Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This seems deeply weird to me. wth?
They still won't admit they're fake lmao.But I should point out that the removal of these three songs has nothing to do with their authenticity.
Didn't you know? It's MJ's only album alongside Bad.I’m glad they pointed out that thriller is the best selling album of all time, I keep forgetting it.
Fans already do this. Hardcore fans are (let's face it) a small percentage of the people who consume MJ's music nowadays. So the estate acting like we're not doing enough or "should be concerned with other things" is just not it. The only reason the estate mentioned it was to be condescending and to try and reverse the conversation onto what fans are doing, rather than what they are. There was legitimately no reason to even bring it up in their response other than that.I also agree that fans should be lifting up things that enhance MJ’s legacy, whether or not they like it.
Not sure what your issue with Damien is, but why do you keep bringing up his name? Of all things, your first reaction to this news was that Damien should have done more to combat Leaving Neverland (what?), yet you say his priorities are off?I find the “it was distracting” argument utterly hilarious. Almost nobody outside the fan community know those songs exist, much less feel any sort of contempt for them; it’s just Damien Shields and his army of keyboard warriors lmfao.
You realize that both him and his "army of keyboard warriors" (totally lame and immature calling us that. It's 2022 and most people use keyboards to communicate. Find another lingo) are mainly responsible for the removal of the songs, right? In said "army" you can also find Vera. Even the MJ Online Team admits that in their respond to the situation; because the fans kept talking about the songs (even though I think it's a result of both this and the ongoing case).I find the “it was distracting” argument utterly hilarious. Almost nobody outside the fan community know those songs exist, much less feel any sort of contempt for them; it’s just Damien Shields and his army of keyboard warriors lmfao.
I mean, I didn’t expect an apology or an admission, especially since they’re still fighting a lawsuit. I also agree that fans should be lifting up things that enhance MJ’s legacy, whether or not they like it. I just hope this ends and we can move on.
They still won't admit they're fake lmao.
God forbid should someone fight for Michael’s artisitic legacy.I find the “it was distracting” argument utterly hilarious. Almost nobody outside the fan community know those songs exist, much less feel any sort of contempt for them; it’s just Damien Shields and his army of keyboard warriors lmfao.
I mean, I didn’t expect an apology or an admission, especially since they’re still fighting a lawsuit. I also agree that fans should be lifting up things that enhance MJ’s legacy, whether or not they like it. I just hope this ends and we can move on.
So that means those 3 tracks amassed around 22 million spins?
About 12 million were for monster, i think this got some extra attention because of 50cent. The other two tracks had about 4 million streams each which is about the basic number for non MJ singles. So my best guess is that he has a hardcore fanbase of around 4 to 5 million people.So that means those 3 tracks amassed around 22 million spins?
That would certainly fly in the face of the argument that no one outside the hardcore fanbase even knows about their existence. (Not that it matters, even if that had been the case, it's equally important that these songs are removed from his discography).
Thanks, makes sense that Monster would garner more spins.About 12 million were for monster, i think this got some extra attention because of 50cent. The other two tracks had about 4 million streams each which is about the basic number for non MJ singles. So my best guess is that he has a hardcore fanbase of around 4 to 5 million people.
So my best guess is that he has a hardcore fanbase of around 4 to 5 million people.
Not sure what your issue with Damien is, but why do you keep bringing up his name? Of all things, your first reaction to this news was that Damien should have done more to combat Leaving Neverland (what?), yet you say his priorities are off?
Idk I think that is major low balling! People can be hardcore fans without listening to that album at all, especially if all they associate with it is fake tracks. Like I'm a new hardcore fan and I have literally never streamed that album because I've exclusively heard terrible things about it. I'm sure a lot of people who became fans since the album's release havent felt terribly inclined to listen to it. You know?
Right now, MJ has 30 million monthly listeners, which certainly includes a lot of casual fans, but I would doubt they make up the VAST majority. On YouTube he has 25.5 million subscribers. Now YT subscribers don't necessarily mean a lot either, except that it does indicate anyone subscribed wants to be notified of releases as they happen, and given that he is gone we all know those releases won't happen often. So my point is that a strong chunk of those people don't want to passively find out about new Michael material. May not make then hardcore fans, but certainly more than casual fans!
None of this matters, of course, but I just can't accept his hardcore fan base is so small![]()