Captain.EO
Proud Member
Re: New MJ content?
it will be awhile before we see any new stuff thanks to SN
it will be awhile before we see any new stuff thanks to SN
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
it will be awhile before we see any new stuff thanks to SN
I am qutie sure nothing at all MJ related will happen at Superbowl...
I am qutie sure nothing at all MJ related will happen at Superbowl...
Zakk;4316760 said:I agree, the Grammy Awards are a little more likely for at least something to be mentioned.. Even if its a retrospective of his career.
Good sign billboard promoted MJ as a BLACK icon yesterday
That's a real positive in my eyes. MJ is here forever!!
Now let's get these 4K videos and new music![]()
But why did they remove the post again?? - That seems a bit weird.
While I understand that MJ doesn't need the Grammys, it's also probably the best launching point for a new project. It attracts young and old alike, it's a worldwide draw, and it crosses genre and style barriers. Other award shows (Billboard Music Awards, iHeart) tend to lean to one side of the aisle, and the Super Bowl costs millions upon millions for a single advertisement.
If a new album truly is coming, the Grammys is where it should be announced.
https://twitter.com/billboard/status/1356816027758264323 it's still there, just part of a thread !
But why did they remove the post again?? - That seems a bit weird.
i agree. that was a crazy move. it seem to be up now but i would be caution. this isn't the first billboard play crap with michael. they need to get a grip.
Yeah, they did the photoshoot with the Leaving Neverland liars as if they were a boyband :lmao:
And then on top of that they wrote an article saying MJs music sales had gone down straight after LN premiered... only to have to correct it a few days later when MJs sales had increased! :lmao:
Pardon my French, but f**k Billboard!
John Branca's application for 'KING OF POP' Signed & Dated January 25th, 2021.
"Trademark/Service Mark Application, Principal Register
Serial Number: 90487422
Filing Date: 01/25/2021
Approved for use through 02/28/2021. OMB 0651-0009
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it contains a valid OMB control number."
https://uspto.report/TM/90487422/APP20210128111819/
Pretty sure this is an ongoing trademark so that people can't make MJ stuff and profit from it. Look at how broad the use is.
Pretty sure this is an ongoing trademark so that people can't make MJ stuff and profit from it. Look at how broad the use is.
Triumph International Inc. is used for licensing. In regard to "new" songs they'll have to use publishing services.
![]()
This means probably nothing, but Bill Bottrells "Blood on the Dancefloor" (completely different song than Teddy's botdf) has been added to BMI recently. Interestingly, it lists Michael as the performing artist. So there has to be some laid down MJ vocals - that's news to me.
![]()
This means probably nothing, but Bill Bottrells "Blood on the Dancefloor" (completely different song than Teddy's botdf) has been added to BMI recently. Interestingly, it lists Michael as the performing artist. So there has to be some laid down MJ vocals - that's news to me.
News to me also, I always thought the rumour was that Michael heard Bill mention the title and later used it with Teddy Riley to conceive a completely different track.
Bill Bottrell said:Blood on the Dancefloor was a song I wrote for MJ during the sessions when Dangerous was written, sometime in 1988. I thought I'd be a clever salesman and I teased Michael about this great song I had called Blood on the Dancefloor. He was out of town and I was trying to tweak the song and this went on for weeks. He was really intrigued, so much so that before he ever heard what I did, he wrote his OWN Blood on the Dancefloor.
Yeah, they did the photoshoot with the Leaving Neverland liars as if they were a boyband :lmao:
And then on top of that they wrote an article saying MJs music sales had gone down straight after LN premiered... only to have to correct it a few days later when MJs sales had increased! :lmao: