Slave To The Rhythm
Proud Member
Re: Did MJ have ANY faults?
Sorry I believe you missunderstood me... I meant I questioned his behaviour with children sometimes. Which I could see in videos. To me there's a difference between the scenes with macauly culkin (michael is very likeable here!!!) and scenes where is too much handholding to me for example.
And I meant regarding the cases and what I read about them I believe he was innocent. Although there are some things that I don't completely understand Even After Hours Of research.
And yes you could say that about anyone... although about me. But I Said it about hin because his interest in children was definitly unnormal. Maybe unnormal in a very good way, a way we all should be or maybe not. I believe he was just very naive and had a great heart. But I would never say that I Can be 100 % sure that he didn't although have Interest in children. Behause I simply can't know. And I wanted to say that that wouldn't make him a criminal when he didn't life this! (And again I don't believe he had that interest! I just said I can't be 100% sure even after research.
And I want to ask you if you can be 100% sure that he didn't??? and no I don't have a Problem at all and never wanted To be offensive. Just can't believe when some fan's say he was 100% mistakeless and I wanted to bring a extreme example that we can't say that about no one! ?
So is everything alright? Didn't want to offend anyone
By your logic I can say: we can never be sure if you do not have a sexual interest in children and I can continue to hint at you having a sexual interest in children, after all we can never be sure, right? If we are now judging people based on what you ASSUME to be in their heads rather than whether there is any evidence against them of anything like that.
You are also using straw-man arguments:
Unlike it seems to be the case with you, most of us actually did our research regarding the allegations against him, we do not base our belief that he was innocent on things like "he was nice and charming", nor do we base our belief that he was innocent in all allegations against him based on the fact he was acquitted of the Arvizo case. We believe he was innocent in other allegations as well because we researched those cases as well. So you are simply attacking straw-men here.
If you have a genuine doubt or problem you can go to the trials and tribulations section and ask of those who have more knowledge in these cases than you.
Sorry I believe you missunderstood me... I meant I questioned his behaviour with children sometimes. Which I could see in videos. To me there's a difference between the scenes with macauly culkin (michael is very likeable here!!!) and scenes where is too much handholding to me for example.
And I meant regarding the cases and what I read about them I believe he was innocent. Although there are some things that I don't completely understand Even After Hours Of research.
And yes you could say that about anyone... although about me. But I Said it about hin because his interest in children was definitly unnormal. Maybe unnormal in a very good way, a way we all should be or maybe not. I believe he was just very naive and had a great heart. But I would never say that I Can be 100 % sure that he didn't although have Interest in children. Behause I simply can't know. And I wanted to say that that wouldn't make him a criminal when he didn't life this! (And again I don't believe he had that interest! I just said I can't be 100% sure even after research.
And I want to ask you if you can be 100% sure that he didn't??? and no I don't have a Problem at all and never wanted To be offensive. Just can't believe when some fan's say he was 100% mistakeless and I wanted to bring a extreme example that we can't say that about no one! ?
So is everything alright? Didn't want to offend anyone