Latest on MJJC

"Michael", a biopic about Michael Jackson, is officially happening.

Watching the small clips of Beat It from the film, I wonder if that's a rehearsal than the short film.

Like they show Mike rehearsing for the short film and talking to the dancers. That would explain why he's doing different moves, why it looks very bright and why he's wearing the piano shirt?

Just a theory I guess. The Beat It stuff really has me puzzled
 
The only thing that really cuts me to my bones is why was they not celebrating this man when he was alive! Why is everybody only just realising that this beautiful human being was so different and only really trusted children because he thought they would never let him down, unfortunatly they did!
I hope this film really does just show this side of Michael only his closest ever saw.
 
Zizzistar said:
Lionsgate/Universal/MJ estate are the ones who should be concerned with the revenue and impact of this movie, since they are the ones who decided to invest 150+ millions on this. it's not money that is going in your pocket either way
Click to expand...
Exactly.

I don't care if the movie makes money or not. I'm not a shareholder in Lionsgate. Why would it bother me? Such a strange position people have on this.

Do you guys cheer when Toyota announce how many cars they sold? Do you spend weeks speculating whether Adidas will break a sales record for shoes?

innuendo141 said:
It's a thread about the film to discuss, and box office is something that's very important
Click to expand...
But it's not. Worshipping sales figures is just juvenile. It's not even as if it's measuring the right thing - the success of a movie is surely based on how many people saw it, not how many dollars it took? That's a worthless comparison - inflation ensures that something costing $10 in 2018 will cost at least $13 today. Movie studios just like to use $ because then they can always claim "most successful movie ever" even when it's not true.

If you're not an actor, not a director, not a producer, not in casting or set design or cinematography or sound editing or visual effects, then how much a movie makes has absolutely nothing to do with you.

The only thing worth discussing is what's actually in the movie, and whether it's any good.

MJJuniorSinceMW said:
But that applies to everybody.
Nobody will be as big after he passed.
Click to expand...
Actually, a lot of painters make more money when they're dead.

innuendo141 said:
everyone surrounded by the film seemed so enthusiastic during filming and after shooting had completed.
Click to expand...
Because showbusiness.

Like seriously, what did you expect people to say about the movie they'd just spent months working on?!
 
xscape guy 2003 said:
The only thing that really cuts me to my bones is why was they not celebrating this man when he was alive! Why is everybody only just realising that this beautiful human being was so different and only really trusted children because he thought they would never let him down, unfortunatly they did!
I hope this film really does just show this side of Michael only his closest ever saw.
Click to expand...
AMEN! I so wish we had all of this when he was here.
 
R1chard said:
Do you guys cheer when Toyota announce how many cars they sold? Do you spend weeks speculating whether Adidas will break a sales record for shoes?
Click to expand...
Richard, you do absolutely nothing on this forum but join every single thread and post the most contrary insufferable whingey "I don't like this, I don't understand why people like that" nonsense constantly showing you have a serious inability to understand that other people may have a different opinion to you. If you fail to understand why the box office of a film with a questionable production period is of any importance then I think you should shy away from that topic if you can't understand or follow it and leave it to people who wish to, and are able to discuss it.

Your ridiculous quote above proves you don't.
 
Last edited:
R1chard said:
Exactly.

I don't care if the movie makes money or not. I'm not a shareholder in Lionsgate. Why would it bother me? Such a strange position people have on this.

Do you guys cheer when Toyota announce how many cars they sold? Do you spend weeks speculating whether Adidas will break a sales record for shoes?


But it's not. Worshipping sales figures is just juvenile. It's not even as if it's measuring the right thing - the success of a movie is surely based on how many people saw it, not how many dollars it took? That's a worthless comparison - inflation ensures that something costing $10 in 2018 will cost at least $13 today. Movie studios just like to use $ because then they can always claim "most successful movie ever" even when it's not true.

If you're not an actor, not a director, not a producer, not in casting or set design or cinematography or sound editing or visual effects, then how much a movie makes has absolutely nothing to do with you.

The only thing worth discussing is what's actually in the movie, and whether it's any good.


Actually, a lot of painters make more money when they're dead.


Because showbusiness.

Like seriously, what did you expect people to say about the movie they'd just spent months working on?!
Click to expand...

I want this movie to do well and I’m curious about box office figures for one reason - Michael. He deserves this movie to be successful.

Surely as a fan you want this to be a big success as it reflects on MJ, even though he’s not here it would mean a lot to him.

If it bombs , the media will have a field day, nobody is interested in Jackson anymore, he’s lost his fans and is a thing of the past. Nobody gives a **** etc.
 
"Marvel Studios is officially set to start reshoots on Avengers Doomsday only 10 months before film's upcoming December release."

So could we say that production of this movie is a total mess? Or does it work this way only with MJ?
 
t1mber said:
"Marvel Studios is officially set to start reshoots on Avengers Doomsday only 10 months before film's upcoming December release."

So could we say that production of this movie is a total mess? Or does it work this way only with MJ?
Click to expand...
Reshoots are normal - the accompanying story that the film has had to be seriously rewritten because of what was allegedly a mental oversight changes this slightly and has to be taken into consideration here.

And yes, films like Multiverse of Madness went through serious reshoots and rewrites and was not what the original film set out to be and doesn't have the greatest of reactions critically even if it made a load. But it's one of my favourite films of the MCU, so there's that. Box office, reshoots etc mean f*ck all if you enjoy a film at the end of the day. Eternals is my favourite MCU film. That made €89.

Discussion about the production, box office and critical reception is completely separate to enjoying the film for me, FYI. At the end of the day, I just want to like the film - the same as any other film. I'd like to see the film do well for the man himself, but selfishly I'd prefer a film that I truly enjoy - which is what I wanted from Xscape but while it did well, I hated it.
 
Blues_Away2023 said:
I want this movie to do well and I’m curious about box office figures for one reason - Michael. He deserves this movie to be successful.
Click to expand...
Huh? "Deserves"? Wrong choice of words. It's just Lionsgate trying to make money from Michael's name. It's a business product. It has absolutely nothing to do with MJ.

Blues_Away2023 said:
Surely as a fan you want this to be a big success as it reflects on MJ
Click to expand...
No it doesn't, and no I don't.

It doesn't reflect on MJ, his songs, his ability, or his personality. He had nothing to do with it. Most of the people working on the film didn't even meet him.

And - again - I'm not in MJs entourage or his family. I don't gain anything from this, just like I don't gain if people stream Thriller. I have no interest and no reason to care. It doesn't reflect on me or contribute to my happiness.

It's just business. Somebody else's business.

Blues_Away2023 said:
even though he’s not here it would mean a lot to him.
Click to expand...
Wtf? He was a private and reclusive individual. He was against the previous biopic, why would he approve of this one?

Blues_Away2023 said:
If it bombs , the media will have a field day, nobody is interested in Jackson anymore, he’s lost his fans and is a thing of the past. Nobody gives a **** etc.
Click to expand...
I don't care what the media says. Not my problem and not your problem.
 
R1chard said:
Huh? "Deserves"? Wrong choice of words. It's just Lionsgate trying to make money from Michael's name. It's a business product. It has absolutely nothing to do with MJ.


No it doesn't, and no I don't.

It doesn't reflect on MJ, his songs, his ability, or his personality. He had nothing to do with it. Most of the people working on the film didn't even meet him.

And - again - I'm not in MJs entourage or his family. I don't gain anything from this, just like I don't gain if people stream Thriller. I have no interest and no reason to care. It doesn't reflect on me or contribute to my happiness.

It's just business. Somebody else's business.


Wtf? He was a private and reclusive individual. He was against the previous biopic, why would he approve of this one?


I don't care what the media says. Not my problem and not your problem.
Click to expand...
Your attitude is fecking stinking

It’s all me me me
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top