michaeljackson.nl
Proud Member
Thursday is the Lionsgate earnings call. I expect more information about the movie and a potential part 2 there.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's because of organizations like ASPCA, Humane Society, PETA, Greenpeace, etc. They monitor movies/TV, circuses, SeaWorld, zoos, rodeos, farm animals, research animals, and so on. If you buy some shampoo, it might have something like "free from animal testing" on it.
I guess it is easier to use CGI too, although it's more expensive. Like those 2 recent "live action" Lion King movies, they couldn't train a group of real animals to do any of that stuff.
Both good points... it would make sense to use CG in such cases. I just wish it looked more natural. Maybe my eyes are too good, lol.A real amimals would too difficult to train remember they are animals not humans
CGI bubbles is the least of our worriesBoth good points... it would make sense to use CG in such cases. I just wish it looked more natural. Maybe my eyes are too good, lol.
They are determined to be miserable. I don't know what they want.It's always the same characters on here isn't it. Don't think I've seen a positive post from any of them.
I dont think you realize how disturbing it is for you to say this.I wanted something raw and gritty , I want to see Michael get the shit beat out of him by Joe. I want to see the trauma he had to endure.
We’re basically getting a watered down lifetime movie.
I’m not the biggest fan of Paris but now I understand why she wasn’t happy with this.
Yeah and why don't we add some Trial examinations to it? Let's make it like "Serbian Film". LolI wanted something raw and gritty , I want to see Michael get the shit beat out of him by Joe. I want to see the trauma he had to endure.
We’re basically getting a watered down lifetime movie.
I’m not the biggest fan of Paris but now I understand why she wasn’t happy with this.
I love when my words are misconstrued, feels great as someone with a communication disability and not traumatising in the slightestCinephiles be like “Fantastic Four 2005 has more cinematic depth than any picture of the last three years”
They literally filmed the 1993 raid at Neverland Ranch, and there are leaked photos from the set. There was also an article recently that came out about how stressful it was for Jaafar.Are people still believing this? How is it not obvious that the studio is simply saying "**** you, we don't want to talk about anything negative"? Basically they're putting their fingers in their ears and singing lalala, hoping everything they don't like will go away.
I think they mean they can't confirm the exact releasing date of part 2, rather than not confirming the shooting of part 2, as they've already filmed the whole storyThis is incorrect as a part 2 has not been confirmed in any way.
I hope soThursday is the Lionsgate earnings call. I expect more information about the movie and a potential part 2 there.
I’m just making a silly joke lampooning worse cinephiles than you. Please don’t take it personally.I love when my words are misconstrued, feels great as someone with a communication disability and not traumatising in the slightest![]()
it's 10000% better. God, I miss Michael!!! I wish he were around so much! He deserved that retirement.This is so cool!
Well, it shouldn't be too dramatic, but also not too vanilla imo...I hope they bring across how much Michael had to deal with. I think it's an important part of his life, formed his character and made him who he was. People need to understand that about him, that's why it is nonsense to only show "Michael at his best". He was that great because of his background, it made him a fighter throughout his whole life.Yeah and why don't we add some Trial examinations to it? Let's make it like "Serbian Film". Lol
It's a Biopic that needs people of all age to go and see it. If you want raw and gritty just go and watch an experimental European film.
While we watch Michael at his best.With Lights, Sparkles and lots of colours. We need a feel good movie. We don't need more trauma and pain.
Ok so you want a cookie cutter type movie where it’s all fluff and rainbows , got itYeah and why don't we add some Trial examinations to it? Let's make it like "Serbian Film". Lol
It's a Biopic that needs people of all age to go and see it. If you want raw and gritty just go and watch an experimental European film.
While we watch Michael at his best.With Lights, Sparkles and lots of colours. We need a feel good movie. We don't need more trauma and pain.
I don't think they have filmed much from late 90s and 2000s. If there was a sequel they would have to do more filming. I think the cut material of this first movie is mostly set in 1990-93.I think they mean they can't confirm the exact releasing date of part 2, rather than not confirming the shooting of part 2, as they've already filmed the whole story![]()
Tried to AI-enhance a chart from one of Colman Domingo's instagram stories:
![]()
![]()
Not confirmed but this is something. From the late last year:This is incorrect as a part 2 has not been confirmed in any way.
all good, appreciate your understandingI’m just making a silly joke lampooning worse cinephiles than you. Please don’t take it personally.
Yeah, I don't really see why he would give this answer if they weren't thinking about doing a second film.Not confirmed but this is something. From the late last year:
![]()
‘Michael’ Teaser Delivers 30M+ Views In First Six Hours; Lionsgate Motion Picture Chair Provides Update On Potential Sequel
In its first six hours after dropping today, the first teaser for Michael from Lionsgate racked up over 30 million views.deadline.com
"He continued, “While we’re not yet ready to confirm plans for a second film, I can tell you that the creative team is hard at work making sure that we’re in a position to deliver more Michael soon after we release the first film.”"
When is superbowl?tv spot #2 superbowl !!, i can't wait
SundayWhen is superbowl?
For all we know there's another 'character breakdown' chart right next to it that goes from 1994-2009. I believe Fuqua reiterated 'life to death' even after principal photography had wrapped.I don't think they have filmed much from late 90s and 2000s. If there was a sequel they would have to do more filming. I think the cut material of this first movie is mostly set in 1990-93.
Edit: This probably tells the intended timeline:
The original script ended in 1994. Nothing beyond that was shot. Very little of the unused footage can ever be used.For all we know there's another 'character breakdown' chart right next to it that goes from 1994-2009. I believe Fuqua reiterated 'life to death' even after principal photography had wrapped.
Also, someone in attendance at CinemaCon '24 thought they saw the baby dangling scene and the aftermath of the '99 Munich concert accident.
Even the extras are under strict NDAs and all recording devices were confiscated for each and every shoot. And it appears all of the "leaks" were intentional. My point is that it's been a highly secretive project; don't assume material doesn't exist just because we aren't privy to it. Lots of security and highly-guarded sound stages were employed during the production.
I mean, even when they transformed that public building into a vintage Toys 'R Us, nobody was able to catch a glimpse of anything or anyone during shooting.
Wouldn't we know if someone was cast as Lisa Marie? You couldn't really skip over his marriage. I feel like the casting would be annonced and be very hard to keep secret.For all we know there's another 'character breakdown' chart right next to it that goes from 1994-2009. I believe Fuqua reiterated 'life to death' even after principal photography had wrapped.
Also, someone in attendance at CinemaCon '24 thought they saw the baby dangling scene and the aftermath of the '99 Munich concert accident.
Even the extras are under strict NDAs and all recording devices were confiscated for each and every shoot. And it appears all of the "leaks" were intentional. My point is that it's been a highly secretive project; don't assume material doesn't exist just because we aren't privy to it. Lots of security and highly-guarded sound stages were employed during the production.
I mean, even when they transformed that public building into a vintage Toys 'R Us, nobody was able to catch a glimpse of anything or anyone during shooting.
Thats what i wanna know! Thet may get rileyWouldn't we know if someone was cast as Lisa Marie? You couldn't really skip over his marriage. I feel like the casting would be annonced and be very hard to keep secret.
Perhaps, but if we still don't know who has been cast as Janet or even if Janet has been cast at all...Wouldn't we know if someone was cast as Lisa Marie? You couldn't really skip over his marriage. I feel like the casting would be annonced and be very hard to keep secret.
I love when my words are misconstrued, feels great as someone with a communication disability and not traumatising in the slightest![]()
Yes. 100%[...] But...I always have the problem that I can't take it when someone else plays Michael. And that's nothing against Jaafar, I am sure he did an incredible job and really put his heart and soul into the movie. I just look at it and think "aaah, nah...no, that's not...naaah". Can't explain...can someone understand me? [...]
Same. For me it was the stupendously brilliant editing that did it. Mind you, I watched it just once and haven't revisited it but, still, that was an awesome job they did. As for the actual trailer ... I'd honestly rather watch that video that @michaeljackson.nl already posted ...And I was kinda more impressed by the teaser.