AG5050 and magic, I agree that it's important to fact-check information we post and rectify errors. That said, from what I've seen, fans and supporters have mostly been posting factual information. Jermaine & Taj Jackson both conceded that Michael Jackson's fanbase is very well-versed in the sense that we do our research, we consult court documents, we know the details of each case, etc. A few mistakes on our part pale in comparison to the avalanche of half-truths and blatant lies printed in the media since even before the Chandler case.
Crazy cult? I don't think we need to worry about looking "crazy". You wanna see crazy? PM me and I'll link you to a Madonna fan forum where anybody that offers MJ the least support is called a
pedophile apologist, not only by the members but by the mods as well! The thread is entitled 'Michael Jackson - Paedophile (Continued)' and reeks of craziness.
I was very respectful to all members, stated facts and provided sources. I was immediately cussed out of the forum (F*** O** PEDO APOLOGIST) and then suspended for one day, restricted from posting for four days, and I received a permanent warning point when I was not impolite nor disruptive in any way. The member that cussed at me was not punished at all, and a mod proceeded to call me an
MJ pedophile apologist and wrote that all of us MJ supporters come across as
unhinged lunatics. PM me, and I'll give you the link so you see the conversation for yourself!
Now, that's crazy! That's scary! lol I was like... "What a freak!" And then: "The mod is a freak too?!" They were calling Michael all sorts of names, saying he is evil to the core, wishing he rots in Hell (Heaven forbid!), describing the alleged abuse as described by ROBson & SafeCHECK (Michael anally raping them, masturbating to them, having them on all fours, etc.)... No discernment, just blindly believing all those allegations and all the tabloid junk they've read.
And such comments may be found elsewhere online, all sorts of disgusting and depraved comments. Now, I did refer to the
Leaving Neverland stars as ROBson, SafeCHECK & Dan GREED, and I had a right to, just like they'd allow themselves to call MJ all sorts of insulting names. The same thing happened at another Madonna forum in year 2001. There was a thread entitled 'How Weird Is Michael Jackson'. They were all bashing him (and that was even before the Arvizo case). I politely joined the discussion and defended Michael only to be labelled a pedophile, a wack-job and to be told I needed to get shot in the head... Now, that's crazy! Especially since Madonna loves MJ and has always spoken nicely of him.
So no, I would not worry about us looking crazy. We have a right to be angry just like they feel their anger towards Michael and his defenders justified. If you want a text to look formal, you may refer to Michael Jackson as Jackson but referring to him as MJ or Michael will in no way make you look crazy!
Look... On some occasions, I'd defend MJ in a polite manner stating facts, and I'd be called a mega-fan or else when I was only a casual fan. Those types fail to do their research, their only research being
them tabloids, but somehow, they feel more grounded in reality than those who actually did do their research and fully know those cases. Doesn't make much sense, does it?
They repeat the same lies (Michael settled the criminal case, it screams guilty, Jordan correctly described his private parts, child porn was found in his home, etc.), but call us crazy, obsessed or whatever when we present them with facts, court documents, and truthful articles. I would not take ANYTHING those types say personally. They may say anything they want, I don't care, nor should you. They are the crazy and the obsessed ones, obsessed with making of MJ a paedophile even though each case against him was thoroughly debunked and he was never found guilty in a court of law! MJ called them
tabloid junkies for a reason.
Now, we're doing this work to salvage MJ's honour, help redeem his image and correct lies and half-truths that keep circulating, and that's commendable. Some of us may get angry, and that's totally commendable as well.
Follow
SmoothEmJay #JusticeForMJ on Twitter. On some occasions, he'll "lose his patience" and tell it like is, and he's damn right to do so. Here's an example:
https://twitter.com/roboemjay/status/1113574434433114115. He was damn right to put that tabloid in their place. People have shat all over MJ for decades, said the most vicious things about him, and if some fans choose to use the same language, then so be it.
I don't care about people thinking ill of us 'cause everything they say about us, we can say about them! No matter how polite and civilized we are, some haters will think ill of us anyway 'cause they've been brainwashed for 25 years to see MJ as a monstrous freak and child molester. One of those Madonna fans was like: "I pity them."—well, I pity them haters for they are pathetic!
If Madonna ever taught them one thing, it's to have the ability to think for themselves, and that's an ability they clearly lack. What's the point of joining a forum if all members must agree at 100% on everything? I'm not just referring to those fans but all them MJ haters online. And those celebrities that have recently bashed MJ are even more stupid in the sense they know better than anyone how the media (esp. the tabloid media) work, and they might be next! By giving false accusers so much credence, they are setting up their own downfall, and I applaud all those celebrities that stood up for Michael.
And I see no problem whatsoever with using the terms "mockumentary", "fraudumentary" or "those idiots" because that's the plain truth! It is NOT a documentary. A proper documentary is based on the truth, not lies and false allegations of child sex abuse, one of the most vicious crimes there is. People (incl. journalists) call MJ all sorts of names (incl. Sicko *****, etc.) so we should feel free to call them ROBson, SafeCHECK or whatever (depending on what's appropriate).
I feel no sympathy for them at all, and yes, we can be 100% sure Michael did NOT EVER commit child sex abuse just like all those tabloid junkies are 100% certain Michael did and keep fooling people into believing such calumny. Each single case against Michael was fully disproven, so we can be 100% sure he did not play w/ little boys' or teenagers'
pee-pees or poop-holes as one hater put it. There is no logical reason to believe otherwise. And in the United States, according to the 5th, 6th and 14th amendments, one is
innocent until proven guilty.
And since Michael passed away 10 years ago already, there will never ever be any evidence against him. The only evidence would be photos or videos, and photos and videos can be doctored (now more than ever before), and if such evidence existed, the FBI would have found it. Brace yourselves! Michael Jacobshagen said he has such videos in his possession, but he's lying, and if he has anything, it was faked!
