Hot_Street
Proud Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2022
- Messages
- 3,186
- Points
- 113
2026?
and I had hope for Dangerous 35 and Invincible 25
and I had hope for Dangerous 35 and Invincible 25
Well, it all depends on what the judge decides. From stuff I posted a while back I remember the MJE legal team asking for 2026 partly bc the case is complicated. They asked for the case to be designated as a complex case and that got turned down. But a lawsuit which is nearly 11 years old and where the details have changed more than once is bound to be complicated, I would have thought. So maybe that amount of prep time is really needed. Which is guesswork on my part. I know nothing about legal cases.2026?
Can't see Invincible getting anything whether there's a court case or not, tbh.and I had hope for Dangerous 35 and Invincible 25
At least we can put the blame on the two liars.Well, it all depends on what the judge decides. From stuff I posted a while back I remember the MJE legal team asking for 2026 partly bc the case is complicated. They asked for the case to be designated as a complex case and that got turned down. But a lawsuit which is nearly 11 years old and where the details have changed more than once is bound to be complicated, I would have thought. So maybe that amount of prep time is really needed. Which is guesswork on my part. I know nothing about legal cases.
Can't see Invincible getting anything whether there's a court case or not, tbh.
Hey, since you have such extensive knowledge of the case, may I make a humble request? In case you don't mind.Useful reminder. Let's not forget the massive dedication, committment and plain hard work by @andjustice4some and @MJJRepository. They never stop.
@andjustice4some
1 - "Just to clarify, because I've seen a few ask, I don't personally share the court documents online. I share screenshots of the information that is relevant. Most don't know that the majority of work done to research and understand the court hearings is done behind the scenes. We all work very hard to bring you the best and most current information available, but I refuse to give the haters a way to misinterpret the court docs intentionally."
2 - "Also, the court documents are not free. Both @MJJRepository and I have paid a lot of money to bring what we can forward to those who support Michael's innocence, but certainly not to those who have an agenda to twist
Er, I don't have extensive knowledge of this lawsuit. I have no legal training or qualifications. I post stuff that is interesting to me so I can read through it and try to get my head around it. I rely heavily on the helpful comments from @andjustice4some and @JuliaBerkowitz1.Hey, since you have such extensive knowledge of the case, may I make a humble request? In case you don't mind.
But atleast, you do know the resources and where to get them?Er, I don't have extensive knowledge of this lawsuit. I have no legal training or qualifications. I post stuff that is interesting to me so I can read through it and try to get my head around it. I rely heavily on the helpful comments from @andjustice4some and @JuliaBerkowitz1.
I post stuff in the way that I do so I can revisit it and also it's here as FYI in case anyone else is interested. @Annita posts lots of stuff as well. Other people have posted stuff in the past. The people doing that seems to change over time.
No thanks.But atleast, you do know the resources and where to get them?
So, why not create a Reddit account and join us at r/mjinnocent? It will be great help. Especially on a site where people love to call MJ a pedo.
Just sharing the word of my fellow mates over there.
Well.... fine. *sips coffee*No thanks.
In fairness you're asking a stranger on the internet to create a Reddit account and to compile tweets and information from other people to share on Reddit and you reply like thatWell.... fine. *sips coffee*
You are right, dammit! I will once I go back to being on Reddit again.In fairness you're asking a stranger on the internet to create a Reddit account and to compile tweets and information from other people to share on Reddit and you reply like that
Share it on Reddit yourself!![]()
I am commenting just to follow your question. I am curious too.So, not sure where to ask this, but maybe I can get some enlightenment.
Why can't the Estate supercede the original 1994 Settlement with Jordie Chandler with a new settlement where Jordie keeps his income and anonymity, but has to publicly admit that Michael never did untoward harm or inappropriate conduct. Is this at all possible and what would it take.