Latest on MJJC

Vanity-Fair: MJ`s Family: Inside Their Desperate Attempt to Oust Estate Executors

Bubs said:
LA TOYA JACKSON
I Didn't LOOT MJ's House
Threatens Lawsuit
If Vanity Fair doesn't oblige, La Toya says she'll sue.:hysterical:
Click to expand...

That's right, she doesn't need any money. She's made plenty with her Psychic Readings, Cosemetic Company, and that smash hit album. Go get em' ToyToy
 
She ain't going to sue VR either:hysterical:
When they were robbing Michael's house, there were tons of tv crowds around, that means evidence for VF.
They cannot prove what LaToya did in the house but they can prove with what she came out
Take a look at this http://www.radaronline.com/exclusiv...nks-fans-while-removing-items-michaels-rented

Flat screen tv is one of the things that must have been really important that it cannot be left in the house:scratch:
 
If you do google search using key words Latoya Michael's house and use custom range date 25/06/2009- 30/06/2009
you'll find tons of videos with most of the family members (including Marlon!)coming and going there.
None of them left empty handed. They said that there were worried if somebody was going to break in. They themselves arranged security there, so the only ones robbing the house was family.
 
These cease and desist letters from the looting bandits make them seem even more pathetic in my eyes. They sat by and even contributed to the character assasination of Michael and suddenly they are fired up and ready to fight when their greedy natures are exposed? What happened to their stance of ignoring these kind of stories to not bring additional attention to it? I've heard that excuse a couple of times when the press was attacking Michael.

I'm waiting for Maureen's denial about selling Michael's stolen property.
 
Bubs said:
LA TOYA JACKSON
I Didn't LOOT MJ's House
Threatens Lawsuit
EXCLUSIVE
La Toya Jackson insists ... she did not raid Michael Jackson's home just hours after his death, pillaging plastic bags filled with cash -- and now, she's threatening to sue a major magazine for saying otherwise.

La Toya has fired off a cease-and-desist letter to Vanity Fair, claiming its recent article entitled "Estate of Siege" is "replete with misstatements of fact, false innuendos, and defamatory insinuations."

According to La Toya's letter, the article falsely claims she showed up at MJ's Carolwood mansion shortly after his death and loaded plastic bags filled with cash into a duffel bag. The VF article goes on to describe La Toya's bf leaving the home in a moving van.

La Toya claims the article describes her visit as a "mad scramble for money" -- strongly insinuating she stole large sums of cash from MJ's house.

According to La Toya ... the allegations are nothing but lies and she wants a full retraction asap.

If Vanity Fair doesn't oblige, La Toya says she'll sue.:hysterical:


Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2012/10/11/la-to...ath-loot-home-cash-vanity-fair/#ixzz290a8TSgn
Click to expand...

Yes you did Toy YES YOU DID so go ahead and file your lawsuit so we can find out all the dirt you did that night!
Can't wait!!!!
 
Bubs said:
If you do google search using key words Latoya Michael's house and use custom range date 25/06/2009- 30/06/2009
you'll find tons of videos with most of the family members (including Marlon!)coming and going there.
None of them left empty handed. They said that there were worried if somebody was going to break in. They themselves arranged security there, so the only ones robbing the house was family.
Click to expand...

None of them are innocent bystanders in this, some just know how to slide under the radar better than others.
 
jacksons_vulture.JPG


There is a room for few more Jackson's on that branch.
 
Bubs;3723677 said:
If you do google search using key words Latoya Michael's house and use custom range date 25/06/2009- 30/06/2009
you'll find tons of videos with most of the family members (including Marlon!)coming and going there.
None of them left empty handed. They said that there were worried if somebody was going to break in. They themselves arranged security there, so the only ones robbing the house was family.
Click to expand...

Following articles were published on June 27 2009

"Michael Jackson's death: Moving vans arrive at Holmby Hills mansion:

Two moving vans arrived at Michael Jackson’s rented Holmby Hills mansion this morning, and workers are removing items from the home and loading them into one of the vans.

The large, white Atlas Van Lines trucks came about the same time Janet Jackson arrived. She drove up in a maroon Bentley while wearing dark sunglasses. Before noon, one truck was inside the estate’s massive black gates, and the other van waited outside."

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lan...s-arrive-at-singers-holmby-hills-mansion.html

"AP Associated Press
It was reported that this morning, Saturday, June 27, 2009, Janet Jackson and two moving trucks arrived to the Los Angeles home of Michael Jackson.

The Associated Press reports Jackson arrived at Michael Jackson’s Holmby Hills residence wearing dark glasses and went directly into the deceased Jackson’s home, where outside two moving trucks were parked that had arrived shortly before.

About eight movers were seen entering the property with dollies and packing equipment, says the AP.

It us not immediately clear who sent the movers or what items they could be taking out of the residence."


"Michael Jackson's Sisters Visit His Home

Janet Jackson and sister LaToya arrived at their brother's rented Holmby Hills mansion on Saturday as moving trucks carted off some of the singer's – and his children's – possessions.

A source told PEOPLE that the belongings of Michael Jackson's three children were being removed from the house and taken to the Jackson family home in Encino. The children have been holed up with grandparents – Joe and Katherine – at the San Fernando Valley house since the singer died on June 25.

Janet was at the home during the move, while LaToya showed up later in the day. Some of the singer's prized possessions were also being removed from the house for safekeeping, the source said, because there is concern that someone could break into the home".

http://www.people.com/people/package/article/0,,20287787_20288159,00.html
 
"Some of the singer's prized possessions were also being removed from the house for safekeeping, the source said, because there is concern that someone could break into the home".

What ever was removed from there, Michael's kids will never see them.


Brown Gangsta, Rebbie cannot deny anything, she left digital footprint from her actions and there is her statement that she guaranteed that the items sold at ebay are genuine. Also if I were that fan who tried to get back the item from Rebbie which she sold at ebay, I would get in touch with Sullivan and give him a scoop how Rebbie refuse to give it back.
 
Last edited:
LoL the books certainly rubbing some ppl up the wrong way. truth hurts eh!. did they not think there would be footage of them at the house. even grace said they were asking where the money was kept.

lawsuit threats are as fake as randys theres more to come. no point in them sueing as theyd keep running from giving a depo lol
 
Bubs said:
Brown Gangsta, Rebbie cannot deny anything, she left digital print from her actions and there is her statement that she guaranteed that the items sold at ebay are genuine. Also if I were that fan who tried to get back the item from Rebbie which she sold at ebay, I would get in touch with Sullivan and give him a scoop how Rebbie refuse to give it back.
Click to expand...

Yea I know, but they don't have the best track record of remembering when they incriminate themselves. It's just amusing when they get caught in their lies and make fools of themselves lol.
 
The Brown Gangsta said:
These cease and desist letters from the looting bandits make them seem even more pathetic in my eyes. They sat by and even contributed to the character assasination of Michael and suddenly they are fired up and ready to fight when their greedy natures are exposed? What happened to their stance of ignoring these kind of stories to not bring additional attention to it? I've heard that excuse a couple of times when the press was attacking Michael.

I'm waiting for Maureen's denial about selling Michael's stolen property.
Click to expand...

Brown Gangsta I totally agree!

They all sat by and allowed the media to attack MJ while they did nothing. They all stood by and allowed people to take advantage of MJ instead of intervening and helping their loved one. They all saw MJ surrounded by leeches and terrible people and they did nothing but stand by. They all saw MJ going to doctors like Klein and Hoefflin and did nothing about it but then want to call him a drug addict when they knew who he was going to. Why not intervene then? why not report Klein to the medical board if they thought he was overmedicating MJ? why not report Hoefflin if they thought he was doing unecessary procedures on Michael? Now suddenly they are being attacked and they come out threatening lawsuits. I think in all the years I've followed Janet I've never seen her attorneys come out with press releases like in recent months.
 
elusive moonwalker said:
LoL the books certainly rubbing some ppl up the wrong way. truth hurts eh!. did they not think there would be footage of them at the house. even grace said they were asking where the money was kept.

lawsuit threats are as fake as randys theres more to come. no point in them sueing as theyd keep running from giving a depo lol
Click to expand...


yeah has Katherine denied asking Grace where the money was hours after her son was murdered and her grandchildren were grieving?
 
^ Yes, her lawyers denied it saying that to infer she was going through mj's house the night of 25 june when she was in fact tending to grieving ppb was outrageous. Clearly they hadn't read latoya and jermaine's books where they both confirmed mrs j went to the house that night. Pretty poor show if even a hack like randall sullivan is more accurate than mrs j's highly paid lawyers. In future i'm going to disbelieve every word mrs j's lawyers utter.

Bubs said:
If you do google search using key words Latoya Michael's house and use custom range date 25/06/2009- 30/06/2009
you'll find tons of videos with most of the family members (including Marlon!)coming and going there.
None of them left empty handed. They said that there were worried if somebody was going to break in. They themselves arranged security there, so the only ones robbing the house was family.
Click to expand...

What i remember reading from this time is that the family made off with some of the furniture thinking it was mj's when in fact mj rented the place fully furnished, so they had to go back reluctantly with their removal vans with all the stuff.
 
Last edited:
Isn't it interesting how Janet nor LaToya say nothing on behalf of their mother. She is described as bad as others but obviously Janet and LaToya are not too worried about her reputation? I guess now its each of their own.
 
Bubs said:
Isn't it interesting how Janet nor LaToya say nothing on behalf of their mother. She is described as bad as others but obviously Janet and LaToya are not too worried about her reputation? I guess now its each of their own.
Click to expand...

I have come to the FULL conclusion that they are a bunch of FAKES!

Some of them run around here talking about "family unity," while those same folks don't want to pay child support for their own children.

They talk lovingly about Mother, putting her on a pedestal, at the same time TRICKING her into believing that she needs to "rest" at an Arizona spa. Then they have the NERVE to put her in front of a television camera wherein she makes a complete fool of herself, while saying how her children would NEVER do that to her. When in fact that's exactly what they did to her.

Now they are all in hiding because their bogus little plan not only backfired, but it backfired very, very badly.

LaToya might not have been in on that, but she get's no pass from me. Her and her man STOLE Michael's private home videos and a bunch of other stuff, I'm sure. Her man stayed in Michael's home for over a week, I'm sure during that time he checked in every closet, every cabinet, under every bed, and in every corner.

Pack of thieves!
 
Big Apple2 said:
I have come to the FULL conclusion that they are a bunch of FAKES!

Some of them run around here talking about "family unity," while those same folks don't want to pay child support for their own children.

They talk lovingly about Mother, putting her on a pedestal, at the same time TRICKING her into believing that she needs to "rest" at an Arizona spa. Then they have the NERVE to put her in front of a television camera wherein she makes a complete fool of herself, while saying how her children would NEVER do that to her. When in fact that's exactly what they did to her.

Now they are all in hiding because their bogus little plan not only backfired, but it backfired very, very badly.

LaToya might not have been in on that, but she get's no pass from me. Her and her man STOLE Michael's private home videos and a bunch of other stuff, I'm sure. Her man stayed in Michael's home for over a week, I'm sure during that time he checked in every closet, every cabinet, under every bed, and in every corner.

Pack of thieves!
Click to expand...

LaToya is blowing hot air. She's gotten in good with Paris, praising everything she does. She has hooked PPB into her reality TV show and this new enterprise she has involved herself with tonight. I know she wants to make sure things are smoothed over with them before tonights "party" so she's putting on this "I will sue" act.
 
Yeah, LaToya cannot afford to have Michael's children think badly of her. If she let this slide, it may open the door for the children to consider what other underhanded thing LaToya may have done. LaToya is wise enough to know that she needs to be the family member that Prince, Paris and Blanket trust.
 
Well, well, well, Latoya is making papa Joe look like a nice guy by parading Michael's kids around for profit.
 
You would think their guardians would monitor these things. I am sorry. I don't know who really has the kids best interests at heart. Only Michael really did.
 
simply put, i wish the family would stay away from what is Michael's, and his childrens', and leave the executors alone.
 
respect77 said:
Michael did not sue VG because of his book. Michael sued VG because of his claims in interviews that he saw and possessed a video tape in which Michael was seen molesting his nephew, Jeremy. The problem with suing journalists in the US is that they are so much protected by the law. Such as with the Shield Law which says no journalist can be compelled to reveal his sources in court. This means in practice that they can say they got a certain info from an unnamed source and they cannot be forced in court to reveal who that source was - or if the source exists at all, or they just made up that info. This basically gives a licence to lie to journalists as it becomes very difficult to win a lawsuit against a journalist. All the journalist will have to do in court is to hide behind the Shield Law and say he's not willing to reveal his source - and so no one ever will know if his source is credible or if it is existing at all.

The reason why Michael was able to win against VG for his claim was because VG made the mistake of claiming that the mother of Jeremy (Margaret Maldonado) saw and possessed the tape and then Margaret could be called to testify and she said none of it was true and she did not ever meet VG. Had VG said his source was unnamed it would have been a lot more difficult to win against him.

If Sullivan's "sources" are unidentified and those sources cannot be called to confirm or deny the story, then it is very difficult for Janet to sue him and to win against him.
Click to expand...

Respect good points, and as soon as I saw VF stating that they stand by Sullivan's comments, the Shield law came to my mind. VF knows that this is all made up, but they also know that Sullivan does not have to reveal his made up source. Janet will have to find a clever lawyer to go around this. Maybe she could show what the actual reasons were and then sue Sullivan for writing incorrect information? (reminds me of the TMZ story about the slap that had to be retracted)

Now VF is correcting the amount. Isn't that the work of Sullivan's researchers? I just love how VF pretends that the only information to correct in that mess is 49,000.
 
The Brown Gangsta;3723712 said:
Yea I know, but they don't have the best track record of remembering when they incriminate themselves. It's just amusing when they get caught in their lies and make fools of themselves lol.
Click to expand...

LaToya especially has a bad memory. She is now denying looting Michael's house but she cannot remember what she said in all the interviews she did after MJ's death. She denies that she wasn't looking for money, but in all the interviews after Michael's death she said the money and jewellery Michael kept in the house was missing, how would she know if she wasn't looking:doh:
Snippet one of her many interviews days after MJ died:

I want to know how Michael died, and then, at 11pm on the day he dies, all the staff are fired?’ she asks rhetorically. ‘That raised my suspicions.’
When she arrived at the house with her manager and close friend Jeffre Phillips, new security guards were in place.

While Michael regularly kept up to £1million in cash inside his home, La Toya says none was found. Nor was any of his vast collection of jewellery: ‘Someone went in there and did a good job. So many people were in the house before I got there.’
Rest of it here http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbi...a-Jackson-Michael-murdered--I-felt-start.html

Even it is Daily mail, but we do remember all of members of family gave interviews to english tabloids after Michael's death.
Here is a little info regarding their interviews and how much they got paid.
http://www.x17online.com/celebritie..._jackson_was_paid_200000_for_his_abc_inte.php


So yeah, I think Sullivan is standing quite firm ground what comes to what went on at Michael's house with family members foraging there. They put themselves in to position by giving interviews and then not remembering what they said.
 
Bubs said:
LaToya especially has a bad memory. She is now denying looting Michael's house but she cannot remember what she said in all the interviews she did after MJ's death. She denies that she wasn't looking for money, but in all the interviews after Michael's death she said the money and jewellery Michael kept in the house was missing, how would she know if she wasn't looking:doh:
Click to expand...


Vanity Fair's lawyers are surely going to bring LaToya's previous media interviews forward in court if she sues them even just to see her mess up her own credibility. She's already got a bad reputation for saying things that don't make sense when compared to the facts. I hope for her own sake, she doesn't sue. The lawsuit would be a hot mess for her if what she said in the past about the situation at the house gets thrown back in her face.
 
Last edited:
Vanity Fair has made correction of Janet part in their article:hysterical:

Michael Jackson’s burial was delayed due to wrangling between Janet Jackson and her brother’s estate, a detail revealed in a November Vanity Fair–exclusive excerpt of Untouchable, Randall Sullivan’s Michael Jackson biography, which will be published next month. According to Sullivan, Janet put up the $49,000* deposit at Forest Lawn to secure a spot for Michael but refused to let the funeral take place until the money was repaid.

* A previous version of this blog post reported that the amount of Janet Jackson's deposit was $40,000. Records released last week indicate that the amount was $49,000.

That made me :lmao:
I wonder if Janet's pr person is going to issue another statement and demand correction?
 
elusive moonwalker said:
LoL the books certainly rubbing some ppl up the wrong way. truth hurts eh!. did they not think there would be footage of them at the house. even grace said they were asking where the money was kept.

lawsuit threats are as fake as randys theres more to come. no point in them sueing as theyd keep running from giving a depo lol
Click to expand...

I don't think any of them is going sue, they themselves dug themselves in to deep shit by giving interviews left and right and the not remembering what they said:doh: We should start collection so we could send diaries for them, but then again this way its much more funnier when they talk shite.

Btw, we are still waiting for Randy et all taking the will issue to the proper authorities. So far nothing has come out of it.

Jackie said in one recent interview that next year Randy is going to join in their Unity tour, so obviously Randy's options for money from AEG seems to be pretty slim.
 
Last edited:
And she first thought foul play was involved in her brother's untimely demise after she arrived at his house in Holmby Hills, L.A., hours after his death - insisting wads of cash and jewellery the star usually kept at his residences were nowhere to be found.
She explains to the publication, "Michael always had cash in his homes, usually around $2 million (£1.2 million) which he used to pay out on things. People said he wasn't wealthy, but Michael always had money with him.
"When I went to the house later that day there was no cash or jewellery. So many people had been through that house before I got there. Someone went in there and did a good job. It was very strange.

http://www.contactmusic.com/news/la-toya-michaels-cash-went-missing-hours-after-his-death_1109472
This story originally was publisher NOTW, which on no more, but she gave an interview to them too.

and what comes to Katherine pr person saying that K wasn't there, and her doing anything else than comforting kids after Michael's passing is not true either. She too went to house, she went court to be appointed as administrator to Michael's estate as well as kids guardian, and before doing that she must have had meetings and consultations with lawyers, so kids were pretty much left their own to grieve in those first few days

I'm so pissed of LaToya's exploiting Michael's kids that I'm seriously considering giving a helping hand to VF and Sullivan:angry:
 
La Toya claims that contrary to reporting in the high-profile piece, she never “demanded" access to the King of Pop’s rented estate in the hours after his death or stuffed valuables into black plastic garbage bags purportedly removed the next morning by van.


"I'm fighting back because these are outright blatant lies, and I want people to know the truth. I'm taking action towards everyone involved," La Toya told the Daily News as she walked a "pink" carpet with Michael's three kids at the launch of the new Mr. Pink ginseng energy drink.


The article’s “reckless and irresponsible” allegations “resulted in our clients’ reputations being trashed in the international media,” lawyer Stephen Moeller wrote in the letter obtained by The News.



http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/la-toya-retraction-vanity-fair-article-1.1181352
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top