[Discussion] Sexual Abuse Claims Against MJ Estate - Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe

An article from People about Jimmy's claim showed up on my FB timeline, I read about 30 of the 400 comments and not one of them said they believed him, everyone said either B.S. or he's dead and leave him alone. I'm glad people are seeing thru this ridiculous shit, IMO his and Wade's claims would be more believable it they didn't take it to the extreme for maximum greed, if they just stuck to touching à la Jordan and Gavin maybe some would believe it, but they took it way off the deep end just to try and get more money, and it seems to be backfiring on them.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

^I was JUST going to post the same thing. I braced myself with the comments and was shocked when I read them. Made me feel a loooot better.

I think a lot of people, even those who may think he's guilty, are looking at this and are just shocked that they're doing this to a dead guy and his kids. Even those who think he may be guilty think that's low. Which is a good thing, I guess. B
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I didn't bother to read the article, and I was kinda scared to read the comments, but curiosity got the best of me and I clicked on them anyways, glad I did, I was expecting to see a bunch of nasty comments, but I didn't see any, what a relief.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Safechuck's Facebook profile picture is him with Michael Jackson, still using his "sexual abuser" as a claim to fame! No shame.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I saw a screen cap of that, but I doubted it was actually him, I've searched FB for him a few times over the years and never came up with anything, so I thought it was a poser? It's also under the name Jimmy, but I think he uses James now.
 
Gold Pants Girl;4034498 said:
An article from People about Jimmy's claim showed up on my FB timeline, I read about 30 of the 400 comments and not one of them said they believed him, everyone said either B.S. or he's dead and leave him alone. I'm glad people are seeing thru this ridiculous shit, IMO his and Wade's claims would be more believable it they didn't take it to the extreme for maximum greed, if they just stuck to touching à la Jordan and Gavin maybe some would believe it, but they took it way off the deep end just to try and get more money, and it seems to be backfiring on them.

I have noticed that too. The support in the comments section for MJ is overwhelming! I contributed my part and immediately started earning likes. People believing in MJ's innocence are not just the fans anymore! Haters are being hopelessly outnumbered. This is great!
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

But more than that, just as much as the money ( whether the actual sum claimed is inflated or not) is that he/ they seem to want to destroy Michael entirely...his cultural legacy, all the good memories people have of him, his 'meaning and significance in society'. This is exactly what has happened (for justifiable reasons) to Savile, whose family even arranged to have his headstone smashed. I wonder if W and J have been taking notes ....
(Savile was a monster who deserves to be demonised....very many people who worked with him 'knew' or had strong suspicions about his abuse, but he was 'untouchable' at the time....Quite the reverse for Michael who has been demonised and prosecuted for the sake of greed and ambition).
I get a Google Alert daily on any news stories on Michael (I created the alert back in 2009 when I was trying to find out any news and even now thousands of stories come over)
But there was one (from the UK) that said is "WJ the new Saville?" And most of the comments were super nasty.
I don't know anything about Saville and barely know about the "Top of the Pops" except that I assume it was the UK version of "American Bandstand" or "Soul Train." But he died and he was honored (4000 people lined the street for his funeral) and then a year later they had a documentary claiming he was a pedophile and suddenly all of these hundreds and hundreds of allegations started flooding in.
Of course, I immediately thought of Michael since Saville was also a beloved figure there and apparently did so much for charity and was even knighted for it-and it was really bugging me that these were allegations, not actual investigations or evidence and everyone was going crazy about it. Tearing down his headstone, stripping him of his awards, closing down his charities.
Now even more awful things are being said-like him "killing" people and having sex with dead bodies. One commenter said next "Saville will be blamed for WWII atrocities instead of Hitler."
I know you all in the UK know much, much more than me abut it, so it is not a rush to judgement or a witch hunt? It just seems impossible that somebody could do this kind of thing for 40 or more years without anyone investigating anything?
But again, I really don't know any detail-they haven't covered him at all in the US-so I just hear about him when he is linked to a Michael story.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I have noticed that too. The support in the comments section for MJ is overwhelming! I contributed my part and immediately started earning likes. People believing in MJ's innocence are not just the fans anymore! Haters are being hopelessly outnumbered. This is great!
I read those too-I was so grateful. Couldn't have been more pleased about that.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I get a Google Alert daily on any news stories on Michael (I created the alert back in 2009 when I was trying to find out any news and even now thousands of stories come over)
But there was one (from the UK) that said is "WJ the new Saville?" And most of the comments were super nasty.
I don't know anything about Saville and barely know about the "Top of the Pops" except that I assume it was the UK version of "American Bandstand" or "Soul Train." But he died and he was honored (4000 people lined the street for his funeral) and then a year later they had a documentary claiming he was a pedophile and suddenly all of these hundreds and hundreds of allegations started flooding in.
Of course, I immediately thought of Michael since Saville was also a beloved figure there and apparently did so much for charity and was even knighted for it-and it was really bugging me that these were allegations, not actual investigations or evidence and everyone was going crazy about it. Tearing down his headstone, stripping him of his awards, closing down his charities.
Now even more awful things are being said-like him "killing" people and having sex with dead bodies. One commenter said next "Saville will be blamed for WWII atrocities instead of Hitler."
I know you all in the UK know much, much more than me abut it, so it is not a rush to judgement or a witch hunt? It just seems impossible that somebody could do this kind of thing for 40 or more years without anyone investigating anything?
But again, I really don't know any detail-they haven't covered him at all in the US-so I just hear about him when he is linked to a Michael story.

The evidence is very compelling. Savile knew that he was untouchable because he raised millions for charity (mainly hospitals) and had social connections with the royal family (as well as being knighted). He was feted by politicians, befriended by Margaret Thatcher and given an official leadership role at a secure mental hospital, where he was given keys to the entire building and signed official letters 'Dr Savile'. (He had no medical training whatsoever...at most he was trained as a voluntary porter.) He even sexually assaulted a young member of his own family.

http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/10000043.Jimmy_Savile_abused_relative_at_family_parties/
NB the spelling of his name ends in 'vile'.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jimmy Savile scandal: Report reveals decades of abuse

Adults and children, including a boy of eight, were abused by Jimmy Savile, a report detailing allegations over 50 years has revealed.
Police and the NSPCC outlined offences by the late presenter at venues including 13 hospitals and a hospice.
Some 214 crimes were recorded across 28 police force areas, including 34 of rape or penetration, the report said.
The CPS apologised for missing the opportunity to prosecute Savile in 2009, while he was still alive.

The Metropolitan Police said the victims' accounts painted a "compelling picture of widespread sexual abuse by a predatory sex offender", and Cdr Peter Spindler, who is leading the investigation, said Savile had "groomed the nation".
The NSPCC said Savile had been one of the most prolific sex offenders in its 129-year history.

The former BBC presenter of Top Of The Pops and Jim'll Fix It, who also worked as a Radio 1 DJ and received a knighthood in 1990, died aged 84 in October 2011 - a year before the allegations were broadcast in an ITV documentary.

Revelations that Savile had sexually abused children prompted hundreds of victims to come forward, including those who said they were attacked on BBC premises and a number of other institutions.

NSPCC director of child protection advice and awareness Peter Watt said: "The sheer scale of Savile's abuse over six decades simply beggars belief.

"He is without doubt one of the most prolific sex offenders we have ever come across and every number represents a victim that will never get justice now he is dead."

The Giving Victims a Voice report set out the findings of Operation Yewtree, which launched three months ago to investigate the Savile abuse claims.
The 30-page document detailed a number of findings, including:

Savile offended at 13 hospitals, including Great Ormond Street, with one offence recorded at Wheatfields Hospice in 1977. A total of 14 offences were recorded in relation to schools
Savile's youngest victim was an eight-year-old boy, and the oldest was a 47-year-old woman
The earliest allegation is from 1955 in Manchester and the last is from 2009
Offences were carried out at the BBC between 1965 and 2006, including at the last Top of the Pops recording
Peak offending took place between 1966 and 1976

A total of 450 people have made sexual abuse allegations against Savile since October - of whom 73% were under 18, with most aged 13 to 16
There is "no clear evidence" he operated in paedophile ring, although "whether he was part of an informal network" is still being investigated

In response to the report, the BBC said it was "appalled" some of the offences were committed on its premises and restated a "sincere apology to the victims of these crimes".

The report also revealed 16 offences were committed at Leeds General Infirmary between 1965-95 and 22 at Stoke Mandeville Hospital between 1965-88.

One offence was committed at each of the following hospitals - Broadmoor high-security psychiatric hospital, St James Leeds Hospital, High Royds Psychiatric Hospital, Dewsbury Hospital, Wycombe General Hospital, Great Ormond Street Hospital in 1971, Ashworth Hospital, Exeter Hospital, Royal Portsmouth Hospital, St Catherine's Hospital in Birkenhead, and Saxondale Mental Health.


Department of Health investigation into its own conduct in appointing Savile to lead a "taskforce" overseeing management of high security psychiatric hospital Broadmoor in 1988
Director of Public Prosecutions review into decisions by the Crown Prosecution Service not to prosecute Savile in 2009

Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said he wanted to be able to assure NHS patients that it would be "much, much harder" for abuse on such a scale to happen again by establishing whether NHS procedures were to blame.

He told BBC Radio 4's World at One programme that the scale of the challenge for the NHS's investigation into Savile's abuse on its premises was "absolutely huge" because it would cover a period of about 40 years.

Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper called for "a proper overarching review led by child protection experts into why everyone failed to stop Savile and what should be done now".

"A myriad of small reviews and inquiries into how it could happen in different hospitals or the BBC are just not enough," she said.

The Crown Prosecution Service also published a review of a decision in 2009 not to charge Savile with sexual offences in relation to four complaints made to police in Surrey and Sussex.

It said further action might have been possible had "police and prosecutors taken a different approach", prompting director of public prosecutions Keir Starmer to apologise on behalf of the CPS and say the report represented a "watershed moment".


'Extremely distressing'
Great Ormond Street Hospital called the report "extremely distressing", adding the allegation relating to the hospital was "not reported at the time and therefore neither the police nor GOSH hold any records relating to the matter".

Wheatfields Hospice said it was "appalled and dismayed" to hear the allegation against it and its "thoughts are with the individual involved and their family at this difficult time".

BBC media correspondent Torin Douglas said the main target for victims making compensation claims would be the Savile estate. The BBC could also be targeted, he added.
 
Last edited:
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Safechuck's Facebook profile picture is him with Michael Jackson, still using his "sexual abuser" as a claim to fame! No shame.

I don't think Safechuck is on social media, so that's probably a fake account.

He's got a website though pertaining to his work: http://e8interactive.com/

Here is him: http://e8interactive.com/portfolio/about/

I get a Google Alert daily on any news stories on Michael (I created the alert back in 2009 when I was trying to find out any news and even now thousands of stories come over)
But there was one (from the UK) that said is "WJ the new Saville?" And most of the comments were super nasty.

That was a Daily Star article, one of the nastiest and filthiest rags in the UK. I guess their target audience fits into that mentality too, so I would not place much weight on those comments. Even on websites like TMZ (which is tabloid too, just not as low as the Daily Star) I have seen lots of people being sceptical about these allegations. I really don't think they have the kind of public support that they hoped for.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I think that Wade and James were hoping to get support from the general public. Like Wade posting pictures of him and and his kid(s) to get sympathy, but it hasn't gone in their favor

Wade and James have become a bunch of laughing stocks
 
Last edited:
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

It's funny though that Jimmy still uses his photo with his "abuser" as profile photo on Facebook:

 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

It's funny though that Jimmy still uses his photo with his "abuser" as profile photo on Facebook:


Like I said. It's probably a fake account.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

^Oh i didn't read the last pages.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I was just on Facebook and i saw a link of People magazine linking to it and i went....OH LORD....when does it ever stop? This is just beyond ridiculous and it's very sad too cause plenty of people will believe this. I know several people myself that i already KNOW that they will start to talk about this as soon as they see me....sigh. This just shows how utterly rotten and disgusting some people can be. What is this guy thinking? Surely if you have been abused by the guy, you won't be on the photo and smiling your damn ass off, this is just insane. I haven't been following the news much, but how serious do the media in general take this and how far can this Safechuck get?
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

- Delete
 
Gold Pants Girl;4034498 said:
An article from People about Jimmy's claim showed up on my FB timeline, I read about 30 of the 400 comments and not one of them said they believed him, everyone said either B.S. or he's dead and leave him alone. I'm glad people are seeing thru this ridiculous shit, IMO his and Wade's claims would be more believable it they didn't take it to the extreme for maximum greed, if they just stuck to touching à la Jordan and Gavin maybe some would believe it, but they took it way off the deep end just to try and get more money, and it seems to be backfiring on them.

Yeah i decided to check out the comments too, but it was a mix of ''Leave him alone already.'' and ''I just always knew he was a paedophile and not this innocent guy and what not...'' and it went back and forth. I guess this Safechuck asshole saw Wade Robson's claims and thought...''Hey who knows..maybe he'll get something out of this, i should give this a shot too.'' I hope these folks end up in hell. Nah i know they will.
 
I really don&#8217;t believe in conspiracies however I am starting to suspect that people like Diane are behind the scene. I have been thinking why are there stories so damned crazy? The stuff they say happened to them would be funny if it were fiction and not involve a man who can no longer defend himself and was not eye rolling and disgusting. Upchuck is saying he was shown child porn. That is a whole different ball game and the first time we have heard those two words being thrown around not an ounce of proof but when you are hoping for media hype you don&#8217;t need proof. And this is why I think these stories make no sense because they were done for media spin. Like 93 and 05 they were thinking the media would taint the public and the public are saying things like where were you in 05 and he is dead why bother with this now? And this is why I think Diane is involved these stories are for media spin and that is what Diane does she spins stories no matter if they are true or not, hence the lies she told in her Daily Beast story. I am thinking she and Brown and others are harassing people to come forward. JMO<o:p></o:p>
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I saw this article also. Seriously i dont know how far this people can go. And some of the comments there are ridiculous, like what did this Safechuck guy do to be believed this trash he is saying and Robson too ? Are they completely blind ? So ur friend is practising anal sex on you and you smile on the pictures and go with him into public etc, sorry Im not buying it, children know even at that age what is right and whats not...
Michael was helping children throughout his entire life, spent millions on charities, went to orphanages, hospitals and devoted his life to help children, so yeah lets make him the bad guy. If it was only possible to turn back time and show Michael what would his unconditional love & trust in people cause in the future...
There is a good danish movie about this topic called The Hunt, once you are accused of child molestation ur image is never gonna be the same, and also kids are not that innocent as they might seem.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I saw this article also. Seriously i dont know how far this people can go. And some of the comments there are ridiculous, like what did this Safechuck guy do to be believed this trash he is saying and Robson too ? Are they completely blind ? So ur friend is practising anal sex on you and you smile on the pictures and go with him into public etc, sorry Im not buying it, children know even at that age what is right and whats not...
Michael was helping children throughout his entire life, spent millions on charities, went to orphanages, hospitals and devoted his life to help children, so yeah lets make him the bad guy. If it was only possible to turn back time and show Michael what would his unconditional love & trust in people cause in the future...
There is a good danish movie about this topic called The Hunt, once you are accused of child molestation ur image is never gonna be the same, and also kids are not that innocent as they might seem.

The thing I noticed is, with all the children he (Michael) came in contact with over the course of his entire life, the only people to ever accuse him are males, and American males at that. No girls have ever accused him, and nobody from London, or Africa or Germany or Russia or Japan or anywhere else in the world- that I know of anyway- has ever made such claims against him. And whenever the media wants to go looking for somebody- "Was so-and-so abused by Michael Jackson?"- they tend to go after males. As if boys are the only ones he ever spent any time with!

I know I don't need to convince anybody here of his innocence, and that's not what I'm trying to do anyway. I've just had that on my mind for a while and wanted to share it.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

The thing I noticed is, with all the children he (Michael) came in contact with over the course of his entire life, the only people to ever accuse him are males, and American males at that. No girls have ever accused him, and nobody from London, or Africa or Germany or Russia or Japan or anywhere else in the world- that I know of anyway- has ever made such claims against him. And whenever the media wants to go looking for somebody- "Was so-and-so abused by Michael Jackson?"- they tend to go after males. As if boys are the only ones he ever spent any time with!

I know I don't need to convince anybody here of his innocence, and that's not what I'm trying to do anyway. I've just had that on my mind for a while and wanted to share it.


I suppose the "plan" was to portay him that way (as someone who was not interested in women). they called him weird years before 1993. Considering this world is full of sick minded people, it was just a matter of time till someone like Chandler would come up with his masterplan & destroy Michaels image forever. I mean it all looks so obvious and planned and these two are just jumping on the bandwagon, but they are not gonna enjoy the ride for too long. Also the funny thing is u dont see Culkin or Lennon coming up with this, kids who were already rich. Greed...
 
Justthefacts;4034573 said:
I really don&#8217;t believe in conspiracies however I am starting to suspect that people like Diane are behind the scene. I have been thinking why are there stories so damned crazy? The stuff they say happened to them would be funny if it were fiction and not involve a man who can no longer defend himself and was not eye rolling and disgusting. Upchuck is saying he was shown child porn. That is a whole different ball game and the first time we have heard those two words being thrown around not an ounce of proof but when you are hoping for media hype you don&#8217;t need proof. And this is why I think these stories make no sense because they were done for media spin. Like 93 and 05 they were thinking the media would taint the public and the public are saying things like where were you in 05 and he is dead why bother with this now? And this is why I think Diane is involved these stories are for media spin and that is what Diane does she spins stories no matter if they are true or not, hence the lies she told in her Daily Beast story. I am thinking she and Brown and others are harassing people to come forward. JMO<o:p></o:p>

Exactly. In 1993, no child porn was not found and all of MJ's home including Enico was raided. In the week of Aug 23,1993, all of MJ's tapes were taken and examine that week. I also believe Diane D is behind this but goodthinking folks is NOT buying it. When there is anything good talked about MJ, that is when this nonsense come up. Even Tom J on the radio yesterday said Well, MJ has a birthday coming up I guess someone needs to say something. See, many people are seeing this nonsense for what it is worth and hardly no one is talking about it and MJ music is still doing well and playing on the radio. Enuf said.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I know it will never happen, but now would be the perfect time for Jordan Chandler to come forward and tell the truth
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Yeah i decided to check out the comments too, but it was a mix of ''Leave him alone already.'' and ''I just always knew he was a paedophile and not this innocent guy and what not...'' and it went back and forth. I guess this Safechuck asshole saw Wade Robson's claims and thought...''Hey who knows..maybe he'll get something out of this, i should give this a shot too.'' I hope these folks end up in hell. Nah i know they will.
And how does those idoits who said they always knew MJ was a paedophile?I bet you none of those idoits knows the facts or they are idoits who like to start mess on the internet and talk trash about everyone famous. Do you know there are some idoits who post that they still think President Obama was not born in the UNited States. So take what those folks say with a grain of salt.For all you know, those posters are REAL pedphiles hiding behind a story.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I know it will never happen, but now would be the perfect time for Jordan Chandler to come forward and tell the truth
I agree. To me, he is a man now and he is responsible for this lie. yes, his father may have put him up to do it but it is HIS responsibility to correct it. I have seen people clear up lies on their death beds so it never impossible
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

lol I was listening to the radio and one of the people was talking about Safechuck's claims, specifically the wedding and he was like "And people say Michael Jackson was crazy".
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Oh and another thing, who married MJ and Safechuck? How can you play wedding without someone pretending to be the minister?
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I know it will never happen, but now would be the perfect time for Jordan Chandler to come forward and tell the truth

Yes, I know. It would be hillarious if now that Safechuck claims the "duck butter" thing too, Jordan would go up on the stand and reveal that was all his father's creation. But like you I'm not holding my breath. Jordan is a coward, unfortunately, so he will probably just find a way to pull himself out of it, like in 2005.

And this is why I think these stories make no sense because they were done for media spin.

I agree that a lot of it was constructed to generate media headlines and thus to put pressure on the Estate, because otherwise I don't know why they went there to claim such utterly crazy things. Like I said earlier it would have been smarter just to strictly stick to the same things as the previous accusers. That they did study those claims is clear from the fact they used some elements from them (eg. "duck butter" from the Chandler story, alcohol and porn from the Arvizos etc.), but then it's like it was not "good enough" for them. They wanted to make it more brutal, more salacious, even more crazy. But I think that will come back and haunt them because although now they may generate the tabloid headlines they crave for but in a Court those claims will cause big problems for them for many, many reasons.
 
did anyone read or posted the people article. look to the new information.

New Child Sex Abuse Claims Filed Against Michael Jackson

Five years after his sudden passing, Michael Jackson is being accused of sexual abuse by a man who claims he was molested as a child by the superstar.

In court papers filed Monday, James Safechuck, 36, alleges he was abused by the singer when he was 10 years old after appearing in a Pepsi commercial with him.

After multiple visits to Jackson's home (some of which were chaperoned by his parents) and several all-expense-paid cross-country trips, Safechuck joined the pop star on his "Bad" tour, which is when he alleges the first incident of sexual abuse occurred.

Though specifics of the abuse claims are redacted in the papers, Safechuck says it first happened at the Hotel de Crillon during the Paris portion of Jackson's tour.

The papers allege Jackson gave Safechuck jewelry as a "reward" for sexual favors and taught him code words so others wouldn't learn about their sexual activities.

The Jackson estate slammed the allegations Wednesday in a statement to E! News.

"Mr. Safechuck's request to file a late claim against the Jackson Estate so he can recover money from Michael's beneficiary will hopefully be rejected," says the statement. "This is a person that made his claim five years after Michael died, more than 20 years after the incidents supposedly happened and has given sworn testimony that Michael never did anything inappropriate to him."

Claiming he was the first to stay at Jackson's famed Neverland Ranch after it was built, Safechuck states in the papers that the pop star "installed chimes in the hallway to his bedroom" so he could be warned of people approaching and had a "secret closet" in his bedroom where he engaged in sexual activities with Safechuck.

During the four years that Safechuck claims the abuse took place, Jackson engaged in sexual acts with him "hundreds of times &#8211; on tour, at Plaintiff's home, at DECEDENT's apartment/condominium &#8230; at DECEDENT's &#8230; Condominium &#8230; and at Neverland," the papers say.

When Safechuck hit puberty at 12 years old, Jackson began "grooming him for separation [that] spanned several months" and focusing his attention on a younger boy named Brett, Safechuck claims. Eventually, Jackson stopped sexually abusing Safechuck but continued supporting him financially and put him in touch with industry people to guide his career, he adds.

In 1993, Safechuck allegedly testified at the Jordan Chandler childhood sexual abuse trial, where Jackson said those claims "were a complete extortion on the part of the Chandler family," the papers say.

Eventually, Safechuck claims, his relationship with Jackson "tapered off" when he turned 17, enrolled at Moorpark Community College and began having panic attacks.

When he was around 25 years old, Safechuck was contacted by Jackson, who asked him to testify on his behalf in another criminal sexual abuse case. Safechuck alleges Jackson "got angry and threatened him" after he refused to help.

After seeing Wade Robson, whom he had met in 1993, file a lawsuit against Jackson for claims of childhood sexual abuse, Safechuck &#8211; who by then had a wife and newborn daughter &#8211; began meeting with a psychiatrist to deal with his anxiety.

In 2005, Jackson was acquitted on all 10 counts in his child-molestation case. A hearing has been set for early September in this latest case.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

the information in people article isn't helping Wade / Safechuck IMO

such as

After multiple visits to Jackson's home (some of which were chaperoned by his parents) and several all-expense-paid cross-country trips, Safechuck joined the pop star on his "Bad" tour, which is when he alleges the first incident of sexual abuse occurred.

Wade is the only person that claims to be abused on day 2, everyone else it took a longer time.

When Safechuck hit puberty at 12 years old, Jackson began "grooming him for separation [that] spanned several months" and focusing his attention on a younger boy named Brett, Safechuck claims.

Both Wade and Safechuck claims MJ was interested in younger boys. chandler and Arvizo is too old for MJ if you believe Wade and Safechuck.


In 1993, Safechuck allegedly testified at the Jordan Chandler childhood sexual abuse trial, where Jackson said those claims "were a complete extortion on the part of the Chandler family," the papers say.

Eventually, Safechuck claims, his relationship with Jackson "tapered off" when he turned 17, enrolled at Moorpark Community College and began having panic attacks.

When he was around 25 years old, Safechuck was contacted by Jackson, who asked him to testify on his behalf in another criminal sexual abuse case. Safechuck alleges Jackson "got angry and threatened him" after he refused to help.

Not only Michael becomes probably the only abuser who asked his victims to testify for him but Safechuck pretty much admitted he realized this was wrong long before.
 
Back
Top