Walgrens powerful bashing of Dr.Murray - the logic and reasoning behind it?

Well, i'm not a member of the red cross but i have never seen that stated before. Are you saying that cpr is NOT recommended to be done by 2 people? That it should NOT be done by 2 people? When paramedics resuscitate ppl one person does chest compressions and the other bags the airways. Could you clarify your comment?

yes i will: its mostly done and recommended to be done by 1, and then let somebody take over, so you dont get tyred. I asked a friend of mine who is a paramedic and he says that only they do with 2 if there knowing each other, so most people who can do cpr will do it alone, but the paramedics are allowed to do it in 2 when there trained to do so. So i was half way right. when in the situation of being with people who know cpr but arent paramedics and partners there doing it alone.
i hope this helps :)
 
"According to Murray’s own timeline, that he let MJ lie there for over an hour not breathing. Or he could be lying about his timeline, and Murray is not being truthful about his timeline. Third option, is that Dr. Murray is so utterly so incompetent and reckless, that he has no idea what he gave him or when."

What facts is he basing these 3 alternatives from? I am somewhat confused on how it can three different scenarios?

Somehow, the quote made me laugh, but in reality its an extremly sad quote...

The theories are reasonable. All of them to just one of them could be true, don't want to get into detail about that though.

But when you do place the logic and reasoning behind these theories, they don't add up to involuntary manslaughter.

These theories are from the facts that will come out during actual trial testimony, not just simply because murray changed his timeline. I personally believe that murray was not so utterly incompetent.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top