Wikipedia entry regarding his vitiligo

[la_cienega]

Someone has completely edited MJ's vitiligo entry to try and post as much biased information about Michael and vitiligo as possible, can fans get together and fix this?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Jackson's_health_and_appearance

A user calling themselves "Janetrocks" has repeatedly undone edits regarding his appearance to edit all that nonsense in.

They've repeatedly edited Taraborrelli's description of Michael using bleaching creams and nonsense even when in JRT's book he doesn't even use a named source for that, so why is it credible? And all these doctors who've never even met Michael being cited as sources? It's ridiculous.

Michael showed reduced melanocytes in his autopsy, this IS typical of vitiligo sufferers, it doesn't disprove he had it!

No ANA test was performed on MJ at death, but he suffered from discoid lupus and typically ANA tests don't even reveal lupus in people anyway and many tests are required to diagnose it.

This is what confirms his vitiligo: his autopsy report, Dr Klein, Dr Strick, Dr Dan Wallace, Dr James Nordlund, Dr Len Horovitz, Nurse Debbie Rowe, Cicely Tyson, LaToya, Jermaine, Janet, Tito, Joe, Katherine, Paris and Prince Jackson, Gino Brando, David Nordahl, Karen Faye, Deepak Chopra, Gotham Chopra. Prince Jackson also suffers from it.

People who confirmed his lupus: Dr Klein, Debbie Rowe, Dr Richard Strick, Dr Wallace, Dr Deepak Chopra, LaToya and Jermaine Jackson, Michael told author Taraborrelli he had it, Michael attended and gave speech at Lupus fund raiser in 2003 with his lupus specialist rheumatologist, Dr Alan Metzger.

Those two skin diseases were also testified to in 1994 on the witness stand during the Grand juries.


Please, can someone edit that mess out and edit the correct info in?

 

[Nathy MJ]

Who the hell is this Dr. Pamela Lipkin insinuating that Michael bleached his skin before he had vitiligo? We need someone who knows how to edit it...

 

[la_cienega]

Here's some of the edited version where proper sources are used

http://pastebin.com/Sf6iC8wW

But I included some of the previous edit so the Wikipedia mods don't get mad

If they revert it again, we have to revert it back. The people doing this have a clear agenda.

It seems to be a deliberate campaign by the people behind that anti-MJ website "MJFacts" who have also been editing and revising the main MJ Wikipedia page - scroll down to read what they say about the allegations, they cite a source that's even that website.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Jackson

It's a deliberate attempt to try and push their POV out there.


These seem to be the users involved in the same thing with the same agenda

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Historyhorror
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Moneytruthy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Janetrocks

 

[Yazman]

Well, I posted some stuff in the talk page. It will show up under my wiki username - also Yazman - at the very bottom of the page. Maybe some more of y'all can back me up. There are some really anti-MJ editors messing with that article. That historyhorror dude loves to put all his links to wikipedia policy but forgets the one mandating a neutral point of view.