Latest on MJJC

"Michael", a biopic about Michael Jackson, is officially happening.

IF the movie is split into 2 parts then the (false) allegations still MUST be included in part 1, even if it's just the Chandler case. People won't care if they plan on saving the allegations for part 2. They'll just watch part 1 and if the allegations are not addressed people will just say ''tHerE iGnOrinG tHe aLLeGaTiOnS!!!111one111!!!''
 
Hot_Street said:
Assuming there are two parts, what would be a good place for a cliffhanger in part 1?

My suggestion would be this infamous recording by Evan Chandler:
Click to expand...
F//K that man was a nasty hijo de p//a!!!
I agree... This phone call should be played in real as the ending of part one.
I mean seriously... who in their right mind would listen to this, with subtitles so every word is well understood, and leave the cinema not thinking Michael was scammed???

I only hope the Estate would not chicken out of using the real audio in the movie.
 
Billie Jean 78 said:
F//K that man was a nasty hijo de p//a!!!
I agree... This phone call should be played in real as the ending of part one.
I mean seriously... who in their right mind would listen to this, with subtitles so every word is well understood, and leave the cinema not thinking Michael was scammed???

I only hope the Estate would not chicken out of using the real audio in the movie.
Click to expand...
If the rumors are true, they can’t even use a re-recorded clip from that f- - ker!
 
This is Evan Chandler in his own words. What's wrong with that? The contract simply stated that neither party was allowed to talk about it. But Evan is exposing himself with the recording, which is already available online. And if Jordan goes public, Mesereau will be waiting for him.
 
Blues_Away2023 said:
sorry it was @kelley who thinks he is a guilter lol

From what I’ve seen he seems really excited and positive about the project. Nothing but good vibes my man
Click to expand...
To be fair they think everyone here is an undercover guilter 🤣

Anyway been a while since I've spoken in here, this 2 part report sure is creating discourses outside the MJ fandom, I've been seeing everyone discuss it, which means that this biopic is still a thing that everyone knows about which is good.

Personally I'm fine with a 2 parter if done correctly, I feel like this report has made everyone so overdramatic, we get to see Jaafar twice on the big screen 🙏😭
 
MJJuniorSinceMW said:
If the rumors are true, they can’t even use a re-recorded clip from that f- - ker!
Click to expand...
You know what... I say **** it and do it anyways and let the poor bastard come forward and try to make us believe that his father was a good and honest man. I mean seriously, other than Jordan nobody could really do it, right? He would have to come out of the closet. Would he do it?

I say do it and proudly take the consequence!! This recording is a piece of some hot steaming XXX and it should be exposed to the world!!! This is the last time the Estate could do it and they should!!! That recording will never get another oportunity to be exposed to the mainstream crowds like that!!
 
t1mber said:
The modern journalism is dead if the only opportunity for the truth to be seen by general public is a blockbuster movie.
Click to expand...
Journalism is dead regardless!! But that is not the point anymore. This movie is a massive oportunity!! With all the enormous happenings nowadays journalism definitely does not consider it a priority to research Michael's setup and the erroneous public condemnation. This movie will be seen by many, many, many people. Parents and grandparents will bring the young generation into the movies. A front-on presentation of the scam for what it was, including the audio will be entering public collective perception whether you want it to or not. People will talk about it, it will gain a lot of attention. This is the opportunity, the Estate should by no means chicken out!!
 
Hot_Street said:
Assuming there are two parts, what would be a good place for a cliffhanger in part 1?

My suggestion would be this infamous recording by Evan Chandler:
Click to expand...
I've been very reluctant when people suggested using the allegations as the cliffhanger because of the risk that people might leave the movie theater thinking that Michael was guilty and then not bother to watch part 2, but if they end it with Evan's recording, which would make it clear that Michael was innocent, then that might actually work.
 
Where is the announcement!? We Are in the week of the First „Release“
 
Michaels Lover said:
Who said there would be an announcement?
Click to expand...
Maybe it's the CinemaCon thing? :unsure:

At CinemaCon Lionsgate said something like, 'We're working on it, we'll have updates soon' (it was mentioned in John Campea's livestream). Otoh, from the other John Campea video, when he said he'd been talking to two people close to the production, he said there would be an announcement, possibly in the next couple of months, to confirm whether the film will definitely be in two parts and when it will be released. CinemaCon was 3 weeks ago so I suppose it's no surprise some people are wondering about the announcement. That said, there was nothing to suggest we'd hear anything around the time of the original release date.

I'm not expecting anything anytime soon. :)
 
Last edited:
Billie Jean 78 said:
Journalism is dead regardless!! But that is not the point anymore. This movie is a massive oportunity!! With all the enormous happenings nowadays journalism definitely does not consider it a priority to research Michael's setup and the erroneous public condemnation. This movie will be seen by many, many, many people. Parents and grandparents will bring the young generation into the movies. A front-on presentation of the scam for what it was, including the audio will be entering public collective perception whether you want it to or not. People will talk about it, it will gain a lot of attention. This is the opportunity, the Estate should by no means chicken out!!
Click to expand...

If you are talking about 'public perception whether you 'like it or not', I personally don't believe a documentary, series or movie can alter what LN did: **** with your emotions. So tbh the only thing I can think of to counter the subconsious 'many kids alleged him' bs, is to strike back in the exact same, visual way:

Bring all the kids that together, those that just like the accusers, hung around MJ, who slept in his room, were even more close to MJ than the accusers, and let them explain, in detail, on tape, the exact innocent things they did with MJ. I believe that could make a difference for the public eye since just facts are unfortunately not enough, that's just not how the brain works...

Brett Barnes, Macaulay Culkin, Sean Lennon, Anton Schleiter, Omer Bhatti, Gotham Chopra, Corey Feldman, Jonathan Spence and whoever else: get them on tape together to defend Michael, in that way it makes the stories of the few person who sue MJ for money really seem absurd, just by watching
 
Billie Jean 78 said:
Are biopics usually called blockbusters?
😲🫣

On the other hand... how manageable is it to add new music at this stage when the scenes are already filmed?
Click to expand...
Big biopics are called blockbusters.
The song could be put just during the credits and it could be enough for a nomination.
 
Fuzball said:
www.mirror.co.uk

Michael Jackson estate plot major music comeback with one goal in mind

Producers are trying to unearth new music to be used as part of the Michael Jackson biopic which is currently in production - and have one focus in particular
www.mirror.co.uk www.mirror.co.uk
Click to expand...
Would it be too much to ask them to just finish the songs by staying true to what Michael had in mind for them, without "modernizing" them. I'm not too fond of strange duck sounds and whatever else they've added to them so far, I prefer the timeless sound of Michael's original version. If they could just polish them without changing them, that would be great!
 
I appreciate that they specified that they're songs from the Thriller, Bad, and Dangerous sessions since it'll make it easier to speculate and to pinpoint as to what songs they might be, but it's also a bit heartbreaking since it's indirect confirmation that after those albums there really isn't a lot of music left lol.

And also I'll bet my whole bank account that "Chicago 1945" is one of the songs they're at least looking into, it's a song that belongs to one of the eras mentioned and that the Estate also acquired the rights to recently. I'm still hoping that they'll surprise us and release at least 1 song that has never been heard of before or that we have no info on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top