The Michael Jackson Chart Watch

From the Official UK Charts

Consumption of music by Michael Jackson started to grow strongly after the screening of the BBC’s new three-part TV documentary An American Tragedy last month, and increased spectacularly following the release of his new biopic Michael, which sits atop the box office chart despite largely negative reviews from critics. Songs by Jackson solo, in collaborations and with the Jacksons/Jackson 5 achieved consumption of 428,066 units in the latest frame.

The charge is being led by Billie Jean, which soars 13-4 (31,831 sales) this week, with Beat It (22-10, 25,404 sales) and Don’t Stop ‘Til You Get Enough (23-15, 23,491 sales) following in its wake.

That’s the maximum MJ tracks allowed in the Top 75 under primary artist rules, leaving a further 12 ‘starred-out’, of which the one making the biggest impression is Human Nature, a track off Thriller, which wasn’t a UK single at the time, and only appeared in the chart in 2009, when it reached No.62, immediately after Jackson’s death. It was very nearly his final track under primary artist rules this week, being ‘starred-out’ immediately behind Don’t Stop… with consumption of 22,279 units. The Jacksons/Jackson 5 are considered separately, and their debut hit, I Want You Back, which reached No.2 in 1970, has escaped ACR to return at No.33 (12,177 sales).


Amazing news that MJ would have had another 12 singles in the Top 75! 👏👏👏
 
134 % streaming plus for Michael Jackson in Germany since the release of MICHAEL

"Michael Jackson erzielt seit dem Start des Biopics "Michael" allein hierzulande ein Streaming-Wachstum von 134 Prozent. Von den aktuell sieben platzierten Alben des 2009 verstorbenen King of Pop kommen "Thriller" (vier) und "Bad" (neun) am besten an. Von den sieben platzierten Songs wiederum sind es der erstmals seit 43 Jahren wieder in der Top 10 vertretene "Billie Jean" (sechs) sowie "Beat It" (16) und "Dirty Diana" (43)."

https://www.offiziellecharts.de/new...spitze-michael-jackson-mit-134-streaming-plus
 
What is this "primary artist rules" I am reading about... Is this some kind of crapy rule that tries to block out catalogue artists who would dare to have to many albums or sings in the chart??
 
What is this "primary artist rules" I am reading about... Is this some kind of crapy rule that tries to block out catalogue artists who would dare to have to many albums or sings in the chart??

I think it’s the same rules for everyone - new album releases or old albums. 👍

I don’t mind three rules, when they are consistently applied to all. 👌
 
All this is a massive thumbs up for MJ’s genius and his humanity 🤗

Also, it’s a big “screw you!” to;

The predominantly white anti MJ media.

The lying turncoat scum trying to make money (years and years after his death)

The haters, the guilters, the shaders, the pretenders.

A big “screw you” from millions of MJ fans and millions of the ‘free-thinking’ general public! 👌💪

You all tried to destroy he greatest artist to ever live - and you failed, over and over again. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

MJ is back at the top. Go cry your salty tears and bow down to “The King of Pop, Rock, and Soul”!

🙇‍♂️🙇‍♂️🙇‍♂️🙇‍♂️🙇‍♂️🙇‍♂️💪💪💪💪💪
 
uk top-100 singles ( may 8-14):

Billie Jean ( 4)+9, Peak : 1, weeks : 39
beat it ( 10)+12, Peak : 3, weeks : 24
don't stop t'ill you get enough ( 15)+8,
Peak : 3, weeks : 21
i want you back ( re-entry)( 33), Peak : 33,
weeks : 9.
UK music chart rules only allows 3 songs per artist to chart on the singles chart. If that wasn’t the case, Michael would have had at least 10 songs in the top 100.
 
UK music chart rules only allows 3 songs per artist to chart on the singles chart. If that wasn’t the case, Michael would have had at least 10 songs in the top 100.
Is that the "primary artist rule"? What do they do with the other songs that get enough streams or sales? Are they just erased?
 
Is that the "primary artist rule"? What do they do with the other songs that get enough streams or sales? Are they just erased?
Yes, I believe so.

Yes, they get ignored. Is that fair? I don’t think so, but it is done to ensure that one artist doesn’t have most of their discography on the singles chart.
 
Is that the "primary artist rule"? What do they do with the other songs that get enough streams or sales? Are they just erased?

The sales are still recorded 👍

I think they are allowed in the other charts as well, such as; Physical Sales Charts, Download Charts, Stresmimg Charts, Catalogue charts, R&B Charts, etc.

They are just not allowed on the main Top 100 UK Singles Chart.

This rule is not applied to the main Albums Chart.
 
Spotify albums today :

THRILLER ( 18,794,868)
Bad ( 11,712,338)
off the wall ( 6,812,009)
History ( 4,276,162)
dangerous ( 4,261,736)
xscape deluxe version ( 3,182,943)
invincible ( 3,155,412).
 
uk top-100 albums ( may 9-14):

( streaming :)

the essential ( 1)+11, Peak ( 1), weeks ( 579)
THRILLER ( 4)+5, Peak ( 4), weeks ( 248)
Bad ( 6)+7, Peak ( 6), weeks ( 295)
off the wall ( 69)+56, Peak : ( 69), weeks ( 2)
dangerous ( 76)+72, Peak ( 16), weeks : ( 2)
the ultimate collection J5 ( NEW)( 99)
Peak ( 99), weeks ( 1)

( sales):

Michael ( 7), Peak ( 4), weeks ( 2)
THRILLER ( 10)+3, Peak ( 10), weeks ( 110)
number ones ( 11)+3, Peak ( 8), weeks ( 181)
off the wall ( 24)+7, Peak ( 24), weeks ( 14)
Bad ( 25)+5, Peak ( 25), weeks ( 22)
the essential ( 43)+18, Peak ( 43), weeks ( 66)

( downloads):

number ones ( 6)( =), Peak ( 1), weeks ( 592)
Michael ( 7), Peak ( 5), weeks ( 2)
THRILLER ( 9)( =), Peak ( 7), weeks ( 104)
the essential ( 20)( =), Peak ( 4), weeks ( 123)
Bad ( 22), Peak ( 5), weeks ( 43)
off the wall ( 27), Peak ( 6), weeks ( 22)
History ( 36), Peak ( 27), weeks ( 21)
the ultimate collection J5 ( 76), Peak ( 39)
weeks ( 10)
dangerous ( 93), Peak ( 10), weeks ( 9)

( physical):

Michael ( 8), Peak ( 4), weeks ( 2)
THRILLER ( 10)+8, Peak ( 3), weeks ( 318)
number ones ( 11)+9, Peak ( 1), weeks ( 551)
off the wall ( 24)+11, Peak ( 3), weeks ( 147)
Bad ( 26)+11, Peak ( 6), weeks ( 161)
the essential ( 62)+25, Peak ( 1), weeks ( 195)
dangerous ( 99)+65, Peak ( 42), weeks ( 42)

( SOUNDTRACK):

Michael ( 1), Peak ( 1), weeks ( 2).
 
Spotify songs top-200 ( may 7):

Billie Jean ( 3)( =)( 5,593,220)
beat it ( 6)( =)( 4,412,191)
don't stop t'ill you get enough ( 12)( 3,287,898)
human nature ( 18)( =)( 3,019,925)
smooth criminal ( 30)( =)( 2,578,943)
Bad ( 47)( =)( 2,194,427)
dirty diana ( 50)+1, ( 2,133,784)
they don't care about us ( 53)+1, ( 2,086,087)
THRILLER ( 63)( 1,939,977)
Chicago ( 65)+5, ( 1,935,189)
the way you make me feel ( 71)+2, ( 1,877,958)
rock with you ( 92)( 1,723,316)
i want you back ( 109)( 1,597,167)
remember the time ( 161)( 1,389,659)
pretty young thing ( 178)( 1,337,357).
 
youtube most viewed music videos in the past 24 hours ( top-500):

Billie Jean ( 9)( 2,286,613)
beat it ( 11)( 2,096,377)
smooth criminal ( 20)+5, ( 1572,135)
they don't care about us ( 21)( 1,568,668)
don't stop t'ill you get enough ( 33)+1
( 1,267,180)
thriller-4k ( 42)+7, ( 1,077,937)
thriller shortened version ( 63)+7, ( 900,968)
Bad shortened version ( 70)+12, ( 842,320)
remember the time ( 96)+26, ( 742,790)
rock with you ( 161)+8, ( 598,513)
the way you make me feel ( 196)+33
( 546,311)
earth song ( 199)+10, ( 545,402)
dirty diana ( 208)+25, ( 529,644)
Black or white shortened version ( 228)+6
( 502,458)
human nature ( 402)( 389,496).
 
𝐤𝐱
@kxthrills
·
13h
Spotify’s Weekly Top Albums Global (May 1-7)
#4 (+2) Thriller (Peak: #4) • 280 weeks
#7 (+12) Bad 25 (Peak:
#7) • 17 weeks
#8 (+12) Bad (Peak: #8) • 15 weeks
#37 (+26) Off the Wall (Peak: #37) • 2 weeks
#81 (+39) Dangerous (Peak: #81) • 2 weeks
#181 (NEW) Invincible • 1 week
#195 (NEW) Xscape • 1 week
 
Just a heads up guys (sorry Gaz, if you think it’s slightly off topic);

Having had my third treatment on Thursday, I’m starting to feel the effects creeping up on me, which is normal.

It’s possible I may go ‘quiet’ for around a week or so as I get very weak/fatigued as my body absorbs all of the immunotherapy and chemotherapy along with masses of medication, and my body fights hard to kill the cancer cells.

You may see the odd ‘like/love’ from me (probably at 3am when I can’t sleep 😁), but my brain fog will probably mean I’m not coherent enough to post my usual ramblings 😉

I just wanted to let you know before it kicks in hard, that I haven’t gone (sorry to some of you for that 🤣😉) but more so I wanted to ask you to keep posting your positive news, as it helps me enormously during the tough days 👍

Love to all you great guys and gals ❤️
 
Michael Jackson is the only act to have top 10 hits on the Billboard Hot 100 across six consecutive decades (1970s–2020s) and seven consecutive decades including his work with the Jackson 5 (1960s–2020s) when "I Want You Back" charted at No. 8 on the week of December 27, 1969, in the Billboard Hot 100.


👑👑👑👑🙇‍♂️🙇‍♂️🙇‍♂️🙇‍♂️
 
Yes, I believe so.

Yes, they get ignored. Is that fair? I don’t think so, but it is done to ensure that one artist doesn’t have most of their discography on the singles chart.
So this kind of socialist anomaly is the reason why I cannot take today's chart system seriously.
Am I happy Michael is doing so great on the charts? Yes, I am. Are the charts representative of his (or anyone's) popularity? Big no!! Two obvious reasons:
I. Imagine applying the same logic when Thriller was selling big time... would they have stopped counting the sales at... what? 10M? 20M??
II. Artist John Doe manages to have three hits and all three get into the charts. Michael has 15, but because of this anomaly only three get into the charts. Officially they are both similarly popular.

Charts mean little today. Sold cinema tickets will be more telling.
 
So this kind of socialist anomaly is the reason why I cannot take today's chart system seriously.
Am I happy Michael is doing so great on the charts? Yes, I am. Are the charts representative of his (or anyone's) popularity? Big no!! Two obvious reasons:
I. Imagine applying the same logic when Thriller was selling big time... would they have stopped counting the sales at... what? 10M? 20M??
II. Artist John Doe manages to have three hits and all three get into the charts. Michael has 15, but because of this anomaly only three get into the charts. Officially they are both similarly popular.

Charts mean little today. Sold cinema tickets will be more telling.

Don’t agree at all,

The sales ARE recorded.

The information of the excluded songs and their success is noted and available to all,

The excluded songs are only excluded from the main charts - they’re all over other ‘genre’/steaming charts, etc.

The ‘rules’ are the same for ALL.

Most importantly:

The Global modern metric charts - where MJ is #1 for over a week / count EVERY song - so it’s FULLY representative of who is successful.

As I said previously:
Not personally, fully understanding or ‘liking’ something does not negate its importance.
 
Don’t agree at all,

The sales ARE recorded.

The information of the excluded songs and their success is noted and available to all,

The excluded songs are only excluded from the main charts - they’re all over other ‘genre’/steaming charts, etc.

The ‘rules’ are the same for ALL.


Most importantly:

The Global modern metric charts - where MJ is #1 for over a week / count EVERY song - so it’s FULLY representative of who is successful.

As I said previously:
Not personally, fully understanding or ‘liking’ something does not negate its importance.
For obvious reasons I can only disagree:
I. Most people would only glance at the main charts, hence they carry more importance.

II. Having the same rule for anyone does not refer to anything I had written. The anomaly in the charting system of today is the same as if they had stopped counting the sales of Thriller at 20M which would possibly make Michael as successful as ... let's say Eminem.
 
For obvious reasons I can only disagree:
I. Most people would only glance at the main charts, hence they carry more importance.

II. Having the same rule for anyone does not refer to anything I had written. The anomaly in the charting system of today is the same as if they had stopped counting the sales of Thriller at 20M which would possibly make Michael as successful as ... let's say Eminem.

No it wouldn’t.

As I have said…ALL SALES are counted. They are never lost. It would have no impact on what any album sold over time. The numbers would still accumulate as normal.

You seem to be missing that. Which is odd, as it seems to be your main argument against modern metrics of success.

Also, MJ being #1 is all over the internet/social media…all over the world.

it might not be much on old terrestrial TV, but I’m moving with the times.
 
italy top-100 albums :

Michael ( 7), THRILLER ( 21), dangerous ( 73)
off the wall ( 85), bad ( 92)

( physical):

Michael ( 5), THRILLER ( 7), Bad ( 12), number ones ( 19)

top-100 singles :

Billie Jean ( 26), beat it ( 39), don't stop t'ill you get enough ( 93), smooth criminal ( 97)

spain top-100 albums :

number ones ( 41), ( vinyls): number ones ( 5)

( singles): Billie Jean ( re-entry)( 34),
Beat it ( re-entry)( 46).
 
( singles):

bolivia: Billie Jean ( 10), beat it ( 15)
chile : Billie Jean ( 21)
ecuador : Billie Jean ( 9), beat it ( 19)
peru : Billie Jean ( 5), beat it ( 19)
Luxembourg : Billie Jean ( 16)
slovakia : Billie Jean ( 24).
 
Back
Top