Its NOT him. Nothing in the way this singer phrases anything in this song sounds like Michael. The people who think this is Mike are the equivalent of those terrible singers who audition for idol and think they sound brilliant.
To sound like someone does not mean you're him.
This looks like Michael, but it's not him.
I'm done with this discussion, again, you're insulting Michael Jackson by thinking a D-List amateur's voice is Michael's.
My point exactly, as Jason Malachi doesn't even sound like Michael.That dude doesn't even look like Michael.
Omg, I've listened to this for the 5th time and am still hearing michael.
I'm hearing his grit, and and hearing his smooth harmonies in the chorus.
Plus, the song is very Michael, the beat and the lyrics were clearly written by himself.
You can normally tell a fake song (thats normally on youtube) a mile away, and this isn't it.
Its defo Michael.
Actually come to think of it, there's something very strange going on here... Let's just say if this is or isn't Michael (which I believe it's not him) Why would sony choose out of god knows how many songs to play one that would leave to wonder... I mean "Do You Know Where Your Children Are?" no one on the planet can argue this is Michael, pure and simple, just the first note and it was done for me, exactly like "This Is It"... when you know that we are living in a world where everything is messed in regards to MJ since his passing, and you know everyone is on the verge of questioning the authenticity of his new music, why would you release a song that is questionable wheter it is him or not??? I find that very unusal... there is something big behind this... but what??
Well looks like its just me and you and a couple of others, I totally believe this is Michael, its a new sound new era, get real people, your all stuck in the 90's and early 00's. I'm really happy with the brand new stuff, looking forward to the album.
To sound like someone does not mean you're him.
This looks like Michael, but it's not him.
I'm done with this discussion, again, you're insulting Michael Jackson by thinking a D-List amateur's voice is Michael's.
If you listen to the sound at 3:14. Im feeling Teddy Riley took the "Oh" from Jam and put it on this song. Its so alike!!
I will be speaking with both the Estate and Sony a bit later today on the effects this song is having, I will of course want answers and reasons perhaps even evidence to support their findings that this is indeed Michael.
At this point all I ask is people to be calm, yes I fully understand emotions are running high and we will of course take that into consideration.
Lets see what they have to say later.
I will be MORE happy if Sony confirm its a fraud, than if they confirm it's real... Because them confirming it's real (which it's NOT) is confirmation to us that MJ cannot trust ANYONE! Producers, record labels, even his own fucking estate. THAT is a depressing thought. I wish today were the 1st of April
Im not sure how me thinking that the song is Michael is insulting him. And by the way I don't think that looks like him.
The point is my first reaction is not to shout 'conspiracy' because to me most conspiracy theories are exposed as ridiculous after a while. The main points as I see them support the idea that its MJ.
1) I like the song and on first reaction think its Michael Jackson
2) Teddy Riley who produced the track says its Michael Jackson
3) It is on MichaelJackson.com as a new MJ track
4) Cascio says its Michael Jackson and saw him record it
5) If Sony put out a track claiming to be MJ without MJ they would be liable
6) MJ recorded hundreds of tracks so Sony has no reason to take a risk and be sued.
7) Sony has already said that some tracks have been 'brought to fruition' that clearly suggests an uncompleted track that has been worked on
Now people can dispute those points as they like but they can not conclusively disprove them. i will go by my ears and my understanding of the points raised and other people are welcome to do the same. The key thing here is not to suggest that anyone is wrong just because they believe something different.
I will be speaking with both the Estate and Sony a bit later today on the effects this song is having, I will of course want answers and reasons perhaps even evidence to support their findings that this is indeed Michael.
At this point all I ask is people to be calm, yes I fully understand emotions are running high and we will of course take that into consideration.
Lets see what they have to say later.
gaz;3056407 said:i will be speaking with both the estate and sony a bit later today on the effects this song is having, i will of course want answers and reasons perhaps even evidence to support their findings that this is indeed michael.
At this point all i ask is people to be calm, yes i fully understand emotions are running high and we will of course take that into consideration.
Lets see what they have to say later.
on monday 8th november 2010, @taryll said:
if you question the validity of a professional photo you can ask the photographer for more pictures from that photo shoot. If it is authentic the photographer will turn over different shots. Some with different poses, some even with eyes closed. I questioned the validity of the vocal's on "breaking news" and several other songs of theirs that i've heard and they told me no other takes or tracks exist.
They claim my uncle was so happy with the performance he instructed them to delete all the other files. I had the honor to learn and watch my uncle record my entire life and that is not how he worked. No outtakes, no other tracks, no backups, no proof. Roughly 10 songs they turned in… same story for all of them. I asked for the computer it was created on... They said it broke. I asked for the original hard drive... They said it was destroyed. One dubious excuse after another.