Justin Bieber talks Michael in new interview [Update on page 4]

Well, Prince is somewhat mysterious too, but the point is not Prince but that Justin Bieber is not. BTW, Michael too very rarely gave interviews in the 80s. Later he did give a couple more - and so did Prince. But I don't think the number of interviews determine who is mysterious or who is not.

Here's the definition of mysterious:

mysterious

difficult or impossible to understand, explain, or identify.

(of a person) deliberately enigmatic.

Many people find MJ difficult "to understand, explain, or identify", hence the many misunderstandings and many interpretations of his character and who he "really" was.

How did MJ rarely give interviews in the 80s? their was the ebony one, the encino one, the 1985 one, the 1983 ones, the 20/20 one and probably more that i cannot remember. this is in comparison to a brief unscheduled mid gig 1985 interview and a vague answer to dick clarks 1979 bandstand question. i know the question is about mj but im just saying that i cant see how mj could be considered greatly mysterious by people when this all seems like an exaggeration in comparison to this artists approach.

I understand the definition of mysterious but im wondering what people do not understand about MJ. for me he was always very clear about everything so what is it that people want an answer to? when you say 'misunderstandings' as a part of the definition accusations come to mind but i dont think that would be applicable to fans who know he was innocent therefore it isnt 'mysterious'. the only mystery i can think of for mj is not get the full answer for why he wants to die young in those jewish tapes.

Yeah I don't know what you're getting at with the prince stuff and I really don't know what you're asking for. Do you want me to explain why some people might consider shyness being a mysterious trait?




what? I said I Think part of what made MJ mysterious was his shyness and him being soft-spoken. He's demeanor and way of talking wasn't like the atypical pop artist and I personally believe, but I could be wrong of course, that played a part in his mysterious aura. But that's only a part of it. There are other factors which also may,or may not, have played a role and I believe those things can't be pinned down. They can be an unconventional childhood as you say or they can be something else entirely. I don't think there's a right or wrong answer to this only opinions. I might attribute his mysteriousness to him being soft-spoken and shy and someone might feel differently.

yes but i was also just addressing that loads of people are 'shy' by some people posting here would consider themselves shy does that mean they are mysterious as-well? And MJ or these people are 'mysterious' because you cant figure out a reason why they are shy or they are witholding important info or what? When you link his way of talking to being an atypical trait of popstars rendering him mysterious would that mean it would also mean in your opinion for example that since george michael was gay in the 80s he was mysterious because of his sexuality as most huge popstars were not gay? You must at least have a vague idea of what the other things that cant be pinned down could be if you know they might exist? easy embarrassment? dislike of interviews?

^ I don't know what it is that you're asking for. How do you define a mystery? it's an abstract term and one person see it this way and another can see it that way. Personally, I've never thought of Prince as mysterious even though I've never watched any interview of his besides the one he said "MJ is a lover not a fighter" and I don't think it counts. For me a mystery has to come with some sort of interest and curiousity, something that makes you wonder and you can't quite tell what is it about this thing that's so luring. I think Michael was a mystery to fans, general public and the worldwide media.

how can you make a proper judgement on whether or not prince is mysterious if you have never watched any of his interviews and why does the one you did watch just happen to 'not count' it sounds like bias
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: Justin Bieber talks Michael in new interview

how can you make a proper judgement on whether or not prince is mysterious if you have never watched any of his interviews and why does the one you did watch just happen to 'not count' it sounds like bias

That's InvicibleTals opinion. There is no scale for measuring if someone is mysterious or not some people may feel that way other people don't. Just accept it. Have you ever heard about the X-factor? When there's something about someone that you quite can't explain or understand. There you have it.

And I still don't understand why you keep bringing up Prince. What does Prince have to do with MJ being viewed as mysterious?
 
Re: Justin Bieber talks Michael in new interview

How did MJ rarely give interviews in the 80s? their was the ebony one, the encino one, the 1985 one, the 1983 ones, the 20/20 one and probably more that i cannot remember. this is in comparison to a brief unscheduled mid gig 1985 interview and a vague answer to dick clarks 1979 bandstand question. i know the question is about mj but im just saying that i cant see how mj could be considered greatly mysterious by people when this all seems like an exaggeration in comparison to this artists approach.

OK, then he had several interviews? So? This just confirms what many said in this thread that he was not "hiding" and that's not why he was mysterious. The number of interviews an artist gives is just YOUR criteria of being mysterious (obviously because you argued that Prince was more mysterious because he gave less interviews), everyone else disagreed with it, just like you disagree with others on what constitutes as mysterious and what not.

I understand the definition of mysterious but im wondering what people do not understand about MJ. for me he was always very clear about everything so what is it that people want an answer to? when you say 'misunderstandings' as a part of the definition accusations come to mind but i dont think that would be applicable to fans who know he was innocent therefore it isnt 'mysterious'. the only mystery i can think of for mj is not get the full answer for why he wants to die young in those jewish tapes.

There are a lot of misunderstandings around MJ besides the allegations. And there are a lot of things that people consider mysterious. There have been before the allegations as well. You do not, OK, but that does not mean that in the world generally he is not considered mysterious and unknowable in many aspects. Why do you think the Oprah interview in 1993 was such a big deal? What I realized is that there are many versions of MJ that people have in their mind. And often people just project themselves onto him. That his image has so much variations in people's mind is a sure sign that he is a mysterious figure to most. People who are easily figured out and easily be put in a box will not have so many versions of their image out there.
 
Last edited:
Re: Justin Bieber talks Michael in new interview

how can you make a proper judgement on whether or not prince is mysterious if you have never watched any of his interviews and why does the one you did watch just happen to 'not count' it sounds like bias

Simple. Because I found MJ mysterious before I've watched every interview of his (before I was his fan) and because interviews are not an indication of being mysterious IMO. Each time Michael Jackson made an hour long interview he was an even bigger mystery to people.

and it's not that it "happens to not count", how does a short clip of him saying something about Michael count? I was just being honest and said I DID see this video. If you think it's biased, whatever. It's not.

Years ago I chose to watch every interview of Michael while I have never cared enough to know who Prince was more than I already know. So much for him being mysterious.


That's InvicibleTals opinion. There is no scale for measuring if someone is mysterious or not some people may feel that way other people don't. Just accept it. Have you ever heard about the X-factor? When there's something about someone that you quite can't explain or understand. There you have it.

And I still don't understand why you keep bringing up Prince. What does Prince have to do with MJ being viewed as mysterious?

This. Thank you, Themidwestcowboy.
 
That's InvicibleTals opinion. There is no scale for measuring if someone is mysterious or not some people may feel that way other people don't. Just accept it. Have you ever heard about the X-factor? When there's something about someone that you quite can't explain or understand. There you have it.

And I still don't understand why you keep bringing up Prince. What does Prince have to do with MJ being viewed as mysterious?

Clearly there is no scale but im trying to understand why people consider him 'myserious' and cannot explain why and it just begins to sound like people are saying it for the sake of it to make it sound exciting. and no i have never had the x-factor where there is something about someone where i cannot explain or understand. it wouldn't surprised me if like most things with my own further research there is in answer to this in psychology or science. the prince comparison was showing my understanding of what is considered mysterious and how mj compares. you said someone can do 100 interviews and still be considered a conundrum, to be clear is your point that MJ was myserious solely because although we knew a lot about his life he still was still "shy" and "softspoken"? you didn't answer my other question about george michael linking to your train of thinking with atypical traits of occupations.

OK, then he had several interviews? So? This just confirms what many said in this thread that he was not "hiding" and that's not why he was mysterious. The number of interviews an artist gives is just YOUR criteria of being mysterious (obviously because you argued that Prince was more mysterious because he gave less interviews), everyone else disagreed with it, just like you disagree with others on what constitutes as mysterious and what not.



There are a lot of misunderstandings around MJ besides the allegations. And there are a lot of things that people consider mysterious. There have been before the allegations as well. You do not, OK, but that does not mean that in the world generally he is not considered mysterious and unknowable in many aspects. Why do you think the Oprah interview in 1993 was such a big deal? What I realized is that there are many versions of MJ that people have in their mind. And often people just project themselves onto him. That his image has so much variations in people's mind is a sure sign that he is a mysterious figure to most. People who are easily figured out and easily be put in a box will not have so many versions of their image out there.

i wrote a point in which i was making a comparison to who i would consider myserious and why: a lack of interviews. you responded to tell me that mj had in fact done few also in comparison, i was just correcting you. ok it confirms he was not hiding but my point never was that mj hid my point was that i dont think mj was myserious because he did several interviews giving clear responses whilst prince hadnt in comparison. im not disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing im really curious to understand why michael jackson was 'mysterious' because i find this trait in artists genuinely frustrating if i find myself unable to have answers and mj gave clear answers.

for something i would find to be genuine would be why someone would tweet paisley park is open this week a bunch of people in london go with their savings to Minneapolis and it turns out he was joking, a multi-millionaire joking. i think the oprah interview could have been popular because he had tons of fans with the biggest selling album of all time? an answer to why he was physically white (which we got)? basically do people think he was myserious because he was shy and we will never know the answer why because no interviewer ever asked him that although there are a range of respectable likely reasons as found in everyday people? does this mean shy people in real life are considered mysterious?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: Justin Bieber talks Michael in new interview

i wrote a point in which i was making a comparison to who i would consider myserious and why: a lack of interviews. you responded to tell me that mj had in fact done few also in comparison, i was just correcting you. ok it confirms he was not hiding but my point never was that mj hid my point was that i dont think mj was myserious because he did several interviews giving clear responses whilst prince hadnt in comparison. im not disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing im really curious to understand why michael jackson was 'mysterious' because i find this trait in artists genuinely frustrating if i find myself unable to have answers and mj gave clear answers.

It's clear to me that you simply have a different concept on what the word "mysterious" means as the most of us do here. To me "mysterious" has nothing to do with the amount of interviews someone does, nor with Twitter jokes a celebrity plays on his fans. That's simply your criteria of being mysterious, that does not mean everyone else has to agree with that.

You also keep going on about the shy thing, now making it into your repeated strawman argument - that we think he was mysterious because he was shy. That's simply a false representation of what was actually said.

It's your right to think that MJ was not mysterious and that people only say he was to "make him exciting", but the fact is that he is exciting enough to outdo the supposedly more mysterious Prince in terms of popularity and people's fascination with him, so I don't think we have anything to worry about the excitement and fascination MJ is able to generate and therefore there is no need to make him "sound exciting".
 
Last edited:
Re: Justin Bieber talks Michael in new interview

It's clear to me that you simply have a different concept on what the word "mysterious" means as the most of us do here. To me "mysterious" has nothing to do with the amount of interviews someone does, nor with Twitter jokes a celebrity plays on his fans. That's simply your criteria of being mysterious, that does not mean everyone else has to agree with that.

You also keep going on about the shy thing, now making it into your repeated strawman argument - that we think he was mysterious because he was shy. That's simply a false representation of what was actually said.

It's your right to think that MJ was not mysterious and that people only say he was to "make him exciting", but the fact is that he is exciting enough to outdo the supposedly more mysterious Prince in terms of popularity and people's fascination with him, so I don't think we have anything to worry about the excitement and fascination MJ is able to generate and therefore there is no need to make him "sound exciting".

it is far more than twitter jokes, specifically: allowing absolutely no intrusion into his personal life allowing the press to feed off absolutely nothing for the last 30 years, promising albums and not delivering, recording songs better than what he releases and locking it away, pretending his child is alive on national tv etc.

How is it a straw man argument if that was one of things mentioned along with 'soft-spoken' "quiet, well mannered,"because he was hinding or something like that" these are all traits you can find in everyday people so is this your criteria for being mysterious?

where is the sense in the link you are making between overall excitement and my opinion between people just wanting to "make him exciting"? I never implied their is a link to mysteriousness and 'popularity' nor with peoples fascination? could it be because he recored the soundtrack to their life.. there fans because they really like his music, love his short films? when you say nothing to worry about doesn't that imply you would worry if mjs popularity outdid prince? if so, why?
 
Re: Justin Bieber talks Michael in new interview

i wrote a point in which i was making a comparison to who i would consider myserious and why: a lack of interviews. you responded to tell me that mj had in fact done few also in comparison, i was just correcting you. ok it confirms he was not hiding but my point never was that mj hid my point was that i dont think mj was myserious because he did several interviews giving clear responses whilst prince hadnt in comparison. im not disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing im really curious to understand why michael jackson was 'mysterious' because i find this trait in artists genuinely frustrating if i find myself unable to have answers and mj gave clear answers

Replying that he is a gentleman when asked whether he (Michael Jackson) is a virgin does not come across as a clear answer to me!
 
Re: Justin Bieber talks Michael in new interview

it is far more than twitter jokes, specifically: allowing absolutely no intrusion into his personal life allowing the press to feed off absolutely nothing for the last 30 years, promising albums and not delivering, recording songs better than what he releases and locking it away, pretending his child is alive on national tv etc.

Hardly anything of this list is "mysterious" me. That he did not allow media intrusion into his personal life is being private, not mysterious. Jodie Foster does not allow media intrusion into her personal life. Does that make her mysterious? To me that's just makes her private, not mysterious. Promising albums and not delivering? What does that even have to do with mystery?

How is it a straw man argument if that was one of things mentioned along with 'soft-spoken' "quiet, well mannered,"because he was hinding or something like that" these are all traits you can find in everyday people so is this your criteria for being mysterious?

It's a strawman because you take it out of context and go on about certain cherry-picked words and pretend those were the only things said about MJ's mystery and ignore all the context and larger explanations of what people really mean by it.

when you say nothing to worry about doesn't that imply you would worry if mjs popularity outdid prince? if so, why?

You made an accusation and assumption about people's motives in considering MJ mysterious. You made the assumption it cannot be because they genuinely consider him that but it has to be because of some other motive, like "making him sound exciting". That implies otherwise he would not be exciting. I simply pointed out that "making him sound exciting" is of no worry of ours, well, because he IS exciting. So it's just incorrect to assume that we need anything to do for him to make him "sound exciting" when he already naturally is.
And BTW, MJ's popularity DOES outdo Prince's.
 
Last edited:
Dilan;4095312 said:
Clearly there is no scale but im trying to understand why people consider him 'myserious' and cannot explain why and it just begins to sound like people are saying it for the sake of it to make it sound exciting. and no i have never had the x-factor where there is something about someone where i cannot explain or understand.

Then maybe the not being able to explain why is what makes him mysterious to those who feel that way. Because to this day I cannot understand or explain why MJ’s passing affected me to the extent it did and has. I was always a huge fan, but certainly not obsessive, but his death has affected me as deeply as a family member passing. Which makes no sense at all to me.

On June 25th you could actually feel something cosmic had happened in the air. People who weren’t even fans found themselves crying and didn’t understand why.

Simply put, MJ was an entertainer. His performances were electric, charismatic, and exciting all on their own. But there are lots of electric and exciting entertainers. Why was MJ’s effect as emotionally impactful? Even if you list his many admirable traits of humanitarianism, intellect, humor, humbleness…how do you explain how he was able to connect to the extent that he did with legions across the globe, all races, all ages? It’s a mystery to me, and as much as I’ve read about him, seen interviews about him and from him, he remains an inexplicable phenom to me.
 
Re: Justin Bieber talks Michael in new interview

If people knew what makes MJ so mysterious he wouldn't be that mysterious. :scratch:
 
Hardly anything of this list is "mysterious" me. That he did not allow media intrusion into his personal life is being private, not mysterious. Jodie Foster does not allow media intrusion into her personal life. Does that make her mysterious? To me that's just makes her private, not mysterious. Promising albums and not delivering? What does that even have to do with mystery?



It's a strawman because you take it out of context and go on about certain cherry-picked words and pretend those were the only things said about MJ's mystery and ignore all the context and larger explanations of what people really mean by it.



You made an accusation and assumption about people's motives in considering MJ mysterious. You made the assumption it cannot be because they genuinely consider him that but it has to be because of some other motive, like "making him sound exciting". That implies otherwise he would not be exciting. I simply pointed out that "making him sound exciting" is of no worry of ours, well, because he IS exciting. So it's just incorrect to assume that we need anything to do for him to make him "sound exciting" when he already naturally is.
And BTW, MJ's popularity DOES outdo Prince's.

The consequence of privacy is create a mysteriousness by allowing almost all stories about him to come from other people as opposed to his own word by indirectly or directly allowing so many questions about him as an individual arise whilst also staying private with his own wishes. Yes it does to an extent. But more importantly as a musician not just promising but creating 30+ albums, 30 music videos 13,000, 2 movies and not delivering is mysterious because it makes you wonder what all of these songs sound like and if they can compete with official releases and why hes holding it all back. And hardly anything you've mentioned to me either is "myserious" to me again as I have said previously all the traits you have mentioned can be found in everyday people are all of these people also 'mysterious'?

Ok enlighten to me on the context and larger explanation? The idea is that because these are atypical traits of a musician it renders him mysterious, so do you accept George Michael is also myserious because being a popular artist in the 80s and being gay isn't common? Prince is also shy and well-mannered. So as opposed to being "somewhat mysterious" shouldn't he be just as?

Can you re-direct me to where I said Prince's popularity outdoes MJ's popularity or are you just saying it for the sake of it? Let me rephrase my statement "making him sound exciting then he already is". Obviously it would be absurd to think that MJ isn't at all 'exciting' otherwise he wouldnt have the fanbase that he does however I question the sincerity of what people are saying if the line of logic that is atypical traits in a certain field causing 'mystery' however the same can be said exactly for prince but he is only "somewhat" or just "doesn't count" in the mysteriousness he has. and plenty of people have these shyness, well-mannered traits are they also mysterious?

Replying that he is a gentleman when asked whether he (Michael Jackson) is a virgin does not come across as a clear answer to me!

"That he did not allow media intrusion into his personal life is being private, not mysterious."
 
Last edited:
Re: Justin Bieber talks Michael in new interview

Dilan, please use the multi-quote button
 
gerryevans;4095436 said:
Then maybe the not being able to explain why is what makes him mysterious to those who feel that way. Because to this day I cannot understand or explain why MJ’s passing affected me to the extent it did and has. I was always a huge fan, but certainly not obsessive, but his death has affected me as deeply as a family member passing. Which makes no sense at all to me.

On June 25th you could actually feel something cosmic had happened in the air. People who weren’t even fans found themselves crying and didn’t understand why.

Simply put, MJ was an entertainer. His performances were electric, charismatic, and exciting all on their own. But there are lots of electric and exciting entertainers. Why was MJ’s effect as emotionally impactful? Even if you list his many admirable traits of humanitarianism, intellect, humor, humbleness…how do you explain how he was able to connect to the extent that he did with legions across the globe, all races, all ages? It’s a mystery to me, and as much as I’ve read about him, seen interviews about him and from him, he remains an inexplicable phenom to me.

I felt exactly the same on MJ's passing just a family member i agree! but I don't think its anything to with being mysterious... As you have just stated he had many admirable traits humanitarianism, intellect, humor, humbleness... people from all around the world grew up with his music or either had it passed down to them from their parents he recorded soundtracks to people lives. people who mourned would have seen him in real life or video interview footage and realised he is all of those things and connected with him. therefore sad when he died. like im not seeing the mystery here he did good things so when he died ineivitably everyone around the world who liked him mourned? Just think if you met somebody in real life who was everything or half of the things Michael Jackson was (so much so when they tragically died you were sad) now imagine if that person was a celebrity and a had 10+million strong following its the same thing but just on a huge scale. if anything your point about so many people being sad when he died IMO is a testimony to him being anything but mysterious but very transparent. It's like the thread the user MattyJam made on prince.org 'are you emotionally invested in prince as a human being' not feeling any warmth towards him as a human being because he has aloof and distant pretty much 'mysterious' in that sense.
 
Re: Justin Bieber talks Michael in new interview

And hardly anything you've mentioned to me either is "myserious" to me again as I have said previously all the traits you have mentioned can be found in everyday people are all of these people also 'mysterious'?

And hardly anything you mentioned is mysterious to me. Having much unreleased stuff does not make a person mysterious to me. Someone being private does not make a person mysterious to me. There are other artists in whom those traits can be found yet hardly anyone would think of them when you think mysterious aritsts (hence my Jodie Foster example who is hardly an epitome of mystery, but she is very private).

Ok enlighten to me on the context and larger explanation? The idea is that because these are atypical traits of a musician it renders him mysterious, so do you accept George Michael is also myserious because being a popular artist in the 80s and being gay isn't common? Prince is also shy and well-mannered. So as opposed to being "somewhat mysterious" shouldn't he be just as?

I am not going to repeat several posts from the previous pages. Read them again. If you do not understand them or do not agree with them that is OK. I don't even understand what you are trying to say about George Michael or his sexuality (being a gay artist is pretty common BTW). And you keep going on about the couple of cherry picked phareses you choose to focus on from all these posts (shy, well-mannered) despite of those having been said in a larger context. I am not interested in this any more. It's going in circles.


Can you re-direct me to where I said Prince's popularity outdoes MJ's popularity or are you just saying it for the sake of it?

You said "if MJ's popularity outdid Prince".

when you say nothing to worry about doesn't that imply you would worry if mjs popularity outdid prince? if so, why?

Well, it does outdo it.

wouldnt have the fanbase that he does however I question the sincerity of what people are saying if the line of logic that is atypical traits in a certain field causing 'mystery' however the same can be said exactly for prince but he is only "somewhat" or just "doesn't count" in the mysteriousness he has. and plenty of people have these shyness, well-mannered traits are they also mysterious?

And that is my problem with your posts. That you question people's sincerity because they happen not to see the world or in this case the meaning of mystery the same way as you do. That's kind of rude IMO. And no matter how many times you repeat the same strawman it's still a strawman. There have been a LOT more written in this thread than just that "MJ is mysterious because he is shy or because he is well mannered". And in fact, even those things were said in a certain context which makes it clear that it's not that shyness or well-manneredness alone makes someone mysterious.

Let me give an example. You keep repeating the claim that people here say that MJ was mysterious because he was shy. Actually NO ONE here said that. That's just you taking a word out of its context and misconstructing an argument that way. Themidwestcowboy wrote the following:

I personally don't think that "hiding",(He wasn't even hiding imo), had anything to do with the mystery that was MJ. People that met MJ often relate stories that he was so unique and different. I think a part of it had to do with his shyness and him being soft-spoken but the rest, I don't think no one will ever be able to pinpoint it down. It will be a mystery.

See? This is what was actually said, yet you still keep on acting like the argument was that "MJ was mysterious because he was shy". No, that was NOT the argument. In fact, when you first misconstrued the argument Themidwestcowboy made it clear again that it's not what she said:

what? I said I Think part of what made MJ mysterious was his shyness and him being soft-spoken. He's demeanor and way of talking wasn't like the atypical pop artist and I personally believe, but I could be wrong of course, that played a part in his mysterious aura. But that's only a part of it. There are other factors which also may,or may not, have played a role and I believe those things can't be pinned down.

Despite of that you still keep misrepresenting the argument - which is why I called it a strawman. And people gave several other opinions of why MJ was mysterious but you just ignore those and cling on the strawman that no one actually said.

But I am finished with this discussion. You are free to consider whatever you want to consider mysterious. It's somewhat subjective anyway, as we can see even in this thread: what is mysterious to you is not necessarily mysterious to other people and vica versa. It's just rude to question other people's sincierity just because they do not think about something this subjective the same way as you do.
 
Last edited:
Dilan;4095312 said:
you said someone can do 100 interviews and still be considered a conundrum, to be clear is your point that MJ was myserious solely because although we knew a lot about his life he still was still "shy" and "softspoken”? you didn't answer my other question about george michael linking to your train of thinking with atypical traits of occupations.

Why do you keep doing that? I gave you a perfectly comprehensible explanation to that in the previous page, (Which you have quoted) and i’m not gonna repeat myself. I’m also not going to answer the George Michael question.

Dilan;4095312 said:
my point was that i dont think mj was myserious because he did several interviews giving clear responses whilst prince hadnt in comparison.

In a nutshell, this is your standpoint and everyone that has been reading this thread gets it. That is how you measure mysteriousness. That’s cool. Some people may agree some people may disagree. Can we move on now?
 
respect77;4095476 said:
And hardly anything you mentioned is mysterious to me. Having much unreleased stuff does not make a person mysterious to me. Someone being private does not make a person mysterious to me. There are other artists in whom those traits can be found yet hardly anyone would think of them when you think mysterious aritsts (hence my Jodie Foster example who is hardly an epitome of mystery, but she is very private).



I am not going to repeat several posts from the previous pages. Read them again. If you do not understand them or do not agree with them that is OK. I don't even understand what you are trying to say about George Michael or his sexuality (being a gay artist is pretty common BTW). And you keep going on about the couple of cherry picked phareses you choose to focus on from all these posts (shy, well-mannered) despite of those having been said in a larger context. I am not interested in this any more. It's going in circles.




You said "if MJ's popularity outdid Prince".



Well, it does outdo it.



And that is my problem with your posts. That you question people's sincerity because they happen not to see the world or in this case the meaning of mystery the same way as you do. That's kind of rude IMO. And no matter how many times you repeat the same strawman it's still a strawman. There have been a LOT more written in this thread than just that "MJ is mysterious because he is shy or because he is well mannered". And in fact, even those things were said in a certain context which makes it clear that it's not that shyness or well-manneredness alone makes someone mysterious.

But I am finished with this discussion. You are free to consider whatever you want to consider mysterious. It's somewhat subjective anyway, as we can see even in this thread: what is mysterious to you is not necessarily mysterious to other people and vica versa. It's just rude to question other people's sincierity just because they do not think about something this subjective the same way as you do.


But you 'thanked' a post pointing out MJ is mysterious for giving a vague interview answer? and then you say media intrusion isnt a 'myserious' trait? im assuming you agree that is a 'mysterious' trait? like what exactly makes someone mysterious in your eyes you're just telling me you're disagreeing with what im saying but not telling me what you think is myserious

in the 80's (his peak) he was gay the majority was not therefore an atypical trait - the basis of posts in this thread is being mysterious for being atypical so my question is, is he mysterious? simple. Nothing is going in circles i've re-read this entire thread you also mention "As for happiness. Like you said, Michael actually had big reasons to not to be happy at certain points of his life. When you listen to Destiny you can feel that even back then he had a sadness because of being used and abused." one of prince's biggest songs when doves cry is about that exact same thing? also songs like 'papa' how his father used to beat him plenty of artists make personal songs about their bad childhood or if their up-bringing was normal it'll be another time hardly 'mysterious'.

looking at the context of that statement when you said-- "he was to "make him exciting", but the fact is that he is exciting enough to outdo the supposedly more mysterious Prince in terms of popularity and people's fascination with him, so I don't think we have anything to worry about the excitement and fascination MJ is able to generate and therefore there is no need to make him "sound exciting". I meant to say doesn't that imply you WOULD worry if Prince's popularity outdid MJ and if so, why?

I'm not being rude im interested in what people have to say because their idea of what is considered myserious can be applied to people in real and other artists and my question simply is if being mysterious can just as be applied to them as it can to MJ

Themidwestcowboy;4095483 said:
Why do you keep doing that? I gave you a perfectly comprehensible explanation to that in the previous page, (Which you have quoted) and i’m not gonna repeat myself. I’m also not going to answer the George Michael question.



In a nutshell, this is your standpoint and everyone that has been reading this thread gets it. That is how you measure mysteriousness. That’s cool. Some people may agree some people may disagree. Can we move on now?

Why? I thought the GM question would help me to understand your line of thinking on how someone can be mysterious? yes we can move on now.
 
Last edited:
Dilan;4095468 said:
I felt exactly the same on MJ's passing just a family member i agree! but I don't think its anything to with being mysterious... As you have just stated he had many admirable traits humanitarianism, intellect, humor, humbleness... people from all around the world grew up with his music or either had it passed down to them from their parents he recorded soundtracks to people lives. people who mourned would have seen him in real life or video interview footage and realised he is all of those things and connected with him. therefore sad when he died. like im not seeing the mystery here he did good things so when he died ineivitably everyone around the world who liked him mourned? Just think if you met somebody in real life who was everything or half of the things Michael Jackson was (so much so when they tragically died you were sad) now imagine if that person was a celebrity and a had 10+million strong following its the same thing but just on a huge scale. if anything your point about so many people being sad when he died IMO is a testimony to him being anything but mysterious but very transparent. It's like the thread the user MattyJam made on prince.org 'are you emotionally invested in prince as a human being' not feeling any warmth towards him as a human being because he has aloof and distant pretty much 'mysterious' in that sense.

Hey, Dilan...great points. And if you’re saying you understand all the why’s of MJ and his appeal, then you definitely have an edge on me. Because he wasn’t the only entertainer with the traits we’ve mentioned, he wasn’t the only entertainer who’s had a long career. But he was the only entertainer I know of that caused the kind of cosmic reaction we witnessed especially at his passing.

To me, the mere extent of his impact, that his appeal crossed so many barriers, musical tastes, demographics, etc. etc. in themselves are inexplicable and mysterious to me. So I envy you your complete understanding of MJ and his appeal. And I am NOT being sarcastic when I say that.

Actually, that mystic he has in MY eyes is perhaps why I can never get enough of him, which makes me want to go back to youtube right now to watch a few of my fav videos of him before heading out for the day. They always give me a great start. Cya later.
 
Re: Justin Bieber talks Michael in new interview

But you 'thanked' a post pointing out MJ is mysterious for giving a vague interview answer? and then you say media intrusion isnt a 'myserious' trait? im assuming you agree that is a 'mysterious' trait?

This is the post I thanked:

"Replying that he is a gentleman when asked whether he (Michael Jackson) is a virgin does not come across as a clear answer to me!"

Where does that post say that MJ was mysterious for giving that answer? The post I thanked simply pointed out that it's not true what you said about MJ that he always give clear answers in interviews. That's all I thanked it for. Neither the post or I said that this answer rendered MJ mysterious.

like what exactly makes someone mysterious in your eyes you're just telling me you're disagreeing with what im saying but not telling me what you think is myserious

I did say in several posts in this thread what I think made MJ mysterious:

http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/t...erview/page3?p=4095280&viewfull=1#post4095280

http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/t...erview/page2?p=4095134&viewfull=1#post4095134

http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/t...erview/page2?p=4094987&viewfull=1#post4094987

You want "examples" of mystery but to me is not a collection of "examples" but a general aura that a person has around him. I agree with those who said if you could deconstruct and put a finger on what exactly makes a person mysterious then it would not be so mysterious any more. You disagree. You think mystery comes from such things as how many interviews a person does or how many unreleased songs he has. That's fine. That's your opinion. Time to accept that others see it differently and move on perhaps.

in the 80's (his peak) he was gay the majority was not therefore an atypical trait - the basis of posts in this thread is being mysterious for being atypical so my question is, is he mysterious? simple.

There were a lot of gay artists in the 80s as well, whether closeted or not. It was far from an "atypical trait". Boy George (openly), Freddie Mercury (not expressly out about it, but everyone kind of knew), Madonna (bisexual), David Bowie (bisexual). The 80s were the decade of songs such as


So how was being gay "atypical" in the 80s? And what does it have to do with mystery? I don't get it. You keep misinterpreting what was said about "atypical traits" the same way as you do it with the word "shy".

Nothing is going in circles i've re-read this entire thread you also mention "As for happiness. Like you said, Michael actually had big reasons to not to be happy at certain points of his life. When you listen to Destiny you can feel that even back then he had a sadness because of being used and abused." one of prince's biggest songs when doves cry is about that exact same thing? also songs like 'papa' how his father used to beat him plenty of artists make personal songs about their bad childhood or if their up-bringing was normal it'll be another time hardly 'mysterious'.

Why do you keep twisting everything that other people say? What you quote here from me had nothing to do with mysteriousness. I said this in a totally different context about a different part of the Bieber interview, namely his claim that MJ was not happy. Everyone can see it for themselves in what context I said it: http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/t...ew-interview?p=4094873&viewfull=1#post4094873

Nothing to do with the mystery discussion AT ALL!


I meant to say doesn't that imply you WOULD worry if Prince's popularity outdid MJ and if so, why?

Oh, so that was just a mistake on your part. And I already answered this question earlier.

I'm not being rude im interested in what people have to say because their idea of what is considered myserious can be applied to people in real and other artists and my question simply is if being mysterious can just as be applied to them as it can to MJ

I don't know how interested you are when you only accept your POV about what can be considered mysterious or not. That does not seem like an open mind towards other people's views to me.

ETA: And let me ask you straight up: is this some kind of d**k measuring contest you want to make it between MJ and Prince or what? I don't get your constant need of comparing MJ to Prince. I write something about MJ writing a sad song about feeling used and abused and you: "but Prince had a similar song as well". So? The point is? I don't get it at all what you are trying to do with constantly bringing up Prince on every instance. I almost feel like in the 80s. That's when these MJ vs. Prince discussions were so "in".
 
Last edited:
Re: Justin Bieber talks Michael in new interview

I felt exactly the same on MJ's passing just a family member i agree! but I don't think its anything to with being mysterious... As you have just stated he had many admirable traits humanitarianism, intellect, humor, humbleness... people from all around the world grew up with his music or either had it passed down to them from their parents he recorded soundtracks to people lives. people who mourned would have seen him in real life or video interview footage and realised he is all of those things and connected with him. therefore sad when he died. like im not seeing the mystery here he did good things so when he died ineivitably everyone around the world who liked him mourned? Just think if you met somebody in real life who was everything or half of the things Michael Jackson was (so much so when they tragically died you were sad) now imagine if that person was a celebrity and a had 10+million strong following its the same thing but just on a huge scale. if anything your point about so many people being sad when he died IMO is a testimony to him being anything but mysterious but very transparent. It's like the thread the user MattyJam made on prince.org 'are you emotionally invested in prince as a human being' not feeling any warmth towards him as a human being because he has aloof and distant pretty much 'mysterious' in that sense.

You seem to think that being "mysterious" is somehow a negative thing and I'm not sure why. I believe that MJ's mystery is what kept people so fascinated with him and is one of the main reasons he is considered the King of Pop. Other artists are desperate to replicate that same mystery and eccentricity but it comes off as contrived, which is why they have to keep pulling attention-grabbing stunts to keep people interested. Michael himself was very aware of the importance of retaining a sense of mystery even when you're the biggest star in the world, as he explained in the Shmuley tapes:

The Master of Mystery

Shmuley Boteach: Alright, I want to speak about something with you which is crucial to this book. Of all the things I've seen about you, I have to tell you, I have never seen anyone who understands the power of mystery the way you do. (...) So there are two things I want to ask you. Talk to me about mystery and what it means to you and how did you get the discipline to hold back when you know that every TV show wants you? I mean, gosh, we're being pounded by every single show in America right now to get an interview with you. How do you, where does that discipline come from? Especially Michael, this is important to comment on, because people, your detractors willl criticize you and say, "Michael's a child, he behaves like a child" when really the only definition of maturity that everyone agrees on, is that maturity involves a capacity for delayed gratification. When other people act impetuously, and you can be patient and wait for things in their proper time, that's considered the essence of maturity and self-control.
Michael Jackson: Thank you.
SB: And your career is built on that and I'm not just saying that to flatter you. It's true, I'm amazed at it. So talk to me about mystery. How do you know this, where did it come to you, the power of that which is concealed?
MJ: Wow, you'r so observant. It's amazing how you notice details. Um, I studied... I love psychology, I love magic, I love... I love real beauty. I love real talent. I love when something's miraculous, when something's so beautiful you shouldn't get it. What I love about Halley's Comet, and I always say this to my lawyer, Halley's Comet is no more of a miracle than the moon or the sun. But we make a big deal about it because you see it once in a lifetime and everybody's out there to see it. You know astronomers and fans and people and it's this thing that circles around the solar system but you see it once in a lifetime. If it happened every night nobody would care, but to me the moon is just as miraculous. I always talk about deer and dogs and cats. A lot of people go, "There's a deer! There's a..." 'cause they're shy, they're always hidden. It's a big deal to see a deer, I mean, and I appreciate that, how people should appreciate real ability and I always say I don't care if you're the most talented person in the world, if you come on the television every day people will regurgitate you. You have to know how to play your audience. You have to know that and it's true, Shmuley. And it's not just a game. But it's real for me, it's real for me. It really is.
SB: How do you know that? For example, I had to be taught this. I write about this a lot in my books but I began to develop a lot of my ideas on it from insights from other writers, thinkers, philosophers, etcetera.
MJ: [If you remain mysterious, people will be] more interested, yeah.
SB: Look, if a woman is always taking off her top, no one's going to want to see her breasts.
MJ: That's right.
SB: But if she does it once in a while, that's what makes it so exciting. That's what makes it erotic.
MJ: That's right.
SB: But when it's, everyday...
MJ: That's right.
SB: Like you go to the African tribes and women walk topless, it's nothing.
MJ: Nothing, nothing. Leave something to the imagination. I believe in that and people are all...
SB: Did someone teach you that?
MJ: No. No, it just, looking at... learning from nature and learning you know, just watching and studying, being a serious observer. And umm, you can say to somebody, you can go, "There's six doors, you can open any of those doors. But the fifth door, don't open it. Don't open it, no matter what." Of course everyone is going, "What's behind door number five?" because it's the great mystery. And that's, everyone wants to expose door number five because you know... And I love that and it's not like a game but I want people to appreciate talent and ability. I only do an album every five years. Other artists do an album every year and my albums outlast and outsell all the other artists. And people wait for it. There's like, you know, a whole pulse going on about this album. [Michael was working on completing Invincible at the time]. It's like a fever, they're waiting, they're waiting. It's important to wait.
SB: So what is it about the hidden which makes it outlast the revealed? What is it about holding something back that people want it suddenly?
MJ: I just, I love, I do love the power of mystery, I really do. I think it's very powerful.
SB: Is it spritual? What is it?
MJ: It's spiritual, it's people conjure up all these ideas in their head about what's going on. I mean they used to say, you know, Howard Hughes is up there and he owns the hotel but he stays on that floor, he doesn't come down. He's in the dark, he's in the corner in the bed with long nails and hair down to here and he's hooked to an IV. So the brain would just go crazy conjuring up all kinds of crazy stories, and I love that. I love Howard Hughes 'cause he played this big thing. I mean, to me he's like one of my masters. But, I don't know, this is the first time I've ever said this Shmuley, I love Howard, he's a genius.
SB: Because what? Because he knew the power of mystery?
MJ: How to play people, yeah. He knew how to make the public interested. P.T. Barnum was pretty good at it himself.
SB: Is it just a matter of withdrawing? Is it that simple?
MJ: It's rhythm and timing. You have to know what you're doing. Like you never see me on award shows saying, "The nominees are...". And I get asked to do every show. Now they don't even ask. They know I don't do it. Or to host the show or to come out and say like, "Coming up next, Michael Jackson to present the record of the year.". You never see me coming out and doing the nominees. I don't do it. They know not to even ask me. It' not what I do.
SB:You will never do something which makes you be the means to another end. You're either the end or you're not. It's either about you or you're not going to be the road.
MJ: Yeah, and I'm not trying to say that I'm holy or God or...
SB: But you're not going to belittle yourself either.
(...)
SB: And that's what happened to Madonna. Madonna overexposed herself. She's still a celebrity but she's not what she was.
MJ: Yeah, I know.
SB: She didn't even overexpose herself, Michael, through TV and music. It wasn't that she gave too many interviews. Rather, she overexposed her body. She was a sex symbol. People wanted to know what her body looked like, and she did that stupid, sleazy, disgusting book, and all you had to do was buy the book. The mystery was permanently gone.
MJ: I know, I know. Exactly right.
SB: (...) So you instinctively knew timing, mystery? You just knew?
MJ: ?Yeah, it's true, Shmuley.
SB: It's not like a manager pulled you aside and said, "Michael. You can be a big star. Don't overdo it"?
MJ: No. No way.
SB: Did your brothers not understand it?
MJ: No, they don't understand it. They would jump on anything, any second. If anybody said, "I want to interview you tomorrow about Michael's new style of dress,"Sure." 'Cause they just want to be on TV, to be on TV. I think people appreciate you much more when you, you know conserve, just hold... you know
SB: Hold back?
MJ: Hold back and build yourself and give yourself a certain kind of class and make them reach out for you and just... (...) That, see, that's important to understand in show business. If you open with too much of a bang, where do you go from there? You crescendo too big, you have nowhere to go. You can't do that. That's why I always say, in amusement parks, the guy who creates the roller coaster, the dips, you're going up at first, way up and you go, "Oh my God, why did I do this?" Then it takes you straight down and it takes you up a little bit, then down, and he's the real showman, the guy who creates the dips. You know the peaks and the valleys, then he takes you straight real fast and up and upside down. He's a showman. That guy's a real showman because he understands syncopation and rhythm and structure and that's important. That's real important as an artist of show business and most of your artists today know nothing about it.
SB: They all overexpose themselves.
MJ: At all. At all.
 
Re: Justin Bieber talks Michael in new interview

SB: Did your brothers not understand it?
MJ: No, they don't understand it. They would jump on anything, any second. If anybody said, "I want to interview you tomorrow about Michael's new style of dress,"Sure." 'Cause they just want to be on TV, to be on TV.


Off topic I know - but wow - he is so right about this!!
 
Re: Justin Bieber talks Michael in new interview

This is the post I thanked:



Where does that post say that MJ was mysterious for giving that answer? The post I thanked simply pointed out that it's not true what you said about MJ that he always give clear answers in interviews. That's all I thanked it for. Neither the post or I said that this answer rendered MJ mysterious.



I did say in several posts in this thread what I think made MJ mysterious:

http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/t...erview/page3?p=4095280&viewfull=1#post4095280

http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/t...erview/page2?p=4095134&viewfull=1#post4095134

http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/t...erview/page2?p=4094987&viewfull=1#post4094987

You want "examples" of mystery but to me is not a collection of "examples" but a general aura that a person has around him. I agree with those who said if you could deconstruct and put a finger on what exactly makes a person mysterious then it would not be so mysterious any more. You disagree. You think mystery comes from such things as how many interviews a person does or how many unreleased songs he has. That's fine. That's your opinion. Time to accept that others see it differently and move on perhaps.



There were a lot of gay artists in the 80s as well, whether closeted or not. It was far from an "atypical trait". Boy George (openly), Freddie Mercury (not expressly out about it, but everyone kind of knew), Madonna (bisexual), David Bowie (bisexual). The 80s were the decade of songs such as


So how was being gay "atypical" in the 80s? And what does it have to do with mystery? I don't get it. You keep misinterpreting what was said about "atypical traits" the same way as you do it with the word "shy".



Why do you keep twisting everything that other people say? What you quote here from me had nothing to do with mysteriousness. I said this in a totally different context about a different part of the Bieber interview, namely his claim that MJ was not happy. Everyone can see it for themselves in what context I said it: http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/t...ew-interview?p=4094873&viewfull=1#post4094873

Nothing to do with the mystery discussion AT ALL!




Oh, so that was just a mistake on your part. And I already answered this question earlier.



I don't know how interested you are when you only accept your POV about what can be considered mysterious or not. That does not seem like an open mind towards other people's views to me.

ETA: And let me ask you straight up: is this some kind of d**k measuring contest you want to make it between MJ and Prince or what? I don't get your constant need of comparing MJ to Prince. I write something about MJ writing a sad song about feeling used and abused and you: "but Prince had a similar song as well". So? The point is? I don't get it at all what you are trying to do with constantly bringing up Prince on every instance. I almost feel like in the 80s. That's when these MJ vs. Prince discussions were so "in".


I accept that you don't have a collection of examples, OK. BUT.. the definition is 'difficult or impossible to understand, explain, or identify.' so what parts of mjs character are either of those? what are you struggling to understand or explain what bit?

It's still atypical because the definition is that it isn't still representative off the industry (you have listed 4 people out of how many singers?). homosexuality doesn't even represent half of mainstream 80's artists. This is like me saying Michael Jackson and Prince were shy so its not an atypical trait of the 80s? Shy means "nervous or timid in the company of other people." i understand clearly what it means.

So if that isn't what you mean't by mysterious here are the bases of the posts you linked me to and your points on how mj was mysterious

Why do you think the Oprah interview in 1993 was such a big deal? What I realized is that there are many versions of MJ that people have in their mind. And often people just project themselves onto him. That his image has so much variations in people's mind is a sure sign that he is a mysterious figure to most--- As I saic before could the interview popularity be because everyone adored his music? his dancing? his sincerity? his humanitarian work?

Many people find MJ difficult "to understand, explain, or identify", hence the many misunderstandings and many interpretations of his character and who he "really" was. ---when you say who he "really" was what is an example for you on the alternative options for who he was?

I think a lot of people consider him mysterious because he was not your average guy, he was very much different and a lot of people still cannot figure him out IMO. I don't think that was because he was "hiding" though. He naturally had qualities that made him different. That difference made people wonder about who he "really" is, whether it's a facade or real etc ---many people aren't your average guy, what qualities made him different? whats a facade or real?

Where did you answer the question earlier? I wrote --why would you be worried if Princes popularity outdid mj

I wouldn't call being initially sceptical on sincerity "only accepting my POV" it just seems something is being exaggerated here by the fact that everything is so vague and what has been described can be shown to be a quality of everyday people and other celebrities. its like when you said prince is somewhat myserious. like what is stopping from being just as?

the reason i took out and positioned prince and mjs willy together and measured it is because i thought the point you made about having personal songs was part of your stance for why he was myserious. it wasnt so i have actually got quotes and for what you linked me to with questions
 
Re: Justin Bieber talks Michael in new interview

You seem to think that being "mysterious" is somehow a negative thing and I'm not sure why. I believe that MJ's mystery is what kept people so fascinated with him and is one of the main reasons he is considered the King of Pop. Other artists are desperate to replicate that same mystery and eccentricity but it comes off as contrived, which is why they have to keep pulling attention-grabbing stunts to keep people interested. Michael himself was very aware of the importance of retaining a sense of mystery even when you're the biggest star in the world, as he explained in the Shmuley tapes:

so it the tapes on youtube not the whole interview i can buy a book and theres how much more? because ive never read this so thanks. whilst it clearly shows mj UNDERSTANDS what mysteriousness is and the importance of it is, is the a gap between albums and not announcing nominees at awards. george michael has long gapes between albums does that make him mysterious too? do people here think if MJ announced nominees and created albums annually he would lose his popularity? Prince releases albums annually, whilst not as popular as MJ it can't really be argued to indicate that is the reason he is less popular then MJ he cared. Their is plenty of evidence that shows he sabotaged his own success. Whilst also caring less about sales and more his creative instincts diminishing his popularity with the mainstream.

Off topic I know - but wow - he is so right about this!!

But couldn't that be less to do with failing to understand mystery and more to do with money? Its not like the brothers had hugely successful careers that were on par with michael so if they instead chose not to be on TV nobody would really care and no mystery would be created. did they have a huge following?
 
Re: Justin Bieber talks Michael in new interview

Dilan, it feels like you deliberately don't want to understand other people's POV or if that's not the case then I don't know what is the reason for the constant misinterpretations of the points other people are making in this thread. In any case, I don't care any more. To me it feels like the discussion is going around in circles: someone says something, you dismiss it acting like your definition of mysterious is the only correct one, or you take things out of context and misinterpret what other people say. I am not interested in that, sorry.
 
Re: Justin Bieber talks Michael in new interview

There were a lot of gay artists in the 80s as well, whether closeted or not. It was far from an "atypical trait". Boy George (openly), Freddie Mercury (not expressly out about it, but everyone kind of knew), Madonna (bisexual), David Bowie (bisexual).

Just to clarify, Freddie was bisexual, not gay. He had relationships with both men and women.
 
Re: Justin Bieber talks Michael in new interview

I agree all people are entitled to have their own opinions but it doesn't mean they know what they're taking about.

Having an abusive and dysfunctional upbringing most have given him reasons to be unhappy, the brutally unjust treatment he got from the media in a global scale most have given him reasons to feel that way too, we are humans after all and it's impossible to sustain a forever state of happiness. Despite having such difficult life, it didn't take him away the moments of happiness Michael could've felt. If Beiber is a fan, I assume he saw concerts broadcasted on TV or the TII rehearsals, didn't he see Michael smiling from ear to ear? His eyes sparkled, he loved to be the artist he was, it made him happy to make people happy. For him it was important to do all he did because he wanted to be loved, to be loved made him happy.

Michael wasn't hiding either, he had a very little privacy so he wanted to conceit a bit for himself and tried to it as much as he could.
 
I just posted this video in another thread but I have to share it here too because it's so relevant to what Bieber said

[video=youtube;eCV1t4PpKQ8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCV1t4PpKQ8[/video]

When they talk about loneliness (around 1:25) Michael says “I think some melancholy is good. For the position I’m in, as an entertainer, to know how to go there, and to feel that. That pain, from the past or whatever it is. And to put it into a performance, I think it’s important.
Be honest. To be honest, to be an honest performer. Give it all up, whatever is in there."
 
Re: Justin Bieber - nice words about Michael...

I really have no respect for Bieber as a person but I guess good on him for being a fan.
 
Back
Top