Reflections on Michael: Articles, Blogs & Stories

Tell ‘Em That It’s Human Nature

by GingerSnaps

Death always seems to bring out the best and the worst in people.

Whether it be within the close confines of the family circle who loses a loved one or the large populace of a nation who loses their leader, death can either draw hearts together or rip bonds apart.

Most assuredly, this past week has brought to light a broad spectrum of emotions from virtually millions of fans, non-fans, and observers alike who have an opinion about Michael Jackson. I have read every sort of comment ranging from a proclamation that he was led to Jesus 3 weeks ago (“saved”) by Andrae’ & Sandra Crouch* to someone literally stating that they knew he was suffering today in the flames of Hell.

Then there are the smug remarks by some who can’t understand why so many would have such strong feelings about someone they’ve never met, or why more emphasis isn’t put on the true heroes who have really given to others.
Gosh, it seems that nobody can win, doesn’t it? What comes to mind is that you can please some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can’t please all of the people all of the time.
That’s just human nature, isn’t it?

In a perfect world, each and every person who deserves recognition based on their amount of sacrifice would get it pound for pound…but then again, the ones who are giving for the right reasons usually don’t really care about being praised anyway, so it’s a moot point.

However, what really concerns me — once again — is the attitude I continue to witness time and time again from my very vocal Christian brothers and sisters who loudly proclaim their righteous involvement in their churchiness week after week, and yet when the first occasion shows itself for them to judge another person’s worthiness, they will be ALL over it like white on rice.

God knows that I am so far from righteous that for me to even try to sit here and attempt to type a rebuke is a joke…and yet, I feel very strongly compelled to at least call things out as I see them. My intent is in a spirit of love — to encourage us all to reach higher, to choose better — even if I may fail at expressing it in that way at times.

Here’s the real deal:
The love of God is greater far
than tongue or pen can ever tell;
It goes beyond the highest star,
and reaches to the lowest hell.

Perhaps I am idealistic — you may say I’m a dreamer, but I’m not the only one — and yeah, my capacity for hope almost knows no bounds…there have been times in my life that hope was ALL I had…maybe that’s why I see somebody with such a childlike idealism like Michael Jackson had and I do feel sad that the world has lost that light. Read the lyrics to “Heal The World” wherein he urges us to be God’s glow–brilliant.

Do not misunderstand me, I am fully aware of the man’s frailties. I know he made poor decisions…don’t we all? His were shouted from the rooftops and magnified by his millions of dollars. There but for the grace of God go I! However, I do not believe he was a child molester.

Here’s why:
When I was a peon in the music business, I had people trying to befriend me, just because of the other peons I knew to try and get to higher up peons to try to get to possible higher ups, and maybe — just maybe — on down the line, get to an artist. That was just my case, a total and complete nobody.

Do you not think the biggest star this planet has ever known had hundreds of leeches trying to latch onto him every single day…extortionists trying to constantly get money or whatever else they could out of him?
Those leeches would use whatever they could to get to him – even their children.

Those leeches finally sucked the spirit of Michael Jackson dry.

Those around him said he was never the same after the child molestation trial. I watched a defense attorney being interviewed — who had no vested interest to do so — in tears as he talked about what a broken man Michael Jackson became as he was falsely accused, misinterpreted, and maligned.

You may ask why I feel the need to defend a man I never met. I can only answer that the passion I feel about loving the “unlovable” in the eyes of the mainstream church runs so deep within my veins that I can’t help but speak out. I cannot be silent when I watch people who are not your typical white, Protestant, evangelical, straight, American be maligned just because they are different. There is still an arrogance present that is as filthy rags. It stinks. It’s disgusting.

Just like our own righteousness without the love of God — remember?

“The hardest people to reach with the love of God are not the bad people. They know they are bad. They have no defense. The hardest ones to win for God are the self-righteous people.” –Charles L. Allen

I had breakfast this morning with one of my closest friends. Something we talked about was how when we were growing up in the church, we were taught how broken as people we are. Condemnation, restrictions, and everything we were not allowed to do or be. Just like I said above, our righteousness is as filthy rags…without the love of God.

So, shouldn’t we be striving everyday to live out the balance of knowing we are nothing without the love of God and yet everything because of the love of God — and so is that hooker down on the street corner downtown? And the person sitting in the pew who hasn’t had a shower in 3 days? And that pastor of the mega-church on the hill? And the guy at the prison sitting on death row? And the President? And Britney Spears? And that homeless guy at the McDonalds on Broadway? And me? And you? And Michael Jackson?

http://gingersnaps.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/tell-em-that-its-human-nature/
 
Tell ‘Em That It’s Human Nature

by GingerSnaps

Death always seems to bring out the best and the worst in people.

Whether it be within the close confines of the family circle who loses a loved one or the large populace of a nation who loses their leader, death can either draw hearts together or rip bonds apart.

Most assuredly, this past week has brought to light a broad spectrum of emotions from virtually millions of fans, non-fans, and observers alike who have an opinion about Michael Jackson. I have read every sort of comment ranging from a proclamation that he was led to Jesus 3 weeks ago (“saved”) by Andrae’ & Sandra Crouch* to someone literally stating that they knew he was suffering today in the flames of Hell.

Then there are the smug remarks by some who can’t understand why so many would have such strong feelings about someone they’ve never met, or why more emphasis isn’t put on the true heroes who have really given to others.
Gosh, it seems that nobody can win, doesn’t it? What comes to mind is that you can please some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can’t please all of the people all of the time.
That’s just human nature, isn’t it?

In a perfect world, each and every person who deserves recognition based on their amount of sacrifice would get it pound for pound…but then again, the ones who are giving for the right reasons usually don’t really care about being praised anyway, so it’s a moot point.

However, what really concerns me — once again — is the attitude I continue to witness time and time again from my very vocal Christian brothers and sisters who loudly proclaim their righteous involvement in their churchiness week after week, and yet when the first occasion shows itself for them to judge another person’s worthiness, they will be ALL over it like white on rice.

God knows that I am so far from righteous that for me to even try to sit here and attempt to type a rebuke is a joke…and yet, I feel very strongly compelled to at least call things out as I see them. My intent is in a spirit of love — to encourage us all to reach higher, to choose better — even if I may fail at expressing it in that way at times.

Here’s the real deal:
The love of God is greater far
than tongue or pen can ever tell;
It goes beyond the highest star,
and reaches to the lowest hell.

Perhaps I am idealistic — you may say I’m a dreamer, but I’m not the only one — and yeah, my capacity for hope almost knows no bounds…there have been times in my life that hope was ALL I had…maybe that’s why I see somebody with such a childlike idealism like Michael Jackson had and I do feel sad that the world has lost that light. Read the lyrics to “Heal The World” wherein he urges us to be God’s glow–brilliant.

Do not misunderstand me, I am fully aware of the man’s frailties. I know he made poor decisions…don’t we all? His were shouted from the rooftops and magnified by his millions of dollars. There but for the grace of God go I! However, I do not believe he was a child molester.

Here’s why:
When I was a peon in the music business, I had people trying to befriend me, just because of the other peons I knew to try and get to higher up peons to try to get to possible higher ups, and maybe — just maybe — on down the line, get to an artist. That was just my case, a total and complete nobody.

Do you not think the biggest star this planet has ever known had hundreds of leeches trying to latch onto him every single day…extortionists trying to constantly get money or whatever else they could out of him?
Those leeches would use whatever they could to get to him – even their children.

Those leeches finally sucked the spirit of Michael Jackson dry.

Those around him said he was never the same after the child molestation trial. I watched a defense attorney being interviewed — who had no vested interest to do so — in tears as he talked about what a broken man Michael Jackson became as he was falsely accused, misinterpreted, and maligned.

You may ask why I feel the need to defend a man I never met. I can only answer that the passion I feel about loving the “unlovable” in the eyes of the mainstream church runs so deep within my veins that I can’t help but speak out. I cannot be silent when I watch people who are not your typical white, Protestant, evangelical, straight, American be maligned just because they are different. There is still an arrogance present that is as filthy rags. It stinks. It’s disgusting.

Just like our own righteousness without the love of God — remember?

“The hardest people to reach with the love of God are not the bad people. They know they are bad. They have no defense. The hardest ones to win for God are the self-righteous people.” –Charles L. Allen

I had breakfast this morning with one of my closest friends. Something we talked about was how when we were growing up in the church, we were taught how broken as people we are. Condemnation, restrictions, and everything we were not allowed to do or be. Just like I said above, our righteousness is as filthy rags…without the love of God.

So, shouldn’t we be striving everyday to live out the balance of knowing we are nothing without the love of God and yet everything because of the love of God — and so is that hooker down on the street corner downtown? And the person sitting in the pew who hasn’t had a shower in 3 days? And that pastor of the mega-church on the hill? And the guy at the prison sitting on death row? And the President? And Britney Spears? And that homeless guy at the McDonalds on Broadway? And me? And you? And Michael Jackson?

http://gingersnaps.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/tell-em-that-its-human-nature/
 
Tell ‘Em That It’s Human Nature

by GingerSnaps

Death always seems to bring out the best and the worst in people.

Whether it be within the close confines of the family circle who loses a loved one or the large populace of a nation who loses their leader, death can either draw hearts together or rip bonds apart.

Most assuredly, this past week has brought to light a broad spectrum of emotions from virtually millions of fans, non-fans, and observers alike who have an opinion about Michael Jackson. I have read every sort of comment ranging from a proclamation that he was led to Jesus 3 weeks ago (“saved”) by Andrae’ & Sandra Crouch* to someone literally stating that they knew he was suffering today in the flames of Hell.

Then there are the smug remarks by some who can’t understand why so many would have such strong feelings about someone they’ve never met, or why more emphasis isn’t put on the true heroes who have really given to others.
Gosh, it seems that nobody can win, doesn’t it? What comes to mind is that you can please some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can’t please all of the people all of the time.
That’s just human nature, isn’t it?

In a perfect world, each and every person who deserves recognition based on their amount of sacrifice would get it pound for pound…but then again, the ones who are giving for the right reasons usually don’t really care about being praised anyway, so it’s a moot point.

However, what really concerns me — once again — is the attitude I continue to witness time and time again from my very vocal Christian brothers and sisters who loudly proclaim their righteous involvement in their churchiness week after week, and yet when the first occasion shows itself for them to judge another person’s worthiness, they will be ALL over it like white on rice.

God knows that I am so far from righteous that for me to even try to sit here and attempt to type a rebuke is a joke…and yet, I feel very strongly compelled to at least call things out as I see them. My intent is in a spirit of love — to encourage us all to reach higher, to choose better — even if I may fail at expressing it in that way at times.

Here’s the real deal:
The love of God is greater far
than tongue or pen can ever tell;
It goes beyond the highest star,
and reaches to the lowest hell.

Perhaps I am idealistic — you may say I’m a dreamer, but I’m not the only one — and yeah, my capacity for hope almost knows no bounds…there have been times in my life that hope was ALL I had…maybe that’s why I see somebody with such a childlike idealism like Michael Jackson had and I do feel sad that the world has lost that light. Read the lyrics to “Heal The World” wherein he urges us to be God’s glow–brilliant.

Do not misunderstand me, I am fully aware of the man’s frailties. I know he made poor decisions…don’t we all? His were shouted from the rooftops and magnified by his millions of dollars. There but for the grace of God go I! However, I do not believe he was a child molester.

Here’s why:
When I was a peon in the music business, I had people trying to befriend me, just because of the other peons I knew to try and get to higher up peons to try to get to possible higher ups, and maybe — just maybe — on down the line, get to an artist. That was just my case, a total and complete nobody.

Do you not think the biggest star this planet has ever known had hundreds of leeches trying to latch onto him every single day…extortionists trying to constantly get money or whatever else they could out of him?
Those leeches would use whatever they could to get to him – even their children.

Those leeches finally sucked the spirit of Michael Jackson dry.

Those around him said he was never the same after the child molestation trial. I watched a defense attorney being interviewed — who had no vested interest to do so — in tears as he talked about what a broken man Michael Jackson became as he was falsely accused, misinterpreted, and maligned.

You may ask why I feel the need to defend a man I never met. I can only answer that the passion I feel about loving the “unlovable” in the eyes of the mainstream church runs so deep within my veins that I can’t help but speak out. I cannot be silent when I watch people who are not your typical white, Protestant, evangelical, straight, American be maligned just because they are different. There is still an arrogance present that is as filthy rags. It stinks. It’s disgusting.

Just like our own righteousness without the love of God — remember?

“The hardest people to reach with the love of God are not the bad people. They know they are bad. They have no defense. The hardest ones to win for God are the self-righteous people.” –Charles L. Allen

I had breakfast this morning with one of my closest friends. Something we talked about was how when we were growing up in the church, we were taught how broken as people we are. Condemnation, restrictions, and everything we were not allowed to do or be. Just like I said above, our righteousness is as filthy rags…without the love of God.

So, shouldn’t we be striving everyday to live out the balance of knowing we are nothing without the love of God and yet everything because of the love of God — and so is that hooker down on the street corner downtown? And the person sitting in the pew who hasn’t had a shower in 3 days? And that pastor of the mega-church on the hill? And the guy at the prison sitting on death row? And the President? And Britney Spears? And that homeless guy at the McDonalds on Broadway? And me? And you? And Michael Jackson?

http://gingersnaps.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/tell-em-that-its-human-nature/
 
He Only Wanted To Be Let In - by Tori Tomkins

I'm not sure how many of you read this site, but I think this essay it's so beautiful and true and I wanted to share it with you.
Unfortunately I can only provide the link.


He Only Wanted To Be Let In
by Tori Tomkins

http://www.mj-777.com/?p=8367


Please read, it's very touching and true.:heart:
 
He Only Wanted To Be Let In - by Tori Tomkins

I'm not sure how many of you read this site, but I think this essay it's so beautiful and true and I wanted to share it with you.
Unfortunately I can only provide the link.


He Only Wanted To Be Let In
by Tori Tomkins

http://www.mj-777.com/?p=8367


Please read, it's very touching and true.:heart:
 
He Only Wanted To Be Let In - by Tori Tomkins

I'm not sure how many of you read this site, but I think this essay it's so beautiful and true and I wanted to share it with you.
Unfortunately I can only provide the link.


He Only Wanted To Be Let In
by Tori Tomkins

http://www.mj-777.com/?p=8367


Please read, it's very touching and true.:heart:
 
Michael Jackson Fans Love Like No Other

As long as there are appreciators of great music, Michael Jackson will continue to live on. He has grown to become larger than a phenomenon and more like myth.

I’m a huge fan and I just got through exploring Michael Jackson’s official website. It is a shrine to the man who thanks to Elizabeth Taylor became known to the world as The King of Pop. The site has a plethora of facts, lyrics, pictures, videos, merchandise, and just about anything else from Michael that a fan can dream of. Every song from Michael Jackson’s solo career and every one of his short films is available to listen to and watch for free.

What stood out to me is the amount of love that his fans showed to him, these are real fans. In the photo galleries are hand drawn and computer rendered pieces of art that are inspired by Michael, one of his songs, or recreations of him. They are crafted with the love that he tried to show everyone in the world through music that often contained messages of hope and inspirations to fight a struggle.

Through most of Michael’s career he fought a struggle. A struggle deep from within that manifested itself in an ever changing face and a retreat into his inner child. That lifestyle garnered national attention, everyone raised an eyebrow… Except for a Michael Jackson fan.
Quincy Jones once said that the one thing that every one of Michael’s songs were autobiographical. If there was any truth to this (I personally believe that there is) then the fans knew Michael through his music. The fans knew that there was no way possible Michael would ever do the things that he was accused of. This was the beginning of Michael’s fall from grace in the United States in the eyes of everyone… Except for a Michael Jackson fan.

A fan will view this as justice; I view it as a tragic irony, Evan Chandler committed suicide shortly after Michael’s death. Evan is the father of Jordan Chandler; the two of them together accused Michael of child molestation in 1993. It has been rumored a multitude of times that Jordan has openly admitted to people close to him that he was forced to go along with it and that nothing improper had ever actually taken place.

Michael Jackson fans believe this.

Michael was the type of artist that thrived off of being able to make others happy, once he fell from hard from fame, he felt he had lost everything, so he retreated. So did the nation, and again that excludes Michael Jackson fans.

Since the release of the first posthumous album called Michael, there have been three new videos, oddly enough without Michael in them. The first was from the duet song Hold My Hand with Akon. The video featured Akon with historical clips of Michael. The second was from the song Hollywood Tonight and told an interesting story about a girl much like the one described in the song and the last just released is from the song Behind the Mask (the best song on this album). The thing that these videos share in common is that they are feature either largely or completely consist of fans.

Michael never truly knew how loved he was, it was never shown to him while he was alive. Now in death, he walks water. Why? It’s just Human Nature.

Read more: http://technorati.com/entertainment...ckson-fans-love-like-no/page-2/#ixzz1RQ2VCbnR
 
Michael Jackson Fans Love Like No Other

As long as there are appreciators of great music, Michael Jackson will continue to live on. He has grown to become larger than a phenomenon and more like myth.

I’m a huge fan and I just got through exploring Michael Jackson’s official website. It is a shrine to the man who thanks to Elizabeth Taylor became known to the world as The King of Pop. The site has a plethora of facts, lyrics, pictures, videos, merchandise, and just about anything else from Michael that a fan can dream of. Every song from Michael Jackson’s solo career and every one of his short films is available to listen to and watch for free.

What stood out to me is the amount of love that his fans showed to him, these are real fans. In the photo galleries are hand drawn and computer rendered pieces of art that are inspired by Michael, one of his songs, or recreations of him. They are crafted with the love that he tried to show everyone in the world through music that often contained messages of hope and inspirations to fight a struggle.

Through most of Michael’s career he fought a struggle. A struggle deep from within that manifested itself in an ever changing face and a retreat into his inner child. That lifestyle garnered national attention, everyone raised an eyebrow… Except for a Michael Jackson fan.
Quincy Jones once said that the one thing that every one of Michael’s songs were autobiographical. If there was any truth to this (I personally believe that there is) then the fans knew Michael through his music. The fans knew that there was no way possible Michael would ever do the things that he was accused of. This was the beginning of Michael’s fall from grace in the United States in the eyes of everyone… Except for a Michael Jackson fan.

A fan will view this as justice; I view it as a tragic irony, Evan Chandler committed suicide shortly after Michael’s death. Evan is the father of Jordan Chandler; the two of them together accused Michael of child molestation in 1993. It has been rumored a multitude of times that Jordan has openly admitted to people close to him that he was forced to go along with it and that nothing improper had ever actually taken place.

Michael Jackson fans believe this.

Michael was the type of artist that thrived off of being able to make others happy, once he fell from hard from fame, he felt he had lost everything, so he retreated. So did the nation, and again that excludes Michael Jackson fans.

Since the release of the first posthumous album called Michael, there have been three new videos, oddly enough without Michael in them. The first was from the duet song Hold My Hand with Akon. The video featured Akon with historical clips of Michael. The second was from the song Hollywood Tonight and told an interesting story about a girl much like the one described in the song and the last just released is from the song Behind the Mask (the best song on this album). The thing that these videos share in common is that they are feature either largely or completely consist of fans.

Michael never truly knew how loved he was, it was never shown to him while he was alive. Now in death, he walks water. Why? It’s just Human Nature.

Read more: http://technorati.com/entertainment...ckson-fans-love-like-no/page-2/#ixzz1RQ2VCbnR
 
Michael Jackson Fans Love Like No Other

As long as there are appreciators of great music, Michael Jackson will continue to live on. He has grown to become larger than a phenomenon and more like myth.

I’m a huge fan and I just got through exploring Michael Jackson’s official website. It is a shrine to the man who thanks to Elizabeth Taylor became known to the world as The King of Pop. The site has a plethora of facts, lyrics, pictures, videos, merchandise, and just about anything else from Michael that a fan can dream of. Every song from Michael Jackson’s solo career and every one of his short films is available to listen to and watch for free.

What stood out to me is the amount of love that his fans showed to him, these are real fans. In the photo galleries are hand drawn and computer rendered pieces of art that are inspired by Michael, one of his songs, or recreations of him. They are crafted with the love that he tried to show everyone in the world through music that often contained messages of hope and inspirations to fight a struggle.

Through most of Michael’s career he fought a struggle. A struggle deep from within that manifested itself in an ever changing face and a retreat into his inner child. That lifestyle garnered national attention, everyone raised an eyebrow… Except for a Michael Jackson fan.
Quincy Jones once said that the one thing that every one of Michael’s songs were autobiographical. If there was any truth to this (I personally believe that there is) then the fans knew Michael through his music. The fans knew that there was no way possible Michael would ever do the things that he was accused of. This was the beginning of Michael’s fall from grace in the United States in the eyes of everyone… Except for a Michael Jackson fan.

A fan will view this as justice; I view it as a tragic irony, Evan Chandler committed suicide shortly after Michael’s death. Evan is the father of Jordan Chandler; the two of them together accused Michael of child molestation in 1993. It has been rumored a multitude of times that Jordan has openly admitted to people close to him that he was forced to go along with it and that nothing improper had ever actually taken place.

Michael Jackson fans believe this.

Michael was the type of artist that thrived off of being able to make others happy, once he fell from hard from fame, he felt he had lost everything, so he retreated. So did the nation, and again that excludes Michael Jackson fans.

Since the release of the first posthumous album called Michael, there have been three new videos, oddly enough without Michael in them. The first was from the duet song Hold My Hand with Akon. The video featured Akon with historical clips of Michael. The second was from the song Hollywood Tonight and told an interesting story about a girl much like the one described in the song and the last just released is from the song Behind the Mask (the best song on this album). The thing that these videos share in common is that they are feature either largely or completely consist of fans.

Michael never truly knew how loved he was, it was never shown to him while he was alive. Now in death, he walks water. Why? It’s just Human Nature.

Read more: http://technorati.com/entertainment...ckson-fans-love-like-no/page-2/#ixzz1RQ2VCbnR
 
Re: Truly Inspired: An Interview with Famous Hip-Hop Dancer Rino Nakasone about Michael

thank you for sharing.

Michael still inspires many people and will forever.

with L.O.V.E.
 
Re: Truly Inspired: An Interview with Famous Hip-Hop Dancer Rino Nakasone about Michael

thank you for sharing.

Michael still inspires many people and will forever.

with L.O.V.E.
 
Re: Truly Inspired: An Interview with Famous Hip-Hop Dancer Rino Nakasone about Michael

thank you for sharing.

Michael still inspires many people and will forever.

with L.O.V.E.
 
In MJ’s Shadow

ARMOND WHITE remembers Michael Jackson’s pop open-mindedness

By Armond White


Michael Jackson made the best cinema of 1991 with the music video “Black or White,” which was easily superior to any short or feature-length film released to the public that year. To find a comparable example of visual montage, you have to go back to one of Alain Resnais’ time-shifting études, the marriage scherzo in Citizen Kane or the chase-trial fugue in D.W. Griffith’s Intolerance. I combine musical and filmic values because “Black or White” ’s visionary approach to egalitarianism—ending with a still-miraculous sequence of genetic morphing and counter-balanced by a solo dance of frustration and rage—was a singular feat: Its constant rhythm was accompanied by a stacking-up of thrilling, provocative ideas.

The night “Black or White” premiered on FOX was one of those memorable moments when Michael Jackson brought the world together through his art. That unification is, of course, MJ’s legacy. But not merely in a lovey-dovey sense. MJ’s command of popular attention was always unexpected and challenging. Each cultural/historical marker demonstrated his unique sensibility, mostly superb taste (pardon his penchant for horror-film tropes), his simple yet probing, agitating intellect and his seemingly boundless talents: a great singer, songwriter, dancer and, in movie terms, performer-as-auteur.

This career of milestones hasn’t ended with Jackson’s death last week at age 50. Despite media vultures striking new lows in their ongoing scavenger hunt, Jackson’s loss started unprecedented Internet traffic that experts say diminished the cyberspace and twittering exchanges about Iran’s recent election. His personal incarnation of modern cultural and political change began with 11-year-old Michael’s first national television appearance on ABC’s The Hollywood Palace, performing the still-astonishing “I Want You Back” with his brothers in The Jackson Five. Child prodigies and splashy debuts are commonplace in show business, so who could imagine what Jackson’s brash, playful introduction augured?

The extraordinary achievements that followed dwarfed the careers of stars who attained greater esteem in single pursuits; MJ epitomized for all the greater social benefits of liberated black American expression. As MJ pushed R&B forward, adding to the emotional definition of cultural consumers’ lives, it first seemed like showbiz as usual. The records “ABC,” “The Love You Save” and “I’ll Be There” exemplified youth culture’s new energy and power. Then MJ confounded convention with the startlingly poignant “Ben.” It was a strategic movie tie-in theme (for the 1972 horror flick of the same name, a sequel to Willard) the same year Diana Ross sought to infiltrate Hollywood with the biopic Lady Sings the Blues. But MJ took his B-movie opportunity so seriously that it quietly permeated the zeitgeist. People who don’t appreciate “Ben” don’t really appreciate pop culture and remain clueless about MJ. His tender, profound emotionality taught teenagers everywhere that they could feel more deeply than they realized.

Here’s the beauty part: “Ben” wasn’t just for black fans (such as those who identified with the Jackson Five’s “Mama’s Pearl”) but white listeners also responded (and I know many of them), recognizing and assenting to MJ’s heartfelt pledge. This is why, 25 years after “Ben,” when MJ publicized himself as “The King of Pop,” the tagline stuck. It had been denied him by the Elvis-worshipping racist media, but MJ snatched it from the selfish claws of industry bias. Some scoffed but listeners and sharp observers knew it was true.

Going beyond hubris, MJ made the self-assertion that black artists were usually too modest (or underfinanced) to dare. Since childhood, MJ gained an understanding of how the record industry and the mainstream media work. He aimed for cultural domination, achieved it then moonwalked across our consciousness—strutting and gliding as if the crown was no heavier than a bon vivant’s fedora. Little Michael started out singing about desire with a profound sense of urgency. Both “Ben” and “I Want You Back” offer the sense of immediacy special to great pop, holding witnesses in an intense private moment. It is not ironic that these records incarnate youth’s illusion of immortality. It’s a gift.

***

Most people have a favorite MJ song or performance that exemplifies the ways we come to understand and share joy and sadness, celebration and isolation. MJ mediated these things—as certified when the recent movies 13 Going On 30 and The Wackness paid tribute to MJ. Awareness of his art is a natural part of the modern experience. MJ was such a fact of life for the past 40 years that the newsmedia’s disrespect—as in journos’ demeaning “*****”—deprives the world of appreciating the wonder and depth of Jackson’s art. Critics readily grant hero status to particular artists, but if Bob Dylan, Kurt Cobain, P.J. Harvey and Eminem are pop’s “geniuses” what word can adequately describe the world-changing creativity, astounding craft and miraculous precision of Jackson’s output? His personal issues don’t justify denying it. Mainstream tastemakers find it difficult to accept the intellectual, spiritual and aesthetic progress of MJ absorbing Fred Astaire, Gene Kelly, Billy Eckstein, Sam Cooke, James Brown and Bob Fosse, continuing their work and matching it in his own style.

There’s much originality to reflect on: whether the race-defying polemic “Black or White” or many innovative music-videos like “Scream,” “Bad” (Scorsese’s best post-’70s film) and the redoubtable “Thriller,” which many people admire and first showed MJ’s unique flair for combining popular extravaganza with personal anxiety. Go back to 1971’s “I’ll Be There” (its essence appears even in MJ’s late work). This early classic was more than a love song: The youngster’s earnestness conveyed a cherubic purity in the uncanny lyric, “You and I must make a pact/ We must bring salvation back.” The religious evocation isn’t cloying; it recognizes spiritual need in romantic ardor. The innocence of Jackson’s voice confirms it as natural, basic. Jackson inherited the pop song tradition like catechism; as a devout, he grew into his own sincere articulation—as when echoing Billie Holiday in the “Ain’t Nobody’s Business” refrain of 1988’s “The Way You Make Me Feel,” yet updating and owning it.

On the 1980 “Lovely One,” sung with his brothers, the paean to mother Katherine Jackson becomes an ode to womanhood—the romantic ideal. MJ doesn’t fatuously evade distinctions, but in pop’s great emotional imperative, social boundaries dissolve in the funk and ecstasy of singing, jamming. “Check out this feeling!” he exhorts to all who will listen. The fact of feeling in his music, singing and brotherly harmonies, proves the goodness of loving. Through the vivified funk of “Lovely One,” Jackson demonstrates that You-Must-Dance, rhythmic mastery that goes beyond intellectualizing. Maybe it will never make sense to tight-asses. Pity is, they often have tight souls.

Rev. Al Sharpton was right to remind people that, before Tiger Woods, Oprah Winfrey and Barack Obama benefited from mass self-congratulation, Michael Jackson was a crucial figure contributing to—encouraging—the liberal world’s enlightenment. As a product of the Civil Rights Era, he was an invaluable inspirator of pop open-mindedness. Part of MJ’s social uplift comes from his determination to exceed the social and professional limits of the black social pioneers who preceded him. His funky, elegant stage and studio precision derives from the Northern industrial aspiration passed forward to the Great Migration’s later generations. This remains mysterious to many pop music scholars still stuck in the patronizing, sentimental perception that uneducated, earthy Negroes are “authentic” blacks. President Obama’s grudging condolence suggests that this snobbery still exists in high places. As a Motown artist, MJ defied that stereotype as a way of guaranteeing his own cultural achievement, but it also laid a spiritual and material foundation for success—acceptance and satisfaction—that lasts.

Inherent in all the MJ trailblazing is belief—proof—that the Civil Rights Era-promises of equality are realized in the open and creative expression of group and individual feelings. Artists confide a special faith in their public expression: that what they have to say will be heard and understood. (“Beat It” changed more hearts than the Iowa Caucus.) Through the audacity afforded by exceptional talent, this becomes more than a hope and you can grasp it personally—whether or not anyone else concurs—in “Ben,” “Billie Jean,” “You Are Not Alone” or, as in the challenge posed by “Black or White”: “Don’t tell me you agree with me/ When I saw you kicking dirt in my eye.”

MJ had the audacity to believe that he could also create that communication on a larger scale in sincere anthems like “We Are the World,” “Earth Song” and “Man in the Mirror.” It’s a wonder of pop art when you can’t really separate the gravitas of an anthem from a love lyric. That flash of emotional truth in MJ’s art makes it possible to set aside scandal. What genuine artist has avoided it?

Last year’s pop wonder The Ting Tings have eulogized MJ perfectly: “Michael Jackson, the Pop Giant. His controversial life is now over. His great music will outlive us all.” As the soulless media returns to its routine of hateful recrimination, this cultural fact remains: We all live, dance and cry in Michael Jackson’s shadow.

June 30, 2009
http://nypress.com/article-20022-in-mjrss-shadow.html
 
In MJ’s Shadow

ARMOND WHITE remembers Michael Jackson’s pop open-mindedness

By Armond White


Michael Jackson made the best cinema of 1991 with the music video “Black or White,” which was easily superior to any short or feature-length film released to the public that year. To find a comparable example of visual montage, you have to go back to one of Alain Resnais’ time-shifting études, the marriage scherzo in Citizen Kane or the chase-trial fugue in D.W. Griffith’s Intolerance. I combine musical and filmic values because “Black or White” ’s visionary approach to egalitarianism—ending with a still-miraculous sequence of genetic morphing and counter-balanced by a solo dance of frustration and rage—was a singular feat: Its constant rhythm was accompanied by a stacking-up of thrilling, provocative ideas.

The night “Black or White” premiered on FOX was one of those memorable moments when Michael Jackson brought the world together through his art. That unification is, of course, MJ’s legacy. But not merely in a lovey-dovey sense. MJ’s command of popular attention was always unexpected and challenging. Each cultural/historical marker demonstrated his unique sensibility, mostly superb taste (pardon his penchant for horror-film tropes), his simple yet probing, agitating intellect and his seemingly boundless talents: a great singer, songwriter, dancer and, in movie terms, performer-as-auteur.

This career of milestones hasn’t ended with Jackson’s death last week at age 50. Despite media vultures striking new lows in their ongoing scavenger hunt, Jackson’s loss started unprecedented Internet traffic that experts say diminished the cyberspace and twittering exchanges about Iran’s recent election. His personal incarnation of modern cultural and political change began with 11-year-old Michael’s first national television appearance on ABC’s The Hollywood Palace, performing the still-astonishing “I Want You Back” with his brothers in The Jackson Five. Child prodigies and splashy debuts are commonplace in show business, so who could imagine what Jackson’s brash, playful introduction augured?

The extraordinary achievements that followed dwarfed the careers of stars who attained greater esteem in single pursuits; MJ epitomized for all the greater social benefits of liberated black American expression. As MJ pushed R&B forward, adding to the emotional definition of cultural consumers’ lives, it first seemed like showbiz as usual. The records “ABC,” “The Love You Save” and “I’ll Be There” exemplified youth culture’s new energy and power. Then MJ confounded convention with the startlingly poignant “Ben.” It was a strategic movie tie-in theme (for the 1972 horror flick of the same name, a sequel to Willard) the same year Diana Ross sought to infiltrate Hollywood with the biopic Lady Sings the Blues. But MJ took his B-movie opportunity so seriously that it quietly permeated the zeitgeist. People who don’t appreciate “Ben” don’t really appreciate pop culture and remain clueless about MJ. His tender, profound emotionality taught teenagers everywhere that they could feel more deeply than they realized.

Here’s the beauty part: “Ben” wasn’t just for black fans (such as those who identified with the Jackson Five’s “Mama’s Pearl”) but white listeners also responded (and I know many of them), recognizing and assenting to MJ’s heartfelt pledge. This is why, 25 years after “Ben,” when MJ publicized himself as “The King of Pop,” the tagline stuck. It had been denied him by the Elvis-worshipping racist media, but MJ snatched it from the selfish claws of industry bias. Some scoffed but listeners and sharp observers knew it was true.

Going beyond hubris, MJ made the self-assertion that black artists were usually too modest (or underfinanced) to dare. Since childhood, MJ gained an understanding of how the record industry and the mainstream media work. He aimed for cultural domination, achieved it then moonwalked across our consciousness—strutting and gliding as if the crown was no heavier than a bon vivant’s fedora. Little Michael started out singing about desire with a profound sense of urgency. Both “Ben” and “I Want You Back” offer the sense of immediacy special to great pop, holding witnesses in an intense private moment. It is not ironic that these records incarnate youth’s illusion of immortality. It’s a gift.

***

Most people have a favorite MJ song or performance that exemplifies the ways we come to understand and share joy and sadness, celebration and isolation. MJ mediated these things—as certified when the recent movies 13 Going On 30 and The Wackness paid tribute to MJ. Awareness of his art is a natural part of the modern experience. MJ was such a fact of life for the past 40 years that the newsmedia’s disrespect—as in journos’ demeaning “*****”—deprives the world of appreciating the wonder and depth of Jackson’s art. Critics readily grant hero status to particular artists, but if Bob Dylan, Kurt Cobain, P.J. Harvey and Eminem are pop’s “geniuses” what word can adequately describe the world-changing creativity, astounding craft and miraculous precision of Jackson’s output? His personal issues don’t justify denying it. Mainstream tastemakers find it difficult to accept the intellectual, spiritual and aesthetic progress of MJ absorbing Fred Astaire, Gene Kelly, Billy Eckstein, Sam Cooke, James Brown and Bob Fosse, continuing their work and matching it in his own style.

There’s much originality to reflect on: whether the race-defying polemic “Black or White” or many innovative music-videos like “Scream,” “Bad” (Scorsese’s best post-’70s film) and the redoubtable “Thriller,” which many people admire and first showed MJ’s unique flair for combining popular extravaganza with personal anxiety. Go back to 1971’s “I’ll Be There” (its essence appears even in MJ’s late work). This early classic was more than a love song: The youngster’s earnestness conveyed a cherubic purity in the uncanny lyric, “You and I must make a pact/ We must bring salvation back.” The religious evocation isn’t cloying; it recognizes spiritual need in romantic ardor. The innocence of Jackson’s voice confirms it as natural, basic. Jackson inherited the pop song tradition like catechism; as a devout, he grew into his own sincere articulation—as when echoing Billie Holiday in the “Ain’t Nobody’s Business” refrain of 1988’s “The Way You Make Me Feel,” yet updating and owning it.

On the 1980 “Lovely One,” sung with his brothers, the paean to mother Katherine Jackson becomes an ode to womanhood—the romantic ideal. MJ doesn’t fatuously evade distinctions, but in pop’s great emotional imperative, social boundaries dissolve in the funk and ecstasy of singing, jamming. “Check out this feeling!” he exhorts to all who will listen. The fact of feeling in his music, singing and brotherly harmonies, proves the goodness of loving. Through the vivified funk of “Lovely One,” Jackson demonstrates that You-Must-Dance, rhythmic mastery that goes beyond intellectualizing. Maybe it will never make sense to tight-asses. Pity is, they often have tight souls.

Rev. Al Sharpton was right to remind people that, before Tiger Woods, Oprah Winfrey and Barack Obama benefited from mass self-congratulation, Michael Jackson was a crucial figure contributing to—encouraging—the liberal world’s enlightenment. As a product of the Civil Rights Era, he was an invaluable inspirator of pop open-mindedness. Part of MJ’s social uplift comes from his determination to exceed the social and professional limits of the black social pioneers who preceded him. His funky, elegant stage and studio precision derives from the Northern industrial aspiration passed forward to the Great Migration’s later generations. This remains mysterious to many pop music scholars still stuck in the patronizing, sentimental perception that uneducated, earthy Negroes are “authentic” blacks. President Obama’s grudging condolence suggests that this snobbery still exists in high places. As a Motown artist, MJ defied that stereotype as a way of guaranteeing his own cultural achievement, but it also laid a spiritual and material foundation for success—acceptance and satisfaction—that lasts.

Inherent in all the MJ trailblazing is belief—proof—that the Civil Rights Era-promises of equality are realized in the open and creative expression of group and individual feelings. Artists confide a special faith in their public expression: that what they have to say will be heard and understood. (“Beat It” changed more hearts than the Iowa Caucus.) Through the audacity afforded by exceptional talent, this becomes more than a hope and you can grasp it personally—whether or not anyone else concurs—in “Ben,” “Billie Jean,” “You Are Not Alone” or, as in the challenge posed by “Black or White”: “Don’t tell me you agree with me/ When I saw you kicking dirt in my eye.”

MJ had the audacity to believe that he could also create that communication on a larger scale in sincere anthems like “We Are the World,” “Earth Song” and “Man in the Mirror.” It’s a wonder of pop art when you can’t really separate the gravitas of an anthem from a love lyric. That flash of emotional truth in MJ’s art makes it possible to set aside scandal. What genuine artist has avoided it?

Last year’s pop wonder The Ting Tings have eulogized MJ perfectly: “Michael Jackson, the Pop Giant. His controversial life is now over. His great music will outlive us all.” As the soulless media returns to its routine of hateful recrimination, this cultural fact remains: We all live, dance and cry in Michael Jackson’s shadow.

June 30, 2009
http://nypress.com/article-20022-in-mjrss-shadow.html
 
In MJ’s Shadow

ARMOND WHITE remembers Michael Jackson’s pop open-mindedness

By Armond White


Michael Jackson made the best cinema of 1991 with the music video “Black or White,” which was easily superior to any short or feature-length film released to the public that year. To find a comparable example of visual montage, you have to go back to one of Alain Resnais’ time-shifting études, the marriage scherzo in Citizen Kane or the chase-trial fugue in D.W. Griffith’s Intolerance. I combine musical and filmic values because “Black or White” ’s visionary approach to egalitarianism—ending with a still-miraculous sequence of genetic morphing and counter-balanced by a solo dance of frustration and rage—was a singular feat: Its constant rhythm was accompanied by a stacking-up of thrilling, provocative ideas.

The night “Black or White” premiered on FOX was one of those memorable moments when Michael Jackson brought the world together through his art. That unification is, of course, MJ’s legacy. But not merely in a lovey-dovey sense. MJ’s command of popular attention was always unexpected and challenging. Each cultural/historical marker demonstrated his unique sensibility, mostly superb taste (pardon his penchant for horror-film tropes), his simple yet probing, agitating intellect and his seemingly boundless talents: a great singer, songwriter, dancer and, in movie terms, performer-as-auteur.

This career of milestones hasn’t ended with Jackson’s death last week at age 50. Despite media vultures striking new lows in their ongoing scavenger hunt, Jackson’s loss started unprecedented Internet traffic that experts say diminished the cyberspace and twittering exchanges about Iran’s recent election. His personal incarnation of modern cultural and political change began with 11-year-old Michael’s first national television appearance on ABC’s The Hollywood Palace, performing the still-astonishing “I Want You Back” with his brothers in The Jackson Five. Child prodigies and splashy debuts are commonplace in show business, so who could imagine what Jackson’s brash, playful introduction augured?

The extraordinary achievements that followed dwarfed the careers of stars who attained greater esteem in single pursuits; MJ epitomized for all the greater social benefits of liberated black American expression. As MJ pushed R&B forward, adding to the emotional definition of cultural consumers’ lives, it first seemed like showbiz as usual. The records “ABC,” “The Love You Save” and “I’ll Be There” exemplified youth culture’s new energy and power. Then MJ confounded convention with the startlingly poignant “Ben.” It was a strategic movie tie-in theme (for the 1972 horror flick of the same name, a sequel to Willard) the same year Diana Ross sought to infiltrate Hollywood with the biopic Lady Sings the Blues. But MJ took his B-movie opportunity so seriously that it quietly permeated the zeitgeist. People who don’t appreciate “Ben” don’t really appreciate pop culture and remain clueless about MJ. His tender, profound emotionality taught teenagers everywhere that they could feel more deeply than they realized.

Here’s the beauty part: “Ben” wasn’t just for black fans (such as those who identified with the Jackson Five’s “Mama’s Pearl”) but white listeners also responded (and I know many of them), recognizing and assenting to MJ’s heartfelt pledge. This is why, 25 years after “Ben,” when MJ publicized himself as “The King of Pop,” the tagline stuck. It had been denied him by the Elvis-worshipping racist media, but MJ snatched it from the selfish claws of industry bias. Some scoffed but listeners and sharp observers knew it was true.

Going beyond hubris, MJ made the self-assertion that black artists were usually too modest (or underfinanced) to dare. Since childhood, MJ gained an understanding of how the record industry and the mainstream media work. He aimed for cultural domination, achieved it then moonwalked across our consciousness—strutting and gliding as if the crown was no heavier than a bon vivant’s fedora. Little Michael started out singing about desire with a profound sense of urgency. Both “Ben” and “I Want You Back” offer the sense of immediacy special to great pop, holding witnesses in an intense private moment. It is not ironic that these records incarnate youth’s illusion of immortality. It’s a gift.

***

Most people have a favorite MJ song or performance that exemplifies the ways we come to understand and share joy and sadness, celebration and isolation. MJ mediated these things—as certified when the recent movies 13 Going On 30 and The Wackness paid tribute to MJ. Awareness of his art is a natural part of the modern experience. MJ was such a fact of life for the past 40 years that the newsmedia’s disrespect—as in journos’ demeaning “*****”—deprives the world of appreciating the wonder and depth of Jackson’s art. Critics readily grant hero status to particular artists, but if Bob Dylan, Kurt Cobain, P.J. Harvey and Eminem are pop’s “geniuses” what word can adequately describe the world-changing creativity, astounding craft and miraculous precision of Jackson’s output? His personal issues don’t justify denying it. Mainstream tastemakers find it difficult to accept the intellectual, spiritual and aesthetic progress of MJ absorbing Fred Astaire, Gene Kelly, Billy Eckstein, Sam Cooke, James Brown and Bob Fosse, continuing their work and matching it in his own style.

There’s much originality to reflect on: whether the race-defying polemic “Black or White” or many innovative music-videos like “Scream,” “Bad” (Scorsese’s best post-’70s film) and the redoubtable “Thriller,” which many people admire and first showed MJ’s unique flair for combining popular extravaganza with personal anxiety. Go back to 1971’s “I’ll Be There” (its essence appears even in MJ’s late work). This early classic was more than a love song: The youngster’s earnestness conveyed a cherubic purity in the uncanny lyric, “You and I must make a pact/ We must bring salvation back.” The religious evocation isn’t cloying; it recognizes spiritual need in romantic ardor. The innocence of Jackson’s voice confirms it as natural, basic. Jackson inherited the pop song tradition like catechism; as a devout, he grew into his own sincere articulation—as when echoing Billie Holiday in the “Ain’t Nobody’s Business” refrain of 1988’s “The Way You Make Me Feel,” yet updating and owning it.

On the 1980 “Lovely One,” sung with his brothers, the paean to mother Katherine Jackson becomes an ode to womanhood—the romantic ideal. MJ doesn’t fatuously evade distinctions, but in pop’s great emotional imperative, social boundaries dissolve in the funk and ecstasy of singing, jamming. “Check out this feeling!” he exhorts to all who will listen. The fact of feeling in his music, singing and brotherly harmonies, proves the goodness of loving. Through the vivified funk of “Lovely One,” Jackson demonstrates that You-Must-Dance, rhythmic mastery that goes beyond intellectualizing. Maybe it will never make sense to tight-asses. Pity is, they often have tight souls.

Rev. Al Sharpton was right to remind people that, before Tiger Woods, Oprah Winfrey and Barack Obama benefited from mass self-congratulation, Michael Jackson was a crucial figure contributing to—encouraging—the liberal world’s enlightenment. As a product of the Civil Rights Era, he was an invaluable inspirator of pop open-mindedness. Part of MJ’s social uplift comes from his determination to exceed the social and professional limits of the black social pioneers who preceded him. His funky, elegant stage and studio precision derives from the Northern industrial aspiration passed forward to the Great Migration’s later generations. This remains mysterious to many pop music scholars still stuck in the patronizing, sentimental perception that uneducated, earthy Negroes are “authentic” blacks. President Obama’s grudging condolence suggests that this snobbery still exists in high places. As a Motown artist, MJ defied that stereotype as a way of guaranteeing his own cultural achievement, but it also laid a spiritual and material foundation for success—acceptance and satisfaction—that lasts.

Inherent in all the MJ trailblazing is belief—proof—that the Civil Rights Era-promises of equality are realized in the open and creative expression of group and individual feelings. Artists confide a special faith in their public expression: that what they have to say will be heard and understood. (“Beat It” changed more hearts than the Iowa Caucus.) Through the audacity afforded by exceptional talent, this becomes more than a hope and you can grasp it personally—whether or not anyone else concurs—in “Ben,” “Billie Jean,” “You Are Not Alone” or, as in the challenge posed by “Black or White”: “Don’t tell me you agree with me/ When I saw you kicking dirt in my eye.”

MJ had the audacity to believe that he could also create that communication on a larger scale in sincere anthems like “We Are the World,” “Earth Song” and “Man in the Mirror.” It’s a wonder of pop art when you can’t really separate the gravitas of an anthem from a love lyric. That flash of emotional truth in MJ’s art makes it possible to set aside scandal. What genuine artist has avoided it?

Last year’s pop wonder The Ting Tings have eulogized MJ perfectly: “Michael Jackson, the Pop Giant. His controversial life is now over. His great music will outlive us all.” As the soulless media returns to its routine of hateful recrimination, this cultural fact remains: We all live, dance and cry in Michael Jackson’s shadow.

June 30, 2009
http://nypress.com/article-20022-in-mjrss-shadow.html
 
A Turkish article:

The Last Child

By Avi Albohayre
Translation to English by wapiti_baris
Originally posted at http://shamone-mj.livejournal.com/445979.html


In the wake of the word itself was brought up countless times since June 25th, fans or nonfans alike commenting that their childhood is gone now that he's gone, it's become almost obligatory to question the concept of "childhood". Even though subjects like what childhood exactly means, what era of life it represents and what its consisted of seem to be generally agreed upon, it's usually ignored that the concept itself is a very new one in historical view, that it completely belongs to modern times. Maybe it's because it's almost impossible to accept that a concept like this -which is surely a source of inspiration and an anchor to remember and to hold on to during bad times in an individual's life- might be only a structure of economics and fiction.

Sesame street, the mother putting a tissue to the back of your neck your when you sweat, scabs on knee caps, hard line honesty, free time to provide a limitless imagination... When you put it all aside, "childhood" is a new concept. In historical point of view, there has always been a childhood era. It was a physical reality and was impossible to change. But this concept which is announced by the governments that is comes to an end when you turn 18, is not as universal and protected through history as we might think.

Once upon a time, the thing called "child" was someone short and would grow tall eventually. When they turned 5 they were expected to act like an adult, and historical sources agree that during any periods of time before the 20th century, the individuals who were in their early teens were as mature as today's grown ups and had the intellectual independency of an adult. There are serious evidence that 30.000 children were sent from France and Germany to fight the Holy War in the 13th century and ended up as slaves in Alexandria. And today's mothers bite their nails when they watch a movie where a child character has to take a short journey by themselves.

We said governments and 18, right? According to the Roman Catholic Church, the age was 7. And it was called "the age of discretion". There is no expression of innocence of childhood or the need of protection up until the 17th century. And even then, the acceptance of childhood was only an exception, exclusive to the nobles. It was going to take many years for this reality to be accepted by all social classes of society.

The modern concept of childhood -like many others- was born as a result of Industrial Revolution. The images of kids running down the streets, shouting the headlines with newspapers in their hands, visuals like Oliver Twist are all from this era. At a time when workers did not have any serious rights and when the working hours could extend to 16 hours a day, children were not an exception. The government had no say about a child's rights and the children were sold to the factories to help the family budget. The children without a family were completely exposed and soon in big cities a serious new concept, "children crimes" emerged. The developing mechanization revealed the physical insufficiency of child workers and around the end of the century, the children's place in labour market along with working conditions were reformed. The children under 16 were prohibited to work except for apprenticeship and the fear of unattended children who were unemployed leaning towards crimes introduced the concept of "obligatory education". Peter Pan made his first appereance in the book called "The Little White Bird" in 1902. And this was how the modern concept of childhood was born. The world was finally reaching the 1950s' immediate family portrait which was consisted of mother, father and two children.

Let's get back to 25th of June... This article is actually about Michael Jackson even though I know it may not look like it to this point. But what is surprising is that the man who took away our childhood with him when he died might be ironically the last representative of the times when a child was not a child. He was expected to grow up immediately and work relentlessly since he was 5, was beaten and abused by his father to be a good worker and just like his peers from before the 20th century, had no childhood memories like we do. Being famous and rich didn't make his life any more sufferable. Thesis about the effects of a lost childhood on an individual by criminologists and sociologists brought MJ closer to the saying of George Orwell about rich people: "Another poor person with money". His mistakes were not considered to be relevant to his lost childhood, after all he was the most famous, most talented person who was on top of the world and he had to stay there. He was a blind spot to the governmental child supervision because after all he was too rich to be a statistical data in employment numbers and he was outside of the usual labour market. A background like no one else. When being pushed to grow up without making any mistake emerged as the best possible goal, he was made too vulnerable to handle it. When he wanted to put a stop to endless urban legends and false accusations about himself, he didn't rage and roar like his peers and as a result, his naive, childish and shy responses were ignored by the press. He made the best known dream of a child when asked what to do if they were rich come true and built his own amusement park. The world insisted on judging him based on the perception of what a 40 years old man should be and used his differences, which can be automatically observed on someone who worked since he was 5 and became the most famous person in the world, as a source for their false accusations.

The most famous of the children whom the world failed to do justice closed his eyes to this life, right before he could give many answers to the world one right after the other, on June 25, 2009. Since that day, just like the time the wizard who controlled minds disappeared in Rainbow's Stargazer, we started seeing different angles for the first time. We started to think and discuss about what kind of desease this vitiligo was, the nonsense of the story about him sleeping in an oxygen tank, the psychological effects of being seriously burned while filming a TV ad. We realised how much of a big impact he left in our lives, and that his signature was the biggest mark in our childhoods. Undoubtedly, bringing the feeling of guilt alongside.

Now I can more clearly remember the times when I bought and wore that very similar jacket to the one he wore in the video of Bad and tried to recreate the video with 8 or 10 of my friends, because it was the route to school, the moment I saw his car in front of the hotel he stayed in Istanbul, dangling out of the window of the school bus excitedly with my friends, watching his concert for free from the hill with a view to the stadium until the last moment a cop came and chased me out of there. With his death, it feels like a shield before my eyes has left. Admittedly with a guilty conscience. When his responses to accusations were this apparent, when the pain he was in was this obvious, to feel like it's the first time you come to a realisation, even for someone who is far from a perfectionist like me, is devastating. The unconditional surrender of subconscious to the mass media... no matter how old you are.

It's obvious that urban legends about Michael Jackson will not die after his death. Even in the autopsy report that was printed last week had undertones that ordered our subconscious to see him as a weirdo and find him bizarre;

"There was nothing but pills and one fruit in his stomach." Let's assume it's true... so? Take one man or woman of middle class to aristocracy two months before summer and tell them to lose that belly and then look into their stomachs. Anything different?

"The marks of countless plastic surgery could be seen.." Let's assume it's true... so? Take the same people from the first example, tell them 40s is right around the corner and give them the phone number of a plastic surgeon. Anything different?

"He was obviously addicted to antidepressants and painkillers." Let's assume it's true... so? Who isn't?

Without a doubt, the media's role in portraying a person will be more vehemently discussed after MJ's death. The cliche of people fiercely wearing individuals with extraordinary talents out might seem like a process that was radicalised since the second half of the 20th century. But is it really so?

"He's on stage since he was 5, he looks like a freak, he's pale like a dead person, he's too skinny and he's charged with molestation." That sounds like a description the media gave for years about MJ but in fact, it was said for the probably first super star in history, Nicolo Paganini, in the 19th century. The violin virtuoso Paganini who was more talented than anyone to that point, had lived his life on tours, had achieved a fame that the class discrimination could not prevent, had his audience scream and faint with his stage performances. His interesting looks and costumes had created urban legends and the most famous one of them, the gossip of him selling his soul to the devil for his extraordinary talent, had followed him to his death and even after his death, the Archbishop had prohibited for him to be buried in a Christian funurel. No, I mean they really really seriously believed that he sold his soul to the devil! Thus, we can track back the ancestry of the likes of [* insert the name of your country's idiotic writer/journalist here] and [* and another one here].

The feast table around which the global media is gathered seems not to be cleaned up anytime soon after his death. His fan base is so huge and diverse around the globe it's impossible to sum up what we should do for his legacy... except to make his music known by many more generations and when it comes to the matters he was so sensitive about, to shout the facts to the faces of those who can not or will not break their will and judgment free of enslavement.

Thank you MJ. Eternally.

This is dedicated to all child workers.
 
A Turkish article:

The Last Child

By Avi Albohayre
Translation to English by wapiti_baris
Originally posted at http://shamone-mj.livejournal.com/445979.html


In the wake of the word itself was brought up countless times since June 25th, fans or nonfans alike commenting that their childhood is gone now that he's gone, it's become almost obligatory to question the concept of "childhood". Even though subjects like what childhood exactly means, what era of life it represents and what its consisted of seem to be generally agreed upon, it's usually ignored that the concept itself is a very new one in historical view, that it completely belongs to modern times. Maybe it's because it's almost impossible to accept that a concept like this -which is surely a source of inspiration and an anchor to remember and to hold on to during bad times in an individual's life- might be only a structure of economics and fiction.

Sesame street, the mother putting a tissue to the back of your neck your when you sweat, scabs on knee caps, hard line honesty, free time to provide a limitless imagination... When you put it all aside, "childhood" is a new concept. In historical point of view, there has always been a childhood era. It was a physical reality and was impossible to change. But this concept which is announced by the governments that is comes to an end when you turn 18, is not as universal and protected through history as we might think.

Once upon a time, the thing called "child" was someone short and would grow tall eventually. When they turned 5 they were expected to act like an adult, and historical sources agree that during any periods of time before the 20th century, the individuals who were in their early teens were as mature as today's grown ups and had the intellectual independency of an adult. There are serious evidence that 30.000 children were sent from France and Germany to fight the Holy War in the 13th century and ended up as slaves in Alexandria. And today's mothers bite their nails when they watch a movie where a child character has to take a short journey by themselves.

We said governments and 18, right? According to the Roman Catholic Church, the age was 7. And it was called "the age of discretion". There is no expression of innocence of childhood or the need of protection up until the 17th century. And even then, the acceptance of childhood was only an exception, exclusive to the nobles. It was going to take many years for this reality to be accepted by all social classes of society.

The modern concept of childhood -like many others- was born as a result of Industrial Revolution. The images of kids running down the streets, shouting the headlines with newspapers in their hands, visuals like Oliver Twist are all from this era. At a time when workers did not have any serious rights and when the working hours could extend to 16 hours a day, children were not an exception. The government had no say about a child's rights and the children were sold to the factories to help the family budget. The children without a family were completely exposed and soon in big cities a serious new concept, "children crimes" emerged. The developing mechanization revealed the physical insufficiency of child workers and around the end of the century, the children's place in labour market along with working conditions were reformed. The children under 16 were prohibited to work except for apprenticeship and the fear of unattended children who were unemployed leaning towards crimes introduced the concept of "obligatory education". Peter Pan made his first appereance in the book called "The Little White Bird" in 1902. And this was how the modern concept of childhood was born. The world was finally reaching the 1950s' immediate family portrait which was consisted of mother, father and two children.

Let's get back to 25th of June... This article is actually about Michael Jackson even though I know it may not look like it to this point. But what is surprising is that the man who took away our childhood with him when he died might be ironically the last representative of the times when a child was not a child. He was expected to grow up immediately and work relentlessly since he was 5, was beaten and abused by his father to be a good worker and just like his peers from before the 20th century, had no childhood memories like we do. Being famous and rich didn't make his life any more sufferable. Thesis about the effects of a lost childhood on an individual by criminologists and sociologists brought MJ closer to the saying of George Orwell about rich people: "Another poor person with money". His mistakes were not considered to be relevant to his lost childhood, after all he was the most famous, most talented person who was on top of the world and he had to stay there. He was a blind spot to the governmental child supervision because after all he was too rich to be a statistical data in employment numbers and he was outside of the usual labour market. A background like no one else. When being pushed to grow up without making any mistake emerged as the best possible goal, he was made too vulnerable to handle it. When he wanted to put a stop to endless urban legends and false accusations about himself, he didn't rage and roar like his peers and as a result, his naive, childish and shy responses were ignored by the press. He made the best known dream of a child when asked what to do if they were rich come true and built his own amusement park. The world insisted on judging him based on the perception of what a 40 years old man should be and used his differences, which can be automatically observed on someone who worked since he was 5 and became the most famous person in the world, as a source for their false accusations.

The most famous of the children whom the world failed to do justice closed his eyes to this life, right before he could give many answers to the world one right after the other, on June 25, 2009. Since that day, just like the time the wizard who controlled minds disappeared in Rainbow's Stargazer, we started seeing different angles for the first time. We started to think and discuss about what kind of desease this vitiligo was, the nonsense of the story about him sleeping in an oxygen tank, the psychological effects of being seriously burned while filming a TV ad. We realised how much of a big impact he left in our lives, and that his signature was the biggest mark in our childhoods. Undoubtedly, bringing the feeling of guilt alongside.

Now I can more clearly remember the times when I bought and wore that very similar jacket to the one he wore in the video of Bad and tried to recreate the video with 8 or 10 of my friends, because it was the route to school, the moment I saw his car in front of the hotel he stayed in Istanbul, dangling out of the window of the school bus excitedly with my friends, watching his concert for free from the hill with a view to the stadium until the last moment a cop came and chased me out of there. With his death, it feels like a shield before my eyes has left. Admittedly with a guilty conscience. When his responses to accusations were this apparent, when the pain he was in was this obvious, to feel like it's the first time you come to a realisation, even for someone who is far from a perfectionist like me, is devastating. The unconditional surrender of subconscious to the mass media... no matter how old you are.

It's obvious that urban legends about Michael Jackson will not die after his death. Even in the autopsy report that was printed last week had undertones that ordered our subconscious to see him as a weirdo and find him bizarre;

"There was nothing but pills and one fruit in his stomach." Let's assume it's true... so? Take one man or woman of middle class to aristocracy two months before summer and tell them to lose that belly and then look into their stomachs. Anything different?

"The marks of countless plastic surgery could be seen.." Let's assume it's true... so? Take the same people from the first example, tell them 40s is right around the corner and give them the phone number of a plastic surgeon. Anything different?

"He was obviously addicted to antidepressants and painkillers." Let's assume it's true... so? Who isn't?

Without a doubt, the media's role in portraying a person will be more vehemently discussed after MJ's death. The cliche of people fiercely wearing individuals with extraordinary talents out might seem like a process that was radicalised since the second half of the 20th century. But is it really so?

"He's on stage since he was 5, he looks like a freak, he's pale like a dead person, he's too skinny and he's charged with molestation." That sounds like a description the media gave for years about MJ but in fact, it was said for the probably first super star in history, Nicolo Paganini, in the 19th century. The violin virtuoso Paganini who was more talented than anyone to that point, had lived his life on tours, had achieved a fame that the class discrimination could not prevent, had his audience scream and faint with his stage performances. His interesting looks and costumes had created urban legends and the most famous one of them, the gossip of him selling his soul to the devil for his extraordinary talent, had followed him to his death and even after his death, the Archbishop had prohibited for him to be buried in a Christian funurel. No, I mean they really really seriously believed that he sold his soul to the devil! Thus, we can track back the ancestry of the likes of [* insert the name of your country's idiotic writer/journalist here] and [* and another one here].

The feast table around which the global media is gathered seems not to be cleaned up anytime soon after his death. His fan base is so huge and diverse around the globe it's impossible to sum up what we should do for his legacy... except to make his music known by many more generations and when it comes to the matters he was so sensitive about, to shout the facts to the faces of those who can not or will not break their will and judgment free of enslavement.

Thank you MJ. Eternally.

This is dedicated to all child workers.
 
A Turkish article:

The Last Child

By Avi Albohayre
Translation to English by wapiti_baris
Originally posted at http://shamone-mj.livejournal.com/445979.html


In the wake of the word itself was brought up countless times since June 25th, fans or nonfans alike commenting that their childhood is gone now that he's gone, it's become almost obligatory to question the concept of "childhood". Even though subjects like what childhood exactly means, what era of life it represents and what its consisted of seem to be generally agreed upon, it's usually ignored that the concept itself is a very new one in historical view, that it completely belongs to modern times. Maybe it's because it's almost impossible to accept that a concept like this -which is surely a source of inspiration and an anchor to remember and to hold on to during bad times in an individual's life- might be only a structure of economics and fiction.

Sesame street, the mother putting a tissue to the back of your neck your when you sweat, scabs on knee caps, hard line honesty, free time to provide a limitless imagination... When you put it all aside, "childhood" is a new concept. In historical point of view, there has always been a childhood era. It was a physical reality and was impossible to change. But this concept which is announced by the governments that is comes to an end when you turn 18, is not as universal and protected through history as we might think.

Once upon a time, the thing called "child" was someone short and would grow tall eventually. When they turned 5 they were expected to act like an adult, and historical sources agree that during any periods of time before the 20th century, the individuals who were in their early teens were as mature as today's grown ups and had the intellectual independency of an adult. There are serious evidence that 30.000 children were sent from France and Germany to fight the Holy War in the 13th century and ended up as slaves in Alexandria. And today's mothers bite their nails when they watch a movie where a child character has to take a short journey by themselves.

We said governments and 18, right? According to the Roman Catholic Church, the age was 7. And it was called "the age of discretion". There is no expression of innocence of childhood or the need of protection up until the 17th century. And even then, the acceptance of childhood was only an exception, exclusive to the nobles. It was going to take many years for this reality to be accepted by all social classes of society.

The modern concept of childhood -like many others- was born as a result of Industrial Revolution. The images of kids running down the streets, shouting the headlines with newspapers in their hands, visuals like Oliver Twist are all from this era. At a time when workers did not have any serious rights and when the working hours could extend to 16 hours a day, children were not an exception. The government had no say about a child's rights and the children were sold to the factories to help the family budget. The children without a family were completely exposed and soon in big cities a serious new concept, "children crimes" emerged. The developing mechanization revealed the physical insufficiency of child workers and around the end of the century, the children's place in labour market along with working conditions were reformed. The children under 16 were prohibited to work except for apprenticeship and the fear of unattended children who were unemployed leaning towards crimes introduced the concept of "obligatory education". Peter Pan made his first appereance in the book called "The Little White Bird" in 1902. And this was how the modern concept of childhood was born. The world was finally reaching the 1950s' immediate family portrait which was consisted of mother, father and two children.

Let's get back to 25th of June... This article is actually about Michael Jackson even though I know it may not look like it to this point. But what is surprising is that the man who took away our childhood with him when he died might be ironically the last representative of the times when a child was not a child. He was expected to grow up immediately and work relentlessly since he was 5, was beaten and abused by his father to be a good worker and just like his peers from before the 20th century, had no childhood memories like we do. Being famous and rich didn't make his life any more sufferable. Thesis about the effects of a lost childhood on an individual by criminologists and sociologists brought MJ closer to the saying of George Orwell about rich people: "Another poor person with money". His mistakes were not considered to be relevant to his lost childhood, after all he was the most famous, most talented person who was on top of the world and he had to stay there. He was a blind spot to the governmental child supervision because after all he was too rich to be a statistical data in employment numbers and he was outside of the usual labour market. A background like no one else. When being pushed to grow up without making any mistake emerged as the best possible goal, he was made too vulnerable to handle it. When he wanted to put a stop to endless urban legends and false accusations about himself, he didn't rage and roar like his peers and as a result, his naive, childish and shy responses were ignored by the press. He made the best known dream of a child when asked what to do if they were rich come true and built his own amusement park. The world insisted on judging him based on the perception of what a 40 years old man should be and used his differences, which can be automatically observed on someone who worked since he was 5 and became the most famous person in the world, as a source for their false accusations.

The most famous of the children whom the world failed to do justice closed his eyes to this life, right before he could give many answers to the world one right after the other, on June 25, 2009. Since that day, just like the time the wizard who controlled minds disappeared in Rainbow's Stargazer, we started seeing different angles for the first time. We started to think and discuss about what kind of desease this vitiligo was, the nonsense of the story about him sleeping in an oxygen tank, the psychological effects of being seriously burned while filming a TV ad. We realised how much of a big impact he left in our lives, and that his signature was the biggest mark in our childhoods. Undoubtedly, bringing the feeling of guilt alongside.

Now I can more clearly remember the times when I bought and wore that very similar jacket to the one he wore in the video of Bad and tried to recreate the video with 8 or 10 of my friends, because it was the route to school, the moment I saw his car in front of the hotel he stayed in Istanbul, dangling out of the window of the school bus excitedly with my friends, watching his concert for free from the hill with a view to the stadium until the last moment a cop came and chased me out of there. With his death, it feels like a shield before my eyes has left. Admittedly with a guilty conscience. When his responses to accusations were this apparent, when the pain he was in was this obvious, to feel like it's the first time you come to a realisation, even for someone who is far from a perfectionist like me, is devastating. The unconditional surrender of subconscious to the mass media... no matter how old you are.

It's obvious that urban legends about Michael Jackson will not die after his death. Even in the autopsy report that was printed last week had undertones that ordered our subconscious to see him as a weirdo and find him bizarre;

"There was nothing but pills and one fruit in his stomach." Let's assume it's true... so? Take one man or woman of middle class to aristocracy two months before summer and tell them to lose that belly and then look into their stomachs. Anything different?

"The marks of countless plastic surgery could be seen.." Let's assume it's true... so? Take the same people from the first example, tell them 40s is right around the corner and give them the phone number of a plastic surgeon. Anything different?

"He was obviously addicted to antidepressants and painkillers." Let's assume it's true... so? Who isn't?

Without a doubt, the media's role in portraying a person will be more vehemently discussed after MJ's death. The cliche of people fiercely wearing individuals with extraordinary talents out might seem like a process that was radicalised since the second half of the 20th century. But is it really so?

"He's on stage since he was 5, he looks like a freak, he's pale like a dead person, he's too skinny and he's charged with molestation." That sounds like a description the media gave for years about MJ but in fact, it was said for the probably first super star in history, Nicolo Paganini, in the 19th century. The violin virtuoso Paganini who was more talented than anyone to that point, had lived his life on tours, had achieved a fame that the class discrimination could not prevent, had his audience scream and faint with his stage performances. His interesting looks and costumes had created urban legends and the most famous one of them, the gossip of him selling his soul to the devil for his extraordinary talent, had followed him to his death and even after his death, the Archbishop had prohibited for him to be buried in a Christian funurel. No, I mean they really really seriously believed that he sold his soul to the devil! Thus, we can track back the ancestry of the likes of [* insert the name of your country's idiotic writer/journalist here] and [* and another one here].

The feast table around which the global media is gathered seems not to be cleaned up anytime soon after his death. His fan base is so huge and diverse around the globe it's impossible to sum up what we should do for his legacy... except to make his music known by many more generations and when it comes to the matters he was so sensitive about, to shout the facts to the faces of those who can not or will not break their will and judgment free of enslavement.

Thank you MJ. Eternally.

This is dedicated to all child workers.
 
CELEBRITY SCALES: Michael Jackson, the Wounded Messenger: Star-Studded Legal Commentary for the Celebrity Obsessed
By Matt Semino, ESQ. • on July 18, 2009

With the mask finally removed, her tearful goodbye humanized him in the eyes of millions of adoring fans and even skeptical detractors across the globe. Paris Jackson was the poignant conclusion to her father Michael’s celebrated memorial service. At the same time, her few words served as a painful reminder of the conflicted legacy that, as some proclaim, the greatest entertainer of all time leaves behind in the wake of his sudden, tragic and mysterious death. In Michael Jackson’s passing, this international icon casts as many if not more unanswered questions about the out of the ordinary life he led behind the curtain of his private stage.

Intense speculation over the star’s actual cause of death has ranged from an accidental overdose to explosive allegations from some family members of foul play and even murder. In the later stages of his life, Jackson was caught in a downward spiral of prescription drug abuse fostered through a tangled web of star-struck enablers and unscrupulous members of the medical establishment. As in his life, Michael Jackson was engulfed by complex legal and ethical dilemmas even at the precise moment of his death. Questions concerning the custody of Jackson’s three children, whether those children are connected to him biologically, control over and division of his complex estate, burial procedures and a final resting place for the star’s remains, use of Los Angeles public funding for a celebrity laden memorial service at the Staples Center and countless more controversial issues moved in swiftly like an ominous and heavy fog in the days and weeks following June 25th.

Upon his death, the Pandora’s box that is Michael Jackson’s secretive but highly scrutinized life burst open once again and the media as well as the public’s insatiable appetite for all of the juicy details immediately became palpable. The daily headlines read like vivid medical records. ‘Michael Jackson’s Autopsy Photo,’ ‘Michael Jackson’s Hair on Fire,’ ‘Michael Jackson’s Leg Wounds and Needle Marks,’ and ‘Michael Jackson was Sterile’ are just a few. Only the most imaginative fiction writer could create a story with such high drama and sordid twists and turns. Even with all of its tabloid entertainment value, it is a monumental disservice to Michael Jackson’s memory that a thoughtful analysis of his significant cultural contributions, particularly in the realm of human rights and social justice, are being obscured in the process of examining his death and now his corpse.

Through his prolific body of work, advocacy initiatives and multi-million dollar charity efforts, Michael Jackson raised international awareness and support for some of the most complex and timeless issues confronting the human condition. AIDS, cancer, famine, homelessness, gang violence, racism, totalitarianism, environmental degradation, child abuse, violations of animal rights, restrictions on freedom of speech and other infringements upon basic civil liberties are just some of the difficult subjects Jackson tackled by leveraging the power of his celebrity. Michael Jackson’s intuitive understanding of the problems besetting the human ecological system was uncanny and uncharacteristic for any entertainer close to his magnitude.

Many have been so dazzled by Jackson’s masterful showmanship and the consistent controversy surrounding his life and death that it would be easy not to recognize the overarching social and political themes embodied in his music, videos and public interviews. The intense emotional pull, messages and raw feelings that reverberate through the lyrics and sometimes disturbing video imagery of songs such as “They Don’t Care About Us,” “Heal the World,” “Earth Song,” and “Man in the Mirror” are gut-wrenching. A deeper analysis of Michael Jackson’s work reveals an individual with a burning concern for improving the lives of the disadvantaged and persecuted around the world. The passion and verve with which Jackson digs his hands into the soil and grasps the trees in his video for “Earth Song,” an operatic piece where he addresses environment and animal welfare, is a reflection of a leader of humanity who cares deeply about the issues he is challenging.

Global events in the weeks surrounding Jackson’s death alone directly mirror the complex problems for which he attempted to raise international awareness. In Iran and before the world’s eyes, civilian demonstrations were squashed and innocent victims like the young Neda Agha-Soltan brutally murdered by instruments of a totalitarian state. In Washington, D.C., a white supremacist motivated by pure hate attempted a killing spree at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, murdering an African American security guard in his rampage. In North Korea, U.S. journalists Laura Ling and Euna Lee were unjustly sentenced to twelve years of hard labor to merely serve as international bargaining chips for an evil dictator. Michael Jackson spoke out loudly against these forms of racism and repression and attempted to ignite our passion to prevent the continuance of such abuse, neglect and discrimination. How are we now missing this message when it is even more crucial for it to be absorbed into the public mind? Not only do Michael Jackson’s cries of awakening continue to be ignored but his reputation continues to be smeared.

With the current fixation on the gruesome details surrounding Jackson’s physical demise, we have lost focus on the social relevance of Michael Jackson in our cultural timeline. Jackson’s symbol has the power to force what might be a difficult and uncomfortable period of public self-reflection. What progress has been made on the global humanitarian and civil rights issues that Jackson brought to light for the masses? What realistically still needs to be accomplished in each of these realms to actually make future progress? These are the crucial questions that need to be contemplated in the context of Michael Jackson’s death.

Many may ask why this controversial figure, a man who has been the subject of intense criticism and public backlash, should be given such gravity in framing public discourse over the day’s most important topics. Sometimes it takes one person, not just a political or spiritual leader, who stands out symbolically from the rest of society, to make that society reflect on the principles that it follows and the values it embraces. Jackson, throughout his life and in his death, has been ridiculed and revered, vilified and vaunted. In many respects, his story represents the highest possible highs and the lowest possible lows that life can present to a human being. Michael Jackson’s tremendous talent, success, wealth and public adoration were at odds with his extreme loneliness, fear, addiction and destruction of reputation by public opinion. In the end though, Michael Jackson was much more than an entertainer. His contributions to the entertainment field are no doubt profound. However, it is his broad cultural impact that truly transcends economic, social, political, racial, religious and generational barriers. Jackson rose from being simply a magical performer into becoming a humanitarian of historic import. He was a modern day messenger, a visionary storyteller who raised the level of consciousness for citizens across national boundaries. This level of contribution is what the social contract demands of those who are blessed with natural gifts, power and wealth. Shouldn’t we then embrace and support people who are destined for this life mission instead of deriding them? As history progresses and Jackson’s symbol and work are analyzed in conjunction with the unfolding of human events, the important cultural relevance of his persona will be uncovered. Like a piece of classic Greek literature that embodies timeless themes of human striving and suffering, Michael Jackson’s canon and celebrity will come to hold a similar place in the modern day cultural pantheon. Why then was it necessary to shoot the messenger?

Martin Bashir’s highly controversial 2003 TV documentary, ‘Living with Michael Jackson’ is just one of the many examples of the ways in which Jackson was unfairly portrayed in the media. The documentary was a PR nightmare for the star. Bashir’s video interviews and commentary were cleverly edited as to purposely paint Jackson as a megalomaniac child molester. The film focused, in a highly negative manner, on the abuse Jackson suffered as a child at the hands of his father, the rumors behind his drastic physical transformation, his intense friendships with young boys, the nature of his past romantic relationships and questions concerning the genetic lineage of his children, among other sensitive topics. Bashir conveniently cut out footage that presented a countervailing impression of Jackson. Bashir’s documentary and Michael Jackson’s subsequent rebuttal, in the form of a TV special hosted by Maury Povich, provide a candid, never before seen glimpse into what made this man tick. In many respects, Michael Jackson was a lonely soul who found the greatest comfort isolated behind the gates of his Neverland ranch and in the company of animals, children, carnival rides and opulent possessions. In the last years of his life, Jackson became reclusive to the point that he was unable to function even within celebrity society due to the immensity of his fame and the parasitic attention drawn by even the briefest public appearance. Examining these interviews, it becomes clear that Michael Jackson is one of the most misunderstood figures in modern day popular culture.

The incessant media backlash against Michael Jackson throughout his career and now in his death is driven by the fact that Jackson, as a symbolic figure, forces us to look in the mirror and face the difficult and sometimes intractable problems of our society and in ourselves that we may not want to acknowledge. How dare he? Jackson brilliantly shines light on civilization’s accomplishments and failures in their most extreme forms. To be repulsed by the drastic transformation of his face was to simultaneously recognize the excessiveness of a beauty obsessed culture that allows money to change even the most fundamental components of our DNA. When looking and commenting on his mask, weren’t we also secretly acknowledging both the literal and figurative masks that we sometimes hide behind? Ironically, Michael Jackson’s physical changes led him to be branded as an “oddity” or “freak” by a media culture that promotes physical perfection through any means necessary. As Jackson proclaimed during his interviews with Bashir, “Plastic surgery was not invented for Michael Jackson!”

The child molestation charges brought against Jackson first in 1993 and again in 2005, for which he was skewered and roasted by the media and public, were baseless extortion attempts fueled by the petty greed and jealousy of his accusers. Despite settling the 1993 case and being acquitted of the 2005 charges, Michael Jackson’s commercial appeal and public image were severely damaged by the allegations. The child molestation charges against Jackson represented a modern day witch hunt in its most base form. Unfortunately for Jackson, the hunt was not localized to Salem but played out globally through the aid of modern media technology. The molestation charges were fueled by likely feelings of inadequacy in the parents of the alleged child victims who were so enamored by Jackson. Perhaps these parents did not believe that they could compete with the love and material fantasy that Michael Jackson provided to their children which caused them to lash out in desperation. Jealousy combined with greed is highly combustible. The media’s depiction of Michael Jackson as a plastic surgery obsessed eccentric made him an easy target and an unsympathetic victim. It just wasn’t believable that someone that acted and looked like him could be kind, sensitive, compassionate and loving. What was the motivation behind it all? What was wrong with him? There had to be something askew. What if Michael Jackson’s motivation was simply to give hope to those less fortunate? Was all of this then just the senseless destruction of a human being to satisfy our insecurities and quell our fears of the unknown and misunderstood.

As we reflect upon Michael Jackson’s life and now death, it is difficult not to feel sad for the man and view him in a tragic light. With all of his power, wealth and fame, he now lies before us like a bird crushed after being pelted repeatedly by outsized stones. Dejected, Jackson continued to turn inward, fearful of what the world he cared so deeply about changing for the better was throwing at him. The drugs just served as an opiate to the pain of an artist and humanitarian that was overburdened by a mission that he didn’t believe he accomplished. Addicted, it was the greed of those surrounding Michael Jackson who continued to indulge his desires out of self-preservation. The numbness of the painkillers relieved the ache caused by knowing that despite what he sought to give and change in the society around him, the burden of his creations and the scathing critique it engendered had become too overwhelming for one person to sustain. Michael Jackson was a modern Sisyphus, the loin clothed man condemned to repeatedly pushing a rock up a mountain only to see it roll back down. Sadly though, our Sisyphus collapsed under the weight of his struggle.

Michael Jackson was inflated to the position of a pop deity, a mythical figure, only to be crucified and stoned by the media gods who created his success. His bold eccentricities lied outside of the norm of standard, socially acceptable behavior but were they necessarily illegal or wrong? No. Most of Michael Jackson’s actions were unconventional yet, at the same time, wasn’t the grandeur of his celebrity and global status beyond anything that modern day culture has ever witnessed? His grandeur, his eccentricity, each influenced and exaggerated the other.

It is undeniable that Michael Jackson’s immense celebrity and wealth allowed him to remove himself from mainstream society and observe the world from a privileged vantage point. Sometimes though, it takes that fortunate but isolated position to be able to make the least polluted social observations and ultimately produce the most effective societal commentary through art. Throughout history, the work and lives of multiple artists have been ridiculed and scorned by the public during their heyday, only to be placed posthumously into the canon of the Greats. It is without doubt that Michael Jackson will, in due course, garner this same level of critical acclaim as an artist and most importantly, as a humanitarian.

http://elitestv.com/pub/2009/07/cel...d-legal-commentary-for-the-celebrity-obsessed
 
CELEBRITY SCALES: Michael Jackson, the Wounded Messenger: Star-Studded Legal Commentary for the Celebrity Obsessed
By Matt Semino, ESQ. • on July 18, 2009

With the mask finally removed, her tearful goodbye humanized him in the eyes of millions of adoring fans and even skeptical detractors across the globe. Paris Jackson was the poignant conclusion to her father Michael’s celebrated memorial service. At the same time, her few words served as a painful reminder of the conflicted legacy that, as some proclaim, the greatest entertainer of all time leaves behind in the wake of his sudden, tragic and mysterious death. In Michael Jackson’s passing, this international icon casts as many if not more unanswered questions about the out of the ordinary life he led behind the curtain of his private stage.

Intense speculation over the star’s actual cause of death has ranged from an accidental overdose to explosive allegations from some family members of foul play and even murder. In the later stages of his life, Jackson was caught in a downward spiral of prescription drug abuse fostered through a tangled web of star-struck enablers and unscrupulous members of the medical establishment. As in his life, Michael Jackson was engulfed by complex legal and ethical dilemmas even at the precise moment of his death. Questions concerning the custody of Jackson’s three children, whether those children are connected to him biologically, control over and division of his complex estate, burial procedures and a final resting place for the star’s remains, use of Los Angeles public funding for a celebrity laden memorial service at the Staples Center and countless more controversial issues moved in swiftly like an ominous and heavy fog in the days and weeks following June 25th.

Upon his death, the Pandora’s box that is Michael Jackson’s secretive but highly scrutinized life burst open once again and the media as well as the public’s insatiable appetite for all of the juicy details immediately became palpable. The daily headlines read like vivid medical records. ‘Michael Jackson’s Autopsy Photo,’ ‘Michael Jackson’s Hair on Fire,’ ‘Michael Jackson’s Leg Wounds and Needle Marks,’ and ‘Michael Jackson was Sterile’ are just a few. Only the most imaginative fiction writer could create a story with such high drama and sordid twists and turns. Even with all of its tabloid entertainment value, it is a monumental disservice to Michael Jackson’s memory that a thoughtful analysis of his significant cultural contributions, particularly in the realm of human rights and social justice, are being obscured in the process of examining his death and now his corpse.

Through his prolific body of work, advocacy initiatives and multi-million dollar charity efforts, Michael Jackson raised international awareness and support for some of the most complex and timeless issues confronting the human condition. AIDS, cancer, famine, homelessness, gang violence, racism, totalitarianism, environmental degradation, child abuse, violations of animal rights, restrictions on freedom of speech and other infringements upon basic civil liberties are just some of the difficult subjects Jackson tackled by leveraging the power of his celebrity. Michael Jackson’s intuitive understanding of the problems besetting the human ecological system was uncanny and uncharacteristic for any entertainer close to his magnitude.

Many have been so dazzled by Jackson’s masterful showmanship and the consistent controversy surrounding his life and death that it would be easy not to recognize the overarching social and political themes embodied in his music, videos and public interviews. The intense emotional pull, messages and raw feelings that reverberate through the lyrics and sometimes disturbing video imagery of songs such as “They Don’t Care About Us,” “Heal the World,” “Earth Song,” and “Man in the Mirror” are gut-wrenching. A deeper analysis of Michael Jackson’s work reveals an individual with a burning concern for improving the lives of the disadvantaged and persecuted around the world. The passion and verve with which Jackson digs his hands into the soil and grasps the trees in his video for “Earth Song,” an operatic piece where he addresses environment and animal welfare, is a reflection of a leader of humanity who cares deeply about the issues he is challenging.

Global events in the weeks surrounding Jackson’s death alone directly mirror the complex problems for which he attempted to raise international awareness. In Iran and before the world’s eyes, civilian demonstrations were squashed and innocent victims like the young Neda Agha-Soltan brutally murdered by instruments of a totalitarian state. In Washington, D.C., a white supremacist motivated by pure hate attempted a killing spree at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, murdering an African American security guard in his rampage. In North Korea, U.S. journalists Laura Ling and Euna Lee were unjustly sentenced to twelve years of hard labor to merely serve as international bargaining chips for an evil dictator. Michael Jackson spoke out loudly against these forms of racism and repression and attempted to ignite our passion to prevent the continuance of such abuse, neglect and discrimination. How are we now missing this message when it is even more crucial for it to be absorbed into the public mind? Not only do Michael Jackson’s cries of awakening continue to be ignored but his reputation continues to be smeared.

With the current fixation on the gruesome details surrounding Jackson’s physical demise, we have lost focus on the social relevance of Michael Jackson in our cultural timeline. Jackson’s symbol has the power to force what might be a difficult and uncomfortable period of public self-reflection. What progress has been made on the global humanitarian and civil rights issues that Jackson brought to light for the masses? What realistically still needs to be accomplished in each of these realms to actually make future progress? These are the crucial questions that need to be contemplated in the context of Michael Jackson’s death.

Many may ask why this controversial figure, a man who has been the subject of intense criticism and public backlash, should be given such gravity in framing public discourse over the day’s most important topics. Sometimes it takes one person, not just a political or spiritual leader, who stands out symbolically from the rest of society, to make that society reflect on the principles that it follows and the values it embraces. Jackson, throughout his life and in his death, has been ridiculed and revered, vilified and vaunted. In many respects, his story represents the highest possible highs and the lowest possible lows that life can present to a human being. Michael Jackson’s tremendous talent, success, wealth and public adoration were at odds with his extreme loneliness, fear, addiction and destruction of reputation by public opinion. In the end though, Michael Jackson was much more than an entertainer. His contributions to the entertainment field are no doubt profound. However, it is his broad cultural impact that truly transcends economic, social, political, racial, religious and generational barriers. Jackson rose from being simply a magical performer into becoming a humanitarian of historic import. He was a modern day messenger, a visionary storyteller who raised the level of consciousness for citizens across national boundaries. This level of contribution is what the social contract demands of those who are blessed with natural gifts, power and wealth. Shouldn’t we then embrace and support people who are destined for this life mission instead of deriding them? As history progresses and Jackson’s symbol and work are analyzed in conjunction with the unfolding of human events, the important cultural relevance of his persona will be uncovered. Like a piece of classic Greek literature that embodies timeless themes of human striving and suffering, Michael Jackson’s canon and celebrity will come to hold a similar place in the modern day cultural pantheon. Why then was it necessary to shoot the messenger?

Martin Bashir’s highly controversial 2003 TV documentary, ‘Living with Michael Jackson’ is just one of the many examples of the ways in which Jackson was unfairly portrayed in the media. The documentary was a PR nightmare for the star. Bashir’s video interviews and commentary were cleverly edited as to purposely paint Jackson as a megalomaniac child molester. The film focused, in a highly negative manner, on the abuse Jackson suffered as a child at the hands of his father, the rumors behind his drastic physical transformation, his intense friendships with young boys, the nature of his past romantic relationships and questions concerning the genetic lineage of his children, among other sensitive topics. Bashir conveniently cut out footage that presented a countervailing impression of Jackson. Bashir’s documentary and Michael Jackson’s subsequent rebuttal, in the form of a TV special hosted by Maury Povich, provide a candid, never before seen glimpse into what made this man tick. In many respects, Michael Jackson was a lonely soul who found the greatest comfort isolated behind the gates of his Neverland ranch and in the company of animals, children, carnival rides and opulent possessions. In the last years of his life, Jackson became reclusive to the point that he was unable to function even within celebrity society due to the immensity of his fame and the parasitic attention drawn by even the briefest public appearance. Examining these interviews, it becomes clear that Michael Jackson is one of the most misunderstood figures in modern day popular culture.

The incessant media backlash against Michael Jackson throughout his career and now in his death is driven by the fact that Jackson, as a symbolic figure, forces us to look in the mirror and face the difficult and sometimes intractable problems of our society and in ourselves that we may not want to acknowledge. How dare he? Jackson brilliantly shines light on civilization’s accomplishments and failures in their most extreme forms. To be repulsed by the drastic transformation of his face was to simultaneously recognize the excessiveness of a beauty obsessed culture that allows money to change even the most fundamental components of our DNA. When looking and commenting on his mask, weren’t we also secretly acknowledging both the literal and figurative masks that we sometimes hide behind? Ironically, Michael Jackson’s physical changes led him to be branded as an “oddity” or “freak” by a media culture that promotes physical perfection through any means necessary. As Jackson proclaimed during his interviews with Bashir, “Plastic surgery was not invented for Michael Jackson!”

The child molestation charges brought against Jackson first in 1993 and again in 2005, for which he was skewered and roasted by the media and public, were baseless extortion attempts fueled by the petty greed and jealousy of his accusers. Despite settling the 1993 case and being acquitted of the 2005 charges, Michael Jackson’s commercial appeal and public image were severely damaged by the allegations. The child molestation charges against Jackson represented a modern day witch hunt in its most base form. Unfortunately for Jackson, the hunt was not localized to Salem but played out globally through the aid of modern media technology. The molestation charges were fueled by likely feelings of inadequacy in the parents of the alleged child victims who were so enamored by Jackson. Perhaps these parents did not believe that they could compete with the love and material fantasy that Michael Jackson provided to their children which caused them to lash out in desperation. Jealousy combined with greed is highly combustible. The media’s depiction of Michael Jackson as a plastic surgery obsessed eccentric made him an easy target and an unsympathetic victim. It just wasn’t believable that someone that acted and looked like him could be kind, sensitive, compassionate and loving. What was the motivation behind it all? What was wrong with him? There had to be something askew. What if Michael Jackson’s motivation was simply to give hope to those less fortunate? Was all of this then just the senseless destruction of a human being to satisfy our insecurities and quell our fears of the unknown and misunderstood.

As we reflect upon Michael Jackson’s life and now death, it is difficult not to feel sad for the man and view him in a tragic light. With all of his power, wealth and fame, he now lies before us like a bird crushed after being pelted repeatedly by outsized stones. Dejected, Jackson continued to turn inward, fearful of what the world he cared so deeply about changing for the better was throwing at him. The drugs just served as an opiate to the pain of an artist and humanitarian that was overburdened by a mission that he didn’t believe he accomplished. Addicted, it was the greed of those surrounding Michael Jackson who continued to indulge his desires out of self-preservation. The numbness of the painkillers relieved the ache caused by knowing that despite what he sought to give and change in the society around him, the burden of his creations and the scathing critique it engendered had become too overwhelming for one person to sustain. Michael Jackson was a modern Sisyphus, the loin clothed man condemned to repeatedly pushing a rock up a mountain only to see it roll back down. Sadly though, our Sisyphus collapsed under the weight of his struggle.

Michael Jackson was inflated to the position of a pop deity, a mythical figure, only to be crucified and stoned by the media gods who created his success. His bold eccentricities lied outside of the norm of standard, socially acceptable behavior but were they necessarily illegal or wrong? No. Most of Michael Jackson’s actions were unconventional yet, at the same time, wasn’t the grandeur of his celebrity and global status beyond anything that modern day culture has ever witnessed? His grandeur, his eccentricity, each influenced and exaggerated the other.

It is undeniable that Michael Jackson’s immense celebrity and wealth allowed him to remove himself from mainstream society and observe the world from a privileged vantage point. Sometimes though, it takes that fortunate but isolated position to be able to make the least polluted social observations and ultimately produce the most effective societal commentary through art. Throughout history, the work and lives of multiple artists have been ridiculed and scorned by the public during their heyday, only to be placed posthumously into the canon of the Greats. It is without doubt that Michael Jackson will, in due course, garner this same level of critical acclaim as an artist and most importantly, as a humanitarian.

http://elitestv.com/pub/2009/07/cel...d-legal-commentary-for-the-celebrity-obsessed
 
CELEBRITY SCALES: Michael Jackson, the Wounded Messenger: Star-Studded Legal Commentary for the Celebrity Obsessed
By Matt Semino, ESQ. • on July 18, 2009

With the mask finally removed, her tearful goodbye humanized him in the eyes of millions of adoring fans and even skeptical detractors across the globe. Paris Jackson was the poignant conclusion to her father Michael’s celebrated memorial service. At the same time, her few words served as a painful reminder of the conflicted legacy that, as some proclaim, the greatest entertainer of all time leaves behind in the wake of his sudden, tragic and mysterious death. In Michael Jackson’s passing, this international icon casts as many if not more unanswered questions about the out of the ordinary life he led behind the curtain of his private stage.

Intense speculation over the star’s actual cause of death has ranged from an accidental overdose to explosive allegations from some family members of foul play and even murder. In the later stages of his life, Jackson was caught in a downward spiral of prescription drug abuse fostered through a tangled web of star-struck enablers and unscrupulous members of the medical establishment. As in his life, Michael Jackson was engulfed by complex legal and ethical dilemmas even at the precise moment of his death. Questions concerning the custody of Jackson’s three children, whether those children are connected to him biologically, control over and division of his complex estate, burial procedures and a final resting place for the star’s remains, use of Los Angeles public funding for a celebrity laden memorial service at the Staples Center and countless more controversial issues moved in swiftly like an ominous and heavy fog in the days and weeks following June 25th.

Upon his death, the Pandora’s box that is Michael Jackson’s secretive but highly scrutinized life burst open once again and the media as well as the public’s insatiable appetite for all of the juicy details immediately became palpable. The daily headlines read like vivid medical records. ‘Michael Jackson’s Autopsy Photo,’ ‘Michael Jackson’s Hair on Fire,’ ‘Michael Jackson’s Leg Wounds and Needle Marks,’ and ‘Michael Jackson was Sterile’ are just a few. Only the most imaginative fiction writer could create a story with such high drama and sordid twists and turns. Even with all of its tabloid entertainment value, it is a monumental disservice to Michael Jackson’s memory that a thoughtful analysis of his significant cultural contributions, particularly in the realm of human rights and social justice, are being obscured in the process of examining his death and now his corpse.

Through his prolific body of work, advocacy initiatives and multi-million dollar charity efforts, Michael Jackson raised international awareness and support for some of the most complex and timeless issues confronting the human condition. AIDS, cancer, famine, homelessness, gang violence, racism, totalitarianism, environmental degradation, child abuse, violations of animal rights, restrictions on freedom of speech and other infringements upon basic civil liberties are just some of the difficult subjects Jackson tackled by leveraging the power of his celebrity. Michael Jackson’s intuitive understanding of the problems besetting the human ecological system was uncanny and uncharacteristic for any entertainer close to his magnitude.

Many have been so dazzled by Jackson’s masterful showmanship and the consistent controversy surrounding his life and death that it would be easy not to recognize the overarching social and political themes embodied in his music, videos and public interviews. The intense emotional pull, messages and raw feelings that reverberate through the lyrics and sometimes disturbing video imagery of songs such as “They Don’t Care About Us,” “Heal the World,” “Earth Song,” and “Man in the Mirror” are gut-wrenching. A deeper analysis of Michael Jackson’s work reveals an individual with a burning concern for improving the lives of the disadvantaged and persecuted around the world. The passion and verve with which Jackson digs his hands into the soil and grasps the trees in his video for “Earth Song,” an operatic piece where he addresses environment and animal welfare, is a reflection of a leader of humanity who cares deeply about the issues he is challenging.

Global events in the weeks surrounding Jackson’s death alone directly mirror the complex problems for which he attempted to raise international awareness. In Iran and before the world’s eyes, civilian demonstrations were squashed and innocent victims like the young Neda Agha-Soltan brutally murdered by instruments of a totalitarian state. In Washington, D.C., a white supremacist motivated by pure hate attempted a killing spree at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, murdering an African American security guard in his rampage. In North Korea, U.S. journalists Laura Ling and Euna Lee were unjustly sentenced to twelve years of hard labor to merely serve as international bargaining chips for an evil dictator. Michael Jackson spoke out loudly against these forms of racism and repression and attempted to ignite our passion to prevent the continuance of such abuse, neglect and discrimination. How are we now missing this message when it is even more crucial for it to be absorbed into the public mind? Not only do Michael Jackson’s cries of awakening continue to be ignored but his reputation continues to be smeared.

With the current fixation on the gruesome details surrounding Jackson’s physical demise, we have lost focus on the social relevance of Michael Jackson in our cultural timeline. Jackson’s symbol has the power to force what might be a difficult and uncomfortable period of public self-reflection. What progress has been made on the global humanitarian and civil rights issues that Jackson brought to light for the masses? What realistically still needs to be accomplished in each of these realms to actually make future progress? These are the crucial questions that need to be contemplated in the context of Michael Jackson’s death.

Many may ask why this controversial figure, a man who has been the subject of intense criticism and public backlash, should be given such gravity in framing public discourse over the day’s most important topics. Sometimes it takes one person, not just a political or spiritual leader, who stands out symbolically from the rest of society, to make that society reflect on the principles that it follows and the values it embraces. Jackson, throughout his life and in his death, has been ridiculed and revered, vilified and vaunted. In many respects, his story represents the highest possible highs and the lowest possible lows that life can present to a human being. Michael Jackson’s tremendous talent, success, wealth and public adoration were at odds with his extreme loneliness, fear, addiction and destruction of reputation by public opinion. In the end though, Michael Jackson was much more than an entertainer. His contributions to the entertainment field are no doubt profound. However, it is his broad cultural impact that truly transcends economic, social, political, racial, religious and generational barriers. Jackson rose from being simply a magical performer into becoming a humanitarian of historic import. He was a modern day messenger, a visionary storyteller who raised the level of consciousness for citizens across national boundaries. This level of contribution is what the social contract demands of those who are blessed with natural gifts, power and wealth. Shouldn’t we then embrace and support people who are destined for this life mission instead of deriding them? As history progresses and Jackson’s symbol and work are analyzed in conjunction with the unfolding of human events, the important cultural relevance of his persona will be uncovered. Like a piece of classic Greek literature that embodies timeless themes of human striving and suffering, Michael Jackson’s canon and celebrity will come to hold a similar place in the modern day cultural pantheon. Why then was it necessary to shoot the messenger?

Martin Bashir’s highly controversial 2003 TV documentary, ‘Living with Michael Jackson’ is just one of the many examples of the ways in which Jackson was unfairly portrayed in the media. The documentary was a PR nightmare for the star. Bashir’s video interviews and commentary were cleverly edited as to purposely paint Jackson as a megalomaniac child molester. The film focused, in a highly negative manner, on the abuse Jackson suffered as a child at the hands of his father, the rumors behind his drastic physical transformation, his intense friendships with young boys, the nature of his past romantic relationships and questions concerning the genetic lineage of his children, among other sensitive topics. Bashir conveniently cut out footage that presented a countervailing impression of Jackson. Bashir’s documentary and Michael Jackson’s subsequent rebuttal, in the form of a TV special hosted by Maury Povich, provide a candid, never before seen glimpse into what made this man tick. In many respects, Michael Jackson was a lonely soul who found the greatest comfort isolated behind the gates of his Neverland ranch and in the company of animals, children, carnival rides and opulent possessions. In the last years of his life, Jackson became reclusive to the point that he was unable to function even within celebrity society due to the immensity of his fame and the parasitic attention drawn by even the briefest public appearance. Examining these interviews, it becomes clear that Michael Jackson is one of the most misunderstood figures in modern day popular culture.

The incessant media backlash against Michael Jackson throughout his career and now in his death is driven by the fact that Jackson, as a symbolic figure, forces us to look in the mirror and face the difficult and sometimes intractable problems of our society and in ourselves that we may not want to acknowledge. How dare he? Jackson brilliantly shines light on civilization’s accomplishments and failures in their most extreme forms. To be repulsed by the drastic transformation of his face was to simultaneously recognize the excessiveness of a beauty obsessed culture that allows money to change even the most fundamental components of our DNA. When looking and commenting on his mask, weren’t we also secretly acknowledging both the literal and figurative masks that we sometimes hide behind? Ironically, Michael Jackson’s physical changes led him to be branded as an “oddity” or “freak” by a media culture that promotes physical perfection through any means necessary. As Jackson proclaimed during his interviews with Bashir, “Plastic surgery was not invented for Michael Jackson!”

The child molestation charges brought against Jackson first in 1993 and again in 2005, for which he was skewered and roasted by the media and public, were baseless extortion attempts fueled by the petty greed and jealousy of his accusers. Despite settling the 1993 case and being acquitted of the 2005 charges, Michael Jackson’s commercial appeal and public image were severely damaged by the allegations. The child molestation charges against Jackson represented a modern day witch hunt in its most base form. Unfortunately for Jackson, the hunt was not localized to Salem but played out globally through the aid of modern media technology. The molestation charges were fueled by likely feelings of inadequacy in the parents of the alleged child victims who were so enamored by Jackson. Perhaps these parents did not believe that they could compete with the love and material fantasy that Michael Jackson provided to their children which caused them to lash out in desperation. Jealousy combined with greed is highly combustible. The media’s depiction of Michael Jackson as a plastic surgery obsessed eccentric made him an easy target and an unsympathetic victim. It just wasn’t believable that someone that acted and looked like him could be kind, sensitive, compassionate and loving. What was the motivation behind it all? What was wrong with him? There had to be something askew. What if Michael Jackson’s motivation was simply to give hope to those less fortunate? Was all of this then just the senseless destruction of a human being to satisfy our insecurities and quell our fears of the unknown and misunderstood.

As we reflect upon Michael Jackson’s life and now death, it is difficult not to feel sad for the man and view him in a tragic light. With all of his power, wealth and fame, he now lies before us like a bird crushed after being pelted repeatedly by outsized stones. Dejected, Jackson continued to turn inward, fearful of what the world he cared so deeply about changing for the better was throwing at him. The drugs just served as an opiate to the pain of an artist and humanitarian that was overburdened by a mission that he didn’t believe he accomplished. Addicted, it was the greed of those surrounding Michael Jackson who continued to indulge his desires out of self-preservation. The numbness of the painkillers relieved the ache caused by knowing that despite what he sought to give and change in the society around him, the burden of his creations and the scathing critique it engendered had become too overwhelming for one person to sustain. Michael Jackson was a modern Sisyphus, the loin clothed man condemned to repeatedly pushing a rock up a mountain only to see it roll back down. Sadly though, our Sisyphus collapsed under the weight of his struggle.

Michael Jackson was inflated to the position of a pop deity, a mythical figure, only to be crucified and stoned by the media gods who created his success. His bold eccentricities lied outside of the norm of standard, socially acceptable behavior but were they necessarily illegal or wrong? No. Most of Michael Jackson’s actions were unconventional yet, at the same time, wasn’t the grandeur of his celebrity and global status beyond anything that modern day culture has ever witnessed? His grandeur, his eccentricity, each influenced and exaggerated the other.

It is undeniable that Michael Jackson’s immense celebrity and wealth allowed him to remove himself from mainstream society and observe the world from a privileged vantage point. Sometimes though, it takes that fortunate but isolated position to be able to make the least polluted social observations and ultimately produce the most effective societal commentary through art. Throughout history, the work and lives of multiple artists have been ridiculed and scorned by the public during their heyday, only to be placed posthumously into the canon of the Greats. It is without doubt that Michael Jackson will, in due course, garner this same level of critical acclaim as an artist and most importantly, as a humanitarian.

http://elitestv.com/pub/2009/07/cel...d-legal-commentary-for-the-celebrity-obsessed
 
Back In The Day

Before the weirdness claimed his legacy, Michael Jackson understood his talent—and what he was willing to do for it—better than we ever have.

By John Jeremiah Sullivan



How do you talk about Michael Jackson unless you begin with Prince Screws? Prince Screws was an Alabama cotton-plantation slave who became a tenant farmer after the Civil War, likely on his old master's land. His son, Prince Screws Jr., bought a small farm. And that man's son, Prince Screws III, left home for Indiana, where he found work as a Pullman porter, part of the exodus of southern blacks to the northern industrial cities.

There came a disruption in the line. This last Prince Screws, the one who went north, would have no sons. He had two daughters, Kattie and Hattie. Kattie gave birth to ten children, the eighth a boy, Michael—who would name his sons Prince, to honor his mother, whom he adored, and to signal a restoration. So the ridiculous moniker given by a white man to his black slave, the way you might name a dog, was bestowed by a black king upon his pale-skinned sons and heirs.

We took the name for an affectation and mocked it.

Not to imply that it was above mockery, but of all the things that make Michael unknowable, thinking we knew him is maybe the most deceptive. Lets suspend it.

Begin not with the miniseries childhood of father Joseph's endless practice sessions but with the later and, it seems, just as formative Motown childhood, from, say, 11 to 14—years spent, when not on the road, most often alone, behind security walls, with private tutors and secret sketchbooks. A dreamy child, he collects exotic animals. He likes rainbows and reading. He starts collecting exotic animals now.

His eldest brothers were at one time children who dreamed of child stardom. Michael never knows this sensation. By the time he achieves something like self-awareness, he is a child star. The child star dreams of being an artist.

Alone, he puts on classical records, because he finds they soothe his mind. He also likes the old southern stuff his uncle Luther sings. His uncle looks back at him and thinks he seems sad for his age. This is in California, so poor, brown Gary, with its poisonous air you could smell from leagues away—a decade's exposure to which may already have damaged his immune system in fateful ways—is the past.

He thinks about things and sometimes talks them over with his friends Marvin Gaye and Diana Ross when they are hanging out. He listens to albums and compares. The albums he and his brothers make have a few nice tunes, to sell records, then a lot of consciously second-rate numbers, to satisfy the format. Whereas Tchaikovsky and people like that, they didn't handle slack material. But you have to write your own songs.

Michael has always made melodies in his head, little riffs and beats, but that isn't the same. The way Motown deals with the Jackson 5, finished songs are delivered to the group, from songwriting teams in various cities. The brothers are brought in to sing and add accents.

Michael wants access to the "anatomy" of the music. That's the word he uses repeatedly. Anatomy. What's inside its structure that makes it move?

When he's 17, he asks Stevie Wonder to let him spy while Songs in the Key of Life gets made. There's Michael, self-consciously shy and deferential, flattening himself mothlike against the Motown studio wall. Somehow Stevie's blindness becomes moving in this context. No doubt he is for long stretches unaware of Michael's presence. Never asks him to play a shaker or anything. Never mentions Michael. But Michael hears him.

Most of the Jackson siblings are leaving Motown at this moment, for another label, where they've leveraged a bit more creative sway. The first thing Michael does is write "Blues Away," an unfairly forgotten song, fated to become one of the least dated-sounding tracks the Jacksons do together. A nice left-handed piano riff with strings and a breathy chorus—Burt Bacharach doing Stevie doing early disco, and some other factor that was Michael's own, that dwelt in his introverted-sounding vocal rhythms. Sweet, slightly cryptic lyrics that contain an early notion of melancholy as final, inviolable retreat: I'd like to be yours tomorrow / So I'm giving you some time to get over today / But you can't take my blues away.

By 1978, the year of "Shake Your Body (Down to the Ground)"—co-written by Michael and little Randy—Michael's methods have gelled. He starts with tape recorders. He sings and beatboxes the little things he hears, the parts. Where do they come from? Above. He claims to drop to his knees and thank Jehovah after he snatches one. His voice coach tells the story of Michael one day raising his hands in the air during practice and starting to mutter. The coach, Seth Riggs, decides to leave him alone. When he comes back half an hour later, it's to Michael whispering, "Thank you for my talent."

Some of the things Michael hears in his head he exports to another instrument, to the piano (which he plays not well but passably) or to the bass. The melody and a few percussive elements remain with his vocal. The rest he assembles around it. He has his brothers and sisters with him. He conducts.

His art will later depend on his ability to stay in touch with that childlike inner instrument, keeping near enough to himself to hear his own melodic promptings. If you've listened to toddlers making up songs, the things they invent are often bafflingly catchy and ingenious. They compose to biorhythms somehow. The vocal from Michael's earlier, Off the Wall-era demo of the eventual Thriller hit "Wanna Be Startin' Somethin'" sounds like nothing so much as playful schoolyard taunting. He will always be at his worst when making what he thinks of as "big" music, which he invariably associates with military imagery.

1979, the year of Off the Wall and his first nose job, marks an obscure crisis. Around the start of that year, they offer him the gay lead in the film version of A Chorus Line, but he declines the role, explaining, "I'm excited about it, but if I do it, people will link me with the part. Because of my voice, some people already think I'm that way—homo—though I'm actually not at all."

People want to know, Why, when you became a man, did your voice not change? Rather, it did change, but what did it change into? Listening to clips of his interviews through the '70s, you can hear how he goes about changing it himself. First it deepens slightly, around 1972-73 or so. (Listen to him on The Dating Game in 1972 and you'll hear that his voice was lower at 14 than it will be at 30.) This potentially catastrophic event has perhaps been vaguely dreaded by the family and label for years. Michael Jackson without his falsetto is not the commodity on which their collective dream depends. But Michael has never known a reality that wasn't susceptible on some level to his creative powers. He works to develop something, not a falsetto, which is a way of singing above your range, but instead a higher range. He isolates totally different configurations of his vocal cords, finding their crevices, cultivating the flexibility there. Vocal teachers will tell you this can be done, though it's considered an extreme practice. Whether the process is conscious in Michael's case is unknowable. He probably evolves it in order to keep singing Jackson 5 songs every night through puberty. The startling effect is of his having imaginatively not so much castrated himself as of womanized himself. He essentially evolves a drag voice. On the early demo for "Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough," recorded at home with Randy and Janet helping, you can actually hear him work his way into this voice. It is a character, really. "We're gonna be startin' now, baby," he says in a relaxed, moderately high-pitched man's voice. Then he intones the title, "Don't stop 'til you get enough," in a softer, quieter version of basically the same voice. He repeats the line in a still higher register, almost purring. Finally—in a full-on girlish peal—he sings. A source will later claim to have heard him, in a moment of anger, break into a deep, gruff voice she'd never heard before.

Interesting that these out-flashings of his "natural" voice occurred at moments when he was, as we would say, not himself.

On the Internet, you can see a picture of him near the end of his life, juxtaposed with a digital projection of what he would have looked like at the same age without the surgeries and makeup and wigs. A smiling middle-aged black guy, handsome in an everyday way. We are meant, of course, to feel a connection with this lost neverbeing, and pity for the strange, self-mutilated creature beside him. I can't be alone, however, in feeling just the opposite, that there's something metaphysically revolting about the mock-up. It's an abomination. Michael chose his true face. What is, is natural.

His physical body is arguably, even inarguably, the single greatest piece of postmodern American sculpture. It must be carefully preserved.

It's fascinating to read the interviews he gave to Ebony and Jet over the past thirty years. I confess myself disoriented by them, as a white person. During whole stretches of years when the big media were reporting endlessly on his bizarreness and reclusiveness, he was every so often granting these intimate and illuminating sit-downs to those magazines, never forgetting to remind them that he trusted only them, would speak only to them. The articles make me realize that about the only Michael Jackson I've ever known, personality-wise, is a Michael Jackson who's defending himself against white people who are passive-aggressively accusing him of child molestation. He spoke differently to black people, was more at ease. The language and grain of detail are different. Not that the scenario was any more journalistically pure. The John H. Johnson publishing family, which puts out Jet and Ebony, had Michael's back, faithfully repairing and maintaining his complicated relations with the community, assuring readers that, in the presence of Michael, "you quickly look past the enigmatic icon's light, almost translucent skin and realize that this African-American legend is more than just skin deep." At times, especially when the "homo" issue came up, the straining required could turn comical, as in Ebony in 1982, talking about his obsessive male fans:

michael: "They come after us every way they can, and the guys are just as bad as the girls. Guys jump up on the stage and usually go for me and Randy."

ebony: "But that means nothing except that they admire you, doesn't it?"

Even so, to hear Michael laid-back and talking unpretentiously about art, the thing he most loved—that is a new Michael, a person utterly absent from, for example, Martin Bashir's infamous documentary, in which Michael admitted sharing his bedroom with children. It's only after reading Jet and Ebony that one can understand how otherwise straightforward-seeming people of all races have stayed good friends with Michael Jackson these many years. He is charming; his mind is alive. What a pleasure to find him listening to early "writing version" demos of his own compositions and saying, "Listen to that, that's at home, Janet, Randy, me.… You're hearing four basses on there.…" Or to hear him tell less prepackaged anecdotes, such as the one about a beautiful black girl who froze in the aisle and pissed all down her legs after spotting him on a plane, or the blond girl who kissed him in an airport and, when he didn't respond, asked, "What's wrong, you fag?" He grows tired of reminding people, "There's a reason why I was created male. I'm not a girl." He leaves the reason unspoken.

*****​

When michael and Quincy Jones run into each other on the set of The Wiz, each remembers a moment when Sammy Davis Jr. had taken Jones aside backstage somewhere and whispered, "This guy is something; he's amazing." Michael had "tucked it away." He knows Jones's name from the sleeves of his father's jazz albums, knows Jones is a serious man. He waits till the movie is done to call him up. It's the fact that Jones intimidates him slightly that draws Jackson to him. He yearns for some competition larger than the old intra-familial one, which he has long dominated. That was checkers; he wants to play chess. Fading child stars can easily insulate themselves from further motivation, if they wish, and most do. It's the more human path. Michael seeks pressure instead, at this moment. He recruits people who can drive him to, as he puts it, "higher effort."

Quincy Jones's nickname for him is Smelly. It comes from Michael's habit of constantly touching and covering his nose with the fingers of his left hand, a tic that becomes pronounced in news clips from this time. He feels embarrassed about his broad nose. Several surgeries later—after, one assumes, it had been deemed impolitic inside the Jackson camp to mention the earlier facial self-consciousness—the story is altered. We are told that when Michael liked a track in the studio, he would call it "the smelly jelly." Both stories may be true. "Smelly jelly" has the whiff of Jackson's weird, infantile sayings. Later in life, when feeling weak, he'd say to his people, "I'm hurting…, blanket me," which could mean, among other things, time for my medicine.

Michael knows he won't really have gone solo until his own songwriting finds the next level. He doesn't want inclusion; he wants awe. Jones has a trusted songwriter in his stable, the Englishman Rod Temperton, of Heatwave fame, who brings in a song, "Rock with You." It's very good. Michael hears it and knows it's a hit. He's not even worried about hits at this point, though, except as a kind of by-product of perfection. He goes home and writes "Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough." Janet tinks on a glass bottle. Trusted Randy plays guitar. These are the two siblings whom Michael brings with him into the Quincy Jones adventure, to the innermost zone where he writes. We don't think of the family as having anything to do, musically, with his solo career, except by way of guilt favors. But he feels confident with these two, needs to keep them fully woven into his nest. They are both younger than he. His baby sister.

From the perspective of thirty years, "Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough" is a much better track than "Rock with You." One admires "Rock with You," but melodically Michael's song comes from a more distinctive place. Sophisticated instincts are what you hear.

Michael feels disappointed with Off the Wall. It wins a Grammy, spawns multiple number one singles, dramatically raises Jackson's already colossal level of fame, redeems disco in the very hour and flash of disco's dying. Diana Ross, who once helped out the Jacksons by putting her lovely arm around them, wants Michael to be at her shows again, not for his own sake now but for her own. She isn't desperate by any means, but something has shifted. Quincy Jones and Bruce Swedien, the recording guru who works with him, both take to be absurd the mere idea of "following up" Off the Wall, in terms of success. You do your best, but that kind of thing just happens, if it happens. Jones knows that. Not Michael. All he can see of Off the Wall is that there were bigger records that year. He wants to make something, he says, that "refuse to be ignored."

At home he demos "Billie Jean" with Randy and Janet. When what will be the immortal part comes around, she and Michael go, "Whoo whoo / Whoo whoo."

From Michael's brain, then, through a portable tape recorder, on into the home studio. Bruce Swedien comes over, with a sixteen-track recorder. Being Michael Jackson working on the follow-up to Off the Wall means sometimes your demos are recorded at your home by the greatest recording engineer in the world, but for all that, the team works in a stripped-down fashion, with no noise reduction. "That's usually the best stuff," Michael says, "when you strip it down to the bare minimum and go inside yourself and invent."

On this home demo, made between the "writing version" and the album version, you get to hear Michael's early, mystical placeholder vocals, laid down before he'd written the verses. We hear him say, "More kick and stuff in the 'phones.… I need, uh…more bottom and kick in the 'phones."

Then the music.

[Mumble mumble mum] oh, to say
On the phone to stay…
Oh, born out of time
All the while I see other eyes
One at a time
We'll go where the winds unwind

She told me her voice belonged to me
And I'm here to see
She called my name, then you said, Hello
Oh, then I died
And said, Gotta go in a ride

Seems that you knew my mind, now live
On that day got it made
Oh, mercy, it does care of what you do
Take care of what you do
Lord, they're coming down

Billie Jean is not my lover
She just a girl that says that I am the one
You know, the kid is not my son

A big wonderfully round warm Scandinavian type, Swedien comes from Minnesota, made his mark doing classical, but with classical engineering it's all about fidelity, he knew, and he wants to be part of the making, to help shape the songs. So, a frustrated anatomist himself, coming down from high to low formally and meeting Michael on his way up. Quincy, in the middle with his cool, calls Swedien "Svensk." The white man has the endearing habit of lifting both hands to massage the gray walrus-wings of his mustache. He also has a condition called synesthesia. It means that when he listens to sound, he sees colors. He knows the mix is right only when he sees the right colors. Michael likes singing for him.

In a seminar room in Seattle, at a 1993 Audio Pro recording-geek conference, Swedien talks about his craft. He plays his recording of Michael's flawless one-take vocal from "The Way You Make Me Feel," sans effects of any kind, to let the engineers in the audience hear the straight dope, a great mike on a great voice with as little interference as possible, the right angle, the right deck, everything.

Someone in the audience raises a hand and asks if it's hard recording Michael's voice, given that, as Swedien mentioned before, Michael is very "physical." At first, Swedien doesn't cotton. "Yeah, that is a bit of a problem," he answers, "but I've never had an incident where the microphone has been damaged. One time, though…"

The guy interrupts, "Not to do damage, just the proximity thing."

"Oh!" Swedien says, suddenly understanding. His voice drops to a whisper, "He's unbelievable."

He gives the most beautiful description. "Michael records in the dark," he says, "and he'll dance. And picture this: You're looking through the glass. And it's dark. With a little pin spot on him." Swedien lifts his hand to suggest a narrow cone of light shining directly down from overhead. "And you'll see the mike here. And he'll sing his lines. And then he disappears."

In the outer dark he is dancing, fluttering. That's all Quincy and Swedien know.

"And he's"—Swedien punches the air—"right back in front of the mike at the precise instant."

Swedien invents a special zippered covering for miking the bass drum on "Billie Jean." A muffled enclosure. It gives the song that mummified-heartbeat intensity, which you have seen make a dance floor come to life. The layered bass sounds on the one and the three lend a lurching feline throb. Bass drum, bass guitar, double synthesizer bass, the "four basses," all hitting together, doing the part that started as Michael and Janet going whoo whoo whoo whoo, that came from Jehovah. The tempo is the pulse of a sleeping person.

I have no way of confirming this, but I suspect the reason it sounds like Michael's saying the chad is not my son is that on one take, he'd switched it up and sung the child is not my son. The ch of that child is faintly ghosting each kid, the word they went with. They liked the sonic effect of the slurring, one of those little unfakeable interior things, so they kept it. Possibly a stupid theory. One would love to have been there, the way Michael was with Stevie.

I recall across twenty-five years watching, as a young chad, David Letterman do a bit on the kid line. He claims to have solved it. "We've discovered the mystery word in 'Billie Jean.' Do we have the tape?" They play it, and it goes, She says I am the one / But the [suddenly, in a low, gravelly male voice] CHAIR is not my son.

Michael finds himself back in the old Motown building for a day, doing some video mixing, when Berry Gordy approaches and asks him to be in the twenty-fifth-anniversary special on NBC. Michael demurs. A claustrophobic moment for him. All of that business, his brothers, Motown, the Jackson 5, the past: That's all a cocoon he's been writhing inside, finally chewing through. He knows that "Billie Jean" has exploded; he's becoming something else. But the animal inside him that is his ambition senses the opportunity. He strikes his legendary deal with Gordy, that he'll perform with his brothers if he's allowed to do one of his own solo, post-Motown hits as well. Gordy agrees.

What Michael does with his moment, given the context, given that his brothers have just left the stage and that the stage belongs to Mr. Berry Gordy, is outrageous. In the by-now totemic YouTube clips of this performance, Michael's preamble is usually cut off, which makes it worth watching the disc (which also happens to include one of Marvin Gaye's last appearances before his murder).

Michael is sweaty and strutting. "Thank you.… Oh, you're beautiful.… Thank you," he says, almost slurring with sexiness. You can tell he's worked out all his nerves on the Jackson 5 songs. Now he owns the space as if it were the inside of his cage. Millions upon millions of eyes.

"I have to say, those were the good old days," he rambles on. "I love those songs, those were magic moments, with all my brothers, including Jermaine." (The Jackson family's penchant for high passive aggression at watershed moments is extraordinary; at Michael's funeral, Jermaine will say: "I was his voice and his backbone, I had his back." And then, as if remembering to thank his agent, "So did the family.")

"Those were good songs," Michael says. "I like those songs a lot, but especially, I like—" his voice fades from the mike for a second, ramifying the liveness till the meters almost spike—"the new songs."

Uncontrollable shrieking. He's grabbing the mike stand like James Brown used to grab it, like if it had a neck he'd be choking it. People in the seats are yelling, " 'Billie Jean'! 'Billie Jean'!"

I won't cloud the uniqueness of what he does next with words except to mention one potentially missable (because it's so obvious) aspect: that he does it so entirely alone. The stage is profoundly empty. Silhouettes of the orchestra members are clapping back in the dark. But unless you count the dazzling glove—conceived, according to one source, to hide the advancing vitiligo that discolors his left hand—Michael holds only one prop: a black hat. He tosses that away almost immediately. Stage, dancer, spotlight. The microphone isn't even on. He snatches it back from the stand as if from the hands of a maddening child.

With a mime's tools he proceeds to do possibly the most captivating thing a person's ever been captured doing onstage. Richard Pryor, who was not in any account I have ever read a suck-up, approaches Michael afterward and says simply, "That was the greatest performance I've ever seen." Fred Astaire calls him "the greatest living natural dancer."

Michael tells Ebony, "I remember doing the performance so clearly, and I remember that I was so upset with myself, 'cause it wasn't what I wanted. I wanted it to be more." It's said he intended to hold the crouching en pointe at the end of the moonwalk longer. But if you watch, he falls off his toes, when he falls, in perfect time, and makes it part of the turn. Much as he wipes sweat from under his nose in time, at about 3:25.

The intensity behind his face is unbearable.

Quincy always tells him, "Smelly…get out of the way and leave room so that God can walk in."

A god moves through him.

The god enters, the god leaves.

*****​

It's odd to write about a person knowing he may have been, but not if he was, a serial child molester. Whether or not Michael did it, the suggestion of it shadowed him for so long and finally killed his soul. It's said that toward the end he was having himself put under—with the same anesthesia that may have finished him—not for hours but for days. As though being snuffed. Witnesses to his body on the morgue table report that his prosthetic nose was missing. There were only holes in his face. A mummy. He was mostly bald and weighed scarcely more than 100 pounds. Two separate complete autopsies: They cut him to pieces. As of this writing, no one outside the Jackson camp knows the whereabouts of his body. He seems to be resting temporarily in Berry Gordy's unoccupied crypt.

I have read a stack of books about him in the past month, more than I ever imagined I would—though not more than I wanted. He warrants and will no doubt one day receive a major biography: All the great cultural strains of American music came together in him. We have yet to accept that his very racial in-betweenness made him more and not less of an essential figure in our tradition. He grasped this and used it. His marriage to Elvis's daughter was in part an art piece.

Of all those books, the one that troubles and sticks with me is celebrity journalist Ian Halperin's Unmasked: The Final Years of Michael Jackson, a work obviously slammed into publication to capitalize on the death. Halperin, most famous for a book and movie suggesting Kurt Cobain's suicide was a disguised murder, is not an ideal source, but neither is he a dismissible one. Indeed he accurately predicted Michael's death six months before it happened and seems to have burrowed his way into the Jackson world in several places.

In the beginning, Halperin claims, he set out mainly to prove that Michael had sexually molested young boys and used his money to get away with it. I believe him about this original motivation, since any such proof would have generated the most sensational publicity, sold the most copies, etc. But Halperin finds, in the end, after exhaustively pursuing leads, that every so-called thread of evidence becomes a rope of sand. Somebody, even if it's a family member, wants money, or has accused other people before, or is patently insane. It usually comes down to a tale someone else knows about a secret payoff. Meanwhile you have these boys, like Macaulay Culkin (whom Michael was once accused of fondling) who have come forth and stated that nothing untoward ever happened with Michael. When he stood trial and got off, that was a just verdict.

That's the first half of the Halperin Thesis. The second half is that Michael was a fully functioning gay man, who took secret male lovers his entire adult life. Halperin says he met two of them and saw pictures of one with Michael. They were young but perfectly legal. One told Halperin that Michael was an insatiable bottom.

As for Michael's interest in children, it's hard to imagine that having lacked erotic interest of some kind, but it may well have been thoroughly nonsexual. Michael was a frozen adolescent—about the age of those first dreamy striped-sweater years in California—and he wanted to hang out with the people he saw as his peers. Have pillow fights, call each other doo-doo head. It's creepy as hell, if you like, but victimless. It would make him—in clinical speak—a partial passive fixated pedophile. Not a crime yet, not until they get the mind-reader machines going.

I don't ask that you agree with Halperin, merely for you to admit, as I feel compelled to do, that the psychological picture he conjures up is not less and perhaps just slightly more plausible than the one in which Michael uses Neverland Ranch as a spider's web, luring boys to his bed. If you're like me, you've been subconsciously presuming the latter to be basically the case for most of your life. But there's a good chance it was never true and that Michael loved children with a weird but not immoral love.

Now, if you want a disturbing thought experiment, allow these—I won't say facts…feasibilities—let them percolate, and then watch Martin Bashir's 2003 documentary, Living with Michael Jackson. There's no point adding here to the demonization of Bashir for having more or less manipulated Michael through kindness into declaring himself a complete Fruit of the Loom-collecting fiend, especially when you consider that Bashir was representing us fairly well in the ideas he appears to have carried regarding Michael, that it was probably true.

But when you put on the not-true glasses and watch, and see Michael protesting his innocence, asking, "What's wrong with love?" as his arm hangs around a cancer-stricken boy—or many years earlier, in that strange self-released statement, where he describes with barely suppressed rage the humiliation of having his penis examined by the police—dammit if the whole life doesn't look a lot different. There appears to exist a 50 percent chance that Michael was a martyr of some kind.

We can't pity him. That he embraced his destiny, knowing how fame would warp him, is what frees us to revere him.

We have, in any case, a pathology of pathologization in this country. It's a bourgeois disease, and we ought to call bullshit on it. We bawl that Michael changed his face out of self-loathing. He may have loved what he became.

Ebony caught up with him in Africa in the '90s. He had just been crowned King of Sani by villagers in the Ivory Coast. "You know I don't give interviews," he tells Robert E. Johnson there in the village. "You're the only person I trust to give interviews to."

Deep inside I feel that this world we live in is really a big, huge, monumental symphonic orchestra. I believe that in its primordial form, all of creation is sound and that it's not just random sound, that it's music.

May they have been his last thoughts.

http://www.gq.com/entertainment/cel...-john-jeremiah-sullivan-tribute?currentPage=1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back In The Day

Before the weirdness claimed his legacy, Michael Jackson understood his talent—and what he was willing to do for it—better than we ever have.

By John Jeremiah Sullivan



How do you talk about Michael Jackson unless you begin with Prince Screws? Prince Screws was an Alabama cotton-plantation slave who became a tenant farmer after the Civil War, likely on his old master's land. His son, Prince Screws Jr., bought a small farm. And that man's son, Prince Screws III, left home for Indiana, where he found work as a Pullman porter, part of the exodus of southern blacks to the northern industrial cities.

There came a disruption in the line. This last Prince Screws, the one who went north, would have no sons. He had two daughters, Kattie and Hattie. Kattie gave birth to ten children, the eighth a boy, Michael—who would name his sons Prince, to honor his mother, whom he adored, and to signal a restoration. So the ridiculous moniker given by a white man to his black slave, the way you might name a dog, was bestowed by a black king upon his pale-skinned sons and heirs.

We took the name for an affectation and mocked it.

Not to imply that it was above mockery, but of all the things that make Michael unknowable, thinking we knew him is maybe the most deceptive. Lets suspend it.

Begin not with the miniseries childhood of father Joseph's endless practice sessions but with the later and, it seems, just as formative Motown childhood, from, say, 11 to 14—years spent, when not on the road, most often alone, behind security walls, with private tutors and secret sketchbooks. A dreamy child, he collects exotic animals. He likes rainbows and reading. He starts collecting exotic animals now.

His eldest brothers were at one time children who dreamed of child stardom. Michael never knows this sensation. By the time he achieves something like self-awareness, he is a child star. The child star dreams of being an artist.

Alone, he puts on classical records, because he finds they soothe his mind. He also likes the old southern stuff his uncle Luther sings. His uncle looks back at him and thinks he seems sad for his age. This is in California, so poor, brown Gary, with its poisonous air you could smell from leagues away—a decade's exposure to which may already have damaged his immune system in fateful ways—is the past.

He thinks about things and sometimes talks them over with his friends Marvin Gaye and Diana Ross when they are hanging out. He listens to albums and compares. The albums he and his brothers make have a few nice tunes, to sell records, then a lot of consciously second-rate numbers, to satisfy the format. Whereas Tchaikovsky and people like that, they didn't handle slack material. But you have to write your own songs.

Michael has always made melodies in his head, little riffs and beats, but that isn't the same. The way Motown deals with the Jackson 5, finished songs are delivered to the group, from songwriting teams in various cities. The brothers are brought in to sing and add accents.

Michael wants access to the "anatomy" of the music. That's the word he uses repeatedly. Anatomy. What's inside its structure that makes it move?

When he's 17, he asks Stevie Wonder to let him spy while Songs in the Key of Life gets made. There's Michael, self-consciously shy and deferential, flattening himself mothlike against the Motown studio wall. Somehow Stevie's blindness becomes moving in this context. No doubt he is for long stretches unaware of Michael's presence. Never asks him to play a shaker or anything. Never mentions Michael. But Michael hears him.

Most of the Jackson siblings are leaving Motown at this moment, for another label, where they've leveraged a bit more creative sway. The first thing Michael does is write "Blues Away," an unfairly forgotten song, fated to become one of the least dated-sounding tracks the Jacksons do together. A nice left-handed piano riff with strings and a breathy chorus—Burt Bacharach doing Stevie doing early disco, and some other factor that was Michael's own, that dwelt in his introverted-sounding vocal rhythms. Sweet, slightly cryptic lyrics that contain an early notion of melancholy as final, inviolable retreat: I'd like to be yours tomorrow / So I'm giving you some time to get over today / But you can't take my blues away.

By 1978, the year of "Shake Your Body (Down to the Ground)"—co-written by Michael and little Randy—Michael's methods have gelled. He starts with tape recorders. He sings and beatboxes the little things he hears, the parts. Where do they come from? Above. He claims to drop to his knees and thank Jehovah after he snatches one. His voice coach tells the story of Michael one day raising his hands in the air during practice and starting to mutter. The coach, Seth Riggs, decides to leave him alone. When he comes back half an hour later, it's to Michael whispering, "Thank you for my talent."

Some of the things Michael hears in his head he exports to another instrument, to the piano (which he plays not well but passably) or to the bass. The melody and a few percussive elements remain with his vocal. The rest he assembles around it. He has his brothers and sisters with him. He conducts.

His art will later depend on his ability to stay in touch with that childlike inner instrument, keeping near enough to himself to hear his own melodic promptings. If you've listened to toddlers making up songs, the things they invent are often bafflingly catchy and ingenious. They compose to biorhythms somehow. The vocal from Michael's earlier, Off the Wall-era demo of the eventual Thriller hit "Wanna Be Startin' Somethin'" sounds like nothing so much as playful schoolyard taunting. He will always be at his worst when making what he thinks of as "big" music, which he invariably associates with military imagery.

1979, the year of Off the Wall and his first nose job, marks an obscure crisis. Around the start of that year, they offer him the gay lead in the film version of A Chorus Line, but he declines the role, explaining, "I'm excited about it, but if I do it, people will link me with the part. Because of my voice, some people already think I'm that way—homo—though I'm actually not at all."

People want to know, Why, when you became a man, did your voice not change? Rather, it did change, but what did it change into? Listening to clips of his interviews through the '70s, you can hear how he goes about changing it himself. First it deepens slightly, around 1972-73 or so. (Listen to him on The Dating Game in 1972 and you'll hear that his voice was lower at 14 than it will be at 30.) This potentially catastrophic event has perhaps been vaguely dreaded by the family and label for years. Michael Jackson without his falsetto is not the commodity on which their collective dream depends. But Michael has never known a reality that wasn't susceptible on some level to his creative powers. He works to develop something, not a falsetto, which is a way of singing above your range, but instead a higher range. He isolates totally different configurations of his vocal cords, finding their crevices, cultivating the flexibility there. Vocal teachers will tell you this can be done, though it's considered an extreme practice. Whether the process is conscious in Michael's case is unknowable. He probably evolves it in order to keep singing Jackson 5 songs every night through puberty. The startling effect is of his having imaginatively not so much castrated himself as of womanized himself. He essentially evolves a drag voice. On the early demo for "Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough," recorded at home with Randy and Janet helping, you can actually hear him work his way into this voice. It is a character, really. "We're gonna be startin' now, baby," he says in a relaxed, moderately high-pitched man's voice. Then he intones the title, "Don't stop 'til you get enough," in a softer, quieter version of basically the same voice. He repeats the line in a still higher register, almost purring. Finally—in a full-on girlish peal—he sings. A source will later claim to have heard him, in a moment of anger, break into a deep, gruff voice she'd never heard before.

Interesting that these out-flashings of his "natural" voice occurred at moments when he was, as we would say, not himself.

On the Internet, you can see a picture of him near the end of his life, juxtaposed with a digital projection of what he would have looked like at the same age without the surgeries and makeup and wigs. A smiling middle-aged black guy, handsome in an everyday way. We are meant, of course, to feel a connection with this lost neverbeing, and pity for the strange, self-mutilated creature beside him. I can't be alone, however, in feeling just the opposite, that there's something metaphysically revolting about the mock-up. It's an abomination. Michael chose his true face. What is, is natural.

His physical body is arguably, even inarguably, the single greatest piece of postmodern American sculpture. It must be carefully preserved.

It's fascinating to read the interviews he gave to Ebony and Jet over the past thirty years. I confess myself disoriented by them, as a white person. During whole stretches of years when the big media were reporting endlessly on his bizarreness and reclusiveness, he was every so often granting these intimate and illuminating sit-downs to those magazines, never forgetting to remind them that he trusted only them, would speak only to them. The articles make me realize that about the only Michael Jackson I've ever known, personality-wise, is a Michael Jackson who's defending himself against white people who are passive-aggressively accusing him of child molestation. He spoke differently to black people, was more at ease. The language and grain of detail are different. Not that the scenario was any more journalistically pure. The John H. Johnson publishing family, which puts out Jet and Ebony, had Michael's back, faithfully repairing and maintaining his complicated relations with the community, assuring readers that, in the presence of Michael, "you quickly look past the enigmatic icon's light, almost translucent skin and realize that this African-American legend is more than just skin deep." At times, especially when the "homo" issue came up, the straining required could turn comical, as in Ebony in 1982, talking about his obsessive male fans:

michael: "They come after us every way they can, and the guys are just as bad as the girls. Guys jump up on the stage and usually go for me and Randy."

ebony: "But that means nothing except that they admire you, doesn't it?"

Even so, to hear Michael laid-back and talking unpretentiously about art, the thing he most loved—that is a new Michael, a person utterly absent from, for example, Martin Bashir's infamous documentary, in which Michael admitted sharing his bedroom with children. It's only after reading Jet and Ebony that one can understand how otherwise straightforward-seeming people of all races have stayed good friends with Michael Jackson these many years. He is charming; his mind is alive. What a pleasure to find him listening to early "writing version" demos of his own compositions and saying, "Listen to that, that's at home, Janet, Randy, me.… You're hearing four basses on there.…" Or to hear him tell less prepackaged anecdotes, such as the one about a beautiful black girl who froze in the aisle and pissed all down her legs after spotting him on a plane, or the blond girl who kissed him in an airport and, when he didn't respond, asked, "What's wrong, you fag?" He grows tired of reminding people, "There's a reason why I was created male. I'm not a girl." He leaves the reason unspoken.

*****​

When michael and Quincy Jones run into each other on the set of The Wiz, each remembers a moment when Sammy Davis Jr. had taken Jones aside backstage somewhere and whispered, "This guy is something; he's amazing." Michael had "tucked it away." He knows Jones's name from the sleeves of his father's jazz albums, knows Jones is a serious man. He waits till the movie is done to call him up. It's the fact that Jones intimidates him slightly that draws Jackson to him. He yearns for some competition larger than the old intra-familial one, which he has long dominated. That was checkers; he wants to play chess. Fading child stars can easily insulate themselves from further motivation, if they wish, and most do. It's the more human path. Michael seeks pressure instead, at this moment. He recruits people who can drive him to, as he puts it, "higher effort."

Quincy Jones's nickname for him is Smelly. It comes from Michael's habit of constantly touching and covering his nose with the fingers of his left hand, a tic that becomes pronounced in news clips from this time. He feels embarrassed about his broad nose. Several surgeries later—after, one assumes, it had been deemed impolitic inside the Jackson camp to mention the earlier facial self-consciousness—the story is altered. We are told that when Michael liked a track in the studio, he would call it "the smelly jelly." Both stories may be true. "Smelly jelly" has the whiff of Jackson's weird, infantile sayings. Later in life, when feeling weak, he'd say to his people, "I'm hurting…, blanket me," which could mean, among other things, time for my medicine.

Michael knows he won't really have gone solo until his own songwriting finds the next level. He doesn't want inclusion; he wants awe. Jones has a trusted songwriter in his stable, the Englishman Rod Temperton, of Heatwave fame, who brings in a song, "Rock with You." It's very good. Michael hears it and knows it's a hit. He's not even worried about hits at this point, though, except as a kind of by-product of perfection. He goes home and writes "Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough." Janet tinks on a glass bottle. Trusted Randy plays guitar. These are the two siblings whom Michael brings with him into the Quincy Jones adventure, to the innermost zone where he writes. We don't think of the family as having anything to do, musically, with his solo career, except by way of guilt favors. But he feels confident with these two, needs to keep them fully woven into his nest. They are both younger than he. His baby sister.

From the perspective of thirty years, "Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough" is a much better track than "Rock with You." One admires "Rock with You," but melodically Michael's song comes from a more distinctive place. Sophisticated instincts are what you hear.

Michael feels disappointed with Off the Wall. It wins a Grammy, spawns multiple number one singles, dramatically raises Jackson's already colossal level of fame, redeems disco in the very hour and flash of disco's dying. Diana Ross, who once helped out the Jacksons by putting her lovely arm around them, wants Michael to be at her shows again, not for his own sake now but for her own. She isn't desperate by any means, but something has shifted. Quincy Jones and Bruce Swedien, the recording guru who works with him, both take to be absurd the mere idea of "following up" Off the Wall, in terms of success. You do your best, but that kind of thing just happens, if it happens. Jones knows that. Not Michael. All he can see of Off the Wall is that there were bigger records that year. He wants to make something, he says, that "refuse to be ignored."

At home he demos "Billie Jean" with Randy and Janet. When what will be the immortal part comes around, she and Michael go, "Whoo whoo / Whoo whoo."

From Michael's brain, then, through a portable tape recorder, on into the home studio. Bruce Swedien comes over, with a sixteen-track recorder. Being Michael Jackson working on the follow-up to Off the Wall means sometimes your demos are recorded at your home by the greatest recording engineer in the world, but for all that, the team works in a stripped-down fashion, with no noise reduction. "That's usually the best stuff," Michael says, "when you strip it down to the bare minimum and go inside yourself and invent."

On this home demo, made between the "writing version" and the album version, you get to hear Michael's early, mystical placeholder vocals, laid down before he'd written the verses. We hear him say, "More kick and stuff in the 'phones.… I need, uh…more bottom and kick in the 'phones."

Then the music.

[Mumble mumble mum] oh, to say
On the phone to stay…
Oh, born out of time
All the while I see other eyes
One at a time
We'll go where the winds unwind

She told me her voice belonged to me
And I'm here to see
She called my name, then you said, Hello
Oh, then I died
And said, Gotta go in a ride

Seems that you knew my mind, now live
On that day got it made
Oh, mercy, it does care of what you do
Take care of what you do
Lord, they're coming down

Billie Jean is not my lover
She just a girl that says that I am the one
You know, the kid is not my son

A big wonderfully round warm Scandinavian type, Swedien comes from Minnesota, made his mark doing classical, but with classical engineering it's all about fidelity, he knew, and he wants to be part of the making, to help shape the songs. So, a frustrated anatomist himself, coming down from high to low formally and meeting Michael on his way up. Quincy, in the middle with his cool, calls Swedien "Svensk." The white man has the endearing habit of lifting both hands to massage the gray walrus-wings of his mustache. He also has a condition called synesthesia. It means that when he listens to sound, he sees colors. He knows the mix is right only when he sees the right colors. Michael likes singing for him.

In a seminar room in Seattle, at a 1993 Audio Pro recording-geek conference, Swedien talks about his craft. He plays his recording of Michael's flawless one-take vocal from "The Way You Make Me Feel," sans effects of any kind, to let the engineers in the audience hear the straight dope, a great mike on a great voice with as little interference as possible, the right angle, the right deck, everything.

Someone in the audience raises a hand and asks if it's hard recording Michael's voice, given that, as Swedien mentioned before, Michael is very "physical." At first, Swedien doesn't cotton. "Yeah, that is a bit of a problem," he answers, "but I've never had an incident where the microphone has been damaged. One time, though…"

The guy interrupts, "Not to do damage, just the proximity thing."

"Oh!" Swedien says, suddenly understanding. His voice drops to a whisper, "He's unbelievable."

He gives the most beautiful description. "Michael records in the dark," he says, "and he'll dance. And picture this: You're looking through the glass. And it's dark. With a little pin spot on him." Swedien lifts his hand to suggest a narrow cone of light shining directly down from overhead. "And you'll see the mike here. And he'll sing his lines. And then he disappears."

In the outer dark he is dancing, fluttering. That's all Quincy and Swedien know.

"And he's"—Swedien punches the air—"right back in front of the mike at the precise instant."

Swedien invents a special zippered covering for miking the bass drum on "Billie Jean." A muffled enclosure. It gives the song that mummified-heartbeat intensity, which you have seen make a dance floor come to life. The layered bass sounds on the one and the three lend a lurching feline throb. Bass drum, bass guitar, double synthesizer bass, the "four basses," all hitting together, doing the part that started as Michael and Janet going whoo whoo whoo whoo, that came from Jehovah. The tempo is the pulse of a sleeping person.

I have no way of confirming this, but I suspect the reason it sounds like Michael's saying the chad is not my son is that on one take, he'd switched it up and sung the child is not my son. The ch of that child is faintly ghosting each kid, the word they went with. They liked the sonic effect of the slurring, one of those little unfakeable interior things, so they kept it. Possibly a stupid theory. One would love to have been there, the way Michael was with Stevie.

I recall across twenty-five years watching, as a young chad, David Letterman do a bit on the kid line. He claims to have solved it. "We've discovered the mystery word in 'Billie Jean.' Do we have the tape?" They play it, and it goes, She says I am the one / But the [suddenly, in a low, gravelly male voice] CHAIR is not my son.

Michael finds himself back in the old Motown building for a day, doing some video mixing, when Berry Gordy approaches and asks him to be in the twenty-fifth-anniversary special on NBC. Michael demurs. A claustrophobic moment for him. All of that business, his brothers, Motown, the Jackson 5, the past: That's all a cocoon he's been writhing inside, finally chewing through. He knows that "Billie Jean" has exploded; he's becoming something else. But the animal inside him that is his ambition senses the opportunity. He strikes his legendary deal with Gordy, that he'll perform with his brothers if he's allowed to do one of his own solo, post-Motown hits as well. Gordy agrees.

What Michael does with his moment, given the context, given that his brothers have just left the stage and that the stage belongs to Mr. Berry Gordy, is outrageous. In the by-now totemic YouTube clips of this performance, Michael's preamble is usually cut off, which makes it worth watching the disc (which also happens to include one of Marvin Gaye's last appearances before his murder).

Michael is sweaty and strutting. "Thank you.… Oh, you're beautiful.… Thank you," he says, almost slurring with sexiness. You can tell he's worked out all his nerves on the Jackson 5 songs. Now he owns the space as if it were the inside of his cage. Millions upon millions of eyes.

"I have to say, those were the good old days," he rambles on. "I love those songs, those were magic moments, with all my brothers, including Jermaine." (The Jackson family's penchant for high passive aggression at watershed moments is extraordinary; at Michael's funeral, Jermaine will say: "I was his voice and his backbone, I had his back." And then, as if remembering to thank his agent, "So did the family.")

"Those were good songs," Michael says. "I like those songs a lot, but especially, I like—" his voice fades from the mike for a second, ramifying the liveness till the meters almost spike—"the new songs."

Uncontrollable shrieking. He's grabbing the mike stand like James Brown used to grab it, like if it had a neck he'd be choking it. People in the seats are yelling, " 'Billie Jean'! 'Billie Jean'!"

I won't cloud the uniqueness of what he does next with words except to mention one potentially missable (because it's so obvious) aspect: that he does it so entirely alone. The stage is profoundly empty. Silhouettes of the orchestra members are clapping back in the dark. But unless you count the dazzling glove—conceived, according to one source, to hide the advancing vitiligo that discolors his left hand—Michael holds only one prop: a black hat. He tosses that away almost immediately. Stage, dancer, spotlight. The microphone isn't even on. He snatches it back from the stand as if from the hands of a maddening child.

With a mime's tools he proceeds to do possibly the most captivating thing a person's ever been captured doing onstage. Richard Pryor, who was not in any account I have ever read a suck-up, approaches Michael afterward and says simply, "That was the greatest performance I've ever seen." Fred Astaire calls him "the greatest living natural dancer."

Michael tells Ebony, "I remember doing the performance so clearly, and I remember that I was so upset with myself, 'cause it wasn't what I wanted. I wanted it to be more." It's said he intended to hold the crouching en pointe at the end of the moonwalk longer. But if you watch, he falls off his toes, when he falls, in perfect time, and makes it part of the turn. Much as he wipes sweat from under his nose in time, at about 3:25.

The intensity behind his face is unbearable.

Quincy always tells him, "Smelly…get out of the way and leave room so that God can walk in."

A god moves through him.

The god enters, the god leaves.

*****​

It's odd to write about a person knowing he may have been, but not if he was, a serial child molester. Whether or not Michael did it, the suggestion of it shadowed him for so long and finally killed his soul. It's said that toward the end he was having himself put under—with the same anesthesia that may have finished him—not for hours but for days. As though being snuffed. Witnesses to his body on the morgue table report that his prosthetic nose was missing. There were only holes in his face. A mummy. He was mostly bald and weighed scarcely more than 100 pounds. Two separate complete autopsies: They cut him to pieces. As of this writing, no one outside the Jackson camp knows the whereabouts of his body. He seems to be resting temporarily in Berry Gordy's unoccupied crypt.

I have read a stack of books about him in the past month, more than I ever imagined I would—though not more than I wanted. He warrants and will no doubt one day receive a major biography: All the great cultural strains of American music came together in him. We have yet to accept that his very racial in-betweenness made him more and not less of an essential figure in our tradition. He grasped this and used it. His marriage to Elvis's daughter was in part an art piece.

Of all those books, the one that troubles and sticks with me is celebrity journalist Ian Halperin's Unmasked: The Final Years of Michael Jackson, a work obviously slammed into publication to capitalize on the death. Halperin, most famous for a book and movie suggesting Kurt Cobain's suicide was a disguised murder, is not an ideal source, but neither is he a dismissible one. Indeed he accurately predicted Michael's death six months before it happened and seems to have burrowed his way into the Jackson world in several places.

In the beginning, Halperin claims, he set out mainly to prove that Michael had sexually molested young boys and used his money to get away with it. I believe him about this original motivation, since any such proof would have generated the most sensational publicity, sold the most copies, etc. But Halperin finds, in the end, after exhaustively pursuing leads, that every so-called thread of evidence becomes a rope of sand. Somebody, even if it's a family member, wants money, or has accused other people before, or is patently insane. It usually comes down to a tale someone else knows about a secret payoff. Meanwhile you have these boys, like Macaulay Culkin (whom Michael was once accused of fondling) who have come forth and stated that nothing untoward ever happened with Michael. When he stood trial and got off, that was a just verdict.

That's the first half of the Halperin Thesis. The second half is that Michael was a fully functioning gay man, who took secret male lovers his entire adult life. Halperin says he met two of them and saw pictures of one with Michael. They were young but perfectly legal. One told Halperin that Michael was an insatiable bottom.

As for Michael's interest in children, it's hard to imagine that having lacked erotic interest of some kind, but it may well have been thoroughly nonsexual. Michael was a frozen adolescent—about the age of those first dreamy striped-sweater years in California—and he wanted to hang out with the people he saw as his peers. Have pillow fights, call each other doo-doo head. It's creepy as hell, if you like, but victimless. It would make him—in clinical speak—a partial passive fixated pedophile. Not a crime yet, not until they get the mind-reader machines going.

I don't ask that you agree with Halperin, merely for you to admit, as I feel compelled to do, that the psychological picture he conjures up is not less and perhaps just slightly more plausible than the one in which Michael uses Neverland Ranch as a spider's web, luring boys to his bed. If you're like me, you've been subconsciously presuming the latter to be basically the case for most of your life. But there's a good chance it was never true and that Michael loved children with a weird but not immoral love.

Now, if you want a disturbing thought experiment, allow these—I won't say facts…feasibilities—let them percolate, and then watch Martin Bashir's 2003 documentary, Living with Michael Jackson. There's no point adding here to the demonization of Bashir for having more or less manipulated Michael through kindness into declaring himself a complete Fruit of the Loom-collecting fiend, especially when you consider that Bashir was representing us fairly well in the ideas he appears to have carried regarding Michael, that it was probably true.

But when you put on the not-true glasses and watch, and see Michael protesting his innocence, asking, "What's wrong with love?" as his arm hangs around a cancer-stricken boy—or many years earlier, in that strange self-released statement, where he describes with barely suppressed rage the humiliation of having his penis examined by the police—dammit if the whole life doesn't look a lot different. There appears to exist a 50 percent chance that Michael was a martyr of some kind.

We can't pity him. That he embraced his destiny, knowing how fame would warp him, is what frees us to revere him.

We have, in any case, a pathology of pathologization in this country. It's a bourgeois disease, and we ought to call bullshit on it. We bawl that Michael changed his face out of self-loathing. He may have loved what he became.

Ebony caught up with him in Africa in the '90s. He had just been crowned King of Sani by villagers in the Ivory Coast. "You know I don't give interviews," he tells Robert E. Johnson there in the village. "You're the only person I trust to give interviews to."

Deep inside I feel that this world we live in is really a big, huge, monumental symphonic orchestra. I believe that in its primordial form, all of creation is sound and that it's not just random sound, that it's music.

May they have been his last thoughts.

http://www.gq.com/entertainment/cel...-john-jeremiah-sullivan-tribute?currentPage=1
 
Back In The Day

Before the weirdness claimed his legacy, Michael Jackson understood his talent—and what he was willing to do for it—better than we ever have.

By John Jeremiah Sullivan



How do you talk about Michael Jackson unless you begin with Prince Screws? Prince Screws was an Alabama cotton-plantation slave who became a tenant farmer after the Civil War, likely on his old master's land. His son, Prince Screws Jr., bought a small farm. And that man's son, Prince Screws III, left home for Indiana, where he found work as a Pullman porter, part of the exodus of southern blacks to the northern industrial cities.

There came a disruption in the line. This last Prince Screws, the one who went north, would have no sons. He had two daughters, Kattie and Hattie. Kattie gave birth to ten children, the eighth a boy, Michael—who would name his sons Prince, to honor his mother, whom he adored, and to signal a restoration. So the ridiculous moniker given by a white man to his black slave, the way you might name a dog, was bestowed by a black king upon his pale-skinned sons and heirs.

We took the name for an affectation and mocked it.

Not to imply that it was above mockery, but of all the things that make Michael unknowable, thinking we knew him is maybe the most deceptive. Lets suspend it.

Begin not with the miniseries childhood of father Joseph's endless practice sessions but with the later and, it seems, just as formative Motown childhood, from, say, 11 to 14—years spent, when not on the road, most often alone, behind security walls, with private tutors and secret sketchbooks. A dreamy child, he collects exotic animals. He likes rainbows and reading. He starts collecting exotic animals now.

His eldest brothers were at one time children who dreamed of child stardom. Michael never knows this sensation. By the time he achieves something like self-awareness, he is a child star. The child star dreams of being an artist.

Alone, he puts on classical records, because he finds they soothe his mind. He also likes the old southern stuff his uncle Luther sings. His uncle looks back at him and thinks he seems sad for his age. This is in California, so poor, brown Gary, with its poisonous air you could smell from leagues away—a decade's exposure to which may already have damaged his immune system in fateful ways—is the past.

He thinks about things and sometimes talks them over with his friends Marvin Gaye and Diana Ross when they are hanging out. He listens to albums and compares. The albums he and his brothers make have a few nice tunes, to sell records, then a lot of consciously second-rate numbers, to satisfy the format. Whereas Tchaikovsky and people like that, they didn't handle slack material. But you have to write your own songs.

Michael has always made melodies in his head, little riffs and beats, but that isn't the same. The way Motown deals with the Jackson 5, finished songs are delivered to the group, from songwriting teams in various cities. The brothers are brought in to sing and add accents.

Michael wants access to the "anatomy" of the music. That's the word he uses repeatedly. Anatomy. What's inside its structure that makes it move?

When he's 17, he asks Stevie Wonder to let him spy while Songs in the Key of Life gets made. There's Michael, self-consciously shy and deferential, flattening himself mothlike against the Motown studio wall. Somehow Stevie's blindness becomes moving in this context. No doubt he is for long stretches unaware of Michael's presence. Never asks him to play a shaker or anything. Never mentions Michael. But Michael hears him.

Most of the Jackson siblings are leaving Motown at this moment, for another label, where they've leveraged a bit more creative sway. The first thing Michael does is write "Blues Away," an unfairly forgotten song, fated to become one of the least dated-sounding tracks the Jacksons do together. A nice left-handed piano riff with strings and a breathy chorus—Burt Bacharach doing Stevie doing early disco, and some other factor that was Michael's own, that dwelt in his introverted-sounding vocal rhythms. Sweet, slightly cryptic lyrics that contain an early notion of melancholy as final, inviolable retreat: I'd like to be yours tomorrow / So I'm giving you some time to get over today / But you can't take my blues away.

By 1978, the year of "Shake Your Body (Down to the Ground)"—co-written by Michael and little Randy—Michael's methods have gelled. He starts with tape recorders. He sings and beatboxes the little things he hears, the parts. Where do they come from? Above. He claims to drop to his knees and thank Jehovah after he snatches one. His voice coach tells the story of Michael one day raising his hands in the air during practice and starting to mutter. The coach, Seth Riggs, decides to leave him alone. When he comes back half an hour later, it's to Michael whispering, "Thank you for my talent."

Some of the things Michael hears in his head he exports to another instrument, to the piano (which he plays not well but passably) or to the bass. The melody and a few percussive elements remain with his vocal. The rest he assembles around it. He has his brothers and sisters with him. He conducts.

His art will later depend on his ability to stay in touch with that childlike inner instrument, keeping near enough to himself to hear his own melodic promptings. If you've listened to toddlers making up songs, the things they invent are often bafflingly catchy and ingenious. They compose to biorhythms somehow. The vocal from Michael's earlier, Off the Wall-era demo of the eventual Thriller hit "Wanna Be Startin' Somethin'" sounds like nothing so much as playful schoolyard taunting. He will always be at his worst when making what he thinks of as "big" music, which he invariably associates with military imagery.

1979, the year of Off the Wall and his first nose job, marks an obscure crisis. Around the start of that year, they offer him the gay lead in the film version of A Chorus Line, but he declines the role, explaining, "I'm excited about it, but if I do it, people will link me with the part. Because of my voice, some people already think I'm that way—homo—though I'm actually not at all."

People want to know, Why, when you became a man, did your voice not change? Rather, it did change, but what did it change into? Listening to clips of his interviews through the '70s, you can hear how he goes about changing it himself. First it deepens slightly, around 1972-73 or so. (Listen to him on The Dating Game in 1972 and you'll hear that his voice was lower at 14 than it will be at 30.) This potentially catastrophic event has perhaps been vaguely dreaded by the family and label for years. Michael Jackson without his falsetto is not the commodity on which their collective dream depends. But Michael has never known a reality that wasn't susceptible on some level to his creative powers. He works to develop something, not a falsetto, which is a way of singing above your range, but instead a higher range. He isolates totally different configurations of his vocal cords, finding their crevices, cultivating the flexibility there. Vocal teachers will tell you this can be done, though it's considered an extreme practice. Whether the process is conscious in Michael's case is unknowable. He probably evolves it in order to keep singing Jackson 5 songs every night through puberty. The startling effect is of his having imaginatively not so much castrated himself as of womanized himself. He essentially evolves a drag voice. On the early demo for "Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough," recorded at home with Randy and Janet helping, you can actually hear him work his way into this voice. It is a character, really. "We're gonna be startin' now, baby," he says in a relaxed, moderately high-pitched man's voice. Then he intones the title, "Don't stop 'til you get enough," in a softer, quieter version of basically the same voice. He repeats the line in a still higher register, almost purring. Finally—in a full-on girlish peal—he sings. A source will later claim to have heard him, in a moment of anger, break into a deep, gruff voice she'd never heard before.

Interesting that these out-flashings of his "natural" voice occurred at moments when he was, as we would say, not himself.

On the Internet, you can see a picture of him near the end of his life, juxtaposed with a digital projection of what he would have looked like at the same age without the surgeries and makeup and wigs. A smiling middle-aged black guy, handsome in an everyday way. We are meant, of course, to feel a connection with this lost neverbeing, and pity for the strange, self-mutilated creature beside him. I can't be alone, however, in feeling just the opposite, that there's something metaphysically revolting about the mock-up. It's an abomination. Michael chose his true face. What is, is natural.

His physical body is arguably, even inarguably, the single greatest piece of postmodern American sculpture. It must be carefully preserved.

It's fascinating to read the interviews he gave to Ebony and Jet over the past thirty years. I confess myself disoriented by them, as a white person. During whole stretches of years when the big media were reporting endlessly on his bizarreness and reclusiveness, he was every so often granting these intimate and illuminating sit-downs to those magazines, never forgetting to remind them that he trusted only them, would speak only to them. The articles make me realize that about the only Michael Jackson I've ever known, personality-wise, is a Michael Jackson who's defending himself against white people who are passive-aggressively accusing him of child molestation. He spoke differently to black people, was more at ease. The language and grain of detail are different. Not that the scenario was any more journalistically pure. The John H. Johnson publishing family, which puts out Jet and Ebony, had Michael's back, faithfully repairing and maintaining his complicated relations with the community, assuring readers that, in the presence of Michael, "you quickly look past the enigmatic icon's light, almost translucent skin and realize that this African-American legend is more than just skin deep." At times, especially when the "homo" issue came up, the straining required could turn comical, as in Ebony in 1982, talking about his obsessive male fans:

michael: "They come after us every way they can, and the guys are just as bad as the girls. Guys jump up on the stage and usually go for me and Randy."

ebony: "But that means nothing except that they admire you, doesn't it?"

Even so, to hear Michael laid-back and talking unpretentiously about art, the thing he most loved—that is a new Michael, a person utterly absent from, for example, Martin Bashir's infamous documentary, in which Michael admitted sharing his bedroom with children. It's only after reading Jet and Ebony that one can understand how otherwise straightforward-seeming people of all races have stayed good friends with Michael Jackson these many years. He is charming; his mind is alive. What a pleasure to find him listening to early "writing version" demos of his own compositions and saying, "Listen to that, that's at home, Janet, Randy, me.… You're hearing four basses on there.…" Or to hear him tell less prepackaged anecdotes, such as the one about a beautiful black girl who froze in the aisle and pissed all down her legs after spotting him on a plane, or the blond girl who kissed him in an airport and, when he didn't respond, asked, "What's wrong, you fag?" He grows tired of reminding people, "There's a reason why I was created male. I'm not a girl." He leaves the reason unspoken.

*****​

When michael and Quincy Jones run into each other on the set of The Wiz, each remembers a moment when Sammy Davis Jr. had taken Jones aside backstage somewhere and whispered, "This guy is something; he's amazing." Michael had "tucked it away." He knows Jones's name from the sleeves of his father's jazz albums, knows Jones is a serious man. He waits till the movie is done to call him up. It's the fact that Jones intimidates him slightly that draws Jackson to him. He yearns for some competition larger than the old intra-familial one, which he has long dominated. That was checkers; he wants to play chess. Fading child stars can easily insulate themselves from further motivation, if they wish, and most do. It's the more human path. Michael seeks pressure instead, at this moment. He recruits people who can drive him to, as he puts it, "higher effort."

Quincy Jones's nickname for him is Smelly. It comes from Michael's habit of constantly touching and covering his nose with the fingers of his left hand, a tic that becomes pronounced in news clips from this time. He feels embarrassed about his broad nose. Several surgeries later—after, one assumes, it had been deemed impolitic inside the Jackson camp to mention the earlier facial self-consciousness—the story is altered. We are told that when Michael liked a track in the studio, he would call it "the smelly jelly." Both stories may be true. "Smelly jelly" has the whiff of Jackson's weird, infantile sayings. Later in life, when feeling weak, he'd say to his people, "I'm hurting…, blanket me," which could mean, among other things, time for my medicine.

Michael knows he won't really have gone solo until his own songwriting finds the next level. He doesn't want inclusion; he wants awe. Jones has a trusted songwriter in his stable, the Englishman Rod Temperton, of Heatwave fame, who brings in a song, "Rock with You." It's very good. Michael hears it and knows it's a hit. He's not even worried about hits at this point, though, except as a kind of by-product of perfection. He goes home and writes "Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough." Janet tinks on a glass bottle. Trusted Randy plays guitar. These are the two siblings whom Michael brings with him into the Quincy Jones adventure, to the innermost zone where he writes. We don't think of the family as having anything to do, musically, with his solo career, except by way of guilt favors. But he feels confident with these two, needs to keep them fully woven into his nest. They are both younger than he. His baby sister.

From the perspective of thirty years, "Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough" is a much better track than "Rock with You." One admires "Rock with You," but melodically Michael's song comes from a more distinctive place. Sophisticated instincts are what you hear.

Michael feels disappointed with Off the Wall. It wins a Grammy, spawns multiple number one singles, dramatically raises Jackson's already colossal level of fame, redeems disco in the very hour and flash of disco's dying. Diana Ross, who once helped out the Jacksons by putting her lovely arm around them, wants Michael to be at her shows again, not for his own sake now but for her own. She isn't desperate by any means, but something has shifted. Quincy Jones and Bruce Swedien, the recording guru who works with him, both take to be absurd the mere idea of "following up" Off the Wall, in terms of success. You do your best, but that kind of thing just happens, if it happens. Jones knows that. Not Michael. All he can see of Off the Wall is that there were bigger records that year. He wants to make something, he says, that "refuse to be ignored."

At home he demos "Billie Jean" with Randy and Janet. When what will be the immortal part comes around, she and Michael go, "Whoo whoo / Whoo whoo."

From Michael's brain, then, through a portable tape recorder, on into the home studio. Bruce Swedien comes over, with a sixteen-track recorder. Being Michael Jackson working on the follow-up to Off the Wall means sometimes your demos are recorded at your home by the greatest recording engineer in the world, but for all that, the team works in a stripped-down fashion, with no noise reduction. "That's usually the best stuff," Michael says, "when you strip it down to the bare minimum and go inside yourself and invent."

On this home demo, made between the "writing version" and the album version, you get to hear Michael's early, mystical placeholder vocals, laid down before he'd written the verses. We hear him say, "More kick and stuff in the 'phones.… I need, uh…more bottom and kick in the 'phones."

Then the music.

[Mumble mumble mum] oh, to say
On the phone to stay…
Oh, born out of time
All the while I see other eyes
One at a time
We'll go where the winds unwind

She told me her voice belonged to me
And I'm here to see
She called my name, then you said, Hello
Oh, then I died
And said, Gotta go in a ride

Seems that you knew my mind, now live
On that day got it made
Oh, mercy, it does care of what you do
Take care of what you do
Lord, they're coming down

Billie Jean is not my lover
She just a girl that says that I am the one
You know, the kid is not my son

A big wonderfully round warm Scandinavian type, Swedien comes from Minnesota, made his mark doing classical, but with classical engineering it's all about fidelity, he knew, and he wants to be part of the making, to help shape the songs. So, a frustrated anatomist himself, coming down from high to low formally and meeting Michael on his way up. Quincy, in the middle with his cool, calls Swedien "Svensk." The white man has the endearing habit of lifting both hands to massage the gray walrus-wings of his mustache. He also has a condition called synesthesia. It means that when he listens to sound, he sees colors. He knows the mix is right only when he sees the right colors. Michael likes singing for him.

In a seminar room in Seattle, at a 1993 Audio Pro recording-geek conference, Swedien talks about his craft. He plays his recording of Michael's flawless one-take vocal from "The Way You Make Me Feel," sans effects of any kind, to let the engineers in the audience hear the straight dope, a great mike on a great voice with as little interference as possible, the right angle, the right deck, everything.

Someone in the audience raises a hand and asks if it's hard recording Michael's voice, given that, as Swedien mentioned before, Michael is very "physical." At first, Swedien doesn't cotton. "Yeah, that is a bit of a problem," he answers, "but I've never had an incident where the microphone has been damaged. One time, though…"

The guy interrupts, "Not to do damage, just the proximity thing."

"Oh!" Swedien says, suddenly understanding. His voice drops to a whisper, "He's unbelievable."

He gives the most beautiful description. "Michael records in the dark," he says, "and he'll dance. And picture this: You're looking through the glass. And it's dark. With a little pin spot on him." Swedien lifts his hand to suggest a narrow cone of light shining directly down from overhead. "And you'll see the mike here. And he'll sing his lines. And then he disappears."

In the outer dark he is dancing, fluttering. That's all Quincy and Swedien know.

"And he's"—Swedien punches the air—"right back in front of the mike at the precise instant."

Swedien invents a special zippered covering for miking the bass drum on "Billie Jean." A muffled enclosure. It gives the song that mummified-heartbeat intensity, which you have seen make a dance floor come to life. The layered bass sounds on the one and the three lend a lurching feline throb. Bass drum, bass guitar, double synthesizer bass, the "four basses," all hitting together, doing the part that started as Michael and Janet going whoo whoo whoo whoo, that came from Jehovah. The tempo is the pulse of a sleeping person.

I have no way of confirming this, but I suspect the reason it sounds like Michael's saying the chad is not my son is that on one take, he'd switched it up and sung the child is not my son. The ch of that child is faintly ghosting each kid, the word they went with. They liked the sonic effect of the slurring, one of those little unfakeable interior things, so they kept it. Possibly a stupid theory. One would love to have been there, the way Michael was with Stevie.

I recall across twenty-five years watching, as a young chad, David Letterman do a bit on the kid line. He claims to have solved it. "We've discovered the mystery word in 'Billie Jean.' Do we have the tape?" They play it, and it goes, She says I am the one / But the [suddenly, in a low, gravelly male voice] CHAIR is not my son.

Michael finds himself back in the old Motown building for a day, doing some video mixing, when Berry Gordy approaches and asks him to be in the twenty-fifth-anniversary special on NBC. Michael demurs. A claustrophobic moment for him. All of that business, his brothers, Motown, the Jackson 5, the past: That's all a cocoon he's been writhing inside, finally chewing through. He knows that "Billie Jean" has exploded; he's becoming something else. But the animal inside him that is his ambition senses the opportunity. He strikes his legendary deal with Gordy, that he'll perform with his brothers if he's allowed to do one of his own solo, post-Motown hits as well. Gordy agrees.

What Michael does with his moment, given the context, given that his brothers have just left the stage and that the stage belongs to Mr. Berry Gordy, is outrageous. In the by-now totemic YouTube clips of this performance, Michael's preamble is usually cut off, which makes it worth watching the disc (which also happens to include one of Marvin Gaye's last appearances before his murder).

Michael is sweaty and strutting. "Thank you.… Oh, you're beautiful.… Thank you," he says, almost slurring with sexiness. You can tell he's worked out all his nerves on the Jackson 5 songs. Now he owns the space as if it were the inside of his cage. Millions upon millions of eyes.

"I have to say, those were the good old days," he rambles on. "I love those songs, those were magic moments, with all my brothers, including Jermaine." (The Jackson family's penchant for high passive aggression at watershed moments is extraordinary; at Michael's funeral, Jermaine will say: "I was his voice and his backbone, I had his back." And then, as if remembering to thank his agent, "So did the family.")

"Those were good songs," Michael says. "I like those songs a lot, but especially, I like—" his voice fades from the mike for a second, ramifying the liveness till the meters almost spike—"the new songs."

Uncontrollable shrieking. He's grabbing the mike stand like James Brown used to grab it, like if it had a neck he'd be choking it. People in the seats are yelling, " 'Billie Jean'! 'Billie Jean'!"

I won't cloud the uniqueness of what he does next with words except to mention one potentially missable (because it's so obvious) aspect: that he does it so entirely alone. The stage is profoundly empty. Silhouettes of the orchestra members are clapping back in the dark. But unless you count the dazzling glove—conceived, according to one source, to hide the advancing vitiligo that discolors his left hand—Michael holds only one prop: a black hat. He tosses that away almost immediately. Stage, dancer, spotlight. The microphone isn't even on. He snatches it back from the stand as if from the hands of a maddening child.

With a mime's tools he proceeds to do possibly the most captivating thing a person's ever been captured doing onstage. Richard Pryor, who was not in any account I have ever read a suck-up, approaches Michael afterward and says simply, "That was the greatest performance I've ever seen." Fred Astaire calls him "the greatest living natural dancer."

Michael tells Ebony, "I remember doing the performance so clearly, and I remember that I was so upset with myself, 'cause it wasn't what I wanted. I wanted it to be more." It's said he intended to hold the crouching en pointe at the end of the moonwalk longer. But if you watch, he falls off his toes, when he falls, in perfect time, and makes it part of the turn. Much as he wipes sweat from under his nose in time, at about 3:25.

The intensity behind his face is unbearable.

Quincy always tells him, "Smelly…get out of the way and leave room so that God can walk in."

A god moves through him.

The god enters, the god leaves.

*****​

It's odd to write about a person knowing he may have been, but not if he was, a serial child molester. Whether or not Michael did it, the suggestion of it shadowed him for so long and finally killed his soul. It's said that toward the end he was having himself put under—with the same anesthesia that may have finished him—not for hours but for days. As though being snuffed. Witnesses to his body on the morgue table report that his prosthetic nose was missing. There were only holes in his face. A mummy. He was mostly bald and weighed scarcely more than 100 pounds. Two separate complete autopsies: They cut him to pieces. As of this writing, no one outside the Jackson camp knows the whereabouts of his body. He seems to be resting temporarily in Berry Gordy's unoccupied crypt.

I have read a stack of books about him in the past month, more than I ever imagined I would—though not more than I wanted. He warrants and will no doubt one day receive a major biography: All the great cultural strains of American music came together in him. We have yet to accept that his very racial in-betweenness made him more and not less of an essential figure in our tradition. He grasped this and used it. His marriage to Elvis's daughter was in part an art piece.

Of all those books, the one that troubles and sticks with me is celebrity journalist Ian Halperin's Unmasked: The Final Years of Michael Jackson, a work obviously slammed into publication to capitalize on the death. Halperin, most famous for a book and movie suggesting Kurt Cobain's suicide was a disguised murder, is not an ideal source, but neither is he a dismissible one. Indeed he accurately predicted Michael's death six months before it happened and seems to have burrowed his way into the Jackson world in several places.

In the beginning, Halperin claims, he set out mainly to prove that Michael had sexually molested young boys and used his money to get away with it. I believe him about this original motivation, since any such proof would have generated the most sensational publicity, sold the most copies, etc. But Halperin finds, in the end, after exhaustively pursuing leads, that every so-called thread of evidence becomes a rope of sand. Somebody, even if it's a family member, wants money, or has accused other people before, or is patently insane. It usually comes down to a tale someone else knows about a secret payoff. Meanwhile you have these boys, like Macaulay Culkin (whom Michael was once accused of fondling) who have come forth and stated that nothing untoward ever happened with Michael. When he stood trial and got off, that was a just verdict.

That's the first half of the Halperin Thesis. The second half is that Michael was a fully functioning gay man, who took secret male lovers his entire adult life. Halperin says he met two of them and saw pictures of one with Michael. They were young but perfectly legal. One told Halperin that Michael was an insatiable bottom.

As for Michael's interest in children, it's hard to imagine that having lacked erotic interest of some kind, but it may well have been thoroughly nonsexual. Michael was a frozen adolescent—about the age of those first dreamy striped-sweater years in California—and he wanted to hang out with the people he saw as his peers. Have pillow fights, call each other doo-doo head. It's creepy as hell, if you like, but victimless. It would make him—in clinical speak—a partial passive fixated pedophile. Not a crime yet, not until they get the mind-reader machines going.

I don't ask that you agree with Halperin, merely for you to admit, as I feel compelled to do, that the psychological picture he conjures up is not less and perhaps just slightly more plausible than the one in which Michael uses Neverland Ranch as a spider's web, luring boys to his bed. If you're like me, you've been subconsciously presuming the latter to be basically the case for most of your life. But there's a good chance it was never true and that Michael loved children with a weird but not immoral love.

Now, if you want a disturbing thought experiment, allow these—I won't say facts…feasibilities—let them percolate, and then watch Martin Bashir's 2003 documentary, Living with Michael Jackson. There's no point adding here to the demonization of Bashir for having more or less manipulated Michael through kindness into declaring himself a complete Fruit of the Loom-collecting fiend, especially when you consider that Bashir was representing us fairly well in the ideas he appears to have carried regarding Michael, that it was probably true.

But when you put on the not-true glasses and watch, and see Michael protesting his innocence, asking, "What's wrong with love?" as his arm hangs around a cancer-stricken boy—or many years earlier, in that strange self-released statement, where he describes with barely suppressed rage the humiliation of having his penis examined by the police—dammit if the whole life doesn't look a lot different. There appears to exist a 50 percent chance that Michael was a martyr of some kind.

We can't pity him. That he embraced his destiny, knowing how fame would warp him, is what frees us to revere him.

We have, in any case, a pathology of pathologization in this country. It's a bourgeois disease, and we ought to call bullshit on it. We bawl that Michael changed his face out of self-loathing. He may have loved what he became.

Ebony caught up with him in Africa in the '90s. He had just been crowned King of Sani by villagers in the Ivory Coast. "You know I don't give interviews," he tells Robert E. Johnson there in the village. "You're the only person I trust to give interviews to."

Deep inside I feel that this world we live in is really a big, huge, monumental symphonic orchestra. I believe that in its primordial form, all of creation is sound and that it's not just random sound, that it's music.

May they have been his last thoughts.

http://www.gq.com/entertainment/cel...-john-jeremiah-sullivan-tribute?currentPage=1
 
Michael Jackson: On black male sex appeal and the mass market

by Craig Takeuchi
July 10, 2009



With the world mourning the passing of Michael Jackson and his life and achievements are celebrated in print, on TV, and on-line, is there anything new to be said (or seen) about the legendary performer?

One thing that's been frequently mentioned is how the pop icon helped to break down colour barriers in the music industry.

But what might be glossed over is that there are a number of less obvious aspects about what he contributed to the acceptability of black male sexuality in the mass market.

When Jackson shot to superstardom with the release of his '80s solo albums, his success coincided with a time period marked by a literally colourful circus of solo acts that boldly ushered gender and sexual diversity into the mainstream.

Propelled by the momentum generated by the sexually liberating '70s, the '80s popscape was rife with gender blending freaks, to say the least.

Motorcycle-riding Prince roared onto the scene wielding his guitar in high heels and flamboyant outfits (the kind you may or may not find at a secondhand store). And along shebopped quirky Cyndi Lauper, proving personality can triumph over gender objectification. And of course, material grrl Madonna demonstrated that sexpots could have balls.

From across the pond, androgynous, makeup-loving chameleon Boy George pranced around in dresses, unabashedly flaunting his effeminate manners; Annie Lennox, with her buzz cuts and business suits, proved that sisters were doing it for themselves; and earth oddity David Bowie offered a refined, artistic alternative to the rugged masculinity of male solo acts like Bruce Springsteen or Bryan Adams. And New Wave bands like The Communards, Erasure, and Depeche Mode included either members who were out as gay men, or had penchants for cross-dressing and playing S&M M&S (that's master and servant, for non-Depechians).

Among this rainbow coalition of characters moonwalked Michael Jackson.

While his talent was undeniable, a less recognized factor that contributed to his appeal was the fact that he presented a fresh new image of black male sex appeal.

Racist stereotypes, deeply entrenched in North American history, have either feared or demonized black male sexuality. Michael Jackson presented an intriguing counterpoint to that prejudice: here was a young black male who was exhibiting sexually explicit gestures, grabbing his crotch and air-humping the ground, and bellowing lurid, lustful lyrics. But it was all encased within the body of a lithe, skinny, soft-spoken, shy, sexually ambiguous male.

It came off as a "cute" facsimile rather than the real deal—his bark was far worse than his bite. And thus, for the time period, he was far more palatable to an audience dominated by a Caucasian majority.

(It's interesting to note that around the same time that Jackson rose to popularity, there were several TV shows that also found success by presenting black men in miniature. Diff'rent Strokes starring Gary Coleman and later Webster with Emmanuel Lewis featured black children adopted by affluent white parents. Infantilization is one way of softening or avoiding issues deemed unacceptable by the status quo.)

While there were numerous black entertainers prior to Jackson—from the suave Harry Belafonte, Nat King Cole, and Smokey Robinson to the seductive Barry White and Marvin Gaye—they were primarily geared towards an adult audience. Stevie Wonder, Jimi Hendrix, Bob Marley, and Little Richard all appealed to youth—and they all certainly contributed to changing attitudes towards black male public figures—but not on the same commercial scope and image level as Jackson.

Also, New Edition achieved some crossover popularity around the same time, later giving rise to several solo stars, including Bobby Brown and Johnny Gill.

But it was Jackson, as a solo artist and pin-up star, who delivered sexuality in a sanitized, unthreatening image, broke ground as one of the first black teen idols who cracked the youth market on a global magnitude. Girls screamed after him, and guys emulated or idolized him.

(In fact, Justin Timberlake seems to have drawn upon some of these elements of Jackson and repackaged it within the body of a white male.)

While the eccentric stars of the '80s ushered in an era of accepting outcasts, they still faced an uphill battle in maintaining longevity against shifting social mores. By the end of the decade, with the rise of an anti-feminist backlash and safe sex campaigns moving beyond gay communities, public displays of gender and sexual identities were beginning to revert to traditional roles.

For '80s solo stars, the dilemma provoked a fight or flight response.

One figure who fought, and survived, was Madonna. Like her or not, she continued standing her ground, fighting back whenever she was criticized, and refusing to give in. For better or for worse, she continued pushing forward in the face of resistance or rejection.

Yet many other '80s female pop figures gave in to what was once antithetical to them. When Cyndi Lauper took on a more overtly sexual image, it killed the charm that her image was founded on: the childlike, personality-driven innocence that was once refreshing. Even Janet Jackson stopped covering up her body, and became irrevocably trapped in the skin-baring sex goddess role.

Most of the male stars sought escape. Prince progressively alienated the public with his increasingly esoteric behaviour and image, including changing his name to an unpronounceable symbol. Boy George struggled with drug problems and run-ins with the law.

Childlike regression seems to have been Michael Jackson's primary coping mechanism for dealing with the pressures and stress in his life. From his Neverland ranch to his friendships with children, Jackson's proclivities were signs of retreat and avoidance, rather than tackling problems and moving past them.

Interestingly, the public responded well to his attempts to fight back against the media, in songs such as "Leave Me Alone" and "Scream", his duet with Janet Jackson.

However, Michael Jackson's personality was introverted, gentle, and sensitive. In spite of his showmanship, he wasn't naturally a extrovert. (Social structures have never been particularly supportive of sensitive men, especially for those in the public eye and in industries that turn talents into commodities.)

What complicated things was that his sexual, gender, and even racial ambiguity became more pronounced as his career continued. It's ironic that the elements of his appeal that made him popular in the first place eventually came to haunt him. Making matters even worse were the pedophile accusations.

Nonetheless, Jackson's success, and other singers and acts of the time like LL Cool J, proved that black male sexuality could be sold to a mass youth market, and contributed to paving the way commercially for other black male sex symbols and singers ranging from drag queen RuPaul and short-lived heartthrobs Milli Vanilli to Usher, Akon, and countless more.

What's more, Jackson's impact and influence may reverberate in many other less obvious ways in both pop music and social attitudes around the world.

It's tragic that for someone who was surrounded with so much worldwide attention, he seemed unable to either get or receive any help from anyone with the pressures and problems he was facing. However, the real tragedy would be if his life, in both successes and problems, is one that is only adulated or gawked at, but isn't actually learned from.

http://www.straight.com/article-239943/michael-jackson-what-he-contributed-black-male-sex-appeal
 
Michael Jackson: On black male sex appeal and the mass market

by Craig Takeuchi
July 10, 2009



With the world mourning the passing of Michael Jackson and his life and achievements are celebrated in print, on TV, and on-line, is there anything new to be said (or seen) about the legendary performer?

One thing that's been frequently mentioned is how the pop icon helped to break down colour barriers in the music industry.

But what might be glossed over is that there are a number of less obvious aspects about what he contributed to the acceptability of black male sexuality in the mass market.

When Jackson shot to superstardom with the release of his '80s solo albums, his success coincided with a time period marked by a literally colourful circus of solo acts that boldly ushered gender and sexual diversity into the mainstream.

Propelled by the momentum generated by the sexually liberating '70s, the '80s popscape was rife with gender blending freaks, to say the least.

Motorcycle-riding Prince roared onto the scene wielding his guitar in high heels and flamboyant outfits (the kind you may or may not find at a secondhand store). And along shebopped quirky Cyndi Lauper, proving personality can triumph over gender objectification. And of course, material grrl Madonna demonstrated that sexpots could have balls.

From across the pond, androgynous, makeup-loving chameleon Boy George pranced around in dresses, unabashedly flaunting his effeminate manners; Annie Lennox, with her buzz cuts and business suits, proved that sisters were doing it for themselves; and earth oddity David Bowie offered a refined, artistic alternative to the rugged masculinity of male solo acts like Bruce Springsteen or Bryan Adams. And New Wave bands like The Communards, Erasure, and Depeche Mode included either members who were out as gay men, or had penchants for cross-dressing and playing S&M M&S (that's master and servant, for non-Depechians).

Among this rainbow coalition of characters moonwalked Michael Jackson.

While his talent was undeniable, a less recognized factor that contributed to his appeal was the fact that he presented a fresh new image of black male sex appeal.

Racist stereotypes, deeply entrenched in North American history, have either feared or demonized black male sexuality. Michael Jackson presented an intriguing counterpoint to that prejudice: here was a young black male who was exhibiting sexually explicit gestures, grabbing his crotch and air-humping the ground, and bellowing lurid, lustful lyrics. But it was all encased within the body of a lithe, skinny, soft-spoken, shy, sexually ambiguous male.

It came off as a "cute" facsimile rather than the real deal—his bark was far worse than his bite. And thus, for the time period, he was far more palatable to an audience dominated by a Caucasian majority.

(It's interesting to note that around the same time that Jackson rose to popularity, there were several TV shows that also found success by presenting black men in miniature. Diff'rent Strokes starring Gary Coleman and later Webster with Emmanuel Lewis featured black children adopted by affluent white parents. Infantilization is one way of softening or avoiding issues deemed unacceptable by the status quo.)

While there were numerous black entertainers prior to Jackson—from the suave Harry Belafonte, Nat King Cole, and Smokey Robinson to the seductive Barry White and Marvin Gaye—they were primarily geared towards an adult audience. Stevie Wonder, Jimi Hendrix, Bob Marley, and Little Richard all appealed to youth—and they all certainly contributed to changing attitudes towards black male public figures—but not on the same commercial scope and image level as Jackson.

Also, New Edition achieved some crossover popularity around the same time, later giving rise to several solo stars, including Bobby Brown and Johnny Gill.

But it was Jackson, as a solo artist and pin-up star, who delivered sexuality in a sanitized, unthreatening image, broke ground as one of the first black teen idols who cracked the youth market on a global magnitude. Girls screamed after him, and guys emulated or idolized him.

(In fact, Justin Timberlake seems to have drawn upon some of these elements of Jackson and repackaged it within the body of a white male.)

While the eccentric stars of the '80s ushered in an era of accepting outcasts, they still faced an uphill battle in maintaining longevity against shifting social mores. By the end of the decade, with the rise of an anti-feminist backlash and safe sex campaigns moving beyond gay communities, public displays of gender and sexual identities were beginning to revert to traditional roles.

For '80s solo stars, the dilemma provoked a fight or flight response.

One figure who fought, and survived, was Madonna. Like her or not, she continued standing her ground, fighting back whenever she was criticized, and refusing to give in. For better or for worse, she continued pushing forward in the face of resistance or rejection.

Yet many other '80s female pop figures gave in to what was once antithetical to them. When Cyndi Lauper took on a more overtly sexual image, it killed the charm that her image was founded on: the childlike, personality-driven innocence that was once refreshing. Even Janet Jackson stopped covering up her body, and became irrevocably trapped in the skin-baring sex goddess role.

Most of the male stars sought escape. Prince progressively alienated the public with his increasingly esoteric behaviour and image, including changing his name to an unpronounceable symbol. Boy George struggled with drug problems and run-ins with the law.

Childlike regression seems to have been Michael Jackson's primary coping mechanism for dealing with the pressures and stress in his life. From his Neverland ranch to his friendships with children, Jackson's proclivities were signs of retreat and avoidance, rather than tackling problems and moving past them.

Interestingly, the public responded well to his attempts to fight back against the media, in songs such as "Leave Me Alone" and "Scream", his duet with Janet Jackson.

However, Michael Jackson's personality was introverted, gentle, and sensitive. In spite of his showmanship, he wasn't naturally a extrovert. (Social structures have never been particularly supportive of sensitive men, especially for those in the public eye and in industries that turn talents into commodities.)

What complicated things was that his sexual, gender, and even racial ambiguity became more pronounced as his career continued. It's ironic that the elements of his appeal that made him popular in the first place eventually came to haunt him. Making matters even worse were the pedophile accusations.

Nonetheless, Jackson's success, and other singers and acts of the time like LL Cool J, proved that black male sexuality could be sold to a mass youth market, and contributed to paving the way commercially for other black male sex symbols and singers ranging from drag queen RuPaul and short-lived heartthrobs Milli Vanilli to Usher, Akon, and countless more.

What's more, Jackson's impact and influence may reverberate in many other less obvious ways in both pop music and social attitudes around the world.

It's tragic that for someone who was surrounded with so much worldwide attention, he seemed unable to either get or receive any help from anyone with the pressures and problems he was facing. However, the real tragedy would be if his life, in both successes and problems, is one that is only adulated or gawked at, but isn't actually learned from.

http://www.straight.com/article-239943/michael-jackson-what-he-contributed-black-male-sex-appeal
 
Michael Jackson: On black male sex appeal and the mass market

by Craig Takeuchi
July 10, 2009



With the world mourning the passing of Michael Jackson and his life and achievements are celebrated in print, on TV, and on-line, is there anything new to be said (or seen) about the legendary performer?

One thing that's been frequently mentioned is how the pop icon helped to break down colour barriers in the music industry.

But what might be glossed over is that there are a number of less obvious aspects about what he contributed to the acceptability of black male sexuality in the mass market.

When Jackson shot to superstardom with the release of his '80s solo albums, his success coincided with a time period marked by a literally colourful circus of solo acts that boldly ushered gender and sexual diversity into the mainstream.

Propelled by the momentum generated by the sexually liberating '70s, the '80s popscape was rife with gender blending freaks, to say the least.

Motorcycle-riding Prince roared onto the scene wielding his guitar in high heels and flamboyant outfits (the kind you may or may not find at a secondhand store). And along shebopped quirky Cyndi Lauper, proving personality can triumph over gender objectification. And of course, material grrl Madonna demonstrated that sexpots could have balls.

From across the pond, androgynous, makeup-loving chameleon Boy George pranced around in dresses, unabashedly flaunting his effeminate manners; Annie Lennox, with her buzz cuts and business suits, proved that sisters were doing it for themselves; and earth oddity David Bowie offered a refined, artistic alternative to the rugged masculinity of male solo acts like Bruce Springsteen or Bryan Adams. And New Wave bands like The Communards, Erasure, and Depeche Mode included either members who were out as gay men, or had penchants for cross-dressing and playing S&M M&S (that's master and servant, for non-Depechians).

Among this rainbow coalition of characters moonwalked Michael Jackson.

While his talent was undeniable, a less recognized factor that contributed to his appeal was the fact that he presented a fresh new image of black male sex appeal.

Racist stereotypes, deeply entrenched in North American history, have either feared or demonized black male sexuality. Michael Jackson presented an intriguing counterpoint to that prejudice: here was a young black male who was exhibiting sexually explicit gestures, grabbing his crotch and air-humping the ground, and bellowing lurid, lustful lyrics. But it was all encased within the body of a lithe, skinny, soft-spoken, shy, sexually ambiguous male.

It came off as a "cute" facsimile rather than the real deal—his bark was far worse than his bite. And thus, for the time period, he was far more palatable to an audience dominated by a Caucasian majority.

(It's interesting to note that around the same time that Jackson rose to popularity, there were several TV shows that also found success by presenting black men in miniature. Diff'rent Strokes starring Gary Coleman and later Webster with Emmanuel Lewis featured black children adopted by affluent white parents. Infantilization is one way of softening or avoiding issues deemed unacceptable by the status quo.)

While there were numerous black entertainers prior to Jackson—from the suave Harry Belafonte, Nat King Cole, and Smokey Robinson to the seductive Barry White and Marvin Gaye—they were primarily geared towards an adult audience. Stevie Wonder, Jimi Hendrix, Bob Marley, and Little Richard all appealed to youth—and they all certainly contributed to changing attitudes towards black male public figures—but not on the same commercial scope and image level as Jackson.

Also, New Edition achieved some crossover popularity around the same time, later giving rise to several solo stars, including Bobby Brown and Johnny Gill.

But it was Jackson, as a solo artist and pin-up star, who delivered sexuality in a sanitized, unthreatening image, broke ground as one of the first black teen idols who cracked the youth market on a global magnitude. Girls screamed after him, and guys emulated or idolized him.

(In fact, Justin Timberlake seems to have drawn upon some of these elements of Jackson and repackaged it within the body of a white male.)

While the eccentric stars of the '80s ushered in an era of accepting outcasts, they still faced an uphill battle in maintaining longevity against shifting social mores. By the end of the decade, with the rise of an anti-feminist backlash and safe sex campaigns moving beyond gay communities, public displays of gender and sexual identities were beginning to revert to traditional roles.

For '80s solo stars, the dilemma provoked a fight or flight response.

One figure who fought, and survived, was Madonna. Like her or not, she continued standing her ground, fighting back whenever she was criticized, and refusing to give in. For better or for worse, she continued pushing forward in the face of resistance or rejection.

Yet many other '80s female pop figures gave in to what was once antithetical to them. When Cyndi Lauper took on a more overtly sexual image, it killed the charm that her image was founded on: the childlike, personality-driven innocence that was once refreshing. Even Janet Jackson stopped covering up her body, and became irrevocably trapped in the skin-baring sex goddess role.

Most of the male stars sought escape. Prince progressively alienated the public with his increasingly esoteric behaviour and image, including changing his name to an unpronounceable symbol. Boy George struggled with drug problems and run-ins with the law.

Childlike regression seems to have been Michael Jackson's primary coping mechanism for dealing with the pressures and stress in his life. From his Neverland ranch to his friendships with children, Jackson's proclivities were signs of retreat and avoidance, rather than tackling problems and moving past them.

Interestingly, the public responded well to his attempts to fight back against the media, in songs such as "Leave Me Alone" and "Scream", his duet with Janet Jackson.

However, Michael Jackson's personality was introverted, gentle, and sensitive. In spite of his showmanship, he wasn't naturally a extrovert. (Social structures have never been particularly supportive of sensitive men, especially for those in the public eye and in industries that turn talents into commodities.)

What complicated things was that his sexual, gender, and even racial ambiguity became more pronounced as his career continued. It's ironic that the elements of his appeal that made him popular in the first place eventually came to haunt him. Making matters even worse were the pedophile accusations.

Nonetheless, Jackson's success, and other singers and acts of the time like LL Cool J, proved that black male sexuality could be sold to a mass youth market, and contributed to paving the way commercially for other black male sex symbols and singers ranging from drag queen RuPaul and short-lived heartthrobs Milli Vanilli to Usher, Akon, and countless more.

What's more, Jackson's impact and influence may reverberate in many other less obvious ways in both pop music and social attitudes around the world.

It's tragic that for someone who was surrounded with so much worldwide attention, he seemed unable to either get or receive any help from anyone with the pressures and problems he was facing. However, the real tragedy would be if his life, in both successes and problems, is one that is only adulated or gawked at, but isn't actually learned from.

http://www.straight.com/article-239943/michael-jackson-what-he-contributed-black-male-sex-appeal
 
Michael Jackson and the God Feeling

By Deepak Chopra | June 29, 2009; 7:48 PM ET

In startling ways pop culture mirrors long-standing spiritual arguments. In an age where the stage has replaced the pulpit -- where the line between the two is all but invisible -- morality is played out in the lives of celebrities. This is an unsettling phenomenon. Princess Diana slips into the role of Holy Mother almost equal with Mother Teresa. Michael Jackson's call to "Heal the World" in a pop song spreads to every corner of the planet and probably touches more people than the Pope's annual Christmas message.

With the sudden, sad death of Michael Jackson, whom I knew well for twenty years, a specific point of theology comes to life and haunts us. I'm thinking of Manichaeism, a Gnostic doctrine born in Persia in the third century, whose central idea is "the struggle between a good, spiritual world of light, and an evil, material world of darkness," as the Wikipedia entry puts it. Manichaeism pictured the destiny of the world, and each soul, in terms of black versus white, and so potent is the idea that it has permeated race relations, cultural divides, wars, and the whole tendency to demonize "them," those people who are different from us and therefore exist outside the light.

It's hard not to see Michael Jackson as a pop martyr to this kind of either/or thinking. His hit song, "Black or White," insisted that "it don't matter if you're black or white," something he deeply believed in. His skin changed from black to white because of vitiligo, but the public and press mistinterpreted this as a conscious attempt to change his skin and took it as the mark of someone who didn't know what world he belonged in. But I don't want to trade in symbols. As a real person, Michael struggled between extremes, and his vulnerability to the shadow side of human nature was very poignant. The tabloids consigned him to the dark side via cheap, sensationalized stories that verged on the ghoulish (stories he fed with behavior that flirted far too much with transgressive behavior). But the other aspect of Manichaeism was also there, an evangelical desire to bring light and healing to the whole world. The paradox of how one person could be so innocent and so disturbing at the same time remains a mystery.

I began to ponder Michael's nature after I received an e-mail that pointed to "the transcendent feeling he inspired in so many people with his music and his dancing. There was almost a religious, ritualistic feeling to it. He seemed to be in another zone when he was performing and took others with him." I agree, but the wider phenomenon is the "God feeling" communicated to millions of people through pop culture. Princess Diana played a key part, as Bono and Sting still do, as Live Aid concerts do. A transient mass communion substitutes for the traditional communion offered in church; a global feeling of oneness transcends the unity of small religious communities.

The flaws in this God feeling are obvious. It doesn't last. Strangers are brought together for a moment, usually through mass media, only to return to being strangers once the moment is gone. The message being communicated is far simpler than the doctrines and dogmas of organized faiths. All of which can make the God feeling seem superficial and sentimental. Did Michael Jackson really heal the world in any meaningful sense? Did it help Princess Diana to be elevated to saintly status when in reality her private life contained more than its share of trouble, confusion, and turmoil?

None of us are in a position to say. Communion is an actual phenomenon, however, and without it, we would feel much more alone and divided. In Afghanistan a pop talent show known as "Afghan Star" is watched by half the country's population. On the surface it looks like any other imitation of "American Idol," until you learn that this show is the most important vehicle for warring tribes and divisive religious traditions to view each other in peace. Via TV entertainment, "they" don't look as dark and ominous to "us." One is reminded that pop communion may, in fact, be the only kind that doesn't exclude anybody. The God feeling is important just because it isn't bound by doctrine and dogma. No one is outside the fold. When an audience lights candles and sways to "Heal the World," a space is created where nobody is unholy, no religion can exercise its imaginary exclusive patent on the true God. To the extent that Michael inspired such a feeling, he healed his own demons and ours, if only for an hour.

In some way that merges psychology and faith, Michael Jackson did play out the ancient split between dark and light; he was deliberately Manichean in his dangerous game with the media but also deeply divided. I come away feeling deeply distressed that he was imprisoned by a theological idea that has caused so much damage and distortion over the centuries. There is no cosmic war between dark and light, as I see it. Only one reality exists, and it's the human mind that judges and categorizes. We blow our own manmade suffering into grandiose cosmic schemes, and then we bow down and worship effigies to our own self-judgment. But that's an argument for another day. Today I linger on the rare thing that Michael accomplished. He inspired the God feeling in millions of people, and even amidst the grief at his sad undoing, a remembrance of that feeling comes through.


And a comment to the article:
Posted by: filipek7 | June 30, 2009 4:07 PM


Reflections on Light and Darkness

“There is a crack in everything; that’s how the light gets in” (Leonard Cohen)

There are no doubt millions of fans of Michael Jackson’s music who remain baffled by what little they have known of his behavior, character and appearance. There are millions more who are totally indifferent to the music and, if anything, repulsed by what they perceive as an offensive eccentric at best or dangerous deviant at worst. In the days immediately following his tragic death, almost all commentators chose to emphasize this ostensible polarity of Michael’s legacy: “a genius in his art, but a disturbed human being.” It seems like there was always a “but.”

If mainstream gurus are good at anything, it is turning truth on its head and, in the process, eviscerating all that is pure. It is not in Michael Jackson’s musical artistry that his foremost greatness consists, but it is in fact in his wonderful humanity. His music is only just one expression – just one manifestation – of that humanity. These misguided eulogies, therefore, have it all backwards. Michael’s legacy is not limited to an artistry that is somehow soiled by a troubled and troubling life. Michael’s greatest legacy is his loving character and the lessons it teaches us, through his ultimately tragic life, about the true face of an often brutal and ugly world.

In Michael Jackson, we see an innocence and purity rarely seen in an adult. Jackson’s “childlikeness” is perplexing to many people, but it is precisely this trait that sets him apart from an adult world that has learned so effectively to be cold and calculated, smart and shrewd, proper and professional. Adults seeking to better themselves ought to become more childlike. If Michael was guilty, his sin (borrowing Dylan’s prophetic words) was that he knew and felt too much within. Unfortunately, it is typical for those who feel deeply to seem to others utterly odd and insane. Hence the proverbial Pierrot, buffoon or idiot, whose superficial lunacy conceals a deep understanding of the human heart. Michael’s intense capacity to feel allowed him to be a loving, caring and responsive human being. He was far more capable of love than are most adults. Because of this acute sensitivity, what we also see in Michael is an utterly vulnerable, susceptible man.

Michael’s bizarre appearance and eccentric behavior were, paradoxically, far more sensible than the “normal” behavior of most “normal” people within the confounding context world that is itself upside down. All of Michael’s strange gestures and attitudes make perfect sense given one profound premise – that the world is pure, innocent and harmless. Of course those of us who have “grown up” have learned that the world is not “pure, innocent and harmless.” Hence the tragedy of Michael Jackson. His actions, whether holding his baby over the balcony or jumping on top of a car to wave to adoring fans or spending millions of dollars on a single shopping spree, seem irresponsible and disturbing when seen and interpreted through the categories of a deranged world. In fact, his actions were selfless and harmless.

The truth is, Michael had the eyes and heart of a child who saw in one dimension – that of pure love. When he saw that someone desired something from him, he gave selflessly, paying no heed to logical consequences or reasonable caution. The dictates of propriety and convention were, as they ought always to be, totally subordinated to the dictates of love. It made perfect sense to him to give joy to others, even if this exposed him and his own actions to spiteful or selfish manipulation by others.

Michael was not willing to assume, as most adults are conditioned to do, that someone he approached could have a tarnished nature. He gave others the benefit of doubt, approaching them as if approaching angels and children. When he met demons, thus, he was utterly exposed and likely devastated. This, no doubt, brought him much suffering, i.e., not so much the suffering that was inflicted upon him by the malice of others but only just the sudden realization (played over and over again anew) that the person he had hoped was an angel could in fact be so malevolent. Michael never allowed himself, it seems, to draw the seemingly rational and sensible conclusion that most adults have drawn from repeated experience: the world is generally just this way. In other words, Michael’s purity was such that if he met nine people, all of whom turned out to be vile, he would still greet the tenth as an angel. This defies reasonable human “logic,” but it remains steadfast in an adherence to the greater logic of divine love.

Michael surrounded himself with children not because he was perverted, but because he saw in them the hope for a world which had grown to be far too mature. What he loved in children was the proof and justification of the “purity of heart” of which we hear in the Beatitudes. He tried desperately – in only seemingly irrational ways – to protect this adolescent purity from a world whose hideous cruelty he felt in his very own flesh. If the fact that he saw nothing wrong in expressing love toward children in emotionally intimate ways attests only to his purity, our inclination to assume that he was a pedophile and our willingness to assume that love is a pathological deviation can only attest to our essential impurity. In a world that has fallen to pieces, it only makes sense that (to quote Dylan once again) what’s bad is good, what’s good is bad. Thus, love is a pathological disturbance, whereas cold, rational remoteness defines the new “humanity.”

Michael created and surrounded himself with a world fit for a child because he felt that this is the ideal the entire world should aspire to - an ideal that the world so woefully fails to live up to. It was also, incidentally, a way for him to compensate for the pain that was so ever-present to him – the pain of his past and present, the pain of his visceral, personal experience. Michael was sensitive – perhaps hyper-sensitive – and in so being, he felt the pang of every brutal truth far more directly and deeply than most others would. The harm that was inflicted upon him and others was so real to Michael that it induced in him an absolute and immediate moral response. This response - this Neverland world that eradicated the pain of reality through one sweeping contradiction - however unrealistic and idealistic it might seem to a practically minded adult, was totally reasonable for Michael. Michael was the perfect mixture of a child’s innocence and an old-man’s sagacity. He saw both much less and much more. Quincy Jones was therefore profoundly astute and when he famously described Michael as both the oldest and youngest man he knew.

Michael’s innocence is strangely evident in his infamous shopping spree that evoked such a furor when shown in Martin Bashir’s exposé. My own socially and environmentally conscious logic is tempted to condemn and rebuke such wanton excess. And yet, I can only smile when I see Michael in the store. Why? Perhaps because what I really see is an innocent child grasping for an ideal utopia – pleasantly oblivious to the ugliness of a consumptive and destructive society concealed behind a façade of harmless, pretty, enjoyable products. Michael sees only what is immediately there – the potential for a beautiful world wherein children and adults alike have what they need – the joy and inspiration, the peace and beauty. There is really no concern here for stuff. What allows me to smile rather than to cringe is that Michael’s thoughts and actions flow so naturally and effortlessly along these ideal and pure categories, which seem so improbable to my rational mind. He does not see the horror and the ugliness. These do not factor into his thinking. His urge to buy is not inspired by an egoistic urge to amass stuff for his own gratification. Nor does it arise from being manipulated by an insidious system that wants you to buy for its own impure interest.

The Bashir Interview: Casting Pearls before Swine


When I first (only recently) watched the notorious Martin Bashir special, which was shamelessly aired again and again on MSNBC after Michael’s passing, I could not help but cry. At times I felt as though I was witnessing the public humiliation, flogging and crucifixion of an utterly helpless and harmless child. My first thought was, “why did Michael agree to do this? He should have refused!” Upon some reflection, however, I realized that Michael was willing to expose himself (repeatedly) to Bashir’s sadistic onslaught precisely because of who he was. Michael thought that Bashir’s intentions were pure. He wanted to believe that Bashir would not manipulate what had been said and that the journalist’s quest was simply to share the truth with the world. Why not believe this to be the case? Why assume that the interviewer’s instincts could be self-interested and impure? Would that not be admitting that the world is ugly – that the world is not and will never be Neverland?

The contrast between Bashir and Michael really could not be greater. Bashir went out of his way to appear reasonable and measured. Michael, on the other hand, had little regard for how he appeared. His main concern was the truth of how he felt and what he believed. To many people he appeared “crazy.” The truth, of course, was just the opposite. Bashir was consistently cynical, sardonic, judgmental, and seemed to exhibit a pathological indifference when, again and again, he picked at Michael’s raw, open wounds. He showed no regard for the human heart and its anguish. If he had any concern for Michael’s torment, perhaps he was too proud to show it. Bashir concealed his cruelty behind a façade of intelligent, reasonable and intellectual professionalism, as if he were just a skilled journalist in the disinterested pursuit of truth. But it is when things sound perfectly civilized and appear so prim and proper that we should be most wary and suspicious. If we pay close attention, we see that Michael possesses the genuine and good heart and is quite reasonable in all he stands for, whereas Bashir is the true sociopath.

Bashir conducts his hurtful interviews all the meanwhile adhering to the highest professional protocol and journalistic etiquette. At one point in the broadcast, Bashir reflects: “Confronting Michael wasn’t going to be easy, but now it had to happen,” as if this shift to difficult personal subject matter were the result of some inescapable logic, perhaps some imagined standard of journalistic professionalism, which dictates that the truth must be uncovered, whatever the human toll. It is not relevant or important to Bashir how personal the truth may be, whether it has any important humane or useful significance to the audience, or what the consequences of the pursuit of that truth might be. The single thing that matters is the successful exposure of facts, which will secure for Bashir pride among his peers. Are we to admire this journalist’s professional ardor, persistence, and his supreme objectivity in the pursuit of his goal? Is it of no importance that a human being must be sacrificed on the altar of this professional ideal?

In yet another disingenuous attempt to establish his superior ethical and professional credentials, Bashir explains to his audience that his line of questioning is inspired by a “worry” for Michael’s children. Meanwhile, Michael sits and writhes in obvious pain and discomfort. Seeing this, Bashir, ever the objective scientist in hot pursuit, does not desist but rather intensifies his inquest. Michael, the victim, is increasingly desperate and begins to crack. His humanity is bared for all to see. Michael’s legs tremble with anxiety. Under duress, Michael opens up and his emotions spill over. Defenseless because of his innocence, and so pure that he cannot even fathom the foul logic of reason, Michael describes the act of sharing one bed with a child as an expression of care and love. How fair-minded propriety dictates that care and love are in fact deviant behavior is rightly incomprehensible to him. Desperation ringing in his voice, he explains that he cannot abide a crazy world wherein guns and computers have, for children, replaced human contact and compassion. “Why does it mean so much to you?” asks Bashir. The question seems to embody concern, but there is a just barely palpable accusatory tone: Wouldn’t a normal, rational person care less…? Perhaps you care so much because you are demented or perverted…?

The proper question, of course, is how anyone could ever be indifferent to the plight of children in an alienating world? How could anyone care less? Bashir’s rationality has itself become a pathological deviation. Bashir stands in judgment over a phenomenon he cannot understand, because he has grown up beyond where he could ever comprehend the simplicity of a pure heart. His logic is far too sophisticated and proud. When we have grown up to the point where we are actually capable of dispassionately analyzing a tragedy without breaking down and crying about it, we have then truly lost our humanity. Erecting ideals like Neverland in an effort to cope with dismal reality is not a moral failure. Properly seen, it is just a symptom of or testament to the pathological state of the world. The moral failure is the dismal reality in itself.

Bashir is the sort of person who could stab a person and, with cool and calm demeanor, go on to ask why the victim is in pain. He is “disturbed” by Jackson’s ostensibly eccentric behavior and “concerned” for the children, all the meanwhile inflicting psychological torture on the father of these children. Perhaps Bashir even understands that Michael’s sensitivity will make him susceptible to manipulation. He throws Michael off balance and then points to his angst as evidence of character flaws. Bashir is especially interested in the personal and largely irrelevant matter of plastic surgeries, and here his interrogation borders on sadism. Knowing the topic will open painful wounds, he pries into Michael’s demons. Bashir’s interrogation can only bring to mind an SS officer with his cool and scientific method. Perhaps what Bashir was really looking for in his ideal subject was a cold hard rock rather than a human being. What he found instead was an angel.

http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/...9/06/the_spirituality_of_michael_jackson.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top