there are many documented cases of children who were abused and denied for years, even in adulthood, until finally brought to light. For many children who were abused, the abuse was carried out by someone close to their family, so they have to deal with feelings of love and hate for that person at the same time. love because it is someone who takes care of you and treats you well (most abusers are charming with children, give them games, get involved with them until they have total confidence and children come to love them very much), on the other hand they hate what they He does that abuser but they think that if he is doing it a person who loves them can not be so bad, they enter into a very difficult mental contradiction.
On the other hand, as abusers are people who are wanted by the abused they feel that they let themselves be abused and feel bad about it, and often do not want to harm that person they want for something that "they let themselves be done",
They are also afraid to tell their truth and to spoil the relationship of the abuser with the family (if this is very close) and if the abuser is too loved or respected they do not want to be the ones who destroy that because they feel responsible for part of the abuse .
They are all contradictory and internal feelings that many children abused as a result of abuse have and continue into adulthood if they are not treated, this explains why many abused have been unable to tell their abuse until decades later, even if they have denied it.
This issue is very delicate and difficult because not all abused children have hated and accused their abusers from the beginning, this usually happens when the abuser is a stranger or does not belong to the family, but if the abuse is on the part of a relative who has treated you well and is someone very close who is considered as a family everything is complicated because children come into contradiction because on the one hand the abuser treats them well and on the other abuses them and It is so confused for them and they feel guilty about tell the truth
if there are experts in the documentary they will explain it, in this way it is explained that wade has even defended it. On the other hand James never defended, he said in his lawsuit that he refused to defend him in the trial and did not want any contact with him because in 2005 he knew that Michael had used him as a child and did not want to know anything about him, James is much easier to explain everything. he simply denounced his cause as an adult, when he felt strong. but the subject of wade defending him in the trial will be explained by the psychologists for sure. for those who do not know anything about michael it is very easy to believe them both, even if wade denied everything in the trial, because the subject of the abuse is very complex and the victims react in different ways according
if the abuser is very loved by the people or not, if it has treated them well or not ... it is all very complex.
I only know that psychologists and experts can easily explain those things, so I do not know how a replica of questions and answers could be caught by wade, it all depends on what the documentary explains.
uke: :gross:
