Piek
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2017
- Messages
- 384
- Points
- 93
Do I dare say that I like this release better ( because of 2 great tracks) than MJ`s last
album from 2001![]()
You are playing with fire...!

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do I dare say that I like this release better ( because of 2 great tracks) than MJ`s last
album from 2001![]()
Do I dare say that I like this release better ( because of 2 great tracks) than MJ`s last
album from 2001![]()
Arent you the same person who doesnt listen to music for lyrics and often have to translate to know what they mean or find words to substitute…not shocked.Do I dare say that I like this release better ( because of 2 great tracks) than MJ`s last
album from 2001![]()
This is probably one of the most ridiculous things ive ever read.I may be in the minority or the only one, but I really don't mind the Casio tracks, genuine or not. They've always mostly sounded like Michael to me, and I think those are really cool and good songs.
We can't be sure that all vocals are genuine, but maybe enough of Michael's voice is on those tracks. Jason Malachi appears to be a genuinely wholesome Christian guy, so it looks more bizarre that he would have agreed to such a scam unless he was told those would just be background vocals.
And that takes me to the Britney Jean album by Britney Spears. Britney fans (for quite a large part) abhor that album with a passion for the same reason many MJ fans abhor the original Michael release. Background singer Myah Marie was accused and is still being accused of dubbing much of Britney's lead vocals on the record (up to 50%), but I love the album nonetheless. There was definitely a bit of dubbing at least, but that was not Myah's fault but the producers' and engineers'!
Listen to the new Faking Michael podcast, Jason admits the songs are himI may be in the minority or the only one, but I really don't mind the Casio tracks, genuine or not. They've always mostly sounded like Michael to me, and I think those are really cool and good songs.
We can't be sure that all vocals are genuine, but maybe enough of Michael's voice is on those tracks. Jason Malachi appears to be a genuinely wholesome Christian guy, so it looks more bizarre that he would have agreed to such a scam unless he was told those would just be background vocals.
And that takes me to the Britney Jean album by Britney Spears. Britney fans (for quite a large part) abhor that album with a passion for the same reason many MJ fans abhor the original Michael release. Background singer Myah Marie was accused and is still being accused of dubbing much of Britney's lead vocals on the record (up to 50%), but I love the album nonetheless. There was definitely a bit of dubbing at least, but that was not Myah's fault but the producers' and engineers'!