morinen
Proud Member
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2010
- Messages
- 1,074
- Points
- 48
All these recent events with tabloid lies and attempts of fans to disprove them – again – got me thinking… in 10, 20, 50 years, after the dust has cleared, what will become of Michael’s legacy as a person?
In my mind there is no doubt that his music, his short films, his dancing will live on for years and years. Art is immortal, and he will go down in history as a very talented musician. It is evident even now: most people who are skeptical about his so-called “life choices” admit that was a great artist; and as time goes on, events of his personal life will cease to matter completely. People will enjoy his music without caring much about the guy who had that music written. Like we listen to Mozart’s music without looking closely into his life.
I felt it first time very vividly in Las Vegas, on MJ ONE show. His music is celebrated there, but it is also marketed in a very smart way: you create this spectacular extravaganza, you hang posters everywhere, you open a gift shop – an voila, people start flocking in. There are hardcore fans there, yes, but I think the majority of this crowd doesn’t care much about MJ and about what he did or didn’t do. They just come in for a show, they want to be entertained for their 100 bucks. And that’s okay – I guess - that’s what art is for, and Michael wanted to be remembered as the greatest entertainer.
His estate executors encourage this by sticking strictly to the music and carefully walking around everything else. They position him as “Michael Jackson, the King of Pop, the greatest entertainer.” Their answer to allegations and attempts to stain his reputation is, "Go listen to his music, watch the show." And I can understand why – their job is to make his estate profitable, and that’s where the money is – in the music, in the show.
But to us he is so much more than that. And I’ve always wanted people to remember him for the person he was, too. His music will be appreciated by generations, but will those generations fall in love with him, like we did? In 50 years, will they be interested in personal stories from his friends who described him as this sweet and funny guy? Will they cherish bits of candid footage where he flashes that innocent smile of his? Will they cry thinking how he was hurting? He suffered so much in his life, that I feel he deserves to be remembered for that too. Will they want to know what he had done for the children? Will they be inspired by his confidence that nothing is impossible in this world? Will they learn from his mind maps, from his goal-setting techniques, from his determination and strength? He deserves to be remembered for the special, one of a kind person that he was, a humanitarian, an inspiration and a ray of light for millions of people. But will he be? Famous people are usually remembered for their lasting achievements, not for who they were as people, unfortunately. I’m trying to think of a historical example that proves the opposite... Like Gandhi, maybe? Like Lady Di? What do you think?
In my mind there is no doubt that his music, his short films, his dancing will live on for years and years. Art is immortal, and he will go down in history as a very talented musician. It is evident even now: most people who are skeptical about his so-called “life choices” admit that was a great artist; and as time goes on, events of his personal life will cease to matter completely. People will enjoy his music without caring much about the guy who had that music written. Like we listen to Mozart’s music without looking closely into his life.
I felt it first time very vividly in Las Vegas, on MJ ONE show. His music is celebrated there, but it is also marketed in a very smart way: you create this spectacular extravaganza, you hang posters everywhere, you open a gift shop – an voila, people start flocking in. There are hardcore fans there, yes, but I think the majority of this crowd doesn’t care much about MJ and about what he did or didn’t do. They just come in for a show, they want to be entertained for their 100 bucks. And that’s okay – I guess - that’s what art is for, and Michael wanted to be remembered as the greatest entertainer.
His estate executors encourage this by sticking strictly to the music and carefully walking around everything else. They position him as “Michael Jackson, the King of Pop, the greatest entertainer.” Their answer to allegations and attempts to stain his reputation is, "Go listen to his music, watch the show." And I can understand why – their job is to make his estate profitable, and that’s where the money is – in the music, in the show.
But to us he is so much more than that. And I’ve always wanted people to remember him for the person he was, too. His music will be appreciated by generations, but will those generations fall in love with him, like we did? In 50 years, will they be interested in personal stories from his friends who described him as this sweet and funny guy? Will they cherish bits of candid footage where he flashes that innocent smile of his? Will they cry thinking how he was hurting? He suffered so much in his life, that I feel he deserves to be remembered for that too. Will they want to know what he had done for the children? Will they be inspired by his confidence that nothing is impossible in this world? Will they learn from his mind maps, from his goal-setting techniques, from his determination and strength? He deserves to be remembered for the special, one of a kind person that he was, a humanitarian, an inspiration and a ray of light for millions of people. But will he be? Famous people are usually remembered for their lasting achievements, not for who they were as people, unfortunately. I’m trying to think of a historical example that proves the opposite... Like Gandhi, maybe? Like Lady Di? What do you think?
Last edited: