Proposed Michael Jackson Law

Maria MJ

Proud Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2009
Messages
1,051
Points
0
Location
East Europe
Reposting from MJFC, thanks to Jess1984. I hope this belongs here, if not, mods please placed it where appropriate! Thank you.

Michael Jackson’s LawThere’s nothing that can’t be done if we raise our voice as one.

~Michael Jackson



First, it’s necessary to define a new term. Medialoid (mainstream media infected by tabloid journalism) publishes content that is more suitable for tabloid publications.

Proposed
Michael Jackson’s Law

Part 1 — Many occupations require licensing; for example, doctors, lawyers, architects, and accountants must be licensed in all 50 states. To qualify, one must graduate from an accredited university and pass a rigorous board examination. A license doesn’t guarantee a doctor, lawyer, architect, or accountant will be competent. However, licensing prevents a plumber from operating on a person, a homemaker from arguing in court, a dog groomer from designing a building, or a student from maintaining the books of a corporation.

Is it no less important that those entrusted with reporting world events be licensed? Reporters should not be allowed to call themselves journalists unless they graduate from an accredited university with a degree in journalism (including at least one course in journalism ethics and one course in communications and media law) and pass a rigorous board examination.

Media play a huge role in our lives. Television, radio, the Internet, movies, books, and newspapers inform and influence our ideas, opinions, values, and beliefs. They shape our understanding of the world and give us the information we need to hold our leaders accountable. They help us separate fact from opinion.

If formal journalism training and licensing had been required of Diane Dimond and Nancy Grace, neither would have been hired by any news organization. If either had been hired without credentials, the news company that hired them may have been fined for hiring unlicensed persons. Clearly, if Dimond and Grace had not been perceived as journalists, their works of fiction may not have confused the public.

The Society of Professional Journalists believes that public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. The duty of a journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and balanced account of events and issues. Conscientious journalists strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist’s credibility.

Code of Ethics for Journalists

Part 2 — Defaming the dead shall be prohibited. A deceased person’s heirs can sue for libel and slander as aggressively as the person who was defamed when he or she was alive.

Part 3 — A journalist shall lose his or her license for failing to adhere to principles of journalistic ethics and integrity.

Part 4 — News agencies, journalists, and all media shall use public disclaimers to alert and educate readers and viewers regarding content. For example, the Food and Drug Administration protects against harmful claims that are misleading to the public. The following disclaimer must be included on products that purport to be effective but do not have FDA approval:

These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. These products are not meant to diagnose, treat or cure any disease or medical condition.

Following is a proposed disclaimer that shall accompany all medialoid content:

The views expressed herein may not have been fact-checked or verified according to principles of journalistic ethics and integrity. In addition, rumor, barely credible sources, an appeal to emotion and the use of checkbook journalism may be a part of this story or program. This story or program is for entertainment purposes only and was not reviewed by a licensed journalist.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) protects against deceptive advertising that is misleading to the public. In like manner, a governing body shall be formed to uphold standards of ethics and integrity in journalism, oversee licensing for journalists, and protect against media practices that are harmful or mislead the public.

It will take a long time and much effort to pass this proposed legislation. We need your support. Please join us by subscribing to our newsletter.

http://mjtruthnow.com/a-call-to-acti...e-that-change/
 
This is an excellent idea, a new law, to bring some moderation and quality back into the important field of journalism. Journalists carry a certain responsibilty in how items are brought to the footlight. Is it have a quick laugh at someone else's expense ? Is it in-depth coverage of the news behind the news ? Is it to ridicule or demonize certain demographic groups of people, which increases the hatred and intolerance we see so much of today.

On the other hand, we the public, carry a responsibility too. Which newspapers do we buy or subscribe to ? What does it say about mankind that we "enjoy" hearing about famous people and all the stuff that goes wrong in their lives. We read it because it makes us feel better about ourselves and our own life. Isn't that pathetic ?
We should be overjoyed when good fortune is bestowed on others.
I was once on holiday in Turkey and we took a trip to a magical tree. If you placed a personal item in or on the tree you could make a wish and it would come true. I put a handkerchief in the tree and wished good things to happen to my friends and loved ones. I love them dearly and they deserve the best!

It's the same for the media. They truly can make or break a person. Do they even know how much power they possess ?

I hope someday there will be laws to regulate the media more so than today, because of the so-called "Freedom of Speech" anyone can say anything. No rules apply. To me that is just wrong.

Journalists, after their exam, should be forced to take a Penmanship of Honor Oath or something like that. ( Hippocratic Oath but then one for journalists)
 
Back
Top