Very interesting video Tina. I would have preferred to hear Tohme utter these threads himself rather than someone saying he said that. I would like to know what Tohme said exactly. I did see another video of him where he was asked how he felt about being terminated from his job and he maintained that that was not the case ( but it was, we have seen the letter signed by Michael) and he would continue to represent Michael for as long as needed. I tell you, that guy gives me the creeps. He is a shady character and is not to be trusted IMO.
About the Will - ok, so Raymone Bain asks in 2007 if there is a will in place. One could argue that that could just as easily have been the 2002 will, because then the answer would still have been yes. A better question with a more precise answer would have been ( again, just my opinion) "Is there a will in place, Mr Jackson, that replaces the last will and if so in which year was this will signed". Her answer can be interpreted in different ways
1) yes, there is a NEW will in place, therefore the 2002 will is outdated
2) yes, the 2002 will is still valid
My point being: just because she asked the question in the year 2007, does not necessarily mean that this is the same year the (new)will was signed. Do you get my drift ?
It is interesting, and gives me chills down my spine that the gentleman in the beginning ( Mr Acculpo or something like that) readily admits to there being bad influences in Michael's inner circle.
I don't know what to think about the 'dependency on drugs' part. I want to keep in mind that during that time rumors were being spread that MJ was addicted to Demerol. The man I saw in This Is It just did not look like a drug addict to me, so I don't really know what to believe in that sense.
