filmandmusic
Proud Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2021
- Messages
- 5,365
- Points
- 113
It annoys me to no end that the vast majority of the fanbase does not recognize Michael’s Motown albums as part of his studio discography. What makes it even worse is the inclusion of a remix album as a studio album. Blood on the dancefloor was never a “new” album. It has no business being discussed and compared with Invincible or Thriller or Ben.
Sometimes I even wonder if Destiny would be included or not if it was released as a Michael Jackson solo album.
Also tracks of Destiny or Triumph barely get played on spotify while they are for over 75% Michael Jackson tracks due to them not only being sung by Michael but he most often also has writing credits on them and all the vocal arrangements are done by the man himself. Why is work credited as “ the jacksons” supposedly inferior to work credited as Michael Jackson.
If you’re not interested in the Jackson 5 I can understand that though I don’t agree with that but yes it is a kids boysband I get that it doesn’t get liked as much.
Sometimes I even wonder if Destiny would be included or not if it was released as a Michael Jackson solo album.
Also tracks of Destiny or Triumph barely get played on spotify while they are for over 75% Michael Jackson tracks due to them not only being sung by Michael but he most often also has writing credits on them and all the vocal arrangements are done by the man himself. Why is work credited as “ the jacksons” supposedly inferior to work credited as Michael Jackson.
If you’re not interested in the Jackson 5 I can understand that though I don’t agree with that but yes it is a kids boysband I get that it doesn’t get liked as much.