I think it's time for the Estate to shut him the f*ck off. How he dared to use the children, Michael's ONLY CHILDREN to promote himself and his crap music! :angry:
Thank you for saying that. This is the reason why I deleted my original comment because I said the same thing... as soon as I hear him say "Ask Prince, Paris and Blanket", I was spitting nails. I cursed him up and down- "How DARE YOU bring Michael's children into this. How f*****g dare you!" I just went off. I shouldn't have deleted it, but I know I was also reacting in the heat of the moment so I second-guessed myself and deleted it.
In the other thread I mentioned that the only reason this story is still going is because people keep talking about it. In order for the story to go away, then we all just need to ignore it. But when I saw this interview, and he brought Prince, Paris and Blanket into the equation, that changed everything for me. Screw "B" and his story, I don't care about that, I know he's full of sh*t. I care about Michael's children and their being so unfairly dragged into this whole mess. You don't pull sh*t like that to try and prove your point, to try and make yourself look good. If you want to f**k up your life, that's fine, but do not drag innocent children into your lies.
So help me god if I ever meet him face-to-face....
The fact that the video was removed say's everything.
Edit; I just saw this interview on another site, and it's really embarrassing. Like, his obvious deliberate attempt at trying to be like Michael 2.0, literally, is laughable. He probably is somewhat is aware of the dna test being fake and the legal repercussions that go into this. Because when the interviewer flat out asks him is he Michael's kid, he says "next question", then later on the interviewers like, "when did you find out you were Michael's son", and Brandon just stares out the window, silent. Then when asked, when he heard he was Michael's son, then he says 7 or 8. Never going as far as to say for sure he's his kid. And that's cause he isn't. But back to his hilarious effort at being Michael, the way he describes what he wants his music to be like, and he's using his hands to try to visualize how big he wants it to be, is just him duplicating Michael.
Then when he try's to emulate Michael's worrisome side, like Michael did during the Beat It interview while he was filming. I couldn't help but laugh as he said, "what about Brandon?"...It was all so corny.
I noticed this too and it bugged the hell out of me. He cannot answer with a direct yes or no response. Why? Because he knows it's a lie and if he answers with a definitive "yes", it will come back to bite him in the a**. You see, my theory is this: people who have nothing to hide, hide nothing. So if he knows for a fact and beyond a shadow of a doubt that Michael is his biological father, then why doesn't he tell us about that and how he found out? Don't hide behind stories of your childhood and all the "good things" he's doing with his music and how he's such a "deep and creative person", and how he's "such an artist". Just more proof he's trying to plug himself and his music. "Oh, I don't want to be remembered as Michael's son.. I am my own person and I want to be remembered for my music" (this is not a direct quote, but it's the gist of what I heard him saying). Baloney. If that was the case, you never would have brought up this whole DNA thing to start with and you would have allowed your music and, so-called, natural talents shine through. But he has no talent, so he had to make something up.
---------------------
I've spent some time thinking about this (I try not to), and I said to myself, "Okay. Let's play devil's advocate here for a second. Let's assume that Michael is his biological father. The term "father" can mean two things: you can "father" a child by providing sperm to fertilize an egg. The other definition is to raise a child- whether the child is yours biologically or not- and to be present every day in that child's life to successfully prepare them for independence. So even if he was biologically Michael's son, he could never call Michael "daddy" because Michael was not his daddy. He played no role in "B"s life (at least, as far as any of us knows). And
if Billie Jean is to be taken literally, Michael himself absolutely, flat-out denies the whole thing.
/soapbox.