Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How do you know Little Girls and Llama Lola are Dangerous era ?Lucy is in Love with Linus is something I'm curious to hear. Lucy is Linus' older sister.
Fanfare 1992, Little Girls and Llama Lola are also on my list. These were written sometime during Dangerous
???Well here's one way to help end my confusion: What is the difference between the 2001 Ver. of Xscape on Xscape and the 2002 Ver. that leaked in 2002
The 2002 leak is the version from 2001, the Xscape version is from 1999 I think. The only difference is in the mixing, the vocals sound more isolated on the leaked version but that's really it.
How do you know Little Girls and Llama Lola are Dangerous er
I may be wrong but i think Fanfare 1992 is an instrumental , possibly to be used on the Dangerous tour at some point perhaps in some break like they did with the Someone Put your Hand out intrumental on the tour. I don't think it is an actual song ( vocally i mean )Lucy is in Love with Linus is something I'm curious to hear. Lucy is Linus' older sister.
Fanfare 1992, Little Girls and Llama Lola are also on my list. These were written sometime during Dangerous
I may be wrong but i think Fanfare 1992 is an instrumental , possibly to be used on the Dangerous tour at some point perhaps in some break like they did with the Someone Put your Hand out intrumental on the tour. I don't think it is an actual song ( vocally i mean ) Sorry for double post i was not sure the last one had went through .Lucy is in Love with Linus is something I'm curious to hear. Lucy is Linus' older sister.
Fanfare 1992, Little Girls and Llama Lola are also on my list. These were written sometime during Dangerous
TJ and Taj on whether a full version of Why exists with Michael.
At first, it was one of our uncle’s songs for the HIStory album. He made the mistake to let us listen to it before the release of the album and we fell in love with this track -as it happens with all of his songs - but he gave us that one. We admire Babyface a lot, which could explain the reason why Michael gave us this particular song. So we could have the song, but under one condition: we should keep his voice on it. So we kept the chorus as it was, sang by Michael, and we re-sang the verses. Uncle Michael was with us during the recording, he helped us with our singing as well as getting into the atmosphere of the song. You should hear Michael’s version of “Why”, that would be cool. - TJ
No, unfortunately it doesn't exist. There was only my uncle's backgrounds on the demo. There is a Babyface version of Why with MJ backgrounds though. - Taj
Which version of the answer came first and when
Resang the verses could easily mean Babyface's.TJ's response is around the time the song was released and Taj's response is 2008
That's what I'd assume but TJ says "You should hear Michael’s version of “Why”, that would be cool.". Why should we hear a version that doesn't exist?Resang the verses could easily mean Babyface's.
Exactly! It's some bs behind this story!That's what I'd assume but TJ says "You should hear Michael’s version of “Why”, that would be cool.". Why should we hear a version that doesn't exist?
A 3T less version?That's what I'd assume but TJ says "You should hear Michael’s version of “Why”, that would be cool.". Why should we hear a version that doesn't exist?
Keep the dream aliveExactly! It's some bs behind this story!
There’s another interview with TJ from 2022:TJ and Taj on whether a full version of Why exists with Michael.
At first, it was one of our uncle’s songs for the HIStory album. He made the mistake to let us listen to it before the release of the album and we fell in love with this track -as it happens with all of his songs - but he gave us that one. We admire Babyface a lot, which could explain the reason why Michael gave us this particular song. So we could have the song, but under one condition: we should keep his voice on it. So we kept the chorus as it was, sang by Michael, and we re-sang the verses. Uncle Michael was with us during the recording, he helped us with our singing as well as getting into the atmosphere of the song. You should hear Michael’s version of “Why”, that would be cool. - TJ
No, unfortunately it doesn't exist. There was only my uncle's backgrounds on the demo. There is a Babyface version of Why with MJ backgrounds though. - Taj
If that’s the case, he should’ve said “the Babyface version” since Michael is only singing the chorus on both versions.A 3T less version?
Idk.
Keep the dream alive
If that’s the case, he should’ve said “the Babyface version” since Michael is only singing the chorus on both versions.
You left out a whole other comment.There’s another interview with TJ from 2022:
Yes, there is a version of “Why” with my uncle. […] The reason why I know there is another version is because, in the bridge, when Taryll is singing the words, we had no idea what the words were, so we had to listen over and over to how my uncle sang it, and try to figure out what the words were. We still couldn’t figure it out so he just tried to sing it just like him and hope that the words would just come across. But some of those words, Taryll didn’t even know what they were so he was just trying to sound exactly like my uncle since we didn’t have the lyrics. If this was now, I’d have it on my computer but in the 90s, there was none of that. It’s probably on some tape or CD somewhere in storage, but there definitely exists a version. I know for a fact there is at least the bridge and I’m pretty certain there is a whole version. Because when he firstplayed, we wouldn’t have known what the song was without the vocals…
It's possible the track could be Privacy."Michael is such an inventor of sound," Jerkins said. "I think he wanted some new stuff that the ears haven't heard yet, that radio hasn't heard yet, that people haven't heard yet." Jackson recorded at least one rock-flavored track with Jerkins for possible inclusion on the album, as well as a ballad written and produced by R. Kelly, Jerkins said. (Dec 21 2000)
I wonder if the R Kelly track is One More Chance. Wasn’t it suggested this was recorded in 2003?"Michael is such an inventor of sound," Jerkins said. "I think he wanted some new stuff that the ears haven't heard yet, that radio hasn't heard yet, that people haven't heard yet." Jackson recorded at least one rock-flavored track with Jerkins for possible inclusion on the album, as well as a ballad written and produced by R. Kelly, Jerkins said. (Dec 21 2000)
CryI wonder if the R Kelly track is One More Chance. Wasn’t it suggested this was recorded in 2003?
Oh that song is so far removed from my memory bank lol
Is the 2008 version out there?Man you have no idea. It was so freaking good. The bridge reminded me a lot of WBSS bridge where the guitar just hits you. I’ve never really been a huge fan of HT because I don’t like the album version, or the demo. The 2008 version was amazing.
MP has it.Is the 2008 version out there?
Four. The 1986 demo (from the Brad leak), the 1987 mix by Quincy which almost made it, the 1988 Bill Bottrell remix (aka the officially released one) and an alternate version of the 1988 mix.1) How many 'Streetwalker' mixes are we aware of? Is there a well-organised list or something? Naming them by the top of my head I remember that one with the Western Intro, Quincy's unreleased (?) mix and the album version.