Latest on MJJC

"Michael", a biopic about Michael Jackson, is officially happening.

jasmine.uddin said:
I really wouldn't waste my time speculating as I suspect she is just playing mind games with her father's fans by making the comments she did. Now when fans watch the biopic, they will be questioning the validity of it. We need to remember it is a biopic, a dramatic representation of a person's life with creative liberties, it's not designed to be totally accurate or real. Wasn't she acting at some point, you'd think she could differentiate a biopic to a documentary. She could've easily saved all this nonsense for after the biopic release, then she could have clearly communicated the parts she felt were misrepresented.

Even though the script is not from the estate it is an estate backed project. I still think she is using the fans to send out a clear message to the estate that she is not going to play ball. I'm sure the estate will want her to support the biopic when it comes out by making appearances, but she is sending out strong signals that she wants no part of it. In which case she should financially remove herself from profiting from the biopic if she wants to keep her credibility.
Click to expand...
Exactly
 
Can we all please just calm down and not be harsh on her?

I am sure she already has enough on her plate... she just distances herself because it will be a "showing everything in a positive light"- film, which is Hollywood, and she just speaks her mind that she's all about honesty. That's it...all these rumours here...

Yes, she could have said it differently, but I just think she's having a hard time atm...so please...

I think when whe have watched the Biopic we will all say "it was like a great show, but... a show and not a documentary".
 
As @Beano Wild predicted, the headlines are going wild today.

Well done PJ, well done for bringing negative attention to your own fathers biopic. Now the whole world can speculate on whether you are referring to the allegations. Let's not fool ourselves by playing games of semantics, her choice of words left everyone open to that interpretation and she chose not to put a disclaimer in there to eliminate that possibility. And she's been in the public eye too long to not to have predicted this outcome. She is also suggesting that a big portion of the fanbase are delusional, as if that doesn't feed into a certain narrative either.

If it was any other member of the Jackson clan doing this, I highly doubt fans would be so understanding. And if honesty was so important to her she shouldn't have chosen to be so cryptic. The criticism of her public comments are valid, if she didn't want to be held accountable for her words, she shouldn't have posted them.
 
Last edited:
SmoothGangsta said:
Fans have been trying to say she's been distancing herself from MJ for years. Fact is none of us are in her head. Like someone else said she would not even bother to be involved with biopic if she has the opinions that some people are trying to suggest. She even referenced fans saying stuff like this in one of those instagram videos lol.
Click to expand...
Agreed. Paris has had many struggles and I always feel sorry for her. I don't always agree with the little I actually bother to read about her, but at the end of the day she is his daughter and has not had an easy path. It's even beyond me why she even bothers with anything to do with MJ the musician anymore the way MJ fans flock her every post.

She hasn't gone about this the best of ways, but who the hell am I to judge his daughter. Anyone who directly messages and attacks her needs to take a serious look at themselves.
 
Paris sure is a little troublemaker :) She’s entitled to her opinion, but putting it out there feels a bit immature, since the media will always twist things. Maybe she just wants to stay relevant, but it ends up touching her dad’s legacy. I’m not sure what’s going on with her—issues with the estate, a broken engagement, and maybe some tension with her brother too. I don’t need a sugar-coated biopic, but I do wish she’d be a bit more tactful.
 
My guess is, she is just sick of everything being portrayed in a beautiful narrative.

She wasn't there when Michael became famous, when he was on top of his career, when everything (at least on the outside) was all success and magic.

She was there when he had a rough time, when a lot of things fell apart, when he had to fight a thousand fights every day... remember that...and kids always feel the things going on, even when they don't understand it all.

And surely she still carries that weight with her every day. It just affects you. I am not saying Michael wasn't a good father, I am sure he was great and gave his kids everything he could. But it's just a lot to take in for a child...just everything that happened.

So if she's emotional about things or doesn't the find right words sometimes, please keep that in mind. I feel like she just wants to be herself and achieve something without being seen as "she's Michael Jackson's daughter". That doesn't mean she doesn't love him. She's just sick of that Hollywood circus.

Not even following her on Insta or similar, that's just what my guts and a lot of research in psychology tell me.
 
someplace_else said:
My guess is, she is just sick of everything being portrayed in a beautiful narrative.

She wasn't there when Michael became famous, when he was on top of his career, when everything (at least on the outside) was all success and magic.

She was there when he had a rough time, when a lot of things fell apart, when he had to fight a thousand fights every day... remember that...and kids always feel the things going on, even when they don't understand it all.

And surely she still carries that weight with her every day. It just affects you. I am not saying Michael wasn't a good father, I am sure he was great and gave his kids everything he could. But it's just a lot to take in for a child...just everything that happened.

So if she's emotional about things or doesn't the find right words sometimes, please keep that in mind. I feel like she just wants to be herself and achieve something without being seen as "she's Michael Jackson's daughter". That doesn't mean she doesn't love him. She's just sick of that Hollywood circus.

Not even following her on Insta or similar, that's just what my guts and a lot of research in psychology tell me.
Click to expand...
I understand all of this but it's worth pointing out that, out of the 3 siblings, she was the only one who consciously chose to be in the spotlight. She's an actress, a musician, a model. She's the only one effectively in Hollywood.

So she knows the game, she knows how things work, she knows Colman is on a PR tour, she knows how chief editors move.

At the end of the day she knows she gave a full plate of peas to the very environment she works in.

And I'm not trashing her. She's a point about biopics being entertainment and not real. That's a no brainer though. It feels more like she's lashing out at another entity rather than generic Hollywood.
 
Last edited:
Compared to Prince I definitely prefer how Prince is handling himself of course as he comes across a lot more humble and respectful towards other people. Unfortunately Paris seems to have ended up in kind of a bitter spiral combat with her "critics" and king of firing back at fans that are demanding things from her, which is only turning things more toxic! Regardless how bad some of these fans have behaved towards her this is not the way to go about it.

I dont think this will affect the biopic and it was much better that this came out now if she had to get it out of her system than speaking about it when the movie premieres where it would have made much bigger headlines and especially with much more people paying attention to it as the movie at that point is going to be a very hot top. 8 months before the release I doubt most of the public cares and in a month it will be forgotten.

I agree with the critics here that the cryptic statement about fans living a fantasy should have been clarified or articulated in a different way! I can understand she is frustrated if they ignored her feedback and dont want her name to be mentioned saying she approves of the biopic or is highly supportive of it when she clearly is not.

But please can we cut the crap about Paris thinking MJ is a child molester, that is inexcusable to even suggest without hardcore evidence and we have seen ZERO evidence of it, anyone suggesting it is very disrespectful and inappropriate.
 
Last edited:
Lightbringer said:
From all indication she had distanced herself from the movie as when she read the 2nd or 3rd draft/script they had kept all things Paris pointed out as being untruthful in it from the 1st script. Meaning her feedback had been completely ignored. At that point she stopped trying to influence the project or have anything to do with it as she felt it was dishonest.

Fast forward maybe a year or so Colman Domingos comes out and claims Paris has been of great help to him playing Joe Jackson and Paris then comes out in response to that and says that is not true and also that she does not want to be associated with creating the movie as she has not contributed and also feel its not authentic portrayal of her father.
Click to expand...
The first draft was written in 2017. So it's not "fast forward one year later and Colman." This is something she had kept in for a long time.
 
I’m taking this with a grain of salt until we find out (if ever) exactly what notes she gave and what parts of the film she takes issue with.

For example, “this isn’t an accurate representation of how my father parented me and my siblings” is absolutely something she has authority to comment on. “This isn’t how the Pepsi commercial accident went,” on the other hand, is something she wasn’t present for and likely wasn’t made privy to in MJ’s lifetime given that she was a child when he passed. Therefore you’d have to expect them to not take that criticism seriously.

People need to lay off Paris, but I also don’t entirely care for the way she went about this. Attacking Coleman Domingo for an innocuous comment that he could genuinely believe to be true is unnecessarily vitriolic.

I guess we’ll see.
 
She could have simply said she had no in put,and just left it at that she came across as quite rude in my opinion she could always drop the name jackson if she needed she does have a mother
 
Everyone has to have an opinion about the lone woman who stays in her truth. This is historically always the case, hilarious and very sad.

It's not the job of fans to tell someone to control the narrative. The bigger narrative vastly transcends the biopic and I prefer to stay in that.

Sure people will speculate, but using logic she implies that many fans actually know the truths about what she's referring to. Could be anything though.
And I'm certain she's legally prevented from saying anything specific about scripts anyway.
 
I think the thing that some are underappreciating is this is Michael's daughter; think it's safe to say that if Michael were here, he would support whatever his children had to say about him or products that are out of his hands. Agree that the communication could have been handled a little more tactfully, but some users here scolding her like she's supposed to be some sort of ambassador for the Estate and Hollywood's products. She cares about her Dad and the way he's portrayed (rightfully so).

Maybe it's being a Dad myself, but, hypothetically, if my child was unhappy with the way I was portrayed in some posthumous product, I wouldn't be concerned about the performance of the thing; I would be cheering her on.

She's been through the "Michael" album debacle (where they ignored her then too, over her cries of the fake vocals); just because she doesn't "play nice" with the system, doesn't mean she doesn't care; she just has her priorities on her Dad over the box office numbers.
 
apple🍎 said:
I understand all of this but it's worth pointing out that, out of the 3 siblings, she was the only one who consciously chose to be in the spotlight. She's an actress, a musician, a model. She's the only one effectively in Hollywood.

So she knows the game, she knows how things work, she knows Colman is on a PR tour, she knows how chief editors move.

At the end of the day she knows she gave a full plate of peas to the very environment she works in.

And I'm not trashing her. She's a point about biopics being entertainment and not real. That's a no brainer though. It feels more like she's lashing out at another entity rather than generic Hollywood.
Click to expand...
Choosing to be in the spotlight just underlined what I wrote: she wants to be seen as an individual, achieve something she can be proud of, not "just" being MJ's daughter.

And yes, she knows PR but it's just possible she had to get that off her chest without any goal or intention. Of course it's also possible she wants to achieve something with this statement, who knows. I don't know what's going on behind the curtains...all I am saying is: we always want people not to be harsh on Michael because you always have to look at the whole story and why people act the way they do...context, background information,...so let's also keep that in mind when it comes to his kids, please - or when it comes to anyone, basically.
 
Paris really polarises my opinion! I genuinely don’t know where she stands when it comes to Michael.

I do feel however that being as astute as she is, she must have known that the provocative language that she used would stir up controversy. She’s purposely used language and tone that feeds into the MSM’s perspective of Michael and this Biopic!

I also feel that her response to Dominic’s misquote is wildly disproportionate and instead she’s used that it as a springboard to vent.

Given the click bait this is now generating, it will be interesting to see if she clarifies the media interpretation of her quote with the same vigour as Dominic’s. If she doesn’t, it tells me exactly where she stands with Michael.
 
Think she has a lot of integrity and I just hope that biopic maintains his legacy, I think she cares a great deal about the truth. She is obviously seeing some discrepancies in this Hollywood project and gets frustrated when she can't do a thing about it.
 
The media response to Paris's statement could just be a taste of what awaits us when the biopic hits theaters. I think Paris has a lot of Michael in her. She's also a fighter for the truth. And that's exactly what you expect from a biopic: truth and authenticity.
 
Hot_Street said:
The media response to Paris's statement could just be a taste of what awaits us when the biopic hits theaters. I think Paris has a lot of Michael in her. She's also a fighter for the truth. And that's exactly what you expect from a biopic: truth and authenticity.
Click to expand...

I think she should have been more explicit with what she meant by some of her criticisms. Inferring that it’s inaccurate, sugarcoated and satisfies the disillusioned fans take on a specific element of his life (quite clear what she’s giving nod to here), creates a huge question mark over her belief on the subject.

In layman’s term/ for the the general public, she’s basically saying… the allegations are being covered, none if which they’re saying about it is truthful, believe the opposite.
 
Samsonite said:
Out of respect for her brother who is heavily involved in the film she should have just been diplomatic about this. I have stopped expecting anything from her tbh. If she doesn’t want anything to do with her father’s legacy that’s her problem. That’s why I like Prince a lot. He is holding the fort as best as he can as his 2 younger siblings aren’t interested 🤣 Just let her be guys and hope it doesn’t ruin our anticipation for the film :)
Click to expand...
Please leave BIgi out of it.

He's does for MJs legacy behind the scenes. Prince said he was the one who planned and designed the thriller nights events for the HealLA charity prince runs.

BIgi just doesn't like attention or being in the spotlight and theres nothing wrong with that.
 
Harun said:
I don´t know whats wrong with Paris, since Leaving Neverland.
Click to expand...
Paris read the first drafts of the script and still denounced Leaving Neverland.

So sorry to burst your bubble because I know you're hoping and praying she jumps on the Guilter train. but that has nothing to do with this.

She already denounced Wade and James and that mockumentary after it came out

Keep dreaming hun
 
Harun said:
Tell me, are you all blind? Paris is obviously showing that she's not very interested in Michael anymore, tattoo removals, cryptic stuff regarding leaving neverland and the weird behavior with Omer Batti... it's only 1% knowledge of human nature that she's been totally flustered since leaving neverland you live in your imaginative everything is always good fan life and now she is unfollowed Prince and co say to me is this behavoir normal!?
Click to expand...
Can we all agree that people who post blatant lies and propaganda should be banned?

It's already been debunked that Paris removed her MJ tattoos. She still has a huge as tattoo of MJs eyes on her arms.

And everything she said about LN was her denouncing it and calling Wade and James out as liars.

There's been no weird behavior with omer either.

This person is purposely spreading lies and misinformation.

Can everyone please report them? Or are you all just going to attack me again for trying protect this space from guilters taking over?
 
Lightbringer said:
Why would people even assume its about the allegations? If Paris as Harun is alleging thinks MJ was a child molester, why would she be trying to be involved in the film at all? It just does not make any sense. There is simply no evidence that Paris is questioning MJs innocence at all.
Click to expand...
Harun is a Guilter.

I've called them out several times but they are still here so I guess no one cares.
 
Billie Jean 78 said:
Remind me please, what was it about Omer Batti?
And is it a fact she has had her tattoos of Michael removed?
Had she put the whole Jackson family on ignore?

It would be heartbreaking to find out Leaving Neverland corrupted her opinion about her own father.
Click to expand...
No she did not remove her MJ tattoos. Harun is a liar.

And she spoke out against LN. Harun is just projecting his own desires onto Paris and Omer.
 
I personally think that Paris is talking about the possible sugarcoating of the Jackson family itself and how the family itself exploited Michael Jackson when he was only a child for the the financial gain of the Jackson family.
 
mjfanboy27 said:
I think Paris is just as dissatisfied with the estate as the fans, so she doesn't want to support anything anymore
Click to expand...
That's absolutely fine sometimes it's just better to say nothing at all and just get on with life , she hasn't looked paticularly happy at some events with her brothers none of us know her thoughts or feelings , families don't have to agree on everything,but hope they don't drift apart but she's going to have to be prepared for the media to be on her
 
I doubt whether a film that's supposed to be family-friendly in order to be as profitable as possible is compatible with Michael's real life. Physical and emotional abuse in his youth by J., accusations and blackmail by supposed friends since the 1990s, suffering from accidents and illnesses, and, last but not least, a possible murder - all of this doesn't fit with a family film.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top