4u_n_4me
Proud Member
I was wondering if anyone knew Michael's thoughts on same sex marriage?
I think it is something he would avoid mentioning or talking about. I don't think he would say anything if he saw a homosexual couple somewhere, and directly asked I think he would answer something that wouldn't hurt anybody. Deeply inside I think homosexuality is something he didn't really understand. he was in my opinion an old fashioned gentleman believing in old fashioned deeds, and I believe he thought marriage should be between a man and a woman. I do not believe he would ever express such a view as he wouldn't want to hurt anyone, but deep inside I think he found same sex relationships confusing. I don't think he condemned the relationships in any way, but I think he prefered to pretend they didn't exist
and you base this on what, exactly? your own views?
I think it is something he would avoid mentioning or talking about. I don't think he would say anything if he saw a homosexual couple somewhere, and directly asked I think he would answer something that wouldn't hurt anybody. Deeply inside I think homosexuality is something he didn't really understand. he was in my opinion an old fashioned gentleman believing in old fashioned deeds, and I believe he thought marriage should be between a man and a woman. I do not believe he would ever express such a view as he wouldn't want to hurt anyone, but deep inside I think he found same sex relationships confusing. I don't think he condemned the relationships in any way, but I think he prefered to pretend they didn't exist
I am very sorry Chrissychristina, I do feel that you often aswer to threads, without carefully reading them, and it annoys me. I feel if you had read my post decently, you would not be confused about this being my wiev and my assumptions as I do write "I think..." several times through the post.
I am aware that the reason for my irritation might be based on cultural differences or language skills, but please could you show somehow that you post out of interest in the debate, conversation or the subject as I do feel that you are posting, just to post, and I do feel a little hunted by you.
King of disco: Thank you for reading my post and sharing your consideration. You fully do understand what I tried to say. Thank you!
that said, i understand your post was an opinion.
I think it is something he would avoid mentioning or talking about. I don't think he would say anything if he saw a homosexual couple somewhere, and directly asked I think he would answer something that wouldn't hurt anybody. Deeply inside I think homosexuality is something he didn't really understand. he was in my opinion an old fashioned gentleman believing in old fashioned deeds, and I believe he thought marriage should be between a man and a woman. I do not believe he would ever express such a view as he wouldn't want to hurt anyone, but deep inside I think he found same sex relationships confusing. I don't think he condemned the relationships in any way, but I think he prefered to pretend they didn't exist
lucilla;3336505 said:I agree with you.
And this kind of proves your point when you say he was an old fashioned gentleman.
He said "there's a reason why I was created male" in Jet interview here is the link
http://floacist.wordpress.com/2007/10/20/jet-interview-august-16-1979/
But of course, he wouldn't judge anyone.