteries and button cells containing more than 0.0005% mercury by weight (Hg), 0.002% cadmium (Cd), and/or 0.004% lead (Pb);

2. Distributors must treat and recycle batteries for recovery of usable materials; and

3. Producers must pay the costs of collecting, treating and recycling
batteries.
The Battery Directive advanced Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) - an analysis for weighing environmental performance and associated costs by examining the entire product life cycle - from cradle to grave. "Cradle-to-grave" begins with the extraction of materials to create the product, leading to manufacturing, use, and end of life (disposal). LCA is an excellent tool for estimating the cumulative environmental impacts resulting of the entire life cycle because of its focus on raw material extraction, material transportation, and ultimate product disposal often ignored in traditional analysis.

The following illustration shows the LCA approach:

us-recycle-batteries-2013-226-Sep-12.jpg

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); Credit: © ScienceDirect



A recent MIT life cycle battery analysis of household batteries demonstrates that recycling (rather than disposal) yields a higher environmental impact. MIT LCA showed that the most significant impact to the environment occurs in the production stage: Mining and refining of raw materials, battery manufacturer, distribution, and packaging.

In comparison, the end of life stage had less environmental impact. End of life stage includes collection, transportation, process, and recovery of materials for use and disposal through landfills. The LCA informed decision-makers that the use of recovered materials (zinc, magnesium and steel) in batteries (to avoid virgin extraction) yields the most environmental and economic savings. So does streamlining the collection and transportation of recycling.

The EU position coupled with the MIT LCA analysis, brought together Energizer, Kodak, Panasonic, and Rayovac, the largest battery manufactures in the US, to examine opportunities for a voluntary nationwide program to recycle batteries. Over 70 experts from around the world participated.

In 2013, consumers must do the right thing and choose to recycle batteries as part of the largest voluntary program. Annually U.S. consumers purchase over three billion household batteries - think of all the toxic chemicals that will not enter our air, water, and land and the energy and raw material cost saved. Get those recycling bins ready!!

(Source:)http://www.earthtimes.org
Read more at http://www.earthtimes.org/green-blo...batteries-2013-26-Sep-12/#mwHxXqU4aRgxhZJk.99
 
California bans singel-use plastic bags

In California, the days of ocean-polluting, wildlife-killing plastic bags are over.

Gov. Jerry Brown on Tuesday signed into law a bill that makes the Golden State the first in the nation to enact a statewide ban on single-use plastic bags. (Citywide bans are already in effect in San Francisco; Los Angeles; Washington, D.C.; Portland, Ore.; and other municipalities.)

Beginning July 1, 2015, the bill will require retailers to provide alternatives such as recycled paper bags for at least a dime a pop.

“The bill is a step in the right direction—it reduces the torrent of plastic polluting our beaches, parks, and even the vast ocean itself,” Brown said in a statement. “We’re the first to ban these bags, and we won’t be the last.”

Here, in numbers, is how the ban will affect California, wildlife, and the environment.

—Kristina Bravo

Enter Photo Gallery
http://www.takepart.com/photos/california-plastic-bag-ban?cmpid=tpenviro-eml-2014-10-04-couch
read more in the photo gallery
 
H.O.P.E (Help Our Planet Earth)

ABOUT US
301343_2091796582338_1467960102_31671504_1546727450_n.jpg


Here are some fun things we have done in the past!

Beyond Coal Rally:

We rounded up about 30 students and marched around campus to rally for clean energy at the university. We had shirts, painted our faces, and held signs that we each painted! The final stop was outside of Carver Hall where President Soltz's office is. "What do we want? NO MORE COAL!"


Powershift 2011: 28 of us HOPEers traveled to Washington D.C. in April for a mega clean energy conference! 10,000 other college students from all across the country joined us as well as Al Gore, Lisa Jackson (administrator of the EPA), and Cherri Foytlin, a gulf coast resident that walked from Louisiana to Washington. We attended leadership sessions, cheered for inspirational speakers, explored D.C. and rallied in the streets! We went to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, The White House, and BP office and gas stations, while holding signs and wearing green hats. D.C. didn't know what hit them! This conference happens every two years so Powershift 2013, here we come!


Earth Day: This was a big success. We set up tables by the library and had an area to tye-dye shirts, make hemp bracelets, and paint faces as well as donate to the Gulf Restoration Network to help clean up the gulf coast after the oil spill. The students were really into it and the table was crowded all day!

Mountain Top Removal Trip: From November 4th-6th in 2011 we traveled to Whitesville, West Virginia to see first hand the effects of mountain top removal on the environment and surrounding towns. It was saddening to say the least. The coal industries blow up the tops of beautiful, pristine mountains to extract coal and do not consider human safety or health important. "That lump of coal is more valuable than your life." We met up with Coal River Mountain Watch to show us MTR sites and a local elementary school located 150 feet from a coal silo. (Picture shown above.)

Clean Energy Visibility Stunt: On October 25th 2011 in the academic quad, we held signs and handed out flyers that protested natural gas. Some of us were even painted as deer to show that natural gas hurts the environment and animals.
 
WHAT IS #GIVINGTUESDAY?

We have a day for giving thanks. We have two for getting deals. Now, we have #GivingTuesday, a global day dedicated to giving back. On Tuesday, December 2, 2014, charities, families, businesses, community centers, and students around the world will come together for one common purpose: to celebrate generosity and to give.

It’s a simple idea. Just find a way for your family, your community, your company or your organization to come together to give something more. Then tell everyone you can about how you are giving. Join us and be a part of a global celebration of a new tradition of generosity.


GREAT GIVING

GT_OneWay_Give.png

For the last two years, #GivingTuesday has challenged individuals and communities to make the world a better place through generosity. The simple act of giving not only helps others, but also fundamentally connects you to the human family and nourishes a generous community spirit. This year, we want to place emphasis on the concept of great giving. Essentially, this means giving smarter, giving more creatively and giving in a way that is most beneficial for you and the causes closest to your heart.

There are a number of ways to contribute to a charity, but it is important to maximize the impact of your donation by knowing more about the nonprofit you support. With a little research—and by using the tools from Charity Navigator, Foundation Center, and other key #GivingTuesday partners–you can learn the best methods to give smarter, more strategically, and with the most impact.

Some basic questions to ask when selecting a charity to support are:
•How much can I afford to give?
•How will my donation be used?
•Is my charity currently financially sound?
•Am I donating through a middleman or giving platform?
•Is the charity I support a registered non-profit?
•Is the administrative compensation for my charity reasonable?

Great giving is about more than just dollars; it is also about making sure that your donation is sustainable year after year in order to create positive change. When you see long-term progress being made in the causes you care about, you can take ownership over becoming a part of the solution.

There are several resources you can utilize when you are researching charities. Whether you need advice on where to give, or need the tools to research the organizations you currently support, these trustworthy organizations rate and review charities to ensure that they are managed well while making the best use of their donations.

Please use the following list to help ensure that your generous giving on #GivingTuesday is also great giving:
•Better Business Bureau’s Wise Giving Alliance
•Charity Navigator
•Charity Watch
•Federal Trade Commission
•Foundation Center
•IG Advisors
•CECP

What’s your best #greatgiving tip? Tell us on Twitter or Facebook. And head over to the Great Giving resource page for toolkits, stories and videos.

Find More Ways To 'GIVE' Here:
http://www.givingtuesday.org/

 
World Healing Prayers

w02i3o.jpg

Find Prayers, Poems and Affirmations... To Heal The Planet.
World Healing Prayers. Spreading the good intention of prayers, poems and affirmations, to the planet from a variety of faiths and traditions.

Open Your Heart to the World Without opening your door, you can open your heart to the world.

- Tao Te Ching Heal the Planet, Nature Meditation, Nature Prayers, Environment Prayers, Heal the Earth, Heal the Planet, World Peace Prayers, World Healing Meditation, Prayers for World Peace, World Peace Meditation, Global Peace Prayers, Peace Poems, World Peace Prayers, Earth Healing Prayers, Dalai Lama, Eco-spirituality, Prayers for World Peace.


A Native American Prayer for Peace

O Great Spirit of our Ancestors, I raise my pipe to you.
To your messengers the four winds,
and to Mother Earth who provides for your children.
Give us the wisdom to teach our children to love, to respect,
and to be kind to each other so that they may grow with peace in mind.
Let us learn to share all the good things you provide for us on this Earth.
- U.N. Day of Prayer for World Peace

A Buddhist Prayer for Peace

May all beings everywhere plagued with sufferings of body and mind quickly be freed from their illnesses.
May those frightened cease to be afraid, and may those bound be free.
May the powerless find power and may people think of befriending one another.
May those who find themselves in trackless, fearful wildernesses - the children, the aged, the unprotected - be guarded by beneficent celestials, and may they swiftly attain Buddhahood.
- U.N. Day of Prayer for World Peace

A Christian Prayer for Peace

Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God.
But I say to you that hear, love your enemies; do good to those who hate you;
bless those who curse you; pray for those who abuse you.
To those who strike you on the cheek, offer the other also;
and from those who take away your cloak, do not withhold your coat as well.
Give to everyone who begs from you, and of those who take away your goods,
do not ask them again. And as you wish that others would do to you, do so to them.
- U.N. Day of Prayer for World Peace

A Hindu Prayer for Peace

Oh God, lead us from the unreal to the Real.
Oh God, lead us from darkness to light.
Oh God, lead us from death to immortality.
Shanti, Shanti, Shanti unto all.
Oh Lord God almighty, may there be peace in celestial regions.
May there be peace on earth.
May the waters be appeasing.
May herbs be wholesome, and may trees and plants bring peace to all.
May all beneficent beings bring peace to us.
May the Vedic Law propagate peace all through the world.
May all things be a source of peace to us.
And may thy peace itself bestow peace on all and may that peace come to me also.
- U.N. Day of Prayer for World Peace

An Islamic Prayer for Peace

In the Name of Allah, the beneficent, the merciful: Praise be to the Lord of the Universe
who has created us and made us into tribes and nations that we may know each other,
not that we may despise each other.
If the enemy incline towards peace, do thou also incline towards peace, and trust in God,
for the Lord is one that hears and knows all things.
And the servants of God Most Gracious are those who walk on the Earth in humility,
and when we address them, we say, "Peace."
- U.N. Day of Prayer for World Peace

A Jewish Prayer for Peace

Come, let us go to the mountain of the Lord, that we may walk the paths of the Most High.
And we shall beat our swords into ploughshares and our spears into pruning hooks.
Nation shall not lift up sword against nation; neither shall they learn war any more.
And none shall be afraid, for the mouth of the Lord of Hosts has spoken.
- U.N. Day of Prayer for World Peace

Other Faith Prayers

Like the bee gathering honey from the different flowers, the wise person accepts the essence of the different scriptures and sees only the good in all religions.
- Mahatma Gandhi

God has made different religions to suit different aspirations, times and countries...one can reach God if one follows any of the paths with wholehearted devotion.
- Ramakrishna, a Hindu mystic

I believe all religions pursue the same goals, that of cultivating human goodness and bringing happiness to all human beings. Though the means may appear different, the ends are the same.
- His Holiness the Dalai Lama



Click Here and choose your faith daily:

http://www.worldhealingprayers.com/







766f555be85ec713e8bd55d7badc9b24.jpg





WAY TO GO SWEDEN - The World Can Learn A lot From You.


99 Per Cent Of Sweden's Garbage Is Now Recycled (VIDEO)
The Huffington Post Canada

here’s a “recycling revolution” happening in Sweden – one that has pushed the country closer to zero waste than ever before. In fact, less than one per cent of Sweden's household garbage ends up in landfills today.

The Scandinavian country has become so good at managing waste, they have to import garbage from the UK, Italy, Norway and Ireland to feed the country’s 32 waste-to-energy (WTE) plants, a practice that has been in place for years.

“Waste today is a commodity in a different way than it has been. It’s not only waste, it’s a business,” explained Swedish Waste Management communications director Anna-Carin Gripwell in a statement.

Every year, the average Swede produces 461 kilograms of waste, a figure that's slightly below the half-ton European average. But what makes Sweden different is its use of a somewhat controversial program incinerating over two million tons of trash per year.

It’s also a process responsible for converting half the country’s garbage into energy.

“When waste sits in landfills, leaking methane gas and other greenhouse gasses, it is obviously not good for the environment,” Gripwell said of traditional dump sites. So Sweden focused on developing alternatives to reduce the amount of toxins seeping into the ground.

[video=vimeo;103801887]http://vimeo.com/103801887[/video]
At the core of Sweden’s program is its waste-management hierarchy designed to curb environmental harm: prevention (reduce), reuse, recycling, recycling alternatives (energy recovery via WTE plants), and lastly, disposal (landfill).

Before garbage can be trucked away to incinerator plants, trash is filtered by home and business owners; organic waste is separated, paper picked from recycling bins, and any objects that can be salvaged and reused pulled aside.

By Swedish law, producers are responsible for handling all costs related to collection and recycling or disposal of their products. If a beverage company sells bottles of pop at stores, the financial onus is on them to pay for bottle collection as well as related recycling or disposal costs.

Rules introduced in the 1990s incentivized companies to take a more proactive, eco-conscious role about what products they take to market. It was also a clever way to alleviate taxpayers of full waste management costs.

According to data collected from Swedish recycling company Returpack, Swedes collectively return 1.5 billion bottles and cans annually. What can't be reused or recycled usually heads to WTE incineration plants.

WTE plants work by loading furnaces with garbage, burning it to generate steam which is used to spin generator turbines used to produce electricity. That electricity is then transferred to transmission lines and a grid distributes it across the country.

In Helsingborg (population: 132,989), one plant produces enough power to satisfy 40 per cent of the city’s heating needs. Across Sweden, power produced via WTE provides approximately 950,000 homes with heating and 260,000 with electricity.

Recycling and incineration have evolved into efficient garbage-management processes to help the Scandinavian country dramatically cut down the amount of household waste that ends up in landfills. Their efforts are also helping to lower its dependency on fossil fuels.

[video=youtube_share;Kr_DGf77OhM]http://youtu.be/Kr_DGf77OhM[/video]

“A good number to remember is that three tons of waste contains as much energy as one ton of fuel oil … so there is a lot of energy in waste,” said Göran Skoglund, spokesperson for Öresundskraft, one of the country’s leading energy companies.

So if Sweden burns approximately two million tons of waste annually, that produces roughly 670,000 tons worth of fuel oil energy. And the country needs that fuel to operate its well-developed district heating networks which heat homes in Sweden's cold winters.

This is why the country has taken advantage of the fact a number of European nations don’t have the capacity to incinerate garbage themselves due to various taxes and bans across the EU that prevent landfill waste. There's where Sweden comes in to buy garbage other countries can't dispose of themselves at a reasonable cost.

ut trash burning isn’t without controversy. Some critics claim the process as anything but green because it sends more pollution and toxins into the air.

According to a study in the journal of Environmental Science and Technology, more than 40 per cent of the world’s trash is burned, mostly in open air. It’s a process markedly different from the regulated, low-emission processes Sweden has adopted.

Start-up costs for new incineration plants can get pricey and out of reach for some municipalities depending on the integration of processes used to filter ash and flue gas byproducts. Both contain dioxins, an environmental pollutant.

The incineration process isn't perfect, but technological advancements and introduction of flue-gas cleaning have reduced airborne dioxins to “very small amounts,” according to the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.

Unless manufacturers stop making products with materials that can't be reused or tossed into incinerators, a 100 per cent recycling rate is unlikely to be achieved in our lifetime. Goods that are or contain tile, porcelain, insulation, asbestos, and miscellaneous construction and demolition debris can't be burned safely; they have to be dumped in landfills.

“The world needs to produce less waste,” explained Skoglund.

Sweden's success handling garbage didn't come overnight — the latest results are the fruits of a cultural shift decades in the making.

“Starting in the ‘70s, Sweden adopted fairly strict rules and regulations when it comes to handling our waste, both for households and more municipalities and companies,” Gripwell told HuffPost Canada, referring to the country’s “waste hierarchy” now ingrained in Swedish society.

“People rarely question the ‘work’ they have to do,” she said.

In Sweden we learned to recycle from Linus on the line or la Linea...
[video=youtube_share;2XbkcztIHM8]http://youtu.be/2XbkcztIHM8[/video]
It´s from 1991

This is a new reminder from Idol Sweden 2014 and some cheerleaders

[video=youtube_share;toBrvKw36I8]http://youtu.be/toBrvKw36I8[/video]
Panta mera means you should take your empty beer and soda cans and bottles to the shop and you get some money back for it










 
I´ve posted about orcas in captivity before now I want to tell about Stumpy.
Orca observers had noticed an orca with a broken fin, the upper one you can see when orcas are swimming.She could swim but it was clear she couldn´t swim as fast as the others so it would be difficult for her to hunt.
Observers wondered how she did survive.
They got an underwatercamera in the right place and they saw Stumpy was following a female orca durng the hunt.That orca caught a fish bit it by half and let half of it drop and Stumpy could catch it.
Stumpy survived because the other orcas helped to feed her.
Observers said her mother was dead and they had seen her with four different groups so it seems it wasn´t her closest family, but still these orcas, killer whales, cared about her.
 
Last edited:
Ocean Plastic Pollution Costs $13 Billion a Year, and Your Face Scrub Is Part of the Problem
The good news is you can be part of the solution by recycling and being choosy about what you buy.

By David Kirby

Researchers for the first time have put a price tag on the environmental damage done by the millions of tons of plastic floating around the world’s oceans: $13 billion a year.

They added that consumers can do their part to alleviate the problem. One place to start: Avoid personal care products containing polymer microbeads.

Two reports released last week at the first United Nations Environment Assembly in Nairobi paint a troubling picture but also describe feasible—even profitable—uses of postconsumer plastic to help keep it out of the environment. The Plastic Disclosure Project and Trucost, an environmental data firm, produced the papers with support from the U.N. Environmental Program.

The researchers pegged the annual environmental damage from plastic use in consumer goods at an estimated $75 billion.

Some 10 million to 20 million tons of plastic enter the oceans every year, accounting for up to 80 percent of the trash at sea and on shores.

Oceanic plastic comes from “littering, poorly managed landfills, tourist activities, and fisheries,” the UNEP said in a statement. Some sinks to the bottom, but much remains as flotsam, traveling vast distances and “accumulating in massive midocean gyres,” such as the Great Pacific Garbage Patch.

Plastic can cause “mortality or illness when ingested by sea creatures such as turtles, entanglement of animals such as dolphins and whales, and damage to critical habitats such as coral reefs,” the UNEP said. Other problems include chemical pollution, the spread of harmful invasive species that travel on plastic debris, and economic damage to fishing and tourism industries.


Doug Woodring, founder of Ocean Recovery Alliance, which runs the Plastic Disclosure Project, said the $13 billion estimate is conservative: “It depends how wide-ranging you want to incorporate the externalities of waste,” which can include effects on human health, tourism, greenhouse gases, and wildlife.

Cleanup costs are staggering. Woodring said California, Oregon, and Washington alone spend an estimated $500 million a year removing waste from the Pacific coastline.

Now “we have a way to say what we’re doing does cause a problem, and here’s a dollar value,” Woodring said of the UNEP report.

There are many ways to reduce plastic pollution, Woodring said, such as generating less waste in the supply chain. Many products from China, for example, are individually shrink-wrapped before shipping, then unwrapped before landing on shelves.


Adios, Pacific Garbage Patch: This Teenager’s Invention Could Clean It Up

We also need more recycling. Many stores now have “bring-back” programs that let people recycle products containing plastics. Water bottles are particularly challenging, as they contain three types of plastics—bottle, cap, and label—that must be processed separately, increasing costs. Using a single plastic would reduce those costs. (Or better yet, drink from reusable bottles.)

Woodring said industry could also turn to plant-based plastics, though they often must be treated or composted to decompose.

Perhaps the most insidious plastic pollution comes from the tiny polymer microbeads in toothpaste, gels, and facial and body cleansers. Larger pieces of floating plastic can also degrade into microplastic.

Microplastics were recently found in polar sea ice, according to the UNEP, and evidence shows they are eaten by birds, mussels, worms, plankton, the endangered northern right whale, and fish. Yes, remnants of your face scrub could end up on someone’s dinner plate.

Most municipal wastewater systems aren’t equipped to filter the beads, so they end up in rivers, lakes, and oceans, Woodring said. The only solution is to eliminate the material.

It can be done. Before the advent of microbeads, many scrubs contained organic particles, such as apricot pits. In response to the growing outcry over microbeads, personal care giant Unilever announced last year it will phase out polymer beads by 2015.

Woodring hopes the new data will alarm people in the same way climate change does. Unlike carbon dioxide, people can see plastic, which often is emblazoned with the logo of a leading consumer brand.

Consumers—also known as citizens—are as vital to solving this crisis as industry and government. “Everyone’s at fault,” Woodring said. “But we can open a new chapter in thinking of how to manage waste.”

http://www.takepart.com/article/201...billion-year-and-your-face-scrub-part-problem
 
5 ways recycling helps the planet

11vmhsn.jpg

Today's post focuses on how recycling benefits us all...

People are now more aware of how recycling can help us improve our lives and save our natural resources. Every day, we dispose tons and tons of garbage.Before we end up losing our natural resources because of the ill effects of too much garbage, we should practice reusing and recycling materials.


Here are just five ways recycling can help our planet:

1. Recycling helps minimize pollution. One way we can minimize pollution is through recycling and reusing garbage. When people burn garbage, this can harm the ozone layer and produce harmful gases which can lead to respiratory diseases like cough and asthma, among others. When garbage is thrown in the ocean, it could kill and affect our marine resources and coral reefs. Thats why every time we reduce waste, reuse, and recycle our garbage- from used plastic bottles, disposable cups and utensils, paper, and other plastic products, we get to save the earth and even millions of lives from the harmful effects of pollution.

2. Recycling helps preserve our natural resources. Can you imagine how many trees are cut every day to provide us with all our paper and wood? Well, if we recycle paper products like newspapers and books, we can save more trees on earth. As such, recycling products is extremely important so that we can help preserve our natural resources- from trees to minerals to marine resources. If we continue to waste our resources, the time might come that they will all be used up and we will end up with nothing.

3. Recycling gives green jobs. Did you know that recycling also provides green jobs to millions of people? When communities invest in efforts to recycle garbage and other waste materials, people are given the chance to work and earn money. From collecting garbage, segregating, transporting, to recycling them into useable products, people are given the opportunity to help save the environment and at the same time earn money for a living. People opening up junk shops for instance also engage in a worthwhile endeavour.

4. Recycling helps create awareness. Another benefit of recycling is the ripple effect it has on the people. When a school for instance ventures into recycling, this can be adopted by the community, and later on by a bigger organization, or the entire state itself. Through recycling, people become aware of its importance and the word gets spread everywhere. This way, people can work together to help save the environment.

5. Recycling saves expenses and resources. Finally, recycling can help save on our expenses and resources. It helps reduce the amount of materials that are wasted or thrown in landfills such as paper, plastic, glass, and aluminium. This also enables companies to rely less on raw materials, which requires more energy for manufacturing a new product. For instance, recycling plastic material requires less energy than having it produced from raw materials. This is more cost-effective and environment-friendly because carbon emissions are lessened and energy use is greatly reduced.


These are just five ways recycling can help the planet. So do your share now and start recycling.
 
[youtube]1I-_yCEhd2w[/youtube]

BIOLUMINESCENT FOREST – PROJECTIONS IN THE FOREST - Short Film Nominee Cosmic Cine Filmfestival 2015
Published on Mar 14, 2015​

While we’ve seen many examples of projection mapping on the sides of buildings or other relatively flat surfaces in an attempt to add depth or dimension, it seems photographers and digital artists are getting progressively more innovative as the technology continues to evolve. Last week we saw a commendable dance performance making use of projection mapping, and now photographer Tarek Mawad and animator Friedrich van Schoor just spent six weeks embedded in nature to create Bioluminescent Forest. The 4-minute short film imagines what various plants, insects, spiderwebs, and mushrooms might look like if they possessed the ability to emit bioluminescent light, creating a strange wonderland of blinking and twinkling organisms. The filmmakers state that everything you see was created live, without any effects added in post-production.

VIDEOS

[youtube]PZwS-N0_j7E[/youtube]


IMAGES

tumblr_lnqd95WfFd1qm9r09o1_500.jpg


bioluminescent-atolla-jellyfish.jpg


100511-bioluminescence-widder3hr.grid-4x2.jpg


ss4.jpg


2726-1024x576.jpg


bioluminescent-forest-projection-mapping-1024x450.jpg


bio-4.jpg


THE SOURCES:

OFFIZIELLE WEBSITE: http://www.bioluminescent-forest.com

WEBSITE Tarek Mawad: http://www.tarekmawad.com
WEBSITE Friedrich van Schoor: http://www.vanscore.com

FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Tarek-...

YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCi9T...
https://www.youtube.com/user/MrFriedr...

VIMEO: https://vimeo.com/3hund
https://vimeo.com/friedrichvanschoor

INSTAGRAM: https://instagram.com/tarekmawad/

GOOGLE+: https://plus.google.com/u/2/b/1041581...
https://plus.google.com/u/0/101883609...

TUMBLR: http://tarekmawad.tumblr.com

LINKEDIN:
https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view...


INFOS ZUM FILM
Kurzfilm, Deutschland, 2014
Laufzeit: 3:48 min (Hauptfilm) 3:26 (Making-of)
REGISSEUR / PRODUZENT: Tarek Mawad und Friedrich van Schoor
PROTAGONISTEN: Tarek Mawad und Friedrich van Schoor (Making-of)
KAMERA / SCHNITT: Tarek Mawad und Friedrich van Schoor
SOUNDDESIGN / MUSIK: Achim Treu (http://www.ufohawaii.com / http://www.treumedia.de)
PRODUKTION: Simon Straetker Productions
VERLEIH / VERTRIEB: Tarek Mawad (http://www.tarekmawad.com) und Friedrich van Schoor (http://www.vanscore.com)
Cinematographers
Bioluminescent Forest Friedrich van Schoor
Directors
Bioluminescent Forest Friedrich van Schoor
Producers
Bioluminescent Forest Friedrich van Schoor
Category
Film & Animation
License
Standard YouTube License
 
A Dry Demand: Protesters Tell Nestlé to Stop Bottling California Water
Activists gathered at bottling facilities in Los Angeles and Sacramento on Wednesday.

They’re just ruining our planet,” said Patty Shenker, speaking outside Nestlé’s water bottling facility in Los Angeles. “They’re completely destroying our planet for profit, and we’ve got to stop them.”

Shenker, 63, was wearing an orangutan mask—“Animals can’t live without water any more than we can,” she said—and was one of more than 50 people who came out on Wednesday to protest that the world’s largest food and beverage company was continuing to bottle California’s water despite the state facing one of the worst droughts in 1,200 years.

As The Desert Sun reported in March, Nestlé Waters North America bottled 591 million gallons of California water in 2011, when the current drought began; by 2014, it was bottling 705 million gallons, an increase of 17.5 percent. The newspaper also found that Nestlé’s permit to pipe the water for its Arrowhead brand from its mountain spring source and transport it all through the San Bernardino National Forest expired in 1988. While the company remains in good standing with the U.S. Forest Service, the impact of its actions on local watersheds has not been carefully analyzed in more than 25 years.

“It is outrageous, and it is unethical,” said Laura Leavitt, a spokesperson for Courage Campaign, a progressive nonprofit based in Los Angeles that helped organize the protest. A similar event was held outside a Sacramento facility on Wednesday. Leavitt handed petitions signed by more than half a million people to a representative of Nestlé who came out to acknowledge the protesters’ presence. Those petitions called on the company to immediately halt its bottling of water. The company’s response, Leavitt told me, was a polite but firm no, as conveyed in a letter it gave her.

RELATED: For California’s Iconic Lawns, Brown Is the New Green

“They’re not willing to be accountable and stop bottling now, so we’re going to keep fighting,” Leavitt said. In particular, her organization is lobbying Gov. Jerry Brown for an immediate moratorium on the bottling of water. California has been in a formal state of emergency owing to the drought since January 2014, and after another dry winter, Brown announced mandatory reductions in urban water use in April—a first for the naturally semiarid state. More than 1,900 wells across California are bone dry, while major reservoirs are storing 28 to 82 percent less water than they did prior to the drought.

While the state is cracking down on individuals, with Brown requiring cities to cut water use by 25 percent, the heaviest users of water—industry—have generally been left to continue with business as usual.

Nestlé denies that. “For Nestlé, it’s not business as usual in California and hasn’t been for some time,” said Jane Lazgin, a company spokesperson. She said her employer shares the protesters’ concerns “about the effects this devastating drought is having on families, communities, farms, and businesses.” It has also worked to cut the use of water in the production of its other products, she said, claiming recently announced conservation efforts would save 144 million gallons of water a year. But while Nestlé looks forward to a “thoughtful dialogue,” Lazgin said the answer to California’s drought is “positive collective action,” not Nestlé’s unilateral exit from the business of bottled water.


On that topic, Nestlé CEO Tim Brown has aggressively defended his company, telling Pasadena public radio station KPCC that he would “absolutely not” stop selling California’s water. “In fact, if I could increase it, I would,” he said, arguing his company was only meeting consumer demand that would be fulfilled by a competitor in Nestlé’s absence.

During the same discussion, Jay Famiglietti, a hydrologist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, said that it takes 30 to 50 percent more water to fill a plastic bottle than to simply fill a cup from a faucet. The production and transportation of bottled water also has a significant environmental impact: According to a report from the Environmental Working Group, the industry used the equivalent of 32 million to 54 million barrels of oil in 2007.

While Nestlé may be standing firm for now, one of its competitors recently decided that bottling water during a severe drought is not worth the public relations grief. “Due to the serious drought conditions and necessary water conservation efforts in California, Starbucks is moving the sourcing and manufacturing of Ethos Water”—its in-store brand—“out of state,” the popular coffee chain announced on May 7.

That move, said Lauren Steiner, shows that activists like her aren’t asking for too much. “Water is a scarce resource, especially in a drought,” she said, “and I think that it shouldn’t be wasted by private corporations who are bottling and selling it out of state, in many cases.” A founder of the SoCal Climate Action Coalition, she’s pushing to have L.A.’s city council ban the sale of bottled water altogether.


That won’t save the planet, either, she concedes: The bottling and sale of water that’s just as good, at a fraction of the cost, from the tap in one’s kitchen isn’t the most egregious waste in a state that continues to have bright-green golf courses in the middle of deserts. The issue does, however, provide an unwanted opportunity to highlight that natural resources “shouldn’t be privately held by greedy corporations to make a profit off it,” Steiner said.

That’s a radical stance in this capitalist world, but as one man repeatedly chanted at Wednesday’s protest, when it comes to the demand that something as vital to life as water not be shipped and sold elsewhere for private gain amid the worst drought in generations, “It’s reasonable!”

Why You Should Care

California is in its fourth year of drought—considered to be the worst since record-keeping began—and the state’s water resources are beyond scarce. The continued dry weather has had a significant effect on agriculture, and cities are working to meet mandatory reductions in usage. The lack of rain and snow affects wilderness and wildlife too. Not only is it troubling that water is being shipped out of California, but thanks to Nestlé’s long-expired pumping permit, the impact on the plants and animals supported by the spring, which is on federally protected land, is unknown.

http://www.takepart.com/article/201...protest?cmpid=tpfood-eml-2015-05-23-mcdonalds
 
3 cygnets were separated from their family, with help from dedicated humans they could unite again
 
It’s Only August and We Have Already Used More Resources Than the Earth can Replenish in a Year!

It probably will come as little surprise to you that as a global population, humans use the planet’s natural resources at a rate that far exceeds any sustainable measure. With this in mind, it comes as little surprise that August 8, 2016, the world celebrated “Earth Overshoot Day.“ This “holiday” represents the day of the year where the world has officially reached the point where we have used as much from nature as our planet can renew in the whole year.

Yes, that’s right, we’re only into August of 2016 and we,as the Earth Overshoot Day website explains, have already used more ecological resources and services than nature can regenerate through overfishing, overharvesting forests and emitting more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere than forests can sequester. At this rate, we will need a total of 1.6 planet Earths to be able to sustain the human population.

We don’t know about you … but we find that pretty disturbing.

Earth Overshoot Day is hosted and calculated by Global Footprint Network, an international think tank and nonprofit that coordinates research, develops methodological standards and provides decision-makers with a menu of tools to help the human economy operate within Earth’s ecological limits. While the overall reality that globally, we use more than one and a half planets worth of resources is troubling, to say the least, Global Footprint Network breaks it down even further:

The fact is, we are living far beyond our means here and a further comparative breakdown by the organization reveals that if everyone lived like Americans, we’d need 4.8 planets to have enough to go around. On the lower range of the scale, if we all lived like Chinese citizens, we’d still need two planets.
What YOU Can Do

On a collective level, we are all responsible for the depletion of natural resources, but it is very clear that certain lifestyles and habits are more resource intensive than others. This might be intimidating to know, but it breaks down to the reality that we all have the power to effect change if we start with our personal consumption habits. Earth Overshoot Day posits responsible population management, creating a more sustainable food system, and efficient city planning as solutions to this massive problem.

While there are many things that we can do on an individual level to lower our impact on the world, one of the easiest and most effective is our food choices.

One Green Planet believes that our global food system dominated by industrial animal agriculture is at the heart of our environmental crisis. This destructive industry currently occupies over half of the world’s arable land resources, uses the majority of our freshwater stores, and drives greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, this system causes rampant air and water pollution, land degradation, deforestation and is pushing countless species to the brink of extinction. And yet, one in eight people still suffer from food scarcity.

As the leading organization at the forefront of the conscious consumerism movement, it is One Green Planet’s view that our food choices have the power to heal our broken food system, give species a fighting chance for survival, and pave the way for a truly sustainable future.

By choosing to eat more plant-based foods, you can drastically cut your carbon footprint, save precious water supplies and help ensure that vital crop resources are fed to people, rather than livestock. With the wealth of available plant-based options available, it has never been easier to eat with the planet in mind.
http://www.onegreenplanet.org/news/...sources-than-earth-can-replenish-in-one-year/
 
105-1922.jpg

WORLD NOTICE ++++ NOVEMBER 4TH 2016 ++++

The United Nations Climate Article:
The Paris Agreement 2016

[youtube]3nMl55ZYQs0[/youtube]

w7210.jpg

On 5 October 2016, the threshold for entry into force of the Paris Agreement was achieved.

74 Parties have ratified
of 197 Parties to the Convention

0
10
20
30
40
Entry info force
60
70
80
90
100
58.82% achieved
of global GHG emissions


Authoritative information on the status of the Paris Agreement, including information on its signatories, ratification and entry into force, is provided through the United Nations Treaty Collection website.

The Paris Agreement will enter into force on 4 November 2016. The first session of the Conference of the Parties serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement (CMA 1) will take place in Marrakech in conjunction with COP 22 and CMP 12. More information available soon.

UNFCCC Press Release: Landmark Climate Change Agreement to Enter into Force. (Provided on the site)

Paris Agreement: essential elements


The Paris Agreement builds upon the Convention and – for the first time – brings all nations into a common cause to undertake take ambitious efforts to combat climate change and adapt to its effects, with enhanced support to assist developing countries to do so. As such, it charts a new course in the global climate effort.

The Paris Agreement’s central aim is to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change by keeping a global temperature rise this century well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase even further to 1.5 degrees Celsius. Additionally, the agreement aims to strengthen the ability of countries to deal with the impacts of climate change. To reach these ambitious goals, appropriate financial flows, a new technology framework and an enhanced capacity building framework will be put in place, thus supporting action by developing countries and the most vulnerable countries, in line with their own national objectives. The Agreement also provides for enhanced transparency of action and support through a more robust transparency framework. Further information on key aspects of the Agreement can be found here.

Nationally determined contributions

The Paris Agreement requires all Parties to put forward their best efforts through “nationally determined contributions” (NDCs) and to strengthen these efforts in the years ahead. This includes requirements that all Parties report regularly on their emissions and on their implementation efforts.

Further information on NDCs can be found here.

In 2018, Parties will take stock of the collective efforts in relation to progress towards the goal set in the Paris Agreement and to inform the preparation of NDCs.

There will also be a global stocktake every 5 years to assess the collective progress towards achieving the purpose of the Agreement and to inform further individual actions by Parties.
Taking the Paris Agreement forward

Through decision 1/CP.21, Parties also decided on a pdf-icon work programme to be undertaken in preparation to the full implementation of the Paris Agreement.

A tool to track progress made in relation to the work programme is available here:

pdf-icon Progress tracker: Work programme resulting from the relevant requests contained in decision 1/CP.21 (368 kB) (version of 8 September 2016)

The information contained in the progress tracker will be updated regularly. Information on the status of ratification can be found here:


To Review the Status of Ratification
In accordance with Article 21, paragraph 1, of the Paris Agreement, the Agreement shall enter into force on the thirtieth day after the date on which at least 55 Parties to the Convention accounting in total for at least an estimated 55 % of the total global greenhouse gas emissions have deposited their instruments of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession with the Depositary.

The United Nations Climate Website:
http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php


7577eec6b432241b664e38d4ce59ca70.jpg


:heart: Make That Change :agree: Michael must be smiling on us from Heaven !!:group:
 
Last edited:
Palm Oil is Causing Mass Deforestation, Killing Animals – and It’s Making Us Sick

I recently watched a fascinating new documentary film called, “Appetite for Destruction: Palm Oil Diaries.” In it, filmmaker Michael Dorgan journeys around the world to discover the impact that the dramatic increase in palm oil production is having on the countries that produce it, and more broadly the impact palm oil has on us – the people consuming it on a daily basis.

It’s well documented that Conflict Palm Oil production is terrible for human rights, forests, and the climate. The big question remains: why is it in 50 percent of packaged foods at the grocery store? And what is the impact for those that eat it on a daily basis? Is palm oil even healthy for us?

The massive global increase in palm oil in production and consumption has been driven in large part by health concerns in Western countries. As more information became available about the health effects of certain types of fat, food manufacturers have sought replacements for animal fats, which are high in cholesterol, and partially-hydrogenated oils, which are high in trans fats. U.S. imports alone have skyrocketed, climbing 352 percent between 2002 and 2012, the most recent year for which data is available. Palm oil, now the most widely used vegetable oil in the world, is commonly used as a substitute for oils containing trans fats.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) move to ban trans fat has increased demand for palm oil but is palm oil a good alternative for human health and the environment?

In June of 2015, the FDA announced a ban on the use of partially hydrogenated oils, the main dietary source of artificial trans fats, after determining they are not safe to use in food. Since then, the ban on trans fats has had hugely negative and unintended consequences on the global demand for palm oil. The environmental and health alarm bells around substituting palm oil for trans fat have been sounding in the years since the FDA’s move, but now there is sobering new evidence that should be a wake-up call.

Appetite for Destruction reveals some very troubling new evidence linking palm oil to major health problems.
New Evidence Shows Consumption of Palm Oil Threatens Human Health

Appetite for Destruction features the filmmaker, Michael Dorgan, participating in a groundbreaking new experiment, led by a group of Swedish scientists, in which they compare eating muffins containing large amounts of palm oil to eating muffins with an equal amount of sunflower oil each day. The relative impact on human health is surprising.

In the film, Michael has a healthy 4.6 percent body fat when he starts the experiment. Just a few weeks into the study, after eating palm oil every day, his body fat jumps to 7.4 percent (nearly doubled), which adds two kilograms of fat to his body and results in a kilo of muscle loss.

Leaving Sweden and traveling home to the UK, Michael visits a cholesterol specialist named Dr. Linda Mane. Through blood work, Dr. Mane finds that his total cholesterol went up (including HDL and triglycerides) following the experiment. In the film, Dr. Mane tells him, “…Raised blood fats and cholesterol is a key risk factor for coronary heart disease, which is the biggest killer worldwide today. Palm oil is one of the key saturated fats that we know [of which] raises blood cholesterol, and hidden in many packaged foods, we don’t know it’s there unless we’re really skilled at looking at food labels.”

So what do these changes ultimately mean for Michael’s health? The scientists concluded that if Michael kept up similar palm oil consumption patterns, he could be at risk of developing metabolic disease, liver disease, or cardiovascular disease. Palm oil increased the amount of fat stored around his liver and in his abdomen in particular, as well as his total body fat. According to the scientists, eating sunflower oil could actually prevent these risky increases.

With this new study and others, it turns out palm oil and red meat may be two of the biggest contributors to health problems in the American diet. And that’s not all they share. These two commodities also have some of the largest climate and tropical forest footprints of any commodity.
Health Experts Conclude That Palm Oil is NOT Good for Human Health

This latest experiment by Swedish scientists confirms the findings of other leading health institutions like The World Health Organization, the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, and the USDA Agricultural Research Service. In 2014, Dr. Weil joined a chorus of leading health experts as well. Their conclusion?

Palm oil may be a good industry substitute for trans fats as it stays solid at room temperature without hydrogenation, but it isn’t actually a healthier alternative: A 2009 study by the federal Agricultural Research Service found that palm oil isn’t a good substitute for trans fats because consuming either type of fat results in similar spikes in artery-clogging LDL (“bad”) cholesterol and a protein (apolipoprotein B) that distributes it throughout the bloodstream.

Red palm oil is less refined than conventional palm oil or palm kernel oil, which does keep some of the micronutrients intact – specifically Vitamin E, Vitamin A and carotenoids (which give it its color). But if you’re eating for these specific nutrients, palm oil isn’t an ideal choice because it’s so high in saturated fats. If you’re trying to increase your Vitamin E, A or carotenoids, it is better to eat fruits, vegetables, seeds, and nuts. Hear it from our nation’s expert dietitians themselves.
So Why is Palm Oil in “Natural Food” Products if it’s Not Healthy?

If health experts agree that palm oil is no better for our health, and the fat that Michael and others in the film’s experiment gained from eating palm oil was concentrated in dangerous places in the body – like around the liver and vital organs – and can lead to coronary heart disease (which is the biggest killer worldwide today), why is palm oil such a ubiquitous ingredient in “health food” products?

The palm oil industry’s most die-hard advocates suggest that palm oil is perfectly healthy. Take, for example, the Malaysian Palm Oil Council, which suggests that palm oil is “comparable to the much touted gold standard olive oil for its effects on blood cholesterol.” Or, American talk show host Dr. Oz who went on air telling millions of viewers to “give palm oil a try for its incomparable nutritional virtues.” He goes as far as calling it a “miracle oil.” Other than being schils for the palm oil industry, what do these two groups have in common? They are the only ones who actually believe palm oil is healthy.
Solution: Transform the food system with RAN

“Health washing” is nothing new in the food business. As consumers become more educated about the negative effects our food system has on the health of people and the planet, they are moving away from packaged, processed foods and soft drinks. Snack Food companies are well aware of this. In fact, the snack food industry’s greatest threat is the emerging health trend – it hurts their bottom line. Executives, like Al Carey of PepsiCo, who express concern about the growing health trend say this means companies have to innovate and expand into new markets or else risk losing a substantial amount of business.

As we see in Michael Dorgan’s Appetite for Destruction, and given the environmental destruction caused by palm oil production, palm oil is neither healthy for our bodies nor the planet. To transform our food system, we must transform the palm oil industry. Join RAN’s campaign to demand that the biggest global snack food companies cut their ties between the products they sell and deforestation, climate change, human rights abuses and species extinction.

http://www.onegreenplanet.org/environment/palm-oil-is-making-us-sick/
 
Costa Rica Plans to Get Rid of All Disposable Plastics by 2021!

A huge and inspiring decision regarding plastic waste policies recently came from Costa Rica – not only will they be the world’s first country to completely eliminate single-use plastics, but plans are in place to do it as soon as 2021!

The country is taking the plastic waste crisis seriously – and plans to use a multi-prong approach to implement positive changes. The initiative is being led by the Government of Costa Rica, through the Ministries of Health and Environment and Energy, with technical and financial assistance from the United Nations Development Program. It is also supported by local governments, civil society, and a number of private sector groups.

The ambitious plan will involve not only bans on plastic bags or bottles, but also a serious eradication of other plastic products, like lids or coffee stirrers, which are targeted much less often. As a starting point, on World Environment Day 2017, the country launched its national strategy to replace the consumption of single-use plastics with eco-friendly alternatives made out of materials that biodegrade on their own within a six-month period.

According to The Costa Rica News, one-fifth of the 4,000 tons of solid waste produced daily in the country is not collected and recycled, which means that it ends up polluting the Costa Rican landscape.

Phasing-out all single-use plastics isn’t going to be easy. In order for this change to fully happen, all sectors have to commit to eliminating plastic and replacing it with environmentally friendly options. The changes will have to involve, among other things, municipal incentives, new policies and institutional guidelines for suppliers, and investment in strategic initiatives.

Citizens will also have to cooperate for the plans to work out – but the country’s extensive efforts and determination for a better reality is truly inspiring and we hope many, many others follow suit.

While an all-out plastic ban might be far off where you live, you can help reduce the endless amounts of plastic waste in the world by starting with yourself. To learn how to minimize your own use of plastics, check out One Green Planet’s #CrushPlastic campaign!

http://www.onegreenplanet.org/news/costa-rica-ditches-plastics/
 
Paris Moves to Ban All Gas-Powered Cars by 2030

Paris has just announced some great news when it comes to its future carbon footprint – France’s capital authorities plan to ban all gasoline and diesel-fueled cars from the city. The move signals rapid progress in the plan to clean the area of gas-powered cars and, instead, introduce electric vehicles – and it is set to come into effect by the year 2030.

As reported by Business Insider, the ban was announced in Paris City Hall on October 12, 2017. According to the statement, France set a target date for 2040 to get rid of all cars dependent on fossil fuels – and in order to make that deadline, large cities would have to make the transition even sooner.

Christophe Najdovski, an official responsible for transport policy at the office of Mayor Anne Hidalgo, said that the decision was about planning for the long-term and a strategy to reduce greenhouse gases. “Transport is one of the main greenhouse gas producers … so we are planning an exit from combustion engine vehicles, or fossil-energy vehicles, by 2030,” he told France Info radio.

Paris is frequently forced to impose temporary bans on gas-fueled cars due to dangerous surges in particle pollution in the air. Due to the negative response to current “no car days,” Paris City Hall emphasized that it was not really using the word “ban” for the new rule, but rather setting a feasible deadline by which the polluting vehicles would be phased out.

The good news is not many Parisians own cars but rather rely on the extensive public transport systems or use bike, scooter, and hybrid engine car rental networks.

A number of other cities are considering taking a similar step as well. China, the biggest polluter after the U.S., has recently stated that it would be interested in a ban of combustion-engine vehicles.

The ban on gas-powered cars is a huge step in the direction of minimizing pollution, especially since it is about to be introduced in one of the most beloved and most visited by tourists city in the world – and, hopefully, its example will soon be followed by many cities from all around the world.
Paris has just announced some great news when it comes to its future carbon footprint – France’s capital authorities plan to ban all gasoline and diesel-fueled cars from the city. The move signals rapid progress in the plan to clean the area of gas-powered cars and, instead, introduce electric vehicles – and it is set to come into effect by the year 2030.

As reported by Business Insider, the ban was announced in Paris City Hall on October 12, 2017. According to the statement, France set a target date for 2040 to get rid of all cars dependent on fossil fuels – and in order to make that deadline, large cities would have to make the transition even sooner.

Christophe Najdovski, an official responsible for transport policy at the office of Mayor Anne Hidalgo, said that the decision was about planning for the long-term and a strategy to reduce greenhouse gases. “Transport is one of the main greenhouse gas producers … so we are planning an exit from combustion engine vehicles, or fossil-energy vehicles, by 2030,” he told France Info radio.

Paris is frequently forced to impose temporary bans on gas-fueled cars due to dangerous surges in particle pollution in the air. Due to the negative response to current “no car days,” Paris City Hall emphasized that it was not really using the word “ban” for the new rule, but rather setting a feasible deadline by which the polluting vehicles would be phased out.

The good news is not many Parisians own cars but rather rely on the extensive public transport systems or use bike, scooter, and hybrid engine car rental networks.

A number of other cities are considering taking a similar step as well. China, the biggest polluter after the U.S., has recently stated that it would be interested in a ban of combustion-engine vehicles.

The ban on gas-powered cars is a huge step in the direction of minimizing pollution, especially since it is about to be introduced in one of the most beloved and most visited by tourists city in the world – and, hopefully, its example will soon be followed by many cities from all around the world.


http://www.onegreenplanet.org/news/paris-bans-all-gas-powered-cars/
 
Back
Top