R1chard
Proud Member
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2020
- Messages
- 1,864
- Points
- 113
I did say that's where people are going wrong.A biopic about a musician with zero of his music makes zero sense.
A biopic does not need music.
It just doesn't.
Maybe there's people who don't like rap music, but they watch Straight Outta Compton because they want to understand the culture and the artists involved? They want to understand the people and their lifestyle, without being subjected to obnoxious rapping every 5 minutes.
Same thing with this movie.
Again: a biopic is not musical entertainment.
They're different.
I think that's just a fundamental misunderstanding lots of people on this board have.
Yes. And the best biopics are always unofficial, because they're free to tell the story honestly without always trying to portray the subject in a positive light.Those are the unofficial ones.
Again, the point of a biopic isn't to turn Michael into a hero.
That's why it needs to say "the estate didn't make this".The estate can not make a movie that touches this accusation and settlement,
So this is an actual example of where artistic freedom has been limited, and integrity has been taken away - ie the estate's involvement literally makes the film worse.It is their movie. And they are forbidden to do that per the settlement.
Exactly.Personally I dont care how much the movie makes in its first weekend. Doesn't matter if it makes $100 or $100 million, as long as it's a GOOD MOVIE
The quality of the movie is the only thing that counts. Not the critic score. Not the popularity. Not the size of Branca's bank account.
People are worshipping the wrong thing.
Hear hear.This movie has to be a good film that pleases critics/audeinces and not just die-hard fans like us. It needs to tell the truth, no matter how uncomfortable it may be for some of y'all.
Yep. It's hard to take the stage show seriously. The movie is absolutely impossible to take seriously because it glosses over some of the most interesting and unusual aspects of the subject matter.Tons of critics automatically dismissed the Broadway show just on the grounds that it barely addressed the allegations. It was like the actual show itself didnt matter, it was just labelled MJ propaganda from the start. These films CAN'T repeat that.
So here's the thing.To answer your question, yes I will be disappointed if it makes less.
I went to see Hail Mary on Sunday.
I liked it.
So now the question: am I a bad person if I go to watch it again? Will you hate me if I tell my friends to watch it? Will I be banned from this board because I contributed money to the Hail Mary box office profits and potentially prevented "Michael" from taking its rightful place as the biggest grossing movie of the year? Am I insulting MJ's legacy? Maybe I need to stop going to the cinema altogether, just in case another movie gets too popular?
Consider your answer carefully.