Bubs
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2012
- Messages
- 7,856
- Points
- 0
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date set Sept. 10, 2012
I don't know what is she going to produce as she didn't have much to beginning with? They have been uncovering evidence last two years.
This bit is Ivy's summary:
"The plaintiffs (Katherine and PPB) did not, at the time of filling of the complaint nor currently possess the full body of evidence of this misconduct. Rather, plaintiffs suspected (correctly) that this evidence would emerge in discovery and indeed it has."
Furthermore they state
"The most evidence of Defendants (AEG) wrongdoing is in Defendants (AEG) possession"
In other words Katherine's lawyer say that they still do not have the full evidence but they are uncovering evidence from the documents / answers sent to them from AEG. They also argue that AEG have the answers / documents / evidence in their possession.
---------------------------------------------------------------
It's going to be very interesting, especially May summary judgement.
They have to have proper evidence in order to take the case to trial.
He said/she said doesn't count as evidence.
20 days is a lot of time. This judge is really working with her, so let's see if she can produce this information within 20 days that she could not produce in 2 years.
I don't know what is she going to produce as she didn't have much to beginning with? They have been uncovering evidence last two years.
This bit is Ivy's summary:
"The plaintiffs (Katherine and PPB) did not, at the time of filling of the complaint nor currently possess the full body of evidence of this misconduct. Rather, plaintiffs suspected (correctly) that this evidence would emerge in discovery and indeed it has."
Furthermore they state
"The most evidence of Defendants (AEG) wrongdoing is in Defendants (AEG) possession"
In other words Katherine's lawyer say that they still do not have the full evidence but they are uncovering evidence from the documents / answers sent to them from AEG. They also argue that AEG have the answers / documents / evidence in their possession.
---------------------------------------------------------------
It's going to be very interesting, especially May summary judgement.
They have to have proper evidence in order to take the case to trial.
He said/she said doesn't count as evidence.
Last edited: