Michael - The Great Album Debate

I know what will get Bumper through this difficult time without Arky here:

the_hangover_chow.png
 
OH ... MY ... GOD! I think I just found the singer of the Cascio songs. And in other news, watching that was so weird ...


"I didn't even get to first base" ...
 
Bumper, now I just saw that you changed my quote and made me say "sextoy", didn't see that at first, probably because I suppressed it, I'm a good girl. You are putting words in my mouth again!
 
Bumper, now I just saw that you changed my quote and made me say "sextoy", didn't see that at first, probably because I suppressed it, I'm a good girl. You are putting words in my mouth again!

I'm putting nothing in no one's mouth :D
 
Hello everybody! Game time !! :clap:

Listen to Breaking news and find 12 errors. Some are easy, some are difficult, some you won't find without lots of spare time! :D Please find some and I'm gonna provide some info - or you find out yourselves.
http://soundcloud.com/mjlover01/game-time-4


And guess what - I found Michael Jackson in Breaking news. He's hiding in the last 3 "keep"s of the song. Not in the first one though, which I find rather interesting. Notice breath + you + keep + breaking the news. I'm sure, someone on max found out already, but I couldn't find it.
http://soundcloud.com/mjlover01/there-he-is-1
Is the game still on? Couldn't find 12, but only 3...and I really tried..:wacko:

at 2.11 He puts in an extra 'ooh'.
at 2,44 was the easiest for me: He hits a different note.
and at 3.15 he doesn't sing the 'ooh'.

Now, how many little mistakes have we got as a part of this huge one called 'Breaking News'?
 
I knew you'd say something like that, you are so predictable! ;)

If I weren't it wouldn't be fun. :D I could have answered something completely unpredictable like "blue watermelon with gas", but what would have been the point? :p
 
If I weren't it wouldn't be fun. :D I could have answered something completely unpredictable like "blue watermelon with gas", but what would have been the point? :p

Well, you could have said something without innuendo, but you are right, if you play the game, you have to follow the rules. I just wasn't really aware of the fact that we are playing, lol.
 
Well, you could have said something without innuendo, but you are right, if you play the game, you have to follow the rules. I just wasn't really aware of the fact that we are playing, lol.

[youtube]GmHgdLKwU8U[/youtube]
 
The next week will be SOOO good :)

... Sorry, I'm just typing aloud. Continue with sexy chat.
 
And guess what - I found Michael Jackson in Breaking news. He's hiding in the last 3 "keep"s of the song. Not in the first one though, which I find rather interesting. Notice breath + you + keep + breaking the news. I'm sure, someone on max found out already, but I couldn't find it.
http://soundcloud.com/mjlover01/there-he-is-1

@Bumper, with regards to what Grent posted, I don't think Grent is saying that the "breaking" is MJ, Grent is saying that the "keep"s in that soundcloud snippet are mj. is that right? Grent, what mj song are you thinking those "keep"s come from?

Also, that "billie jean literal version"--i almost DIED laughing. that's one of my favorite youtube videos i've seen recently, so amazing :)
 
You don't know HOW much fun this is !! :D
I believe, some jaws are going to drop.
Sorry for the leaving, it was quite late.

GAME TIME! :D
What kind of errors? Like this?

2:41 on the news to-day (cut in the middle of the word today)
2:36 the new (cut before s in newS)
3:38 cut between you and keep


2:41, no sorry.
2:36, no sorry.
3:38, no sorry.

:D

But you are on the right path.

No no, it's just that I thought he means something else, because we already know that, but maybe he didn't.

You are right. Something else. But like that.

Is the game still on? Couldn't find 12, but only 3...and I really tried..:wacko:

at 2.11 He puts in an extra 'ooh'.
at 2,44 was the easiest for me: He hits a different note.
and at 3.15 he doesn't sing the 'ooh'.

Now, how many little mistakes have we got as a part of this huge one called 'Breaking News'?

2.11 & 3.15, no sorry. But you are right on these. So this is the difference between Album and Acapella version! I had nothing to do with that though.
2.44, now we're playing. This is #1, which means the first to be found, not the first to occur. ;)


Guys, this is amazing. #11 to go. I didn't expect it to be that hard.
Ok, here is something to help.

12 times, Jason Malachi is actually heard on this particular track I linked to.
Which I can proof. In court.

@BUMPER, azsummergirl
Girl you are right. The KEEP is Michael Jackson. Listen to the slow version I linked to loudly with good headphones - you'll hear it immediately. I dunno where it's from though. In Keep the faith there is only one solo-"Keep" from Michael (about two thirds into the song), but that's not it.
 
Last edited:
^^the "keep" absolutely does sound like michael, i'm just wondering where it's from. i'll be on the look out for it! that actually makes me angrier than anything, hearing actual mj copy/pastes that make these songs more convincing and cause people to "hear mj". it's so underhanded and sneaky.

i CANT believe i'm doing this, b/c honestly the legality of this whole situation doesn't really matter to me. but i am curious about this . . . i think this may have been mentioned before, so i apologize if it has:

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statue that might otherwise be infringing.

So why are jason malachi/cascio track comparisons removed from youtube? I'm not talking about UNRELEASED cascio tracks, or youtube videos that are just the song all the way through or anything, i'm talking about comparisons for BN, KYHU, and monster. why do these not fall under "fair use"? why are they immediately taken down? why wouldn't someone be able to post a mashup of let me let go and monster on youtube, for example?Or it doesn't even have to be that MUCH of the track. Like what was wrong with that JM potato thing from a while ago--remember? I think the jason-potato only sang like 1 line of BN or something like that, and it was removed. ha, if no one remembers this i'm going to sound crazy

It seems to me that those comparisons, or snippets of comparisons, or satire videos actually fit EVERY category of fair use: reporting (on fraud), criticism (of jason's singing), commentary (on how sad it is that we live in a world where powerful corporations get away with stuff like this), teaching (people why we believe it's not mj), research (of the imposter's voice vs michael's).

Am i missing something? i guess jab me can just do whatever the heck they want. that's cool.

edit: the last paragraph of the wikipedia article on fair use under the "fair use on the internet" section seems applicable. i'm not gonna paste it here.
 
Last edited:
2.44, now we're playing. This is #1, which means the first to be found, not the first to occur. ;)

Maybe I'm just having a blonde moment and don't get what you are trying to show, but isn't that the same thing like the 3 examples that TheSilentOne posted? The cut and paste thing? I think I don't get this game, lol.

12 times, Jason Malachi is actually heard on this particular track I linked to.[/B] Which I can proof. In court.

How? Because that's all I am interested in, if it can be proven in an objective way, court or not. What ears hear is subjective.
 
How? Because that's all I am interested in, if it can be proven in an objective way, court or not. What ears hear is subjective.

:D

Grent meant he can prove he has mixed in Jason 12 times in this BN mix of him. It was a joke.


Some easy spots anyone SHOULD have instantly noticed:
1:16/1:17
1:20/1:21
1:59

2:07
2:43
2:46/2:47

3:23
3:36/3:37
3:54


3 more to go:
1:xx
2:xx
3:xx
 
:D
Grent meant he can prove he has mixed in Jason 12 times in this BN mix of him. It was a joke.

Oh, ok, THAT, lol. I'm still asleep, sorry. Should have listened to it again today, because all I remember from yesterday are the damn backing vocals! ;)
 
Those songs in Michael album WERE already finished before Michaels death.

Hold my hand (finished with Akon in 2007)
Hollywood Tonight (Good low voice like 2000 watts)
Like the way (was already leaked)
Best of Joy (already finished and recorded in London)
Can't make it (Already leaked in 2001)
Behind the mask (Also long finished in the 80's)
Much too soon (also recorded and finished in the 80's)

Even tho I don't listen to leaked songs don't mean I don't know about them before hand. So Michael album is worth buying even tho you don't think Cascio songs are real or not.
 
Hold my hand (finished with Akon in 2007) - Was finished but this had a brand new mix with some new vocals.
Hollywood Tonight (Good low voice like 2000 watts) - Was only one vocal take and the instrumental was reworked.
Like the way (was already leaked) - Instrumental was reworked.
Best of Joy (already finished and recorded in London) - The track was mastered by Neff-U.
Can't make it (Already leaked in 2001) - New instrumental.
Behind the mask (Also long finished in the 80's) - New Instrumental
Much too soon (also recorded and finished in the 80's) - Recorded in HIStory era with reworked instrumental 2010.

:D

Grent meant he can prove he has mixed in Jason 12 times in this BN mix of him. It was a joke.


Some easy spots anyone SHOULD have instantly noticed:
1:16/1:17
1:20/1:21
1:59

2:07
2:43
2:46/2:47

3:23
3:36/3:37
3:54


3 more to go:
1:xx
2:xx
3:xx

What's this?I don't get it...

 
Last edited:
Well, Korgnex, you don´t want to answer my question about if you still believe it´s MJ and it´s good to report the post, OK.

Korgnex;3482420 said:
Some easy spots anyone SHOULD have instantly noticed:
1:16/1:17
1:20/1:21
1:59

2:07
2:43
2:46/2:47

3:23
3:36/3:37
3:54


3 more to go:
1:xx
2:xx
3:xx

Well, you didn´t find the 12 spots, I found 11:

1:12
1:16
1:20
1:59
2:07
2:20
2:44
2:47
3:23
3:36
3:54

Jason can´t fool me.... on none of the Cascio´s tracks.
 
My God, Kapital. I have found all 12 spots. Grent wanted to see if other users (not me) would find them as well.
Why do you think I have hinted where the last spots can be found (1:xx = 1:12, 2:xx = 2:20)? And you're still missing one (3:xx).
You have even quoted me and you still haven't realized it. LOL!

With a remark like "my ears are better" or "you didn't find" you're again showing immature behaviour.
Now please stop talking to me. I didn't forget your words about me on Twitter.

You just came back to attack/ridicule me - AGAIN.
And you failed - AGAIN.
 
Last edited:
Did i have Inmature behaviour?

Sorry, but not.You are the one who attack fans with your signatures because you believe is Michael Jackson on the tracks.

You also everyday introduced the situation of a Mj fan on a court, because you try others believe it´s a case about authenticity, when it´s not.

Stop talking about that fan and stop using his problems trying to probe it´s MJ on the tracks. That case is not about authenticity... and you know it.

Ahh, and stop asking Xtarlight about what i said about you to him, stop.

PD- You did not show the other 2 spots because you didn´t find it, hahaha, you couldn´t say it. You needed my help to find them. :)
 
Last edited:
I know what the case is about. But it's true that the authenticity of the Cascio tracks is a part of it. Even MJJC staff like Gaz (founder) or Ivy e.g. can confirm this. I have not claimed anything else.
Now stop lying!

Kapital77;3482461 said:
PD- You did not show the other 2 spots because you didn´t find it, hahaha, you couldn´t say it. You needed my help to find them.
basicsmile.gif

Oh my God. How ignorant can you be? I needed your help? ROFL! How did I know that there's one at 1:xx, one at 2:xx and the last one is at 3:xx, go and find it.
Sometimes you behave like a child and not like an adult who even claims to have graduated in law. You have again just demonstrated prejudices and ignorance very well.
 
Last edited:
The authenticity is not a part of it, that´s what the fan wants, and you can´t use the problems of a Mj fan for your own fight againts the people who believe it´s not MJ. You were the one who used his problems on your signatures and on many post, that´s bad, really bad.

Stop talking about his problems and stop using disgusting signatures.
 
My God, I'm neither using "the problems of a fan" for my (non-existing) "fight" nor am I using it in my signature. You are very deluded. Like anyone else here who knows about what that fan is trying I'm allowed to refer to it (that person has chosen to make it public, it's not a secret anymore). And it's exactly what the doubters wanted - someone to challenge them in a court case. You even support this and the person in question.
 
Korgnex;3482467 said:
Oh my God. How ignorant can you be?

Ohh, everybody, look how Korgnex insult me and attack me, look.




Korgnex;3482467 said:
I needed your help? ROFL! How did I know that there's one at 1:xx, one at 2:xx and the last one is at 3:xx, go and find it.

How did you know it?. LOL

Because the creator of the game said, !!! THERE ARE 12 FAULTS !!! and you only found 9.


Korgnex;3482467 said:
Sometimes you behave like a child and not like an adult who even claims to have graduated in law. You have again just demonstrated prejudices and ignorance very well.

More attacks and insults, yeah, we know you very well.


Korgnex;3482473 said:
You even support this and the person in question.

I never talked about his problems or use it for the fight. He can´t probe the tracks are fake on the case, that´s the reality for me.

The reality is that you keep fighting against doubters using signatures and you keep insulting me on your posts. But i can understand, you are ALONE.

I will put you on my ignore list to avoid problems reading your posts.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top